• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Panel-Maker AUOptronics Convicted of Price-Fixing, Could Face Up To $1B in Fines

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,274 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
One of the biggest suppliers of LCD panels to notebook and PC monitor manufacturers, AUOptronics, has been convicted by a US court on Tuesday, of price-fixing, a serious anti-competitive practice that cripples innovation and is bad for consumers and progress of the industry. The company faces fines as high as US $1 billion, which could amount to a big blow to the company that already finds itself facing losses.

AUOptronics' conviction follows the December 2011 mega-settlement of LCD makers including Samsung, Sharp, Hitachi, HannStar, and Chimei Innolux. At the time, AUOptronics and LG Electronics were the only fence-sitters. LG Electronics agreed to pay a US $400 million fine, in 2008. AUOptronics' current position is that it finds the evidence presented against it, which led to the conviction as being "distorted and incomplete," and that it will appeal against the verdict. The quantum of fine levied against AUOptronics will surface in the months ahead.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
245 (0.05/day)
Is this why we've been stuck with such shitty 768p laptop displays for the past couple of years? I mean, how can a company charge close to £1000 for a laptop with a shitty 768p display slapped on. How do they not die of shame?
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,274 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Is this why we've been stuck with such shitty 768p laptop displays for the past couple of years? I mean, how can a company charge close to £1000 for a laptop with a shitty 768p display slapped on. How do they not die of shame?

This trial covers developments before 2008. The "1366x768 for notebooks, 1920x1080 for desktops" ramthroat is post-2008. That's another pricing-fixing scam waiting to blow up on their faces.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Is this why we've been stuck with such shitty 768p laptop displays for the past couple of years? I mean, how can a company charge close to £1000 for a laptop with a shitty 768p display slapped on. How do they not die of shame?

I wouldn't say stuck, it isn't impossible to find a 15" laptop with a 1080p screen in it. However, 1366x768 gives a few advantages to the manufacturers. The first is obviously cost, 768p panels are cheaper than 1080p panels, especially at the 15" screen size. Second is the smaller resolution means the absolutely crap onboard video solutions don't get over loaded as easily.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
245 (0.05/day)
I wouldn't say stuck, it isn't impossible to find a 15" laptop with a 1080p screen in it. However, 1366x768 gives a few advantages to the manufacturers. The first is obviously cost, 768p panels are cheaper than 1080p panels, especially at the 15" screen size. Second is the smaller resolution means the absolutely crap onboard video solutions don't get over loaded as easily.

The fact that 768p displays are common in quite expensive laptop models (£1200 for a Thinkpad W series laptop with a 768p display, seriously?) that also have dedicated (professional) graphics is appalling. What is the excuse in such a situation, greed? That's not a very good excuse.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
The fact that 768p displays are common in quite expensive laptop models (£1200 for a Thinkpad W series laptop with a 768p display, seriously?) that also have dedicated (professional) graphics is appalling. What is the excuse in such a situation, greed? That's not a very good excuse.

Yes, greed on the manufacturers part. 1080p laptops can be had for $1200(or £750) if you look for them. The screens are out there, you have to ask the manufacturers why they aren't using them.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
18,914 (2.86/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown
VR HMD Acer Mixed Reality Headset
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
Again, I hope Apple will push for this. And Sony had a 1080p 13 incher avaliable like three years ago, and the pricing was not that wild. Now I can find one 1080p below 15 inches, and it goes for €3000.
 
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
143 (0.03/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Blackbox
Processor Core i7-2600k @ 4.8
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Performance
Cooling Thermalright Macho Rev.A
Memory 32GB Crucial Ballistix Sport VLP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) KFA² (Galax) GTX970 EXOC Black Edition
Storage Bunch of 1-2TB WD RE4 + WD Red
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 2333T
Case Fractal Design Arc Midi
Power Supply Seasonic S12 II 430
Mouse Logitech MX518 Refresh
Keyboard Tesoro Colada G3NL (MX Brown)
Software Win7 Ultimate
I wouldn't say stuck, it isn't impossible to find a 15" laptop with a 1080p screen in it.
Who's talking about 1080p ?
Any higher res than 1366x768 would be better already.
1600x900? 1680x1050?

There are two things I hate about most laptops (the ones a normal person can afford):

- low res 1366x768 screens, even for quite powerful/expensive laptop models
- glare/glossy screens. Who came up with this unusable-in-real-life crap anyways? :banghead:
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
18,914 (2.86/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown
VR HMD Acer Mixed Reality Headset
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
- glare/glossy screens. Who came up with this unusable-in-real-life crap anyways? :banghead:

I think it was first used in "entertainment" laptops, as the glossy stuff usually makes the colours more vibrant or something. Then everyone wanted to be "entertaining" and here we are.

I think. It's just guesses from my part.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Who's talking about 1080p ?
Any higher res than 1366x768 would be better already.
1600x900? 1680x1050?

There are two things I hate about most laptops (the ones a normal person can afford):

- low res 1366x768 screens, even for quite powerful/expensive laptop models
- glare/glossy screens. Who came up with this unusable-in-real-life crap anyways? :banghead:

1680x1050 isn't 16:9, so most people don't want it. And 1600x900 isn't a common panel size, so they are just as expensive as 1080p.

1366x768 is far from unusable, though I agree with the glossy shit making them hard to use outdoors(and sometimes indoors). In fact the 1080p 15" laptops I've had to use were terrible, 1080p on a 15" screen makes everything way to small.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,274 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
1680x1050 isn't 16:9, so most people don't want it. And 1600x900 isn't a common panel size, so they are just as expensive as 1080p.

1366x768 is far from unusable, though I agree with the glossy shit making them hard to use outdoors(and sometimes indoors). In fact the 1080p 15" laptops I've had to use were terrible, 1080p on a 15" screen makes everything way to small.

1600x900 isn't a common panel resolution, because the LCD cartel didn't allow it to become one. 1600x900 is very much possible on small screens. That's kind of the whole issue here. Price-fixing has crippled the pace of competitive-advancement in display sizes and resolutions available to the mainstream.

I remember how 5:4 1280x1024 notebooks were mainstream in 2003-04, and 16:10 1440x900 were mainstream, in 2004-06. If in fact the notebook industry was moving on to more dimension-optimized aspect-ratios, 1600x900 should have been the mainstream resolution (sub-$800 notebooks), 1920x1080 should have been "premium" resolution ($800-$1400 notebooks), and 2560x1440 should have been "high-end" resolution (>$1400 notebooks), that didn't happen.

With PCs, things were going excellent, we could buy $250 1920x1200 monitors in 2008-09, then instead of advancing to affordable 2560x1600 screens, the market side-stepped to inferior 1920x1080, with even $500 27" monitors using the same crap 1080p resolution, and only now we're seeing 2560x1440, at prices well over $500. There's clearly a gaping advancement hole in there.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
245 (0.05/day)
Review on anandtech (http://www.anandtech.com/show/5660/dell-xps-13-a-different-kind-of-ultrabook) about a new Dell ultrabook. Scroll down to comments, everyone's taking the piss out of the 768p screen. And for good reason!

Taken from the comments section:

'To Dell: It's ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC that my circa 2005 Dell Inspiron 6000 15" WUXGA 1900x1200 screen has a higher resolution than your WHOLE current consumer line of laptops in 2012!'
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Review on anandtech (http://www.anandtech.com/show/5660/dell-xps-13-a-different-kind-of-ultrabook) about a new Dell ultrabook. Scroll down to comments, everyone's taking the piss out of the 768p screen. And for good reason!

Taken from the comments section:

'To Dell: It's ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC that my circa 2005 Dell Inspiron 6000 15" WUXGA 1900x1200 screen has a higher resolution than your WHOLE current consumer line of laptops in 2012!'

On a 13" screen, there is no good reason to bash it for having a 768p screen, period. Anything larger would simply be too hard to read for the general public. Until Windows can manage to work out a decent scaling system that actually works, larger resolutions on such tiny screens is feasable.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,180 (0.21/day)
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
The other thing is, higher resolutions means more power consumption and most portable devices cant even last a day without recharging or running off the mains.
 
W

wahdangun

Guest
then why the hell, iPAD or my smartphone have higher DPi than my freakin monitor, its so depressing. and they seems doesn't care about battery life either, so its so unreasonable that current line of LCD can't even have higher DPI than my old sony CRT, and have that CRT for 7 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

is asking for 4K monitor a little bit to much ???
 
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
143 (0.03/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Blackbox
Processor Core i7-2600k @ 4.8
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Performance
Cooling Thermalright Macho Rev.A
Memory 32GB Crucial Ballistix Sport VLP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) KFA² (Galax) GTX970 EXOC Black Edition
Storage Bunch of 1-2TB WD RE4 + WD Red
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 2333T
Case Fractal Design Arc Midi
Power Supply Seasonic S12 II 430
Mouse Logitech MX518 Refresh
Keyboard Tesoro Colada G3NL (MX Brown)
Software Win7 Ultimate
The other thing is, higher resolutions means more power consumption and most portable devices cant even last a day without recharging or running off the mains.
Not entirely right. The majority of the power consumption of an LCD is the backlight. The difference in power consumption of let's say 1366x768 vs. 1600x900 (just as an example) on the same physical LCD panel size is negligible. As in something along the lines of 0.xx Watt more, if even that.

As long as there isn't more space that has to be illuminated (= bigger panel = longer/more backlight CCFLs or more LEDs), the power consumption isn't really an issue.
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.50/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
GOOD! Now they should go after the umpteen other businesses doing the same crap, ATi & Nvidia are doing a bit of this right now if you ask me
 
Top