• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PSUs edge closer to 2000W

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.66/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
1KW psus are about the limit. I dont forsee anything in the future going over that, or even getting near that. 750W would be all you need. Im thinking the future will bring power under control and make things more economical and environment friendly as far as power usage is concerned.
 

ryboto

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
289 (0.04/day)
Processor Opteron 170 [2.8ghz@1.4v|1.25ghz@1.025v]
Motherboard Abit AT8 32x
Cooling HR-03, TR Ultra-120, 3xScythe S-Flex
Memory 2gb Crucial Ballistix PC4000
Video Card(s) Ati Radeon X1950 pro
Storage 150 GB WD Raptor/500GB WD
Display(s) Acer AL2032WA 20'' Widescreen LCD
Case Lian Li PC-A05b
Audio Device(s) On board Audio/Plantronics USB Headset
Power Supply Enermax NoiseTaker EG495AX-VE 485W
Software Windows XP SP2 bblean shell/Ubuntu
aren't the quad fx amd systems the only ones that even draw more than 500W??? A decent 600-700W psu is the absolute maximum that anyone should ever consider. The system in my sig can be powered by a single 300W psu.
 

TXcharger

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
431 (0.07/day)
Location
SAN ANTONE, TX
Processor Intel Prescott 3.0ghz with HT o/c to 3.5ghz
Motherboard Biostar P4M80-M4 (agp)
Cooling AIR!! with Arctic Silver 5 on processor and vga
Memory 2gb(1gb x 2) OCZ high performance PC3200 3-3-3-8
Video Card(s) Sapphire X800gto r430 445/545(1100 effective) w/ Zalman FATALITY fan and Omega Drivers 3.8.360
Storage Maxtor 80gb 7200rpm
Display(s) 19in dell flatscreen LCD
Case Dell Dimension 3000
Audio Device(s) Creative Soundblaster X-Fi Fatal1ty Xtreme Gamer
Power Supply stock 350 watt
Software Windows XP sp2
damn i could almost run a welder off one of those
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
498 (0.08/day)
RickyG512, lets see here, who am I going to go with here, random people on a forum that say one rail with 150A is better, or the people that make the standards and have been researching and learning about the issue for years who say that a single rail shouldn't have more than 20A?

Which would you go with?

The main issue with dual rials is that some manufacturers where labeling the rail by there max power draw they where fused for. Lets say you got a PSU with dual rails that where rated both at 15a. You would assume there would be 30a total, thats where the problem comes in. The 15a is only where the over current kicks in on each rail. The power is really draw form one transformer[ lets say 24a] and then divided by over current protection at 15a each. So you max draw is really 24a but you can pull 15a off of each rail just not at the same time. A lot of manufacturers now suggest single rials[ ATI/AMD for one]and many PSU makers have given up certifications to put all the current on one rail. The 20a limit was there to prevent burnt pins due to over current but it was solved by adding more pins[ 24 an 2x2 also the 8 pin cpu] to draw power form. There are true multi rail PSUs that have separate circuits and provide more then just two fused leads, like better stability under load. The dual rail movement got a bad rap and it was not just because of the low enders, some trusted names where doing the same thing.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
2,555 (0.40/day)
Location
Illinois
Processor i7 2600k@4.6ghz
Motherboard MSI z68ma-ed55
Cooling Silentx Extreem 120mm
Memory 2x4gb XMS 7-8-7-20 1600
Video Card(s) HD6870
Storage 2x128gb Kingston Hyper-X (Raid0), 2x750gb RE3 (RAID1), 2x750gb RE3 (RAID1)
Display(s) Soyo 24", Gateway 22"
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini 6x120mm fans.
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Zalman 750w
Software Windows 7
Dual rail seems like it could be marketing trickery to advertise 2x15 when really it's 24/2 = 2x24 (as in unsmart's example) but the "average idiot" customer wouldn't think that far. I could see the benifit of dual rail as one surge from one rail wouldn't cause dropouts in the other IF the 2 rails had proper independant regulators and filter caps to address the surges.

I have a single Antec trupower 480w running a prescott o/c'd from 3.4 to 4ghz, 512mbx4 ddr-2, 4 sata harddrives, 2 dvd/rw combo drives, 6 case fans and a single x1950 pro. Not a bad accomplishment for a 480w. I added a thermaltake powerexpress 250 now that I have crossfire. The 480w wouldn't have ran like that forever -but- the fan controller in the psu doesn't seem to think the temps are that high because it's sitting at 950rpm. A name brand 550 would seem more then enough for the average user running a single highend card like a x1950xtx. For SLI or Crossfire I would suggest a 650-800w depending on how much other crap is running off it.
 
Top