- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 1,056 (0.20/day)
- Location
- Porto
Processor | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro |
Cooling | AiO 240mm |
Memory | 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast 3600MHz CL18 |
Video Card(s) | Radeon RX 6900XT Reference (amd.com) |
Storage | O.S.: 256GB SATA | 2x 1TB SanDisk SSD SATA Data | Games: 1TB Samsung 970 Evo |
Display(s) | LG 34" UWQHD |
Audio Device(s) | X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX |
Power Supply | XFX 850W |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Wireless |
VR HMD | Lenovo Explorer |
Software | Windows 10 64bit |
Hi.
I'm going to finally try some SSD action in my desktop.
Right now, I'm looking at two possible choices:
- Two Intel X25-V in Raid0, 40GB each at 35MB/s write and 170MB/s read.
- Single X25-M, 80GB at 70MB/s write and 250MB/s read.
Getting the X25-V pair would cost me some 15€ more.
My question is, would it be better to get the dual X25-V instead of the single X25-M?
Would I notice any difference between the theoretical 340MB/s RAID0 read speeds and the 250MB/s from the single drive, or would the SATA controller bottleneck this advantage anyway?
I'll be using the system in my sig (RAID0 would be done through the SB750 southbridge).
Thanks in advance.
I'm going to finally try some SSD action in my desktop.
Right now, I'm looking at two possible choices:
- Two Intel X25-V in Raid0, 40GB each at 35MB/s write and 170MB/s read.
- Single X25-M, 80GB at 70MB/s write and 250MB/s read.
Getting the X25-V pair would cost me some 15€ more.
My question is, would it be better to get the dual X25-V instead of the single X25-M?
Would I notice any difference between the theoretical 340MB/s RAID0 read speeds and the 250MB/s from the single drive, or would the SATA controller bottleneck this advantage anyway?
I'll be using the system in my sig (RAID0 would be done through the SB750 southbridge).
Thanks in advance.