Agreed. As the logic around which core to choose for which task improve (the scheduler) things will look better for 3dcached cores (and perhaps also Intels cripplecores)
I have two fast "test winners" in my current computer - one WD black 850, and one Kingston Fury Renegade. They both operate on pcie-4. After buying those I've often wondered if they really make a meaningful difference compared to two fast pcie-3 drives. I'm sure the pcie-5 drives will be great...
Are you sure? With info like https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/gpudirect-rdma/index.html and https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/14/nvidia_gpu_data/ it certainly seems like it's viable.
The problem is all the features I don't want cost a lot to implement. I don't want to pay for the added features. Something went totally haywire the last decade, where home computer suddenly meant computers for kids. Give me back motherboards with functionality, not aesthetics.
Considering the i5 8250U was released in 2017 and the M1 Pro in 2021 it would be truly embarrasing if the M1 wasn't faster. Intel's i5 series has 4 cores, the M1 has 8. Hardly an apple to apple comparison.
As bloat has a pretty poor sound to it, I'm fairly sure the standard is meant to be AVX 512 BFLOAT16 and not AVX 512 BLOAT16
Above fairly sure, actually :-)