• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Inno3D introduces the WAVE for passive cooling solutions

Bastieeeh

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
459 (0.06/day)
Location
Germany
Processor Dual Xeon 2.8GHz
Motherboard Asus PCH-DL
Cooling Alphacool NexXxoS XP and Dual Laing
Memory 4GB Samsung
Video Card(s) Sapphire X800XT
Storage 8x Hitachi 7K250 Raid 5 and 2x WD Raptor74GB Raid 0
Display(s) Eizo 21" FlexScan T966 CRT and S1910 LCD
Case Lian Li PC-V2100B
Audio Device(s) Creative SB Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply Tagan 480W TG480-U01
Hong Kong 28th February, 2007 - InnoVISION Multimedia Limited introduce the Wave for passive cooling solutions to their Inno3D mainstream 7 series. It is the best solution for not only system integrators but also professional graphic designers who like to work in a quiet environment.





The main advantage for passive cooling is that it generates zero noise whilst continuously cooling your area of your graphics card. As shown in the below table the comparison between passive cooling and active cooling, you can see that the cooling performance is both effective and stable.



The main features for the Inno3D Wave design include:

1. Curve Wave design - is uniquely designed to penetrate heat from top to bottom of the PCB and also circulates heat in and out. (Refer to the diagram)

2. Clipping Arm - is clipped securely onto the top part of the PCB in order to help absorb heat (Refer to the diagram)

3. Double sided Aluminum Extrusion Fins - increases surface area consecutively to radiate heat efficiently (Refer to the diagram)

4. Raise specific heat capacity - lowers temperature increment i.e. is the measure of the heat energy required to raise the temperature of a specific quantity of a substance by a certain amount.



The Inno3D Wave is the perfect solution for silent cooling. It is ready and equipped to the mainstream 7 series. For more information for passive cooling solutions please visit Inno3d.com or contact our sales representative.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.66/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
This would work well in SFF or HTPCs but I dont see it being used for the heavy hitters. Perhaps the lower end to lower mid range cards at best. Unique design though.
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.41/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
That's a very clever design... looks cool too. (sic).

Issues:
1./ "Penetrate"? I don't want heat penetrating ANY of my devices TY.

2./ Clipping design is good for a secure mount. But to "absorb heat" from the PCB? That's BS. The heatsink is going to be HOTTER than the PCB due to mounting over the GPU/RAM. Therefore it's going to transfer heat TO the PCB. While this is probably not a problem... the marketing PR is pure BS

3./ I don't want double sided fins. I want ZERO heat being radiated BACK at the PCB. Dumb. Real dumb.

4./ Raise specific heat capacity – lowers temperature increment How is that of any benefit at all? A GPU is on, not for minutes, but for hours. I don't care how QUICKLY it gets hot, but the MAXIMUM temperature and cooling efficiency.

THERE IS NO WAY the chart shown above is accurate. It doesn't take card 30 minutes to warm up. Unless, its sitting there, idle. The graph should show temperature UNDER LOAD.

Notice how at 65C the fan cuts in on the active cooler... and starts cooling the GPU. But on the passive it just keeps getting hotter and hotter. But wait... HOW ON EARTH CAN A PASSIVE COOLER start cooling faster (see 40 mins). This chart is BOGUS.

IMO "The Wave" should be a lot bigger... extending beyond the end of the card to provide "more thermal capacity" and "more surface area" for cooling. It should also ONLY be used on medium or low power GPU's.
 
Last edited:
Top