• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GT300 Already Taped Out

R_1

Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
448 (0.07/day)
The new HD5870 will be like 2xHD4770 in crossfire on single die , but equipped with 265bit memory bus and faster clock. So G300 must be pretty impressive to beat this little beast.
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (1.26/day)
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
32 rops
around 2100 shaders
GDDR5

thats what the rumors say but based on ati's previous releases its more than likely real

but if I had to guess I would say at least 2400 shaders

I've only seen estimates of about 1200 for the RV870 so assuming an x2 R800 would be 2400 would be about right.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,688 (0.62/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
i hope the 1200 estimated shaders on the RV870 are fine tuned and better than the ones on the RV770, cause 512 nvidia shaders, even though they are difference from teh 240 on GT200, i can only assume nvidia to improve their shaders not use more but less efficient shaders, and thus it's going to rape. So ATI i hope has done one hell of a job on the RV870, i wonder if the sideport that was never activated on the HD 4870x2 will be on the HD 5870x2 and provide a decent performance jump, it would have to i'd think as then the latency from using the onboard crossfire chip would be negated. Dam i wanna see some benchies ugh
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
2,167 (0.35/day)
Location
Darkness
System Name Unreal Machine IV
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard Asrock 570X Taichi
Cooling Noctua U9S
Memory Team UD4-4000 @4000 CL18 1:1
Video Card(s) 5600XT Red Devil
Storage Kingston SSD 240GB + WD RED 4TB + WD Blue SN 550 Nvme 1TB X3
Display(s) DELL U2417H
Case Old school Termalthake xaser III black with lots of noctua 80mm fans
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion + Creative Inspire t7900 7.1 + Sony MDR-1A + AKG K-240
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech G502 hero SE
Keyboard Logitech
Software 10 pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 Multi ~15k 4.4Ghz all core Cinebench R23 single 1.5k 4.65Ghz
?dude where have u been? ATI for the past year has been all over nvidia's ass, they had the performance crown for a while with the HD 4870x2, and yea nvidia does have the most powerful single core graphic card but either way it still took them 2 gpu's on a card to get it back. And yea nvidia does tend to have better drivers at launch than ATI but they also have a lot more access to games(TWIMTBP).

Drivers are important but with this release i thk we'll see the past repeat itself. Not like 2900XT vs 8800GTX, but more like 9800GTX vs HD 3870. The GTX 285 is one hell of a card with 240 SPU's 512-bit GDDR3. GT300 is going to have more than twice as many SPU's, and twice the bandwidth by moving to GDDR5. I just can't see the performance from the chip not destroying ATI's RV870 which i estimate by the specs, will only perform 25-35% faster than HD 4870.

The 1GHz HD4890 already proves capable of beating the 285 in several games, i think those are already 25-35% faster that 4870...
 

cooler

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
124 (0.02/day)
gt300 spec look nice

how many percentage jump will this gpu bring compare to current gpu.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,688 (0.62/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
grid, stalker, fallout 3, red alert 3 are the only games i saw on [/url=http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/radeon-hd4890_7.html#sect0]xbitlab's review[/url] that the HD 4890 outperformed the GTX 285, and it's performance over the HD 4870 is more like 5-15%. but i see your point as the HD 5870(i thk it'll be that) will have 400 more shaders, twice the rop's, and 8 more TMU's than the HD 4870 performance should be 40% more at least, plus the memory clock bump to 1100 from 900.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
5,106 (0.83/day)
Location
Kansas
Processor Core i5 3570K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Pro4
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Extreme
Memory 2x4GB GSkill Sniper
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970 Gaming
Storage 240GB OCZ ARC 100, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) LG 23" 1920x1080
Case Antec P100
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Software Windows 8.1 Pro 64
40nm? That's hot.

Or not hot? Hope temps are nice........:p
 

iStink

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
648 (0.11/day)
System Name The beast
Processor E6600@ 3.4
Motherboard P5W DH Deluxe
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory 3GB G.Sill DDR2-800
Video Card(s) 8800GT @ 700/975
Storage (1)80GB With XP, (1) 320GB storage
Display(s) 205BW & 710N
Case XClio Windtunnel (I love it)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Platinum
Power Supply OCZ gamerXStream 700W
The 1GHz HD4890 already proves capable of beating the 285 in several games, i think those are already 25-35% faster that 4870...
here let me fix that statement for you:

The OVERCLOCKED 1GHz HD4890 already proves capable of beating the STOCK 285 in several games, i think those are already 25-35% faster that 4870...
 

enaher

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
416 (0.08/day)
System Name One does not simply have enough cash for INTEL
Processor Athlon II 450 3.8ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master 212+
Memory 4x4gb Corsair DDR3
Video Card(s) 2x 5830 Sapphire 950c/1150m CF
Storage 2x Seagate 500GB Raid0 + Samsung 1TB
Display(s) BenQ G2220HDA
Case Xigmatek ASGARD PRO
Power Supply SeasonicX 750w
Software W7 x64 Ultimate
I think it sounds impressive, but i want to see performance remember the people that got the 260GTX 192 for 350+ and then the 4870 came and woop its ass for less $, something ive learned from the last year dont buy PR and SPECS, remeber Phenom, The 2900XT, and to some extent the GT200 for the price they had and getting there ass handed by the 9800GX2, dont get me wrong i want a awsome product from Nvidia, but id rather have an awsome product from both Ati & Nvidia to drive prices down and quality up:toast:
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,723 (0.45/day)
Processor i5-7600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Pro4
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-4
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 Corsair LPX Vengeance 15-15-15-36
Video Card(s) MSI Twin Frozr 1070ti
Storage 240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s) 23' Dell AW2310
Case Corsair 550D
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
grid, stalker, fallout 3, red alert 3 are the only games i saw on [/url=http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/radeon-hd4890_7.html#sect0]xbitlab's review[/url] that the HD 4890 outperformed the GTX 285, and it's performance over the HD 4870 is more like 5-15%. but i see your point as the HD 5870(i thk it'll be that) will have 400 more shaders, twice the rop's, and 8 more TMU's than the HD 4870 performance should be 40% more at least, plus the memory clock bump to 1100 from 900.

Is that clock confirmed? Because if not, then it could be a new architecture that stays around 900 but with better performance...ie. 4870 to 4890 with the better quality materials used and whatnot, but hopefully to a greater extent where we will really see AA not even affect games at any resolution, thats what I hope :D
Yea and let's not forget the OCability from the newer 40nm process, and seeing that ATI has a bit more experience with 4770, I predict that it will be more efficient with minimal leakage.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,688 (0.62/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
i agree, and 40nm does seem to allow great oc's. HD 4770 750 stock, and most clocks reach 850+ from what i've seen, and the memory from 600-900 is very common as well. I was under the impression the RV870 was a very finely tuned RV770. i hope more info is released soon on the RV870, i could care less what nv brings cause just hearing these spec's makes me weary for ATI.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,654 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
All these cards are bandwidth starved, all ATI really needs to do to open up the cores they currently have is to add a larger cache on die,a nd shrink the die. A $99 4770 that performes better than a equal priced "250, AKA 9800, AKA 8800..." and overclocks better, runs with less energy use, and cooler.



Hrm.....seems like Nvidiots are still floating the Nvidia boat.


As to drivers, yes Nvidia makes you feel good by realeasing one driver a week in multiple forms so you can spen all your time uninstalling, reinstalling, and trying to see if it fixes things, and then end up using whatever prevents the issues you have or experiance, and with ATI, you don't get all the fun of a bunch of drivers to try, so you just use the one that works. Damn, using only one driver that works and not trying three or four. Seems stuipd to me to, oh well, you keep trying while I go play games.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,654 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
here let me fix that statement for you:






I know words are hard, so here are pictures. The ones above are performance per dollar.

Do you understand this?


Below are the performance at STOCK clocks for the models.






So let me see, spend more money for less performance............ GTX285 FTW!!!!!! ;)
 

Blacksniper87

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
134 (0.02/day)
Location
Rockhampton, Australia
Processor E8400 @ 3.00 GHZ
Motherboard Asus P5K/EPU
Cooling Stock Heatsink
Memory 4gb in 2x 2 GB 1066 MHZ Corsair Dominators
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 280
Storage 2 x Seagate 500 GB
Display(s) Samsung 275t
Case Coolermaster Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Razor Barracuda
Power Supply Unknown
Software Vista Ultimate x64
Fanboi much? geez mate i don't think there is such a thing as a bigger fanboi looser comment. Here's an idea what if, if you think something about nvidia you put in logical sentences and not call people who use there cards Nvidiots.

Hey mate this takes the cake the majority of your graphs are performance per dollar and then you have graphs that are relative performance all of which nvidia wins so do you have a point at all? Lastly i may be relatively new here but from what i know your not allowed to double post.
 

roofsniper

New Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
42 (0.01/day)
Fanboi much? geez mate i don't think there is such a thing as a bigger fanboi looser comment. Here's an idea what if, if you think something about nvidia you put in logical sentences and not call people who use there cards Nvidiots.

Hey mate this takes the cake the majority of your graphs are performance per dollar and then you have graphs that are relative performance all of which nvidia wins so do you have a point at all? Lastly i may be relatively new here but from what i know your not allowed to double post.

you actually have to read the graphs to understand them. 4890 is 21% more performance per dollar than the gtx285. thats a big difference. gtx285 is only 5% more powerful. you pay a lot more for that slight performance bonus.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,965 (0.99/day)
Location
New York
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, Ryzen 9 5980HX
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(With Noctua Fans)
Memory 32Gb Crucial 3600 Ballistix
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080, Asus 6800M
Storage Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME
Display(s) Dell 27 Inch 165Hz
Case Phanteks P500A
Audio Device(s) IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G502 SE Hero
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2
VR HMD Samsung Odyssey Plus
Software Windows 10
I highly doubt ATI would release the 58XX series with only 1200 sp's, I think they will take advantage of the die strink and double up on sp's like they did with the 48XX series before.

I think ATI already predicted that the GT300's would have these specs and 1200 sp's would probably give nowhere near the performance of a GT300 with only 1200sp's.
 

Blacksniper87

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
134 (0.02/day)
Location
Rockhampton, Australia
Processor E8400 @ 3.00 GHZ
Motherboard Asus P5K/EPU
Cooling Stock Heatsink
Memory 4gb in 2x 2 GB 1066 MHZ Corsair Dominators
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 280
Storage 2 x Seagate 500 GB
Display(s) Samsung 275t
Case Coolermaster Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Razor Barracuda
Power Supply Unknown
Software Vista Ultimate x64
yes your point? This is different to when in the history of the computer industry? You always pay significantly more for the highest end product regardless of the slight performance difference. Also i did read the graphs and what i did notice was, there was no overclocks of anything else apart from the 4890 so ..............
 

Darren

New Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
1,936 (0.28/day)
System Name Cheap yet powerful gaming and entertainment rig!
Processor AMD Athlon 3800+ X2 Windsor, 1 MB L2 Cache (512k L2 Per Core), 65W Energy efficient, 2GHz @ 2.78 Ghz
Motherboard Asrock ALiveNF7G-HD720p Rev v5.0
Cooling Freezer 64, 2x120mm, 1x92mm
Memory 8 GB DDRII PC6400 @ 929 MHz OCZ (2GBx4) timing: 5-5-5-5-16-2T
Video Card(s) XFX ATI4830
Storage Seagate 320 GB SATA (16 MB Cache)
Display(s) 19' HannsG (1440x900 @ 75hz)
Case Coolermaster Elite 330 Black Case
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Meridian, Pioneer VSX-516 Receiver 7.1 with DD/DD EX/Prologic II/DTS/DTS-ES//DTS: Neo
Power Supply Cool Master eXtreme Power 460W PSU
Software Vista Ultimate X64 Corporate Edition
yes your point? This is different to when in the history of the computer industry? You always pay significantly more for the highest end product regardless of the slight performance difference. Also i did read the graphs and what i did notice was, there was no overclocks of anything else apart from the 4890 so ..............

Would you pay 21% more for a car that runs 5% faster? NO

So why would anyone with a brain do it for a GPU or a CPU?
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (1.26/day)
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
I highly doubt ATI would release the 58XX series with only 1200 sp's, I think they will take advantage of the die strink and double up on sp's like they did with the 48XX series before.

I think ATI already predicted that the GT300's would have these specs and 1200 sp's would probably give nowhere near the performance of a GT300 with only 1200sp's.

The number of SP's aren't half as important as the way the shaders handle instructions. For example nvidia uses a different method to ati and thats why nvidia can use less, more powerful shaders than ATI. Whose to say ATI will continue with thier current shader model and change it so they can use 1200sp's and get the same performance as 2400. Anyway back to the point ATI engineers prefer to find cheap methods of adding performance and compared to nvidia's tactic of adding more.
 

theorw

New Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
770 (0.13/day)
Location
Athens GREECE
Processor C2D 8400@ 4,05GHz(currently)1,36v
Motherboard DFI LP x48 DK T2RS
Cooling XIGMATEK 1283 w/ bolt-thru kit/SCYTHE Mushashi x2
Memory Crucial BALLISTIX 6400 @900MHz 2,00v
Video Card(s) HD 5770 1040/1400 unlocked/musashi
Storage SG 120GB+WD 160GB
Display(s) 24" FLATRON W2442PA Full HD
Case COOLERMASTER HAF 932
Power Supply Thermaltake PUREPOWER RX 600
Software Vista ultimate SP1
Benchmark Scores VANTAGE:11700 3DMARKO06:18600 FURMARK:9K
?dude where have u been? ATI for the past year has been all over nvidia's ass, they had the performance crown for a while with the HD 4870x2, and yea nvidia does have the most powerful single core graphic card but either way it still took them 2 gpu's on a card to get it back. And yea nvidia does tend to have better drivers at launch than ATI but they also have a lot more access to games(TWIMTBP).

Drivers are important but with this release i thk we'll see the past repeat itself. Not like 2900XT vs 8800GTX, but more like 9800GTX vs HD 3870. The GTX 285 is one hell of a card with 240 SPU's 512-bit GDDR3. GT300 is going to have more than twice as many SPU's, and twice the bandwidth by moving to GDDR5. I just can't see the performance from the chip not destroying ATI's RV870 which i estimate by the specs, will only perform 25-35% faster than HD 4870.

+1
Animalpak WAKE UP!!!
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,745 (0.27/day)
Location
The Nevada Wasteland
System Name 9th Level
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard MSI X570 Carbon wifi
Cooling EK Basic 360, x2 250mm, x1 140mm, x1 120mm fans.
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3200mhz.
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 12GB FTW3
Storage 500gb ssd, 2tb ssd, 6tb HD.
Display(s) MSI 27" Curved 1440p@165hz
Case HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Software Windows 10 64bit
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
2,167 (0.35/day)
Location
Darkness
System Name Unreal Machine IV
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard Asrock 570X Taichi
Cooling Noctua U9S
Memory Team UD4-4000 @4000 CL18 1:1
Video Card(s) 5600XT Red Devil
Storage Kingston SSD 240GB + WD RED 4TB + WD Blue SN 550 Nvme 1TB X3
Display(s) DELL U2417H
Case Old school Termalthake xaser III black with lots of noctua 80mm fans
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion + Creative Inspire t7900 7.1 + Sony MDR-1A + AKG K-240
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech G502 hero SE
Keyboard Logitech
Software 10 pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 Multi ~15k 4.4Ghz all core Cinebench R23 single 1.5k 4.65Ghz
Do u guys realize that a chip with HALF, 50% the GT200 die size a few million's less transistors is only 5% slower that such beast??
HD5870 doest need to beat the gt300 on its game, just do like the 4870 did for half the price you get 70-80% of the performance, if its not enough, slap 2 of those together for the same price and get 140-160% the performance...
But what if they surprise us and create something that really competes with it??
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (1.26/day)
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
I'm going to sit and watch this I haven't seen a fanboy fight in a while :D
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
2,167 (0.35/day)
Location
Darkness
System Name Unreal Machine IV
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard Asrock 570X Taichi
Cooling Noctua U9S
Memory Team UD4-4000 @4000 CL18 1:1
Video Card(s) 5600XT Red Devil
Storage Kingston SSD 240GB + WD RED 4TB + WD Blue SN 550 Nvme 1TB X3
Display(s) DELL U2417H
Case Old school Termalthake xaser III black with lots of noctua 80mm fans
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion + Creative Inspire t7900 7.1 + Sony MDR-1A + AKG K-240
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech G502 hero SE
Keyboard Logitech
Software 10 pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 Multi ~15k 4.4Ghz all core Cinebench R23 single 1.5k 4.65Ghz
Even thought im an ati fanboy, ive already had 2 nvidea cards and 3 ati cards...
When talking about drivers and having experienced both id say i like ati drivers more...
And i say im not gunna waste more than 200 for a card like i did with the 2900XT, its not like there where any cheaper decent card back then, but wasting over 300 i was out of my mind, then i wasted more 200 on 8800GTS G92 but sold for 150 and bought the hd4850 i have now for 180, i had finally done a good deal...
If the next hd5850 is under 200, count me in for a custom one...
I dont think ill side with the green side any more...
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.43/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Sweet, another hungry-hungry hippo.
 
Top