Recent content by Soupsammich

Correction to this, I copied from 1 row too high, which was rt cores instead of tensor cores, it has the equivalent to 136 tensor cores, to the 3070's 184.

Yup, it was an Interesting video, with some important caveats. 1. Orins/a100's double tensor cores/DLA is off the table. A. You can already tell from the nvidia employees t239 initialization kernels vs the t234's it's been removed. This space is used for rt cores on rtx arches. B. The...

I certainly hope you aren't trying to imply thats validating anything you've been trying to claim, because it brutally, mercilessly, slaughters your claims. 18 ms execution time for 4k dlss Just leaves your claims face down in a ditch. To be clear, your claim of 4k 60fps, or good god didnt you...

Had a little time, so decided to do a little referential power breakdown of the rtx 2050 mobile, and how that would be different in an actual mobile/hybrid device. I'm looking at docked power draw for the switch 2. So let's break it down: 2048 Cuda cores, 25% more to power that the 1536 in the...

1080p is all you need for performance mode 4k. *Edit* Somebody reminded me that I forgot ultra performance is no longer 8k only, so all you need for ultra performance 4k is 720p, and 360p for ultr perf to 1080 for portable.* We know the clock speeds and the render config from the stolen nvn2...

It's really not, we've literally known the render config and tested clocks for over a year because of the lapsu$ attack. We know the architecture, the number of cuda cores, the tensor cores, the tmu's the rops. We know the bus width, we know the ram type. We know it's a unified memory...

No one said 4k30 or even 4k60 (input 1080) was outside the realm of possibility.

Yup that's the idea. And no 4k 120 fps surprise surprise. Well probably not a surprise to most. Yeah that gddr6 is probably taking the majority of that 30 watts. Good thing there's lpddr.

I raise you the 2050 mobile. Surprise its ampere. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-rtx-2050-mobile.c3859 At its non boost clock of 735 mhz this thing basically is as close to the ga10f @ 1ghz as you can get. Just has way less ram capacity, but has the same bandwidth.

Really wish nvidia wouldn't hide nsight pros rt core profiling behind forced ndas. Have a strong hunch it's the denoisers thats been kicking the butts of smaller rtx cards, and not the actual raytracing calculations.

I'll put them up for you.... I think you were a bit generous. Ga10f: 1 12 SM ampere rtx gpc: 6 TM's, 6 Polymorph engines, 1,536 cuda cores, 48 Tensor cores, 48 TMU's, 16 Rops, 12 Ray trace cores. (Lapsu$ ransom attack, nvn2 graphics api dump) 2 lppdr5 ram blocks, dual channel, 128 bit bus...

The 3xxx series being good at ray tracing was obvious because it came with the literal hardware to accelerate raytracing. The GA10F, does NOT have the hardware necessary to accelerate Nvidias dlss 3 frame generation, which would be Ada's extra big, extra beefy OFA.

Wow. You guessed that gpu's with hardware dedicated to hardware accelerated ray tracing would be good at ray tracing. That's so good..... for you.

We actually have some pretty interesting benches to extrapolate from, to see what kind of options switch 2 devs will be looking at. We have nvidia provided 'ballpark' benchmarks from nvidias dlss development guides for dlss 2 and 3.1.blah.blah And now we have a 4090 benchmark for dlss 3.5...

You specifically stated a 76.8 Gflop gpu, like 1/3rd an Xbox 360 gpu, could do '4k gaming no sweat' and are now bringing up 6 Tflop gpu's as if they were the same exact thing in the same exact range of capabilities. You have demonstrated you have no concept of what's going on. You also...