• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Gulftown Product Name and Tentative Price Surfaces

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.23/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
Before you do that, make sure your base clock is set back to the standard 133 Mhz.

Please prove that I am wrong. I humbly await your proof!

It's simple. That setting doesn't make your QPI run at 6.4GT/s, it is a multiplier! Fancy eh? If you were to set the QPI at what your bios calls 6.4GT/s then it wouldn't be actually running 6.4GT/s. Check your CPU-Z if you don't believe me.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.23/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
QPI rates are just measured based on data flow aren't they? :)

Yes, now I did something funny. I set my QPI at 4.8GT/s in bios, and when I get into windows I have this...



To me that just confirms that the QPI setting is only a multiplier, and that multiplier (x36) doesn't change on a 920. Even if you're at 133. If you set the multiplier higher, but it won't actually go higher. Overclocking the QPI is possible by increasing the BCLK on a 920, but you can't actually change it just by fiddling with the multiplier.

::EDIT:: Color me funny but you can actually set your QPI higher at 133, and only 133. That's brilliant! It does absolutely nothing since neither the cpu multiplier or bclk are high enough for it to be bottlenecked. On EE chips you can actually set your QPI to (x48) with higher BCLKs and it will work whereas it won't on my 920.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,231 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Yes, now I did something funny. I set my QPI at 4.8GT/s in bios, and when I get into windows I have this...

http://img.techpowerup.org/091214/qpi.jpg

To me that just confirms that the QPI setting is only a multiplier, and that multiplier (x36) doesn't change on a 920. Even if you're at 133. If you set the multiplier higher, but it won't actually go higher. Overclocking the QPI is possible by increasing the BCLK on a 920, but you can't actually change it just by fiddling with the multiplier.

Nice to know for my pending 930 purchase. :toast:
 

SummerDays

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
276 (0.05/day)
When you change the QPI to 6.4 in your motherboard bios (like on this Asus Rampage II

Extreme) it changes the QPI clock frequency to 3.2 Ghz.

To achieve the actual throughput your system is going to have to be clocked faster than 2.66 Ghz.

You can't change the multiplier to reach 4 Ghz. So how are you going to do it?

:roll:

In any case, when Intel is making their i7 series chip, do they make them all exactly the same and then product bin them?
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.23/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
When you change the QPI to 6.4 in your motherboard bios (like on this Asus Rampage II

Extreme) it changes the QPI clock frequency to 3.2 Ghz.

To achieve the actual throughput your system is going to have to be clocked faster than 2.66 Ghz.

You can't change the multiplier to reach 4 Ghz. So how are you going to do it?

:roll:

In any case, when Intel is making their i7 series chip, do they make them all exactly the same and then product bin them?

To a degree, yes. Though there have been 920s out there that will chew the pants off of an EE chip until sub-0 CPU temperatures are introduced.
 

SummerDays

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
276 (0.05/day)
Anyways, after all that..

Setting the QPI results in a 3.2 Ghz speed.

Since they consider it bi-directional, they must get 6.4 GTransfers out of it.

Is that not the proof we were looking for? (correct me if I'm wrong here someone) :D

Which brings me back to my original question: will we be able to do that on the 930?!
 
Last edited:

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.23/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
Anyways, after all that..

Setting the QPI results in a 3.2 Ghz speed.

Since they consider it bi-directional, they must get 6.4 GTransfers out of it.

Is that not the proof we were looking for? (correct me if I'm wrong here someone) :D

Which brings me back to my original question: will we be able to do that on the 930?!

Set the QPI multiplier to x48 at only a 133 BCLK? You should have your answer, and like you said it doesn't matter since the power will not exist to utilize all of that bandwidth.
 

SummerDays

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
276 (0.05/day)
>> You should have your answer, and like you said it doesn't matter since the power will not exist to utilize all of that bandwidth

I don't have DDR3 2000 Ghz+ Ram sitting on my desk, though, which brings us back to being able to simply select the speed of the ram in use. We're only talking about 24.6 GB/s though.

btw, if you're doing this (the guy with houses face whose name right now eludes me), the motherboard will default to a higher memory setting. Make sure you reduce it to what your memory is rated for. I reduced it in the bios to 1.51 volts so it wouldn't increase automatically to 1.65 volts or 1.8 volts.
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (1.26/day)
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
I've done it loads of times. I did a few memory tests and in fact at 2.66ghz it's actually slightly slower than at 4.8GT/s. However if I oc it then it will perform faster but I fear that my oc will be less due to the QPI being way to high.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (1.23/day)
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
>> You should have your answer, and like you said it doesn't matter since the power will not exist to utilize all of that bandwidth

I don't have DDR3 2000 Ghz+ Ram sitting on my desk, though, which brings us back to being able to simply select the speed of the ram in use. We're only talking about 24.6 GB/s though.

btw, if you're doing this (the guy with houses face whose name right now eludes me), the motherboard will default to a higher memory setting. Make sure you reduce it to what your memory is rated for. I reduced it in the bios to 1.51 volts so it wouldn't increase automatically to 1.65 volts or 1.8 volts.

You don't need 2GHz ram to use 6.4GT/s bandwidth, you need a cpu that's operating quickly enough to use the ram.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
7,662 (1.24/day)
Location
c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Processor C2Q6600 @ 1.6 GHz
Motherboard Anus PQ5
Cooling ACFPro
Memory GEiL2 x 1 GB PC2 6400
Video Card(s) MSi 4830 (RIP)
Storage Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB Perpendicular Recording
Display(s) Dell 17'
Case El Cheepo
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software MCE2K5

SummerDays

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
276 (0.05/day)
You don't need 2GHz ram to use 6.4GT/s bandwidth, you need a cpu that's operating quickly enough to use the ram.

You do need fast memory. We're talking about a fast link between a CPU and Memory.

Obviously you need fast memory on the other side of the link in order take advantage of the link speed.

As well, if you're really going to overclock, you'll need the fast memory to do it!
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,250 (0.90/day)
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
damn only extreme version , any news for six core non extreme
 
Top