Recent content by techisfun

The M1 Macs have made PCs overpriced junk IMHO. You can't buy a PC that's as efficient as an M1 Mac because they don't exist, yet. I think M-based Macs are going to be more efficient and better values than PCs for a long time.

AMD Ryzen 5000 = Evolutionary Apple M1 = Revolutionary The M1 has made it obvious that ARM will dominate the desktop within the next 10 years. The average desktop user doesn't need an x86 CPU. x86 users are about to become a niche market. Efficiency has clearly won out over flexibility. In...

AMD Zen 3 = Evolutionary Apple M1 = Revolutionary Anybody who thinks Zen 3 is a bigger accomplishment than the M1 is an idiot. PC gamers are dismissing the M1 because they're dumbshits.

Yes, it is. That's translated x86 code on the M1 keeping up with native x86 code on Cezanne. That's impressive. I was going to buy a Zen 3, but I'll probably buy an M-based Mac now. AMD clearly can't compete against a company like Apple.

This Cezanne CPU is a joke compared to the M1. This is important information for people who want the best products they can buy. I really don't understand where your hostility is coming from. Apple won. AMD, Intel, and Nvidia lost. Get over it.

It's a thread about the performance of a mobile processor. The M1 is better. That's all there is to it. If you can't handle facts, just ignore my posts and stay in your bubble.

PC users care about hardware efficiency, and Apple's M1 is the most efficient desktop chip on the market. Enjoy your inferior technology.

Apple's M1 easily beats this with only 4 hp cores (~1700/7600).:laugh: Even if the scores are better when it's released, the M1 will still have more efficient cores. The native version of Chrome scores a 207 in Speedometer 2.0 on the M1 Mac mini. Ryzen 5950X scores a 140. 10900k scores a 119...

This looks mediocre at best. The graphics are deep within the so-called "uncanny valley, " which is just a complicated way to say they're ugly. The humans look and move like creepy mannequins. Ugly graphics are always a bad sign. It means the developers are idiots who don't know how to make...

I'll spell it out for you: Developers don't support Android because they know the majority of Android phones sold are cheap junk, which means the people buying them have low incomes and can't afford to spend money on apps. Apple is getting attacked only because Google and the Android OEMs are...

According to Epic and others, there's no alternative. Android isn't a viable alternative to iOS because most of the Android phones sold are junk.

Apple is only dominant because Android is garbage. The Android platform is so bad that people don't even consider it a competitor to iOS.

I bought an M1 Mac mini today and returned it a few hours later. The hardware is revolutionary. Unfortunately, macOS is still a pile of crap. The M1 isn't going to help Apple grow their Mac user base. The OS needs a complete redesign. Big Sur is a coat of paint. Here are some observations: It...

The M1 does appear to have the most efficient cores, as Apple said. In terms of efficiency, I doubt PC hardware will be able to catch up to Apple Silicon hardware. PC hardware is far less integrated by design, which makes it less efficient.