• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD FX 8 Core and 4 Core Processor Systems Seen Running at E3

Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
5,614 (1.07/day)
Location
San Diego, CA
System Name White Boy
Processor Core i7 3770k @4.6 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
Cooling CORSAIR H100
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB @ 2177
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 680 CLASSIEFIED @ 1250 Core
Storage 2 Samsung 830 256 GB (Raid 0) 1 Hitachi 4 TB
Display(s) 1 Dell 30U11 30"
Case BIT FENIX Prodigy
Audio Device(s) none
Power Supply SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W Modular
Software Windows Pro 7 64 bit || Ubuntu 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores 2017 Unigine Heaven :: P37239 3D Mark Vantage
What we know from E3:
System A:

Can run:
Game A

Game B(Not sure on the specs)

fixed

This really tells us nothing, given neither of those games are cpu intensive. :mad:
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,230 (0.24/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
fixed

This really tells us nothing, given neither of those games are cpu intensive. :mad:



Ya GPU intensive



Code:
Test System Specs
- Intel Core i7 920 (Overclocked @ 3.70GHz)
- x3 2GB G.Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 (CAS 8-8-8-20)
- Asus P6T Deluxe (Intel X58)
- OCZ ZX Series 1250w
- Crucial RealSSD C300 256GB (SATA 6Gb/s)
- GeForce GTX 590 (3072MB)
- GeForce GTX 580 (1536MB)
- GeForce GTX 570 (1280MB)
- GeForce GTX 560 Ti (1024MB)
- GeForce GTX 550 Ti (1024MB)
- GeForce GTX 480 (1536MB)
- GeForce GTX 470 (1280MB)
- GeForce GTX 460 (1024MB)
- GeForce GTS 450 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 6990 (4096MB)
- Radeon HD 6970 (2048MB)
- Radeon HD 6950 (2048MB)
- Radeon HD 6870 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 6850 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 5870 (2048MB)
- Radeon HD 5830 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 6790 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 6770 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 6750 (1024MB)
- Radeon HD 6670 (1024MB)
- Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
- Nvidia Forceware 275.27
- ATI Catalyst 11.5

590GTX is getting CPU Bottlenecked rofl!!!

Dirt 3 is the first game built for FX I guess

Dragon Age 2 is GPU dependent

Dirt 3 is a CPU intensive game having a gpu is just a plus

I told techspot to use AMD more got the ban

Techspot doesn't seem to understand that intel doesn't scale well with the nvidia gpus(i7 920 @ stock beating a i7 2600K @ stock, proof, proof 2: i7 2500K @ stock getting beat by a i5 750 @ stock)

I have a request to TPU can you do a benchmark of a AMD Phenom II 1100T(and 980BE) and i7 2600K/2500K OC'ed to 3.7GHz with a 6970,6990,590GTX with a 3 monitor setup (7680x1600) for dirt 3 and get the fps list
 
Last edited:

fullinfusion

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
9,909 (1.67/day)
http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/403/bench/CPU2.png

Ya GPU intensive

http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/403/bench/7680.png



590GTX is getting CPU Bottlenecked rofl!!!

Dirt 3 is the first game built for FX I guess

Dragon Age 2 is GPU dependent

Dirt 3 is a CPU intensive game having a gpu is just a plus

I told techspot to use AMD more got the ban

Techspot doesn't seem to understand that intel doesn't scale well with the nvidia gpus(i7 920 @ stock beating a i7 2600K @ stock, proof, proof 2: i7 2500K @ stock getting beat by a i5 750 @ stock)

I have a request to TPU can you do a benchmark of a AMD Phenom II 1100T(and 980BE) and i7 2600K/2500K OC'ed to 3.7GHz with a 6970,6990,590GTX with a 3 monitor setup (7680x1600) for dirt 3 and get the fps list

Im pretty sure that graph is a joke and been altered. Im sure cadaveca ran a few tests of his own and he thought it was weird because those results were different then his runs.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.62/day)
Im pretty sure that graph is a joke and been altered. Im sure cadaveca ran a few tests of his own and he thought it was weird because those results were different then his runs.

Yep. I even installed Dirt3 on a review setup just to check it out.

results are very similar to this, although the difference is not as large. I think that when I redo some boards, I'll be swapping Dirt3 in for F1 2010, in fact...I want to replace Civ 5 too.I think I'll await bulldozer though, and do what board I have on hand then. I don't know that I'll keep every board.:



6970,6990,590GTX with a 3 monitor setup (7680x1600) for dirt 3 and get the fps list

Get me the videocards, and I'll see what I can do.


I'm actually part way through setting up eyefinity right this moment...was gonna shut this rig down and move it over to the triple monitors, but decided to check my mail first, and here I am. So I got the monitors, and the boards/cpus/rams.

I don't do videocard reviews, and never will, and W1zz doesn't do motherboard/CPU reviews, so that's kinda asking for a bit much. Also, asking for triple 30-inch numbers is a bit silly. Common triple setup is 5760x1080, which is what I got.
 
Last edited:
Top