• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Google, IBM, Mellanox, NVIDIA, Tyan Announce Development Group for Data Centers

Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
4,784 (1.06/day)
Location
Still on the East Side
Google, IBM, Mellanox, NVIDIA and Tyan today announced plans to form the OpenPOWER Consortium - an open development alliance based on IBM's POWER microprocessor architecture. The Consortium intends to build advanced server, networking, storage and GPU-acceleration technology aimed at delivering more choice, control and flexibility to developers of next-generation, hyperscale and cloud data centers.

The move makes POWER hardware and software available to open development for the first time as well as making POWER IP licensable to others, greatly expanding the ecosystem of innovators on the platform. The consortium will offer open-source POWER firmware, the software that controls basic chip functions. By doing this, IBM and the consortium can offer unprecedented customization in creating new styles of server hardware for a variety of computing workloads.



"The founding members of the OpenPOWER Consortium represent the next generation in data-center innovation," said Steve Mills, senior vice president, and group executive, IBM Software & Systems. "Combining our talents and assets around the POWER architecture can greatly increase the rate of innovation throughout the industry. Developers now have access to an expanded and open set of server technologies for the first time. This type of 'collaborative development' model will change the way data center hardware is designed and deployed."

"We are happy taking part in the OpenPOWER Consortium and its mission to further accelerate the rate of innovation, performance and efficiency for advanced data center solutions," said Gilad Shainer, vice president of marketing at Mellanox Technologies. "Open source and community development are key to enabling innovative computer platforms and better serve the scalable and emerging applications in the areas of high-performance, Web 2.0 and cloud computing. Mellanox's mission is to provide the most efficient interconnect solution for all compute and CPU architectures and deliver the highest return-on-investment to our users."

As part of their initial collaboration within the consortium, NVIDIA and IBM will work together to integrate the CUDA GPU and POWER ecosystems.

"The OpenPOWER Consortium brings together an ecosystem of hardware, system software, and enterprise applications that will provide powerful computing systems based on NVIDIA GPUs and POWER CPUs," said Sumit Gupta, general manager of the Tesla Accelerated Computing Business at NVIDIA.

"OpenPOWER will bring a new wave of innovation to next-generation data centers," said Albert Mu, general manager of Tyan Computer and vice president of MiTAC International Corp. "A strong ecosystem built around OpenPOWER will bring a range of new technology choices to market, offering more capabilities for Tyan's customers."

OpenPOWER is open to any firm that wants to innovate on the POWER platform and participate in an open, collaborative effort.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
868 (0.17/day)
Location
Toronto, ON. Canada
System Name Gamers PC
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE @ 3.80 GHz
Motherboard MSI 790FX-GD70 AM3
Cooling Corsair H50 Cooler
Memory Corsair XMS3 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 5770 1GB GDDR5
Storage 2 x WD Caviar Green 1TB SATA300 w/64MB Buffer (RAID 0)
Display(s) Samsung 2494SW 1080p 24" WS LCD HD
Case CM HAF 932 Full Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-FI TITANIUM -PCIE x 1
Power Supply Corsair TX Series CMPSU-650TX (650W)
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Integrate the CUDA GPU and POWER ecosystems.? Anything CUDA is bad news IMO. Not a positive development at all.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
746 (0.12/day)
Pfft!! Where the hell did that come from?!? :slap: CUDA did more for the industry than anything else in the past decade or so. Did it fragment the coding base? Maybe. But at least they didn't sit on their ass with their fingers in their butt while criticizing others' work.

They started doing their own thing with CUDA and so far it's been a great achievement for GPU computing, because if CUDA didn't exist, the way things were going, GPU as a computing device wouldn't have taken off in our lifetimes.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (0.98/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
Right what the NSA nazis etc are demanding, superpower, welcome to the bright new world of insane computing........ if we can't nuke you we will drone you by tracking you...... :twitch:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.89/day)
More of Nvidia transforming to be a software support company.

If they had that much faith on CUDA there was no need to buy PGI last month. They certainly didn't buy them for CUDA expertise :laugh:
They bought them for there OpenACC expertise so they can go beyond being stuck to their own proprietary stuff.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.60/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
More of Nvidia transforming to be a software support company.
If they had that much faith on CUDA there was no need to buy PGI last month. They certainly didn't buy them for CUDA expertise :laugh:
They bought them for there OpenACC expertise so they can go beyond being stuck to their own proprietary stuff.
Nvidia have had a foot in both camps (CUDA and open source) for some time. Obviously the company realized (along with everyone else) that open source tends to move extremely slowly - as does anything run by committee.
As 1c3d0g noted, without CUDA there is a significant chance that GPGPU would have not gained traction in any way, shape, or form. CUDA gave Nvidia highly lucrative markets where none previously existed - they also obviously realized that open source would eventually gain traction once the initial inertia (differing interests, funding and implementation) was overcome...transitioning from CUDA to open source isn't moving from one distinct system to another:
If you have an application already written in C for CUDA, it is simple and relatively straightforward to convert the program to OpenCL™ - AMD Developer Central
If nothing else, it seems like a sound business model for a fringe player in the pro markets.
 
Top