1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2008
- Messages
- 10,421 (1.86/day)
- Location
- Duluth, Minnesota
System Name | My Comp | Fiancees Comp |
---|---|
Processor | i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k |
Motherboard | MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3 |
Cooling | Watercooled |
Memory | 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC |
Storage | 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB |
Display(s) | Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G |
Case | CM Storm | CM Elite 430 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Recon 3D PCIe |
Power Supply | Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w |
Mouse | Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s |
Keyboard | Logitech G901 | Logitech G105 |
Software | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 |
Benchmark Scores | 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403 |
that's because it takes twice as much game time in BF3 to have half the fun of BC2.
I don't think I can invest that kind of time. BC2 was out about a year and a half before BF3 landed. And BF3 has almost been out a year and a half with a ton of DLC. And yet I think I had 650 or so hours into BC2 when BF3 came out, I think I have 330 or so into BF3 right now. There's a few things I find better about BF3, but a lot more I find better about BC2. I enjoyed the classes and their unique gadgets, the destruction, and the map layouts much more in BC2.
LMGs blow in BF3 because Assault doesn't have a noobtube to balance them (at least not a spamable one, and I'd rather run the medbox anyways with that class). And even if they had the tube, so little destruction, still wouldn't matter much. I felt Recon was much more entertaining with spot balls, rather than Tugs and crap. Engineer hasn't changed much, but map design just isn't as great, I loved the shit out of BC2 landmines, and I actually liked having a tracer.