• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Readies 16-core Processors with Full Uncore

Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,645 (0.56/day)
Wow, a post made of pure 100% stupid. Never, ever utilize your 100% stupid when posting.



According to various online reviews of Kaveri that thing runs Battlefield 4 (without Mantle which shoudl enable even better performance) with reasonable framerates. Most reviews used recent titles and came up with figures of 30+ fps.

From this point on your post devolves into incoherent babbling about tablets (?!) and whatnot. Again, never use 100% stupid in your posts. Thanks.


Did you read the original post? You claim that the post is 100% stupid, but you don't even bother to read.

I stated that AMD is increasing core count, and that's not an optimal strategy for the consumer CPU market. More cores are bringing us closer to a true fusion of GPU and CPU. I stated that the core count increase is detrimental to consumers, because they are fusing the tablet, desktop, and server market. At no point in time did I reference graphical performance numbers. The point of this article was not graphics, but a CPU with a monstrous core count more akin to what you might see in a GPU.

If you need to stick your foot in your mouth, please do so without calling someone else an idiot. Every person eventually commits a stupid act (I've had my fair share); but missing the point of a post, the point of the thread, and then calling someone else stupid is an act of either brazen ignorance or willful trolling. I have no love or hate for AMD, Nvidea, or Intel. I find it interesting that they are so blatantly leaving the consumer CPU market. Either their vision is so forward thinking that they will have the last laugh, or they have just run full speed into a brick wall. It will be interesting to see what comes of this, and how it hopefully influence desktop computing.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,427 (0.68/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 8 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Crucial MX100 SATA 2.5 SSD
Display(s) Lenovo ThinkVision 27" (LEN P27h-10)
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
All amd Needed to do was to improve the single core performance of their cpu's. who needs more than 8 cores? Just enhance the IPC, single core performance by 40-60% and they could compete with intel!!!

What makes you think AMD care about competing with Intel on a performance level? The objective is to capture a larger market share and thus increase revenue for share holders. No point having the best performing product if nobody buys it.

AMD is probably doing whatever is cost effective for them and the most beneficial to them in the long term, although we probably can't see it now their key shareholders sat in a meeting and agreed this strategy, and right or wrong this was their best solution.


Honestly, I don't see a need for AMD to increase single threaded performance to meet Intel. The reason is that AMD's single threaded performance is good enough. Yes, they lag behind in benchmarks, but in real world use there really isn't anything that is single threaded that AMD can't handle. Saddly, games are still heavily dependent on single threaded performance, but most modern games still run perfectly well on AMD processors despite this, because AMD's single threaded performance is good enough. There are a few exceptions, StarCraft II comes to mind, because it is extremely CPU heavy and extremely single threaded.

I agree. Improving single threaded performance should be secondary. There isn't a single game or application that the average desktop user can't do.

When the need for more cores becomes necessary the work AMD did on their multiple module design will pay off. Even Intel's hyper threading wasn't successful at first, it took lots of trial and error and a decade later we all see the benefits. Same thing with AMD module principle.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,586 (0.34/day)
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Keychron Q1
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 217634.24 BogoMIPS
Who needs more than 8 cores? Just enhance the IPC, single core performance by 40-60% and they could compete with intel!!!

I need. Most of the workloads I do are very heavily threaded. So I would trade my 8-core to, for example, a [hypothetical] CPU of the same architecture with 16 cores while having 35% lower clocks anytime.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
Processor AMD FX-8350 4.8GHz/1.46V
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair V Formula
Cooling Silverstone SST-TD02
Memory Patriot PV38G213C1K DDR3-2133 4GBx2
Video Card(s) PowerColor R9-290(X-mod)
Storage Plextor M5S-256GB
Case my own hand crafted
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply FSP-RAIDER 750W
Software Windows8.1 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Firestrike:8780 3DMark11:P11894 FF14ARR-CC 1080p maximum:13437
Please 4GHz 4M/8C 256SP-GCN APU on Socket FM2+.
When I record PC games, more CPU core is required for x264VFW.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,875 (0.84/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Boomer Master Race
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 4.2Ghz - 5Ghz CPU
Motherboard MSI B650I Edge Wifi ITX Motherboard
Cooling CM 280mm AIO + 2x 120mm Slim fans
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4060 8GB (Temporary Until Next Gen)
Storage Kingston KC3000 M.2 1TB + 2TB HDD
Display(s) Asus TUF 24Inch 165Hz || AOC 24Inch 180Hz
Case Cooler Master NR200P Max TG ITX Case
Audio Device(s) Built In Realtek Digital Audio HD
Power Supply CoolerMaster V850 SFX Gold 850W PSU
Mouse Logitech G203 Lightsync
Keyboard Atrix RGB Slim Keyboard
VR HMD ( ◔ ʖ̯ ◔ )
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do them anymore.
I sincerely doubt this will ever come to any other market besides Opteron. If it does, enjoy the 50000W TDP.
Every thread I see you in you're always bashing AMD, give it a rest o_O
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.61/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
This is definitely a preview of what AMD has in store, first Kaveri, now Hexadecimal Core- maybe the introduction of it to AM3 or an 8 core model Steamroller for AM3+ then Hexadecimal core on the next Desktop socket
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,355 (0.94/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name Dell-y Driver
Processor Core i5-10400
Motherboard Asrock H410M-HVS
Cooling Intel 95w stock cooler
Memory 2x8 A-DATA 2999Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) UHD 630
Storage 1TB WD Green M.2 - 4TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Asus PA248 1920x1200 IPS
Case Dell Vostro 270S case
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Dell 220w
Software Windows 10 64bit
I sincerely doubt this will ever come to any other market besides Opteron. If it does, enjoy the 50000W TDP.

More like 150w, if done on 28nm.


This is definitely a preview of what AMD has in store, first Kaveri, now Hexadecimal Core- maybe the introduction of it to AM3 or an 8 core model Steamroller for AM3+ then Hexadecimal core on the next Desktop socket

According to AMD's roadmap, Vishera 32mn is as far as AM3+ gets.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,316 (0.31/day)
Processor i7-13700k
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming z790-plus
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 RGB
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5 7000mhz
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Geforce RTX 4070 Super ( 2800mhz @ 1.0volt, ~60mhz overlock -.1volts. 180-190watt draw)
Storage 1x Samsung 980 Pro PCIe4 NVme, 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate
Display(s) Acer Predator XB273u 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz
Power Supply Corsair RMx Series RM850x (OCZ Z series PSU retired after 13 years of service)
Mouse Logitech G502 hero
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Honestly, I don't see a need for AMD to increase single threaded performance to meet Intel. The reason is that AMD's single threaded performance is good enough. Yes, they lag behind in benchmarks, but in real world use there really isn't anything that is single threaded that AMD can't handle. Saddly, games are still heavily dependent on single threaded performance, but most modern games still run perfectly well on AMD processors despite this, because AMD's single threaded performance is good enough. There are a few exceptions, StarCraft II comes to mind, because it is extremely CPU heavy and extremely single threaded.

AMD single thread is good enough? Yea really? How many games at this point in time for example uses more then 4 threads? Heck even a lot of programs don't really use much more then 2. Less you get in to encoding graphic design kinda stuff that really helps a ton in. AMD really should put some R&D in to increasing performance cause don't think to many games will span much past 4 cores on best top side which puts AMD behind a bit, on top of that they use 50% more power then the competitors cpu. Yea AMD cpu looks good cause initial cheaper cost but over year or 2 that cost even's out when it add's up in an eletric bill. AMD needs to get i would say either same performance with lower wattage or same wattage with say around 30% boost in single thread work loads. But that game seems to change quick when the 6/8core haswells come out in next 6ish months.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
More like 150w, if done on 28nm.

The current 16-Core parts are 115w on 32nm, so I'm guessing these would likely be similar but with higher clocks.

AMD single thread is good enough? Yea really? How many games at this point in time for example uses more then 4 threads? Heck even a lot of programs don't really use much more then 2. Less you get in to encoding graphic design kinda stuff that really helps a ton in. AMD really should put some R&D in to increasing performance cause don't think to many games will span much past 4 cores on best top side which puts AMD behind a bit, on top of that they use 50% more power then the competitors cpu. Yea AMD cpu looks good cause initial cheaper cost but over year or 2 that cost even's out when it add's up in an eletric bill. AMD needs to get i would say either same performance with lower wattage or same wattage with say around 30% boost in single thread work loads. But that game seems to change quick when the 6/8core haswells come out in next 6ish months.

There isn't anything that relies on single threaded performance, games included, that don't run well on AMDs. There was a time when software was outpacing hardware, but we've reached a point where the hardware has caught up and software has sat stagnant. There are a lot of people still running modern games on Core 2s(heck one of my gaming rigs is a Celeron E3300) and they are still working just fine. And the FX series is beyond Core 2 in single threaded performance. So, yes, AMD's single threaded performance is good enough.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.77/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
Every thread I see you in you're always bashing AMD, give it a rest o_O
I own an 8350, I can 'opinion away' all I like. I was an amd fan through and through, then they messed up and completely disappointed me and everyone else.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
18,914 (2.86/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown
VR HMD Acer Mixed Reality Headset
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
I own an 8350, I can 'opinion away' all I like. I was an amd fan through and through, then they messed up and completely disappointed me and everyone else.

That is because you let yourself believe the hype. You're blaming AMD for your personal failures!

Seriousy though, newtekies idea with a unified socket is great. I'd buy into that.
 
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
5,401 (0.88/day)
Location
Tennessee
System Name AM5
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard Asrock X670E Taichi
Cooling EK AIO Basic 360
Memory Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600 64 Gb - XMP1 Profile
Video Card(s) AMD Reference 7900 XTX 24 Gb
Storage Samsung Gen 4 980 1 TB / Samsung 8TB SSD
Display(s) Samsung 34" 240hz 4K
Case Fractal Define R7
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME PX-1300, 1300W 80+ Platinum, Full Modular
I own an 8350, I can 'opinion away' all I like. I was an amd fan through and through, then they messed up and completely disappointed me and everyone else.

Are you telling me that I am completely disappointed with my 8350? Ha ha ha. Please stop trying to speak for people on this thread.
 

Mindweaver

Moderato®™
Staff member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
8,193 (1.50/day)
Location
Charleston, SC
System Name Tower of Power / Sechs
Processor i7 14700K / i7 5820k @ 4.5ghz
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix Z690-A Gaming WiFi D4 / X99S GAMING 7
Cooling CM MasterLiquid ML360 Mirror ARGB Close-Loop AIO / CORSAIR Hydro Series H100i Extreme
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 3600 / G.Skill DDR4 2800 16GB 4x4GB
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti / ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC Edition
Storage 4x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB M.2, 2x Crucial 1TB SSD / Samsung 870 PRO 500GB M.2
Display(s) Samsung 32" Odyssy G5 Gaming 144hz 1440p, ViewSonic 32" 72hz 1440p / 2x ViewSonic 32" 72hz 1440p
Case Phantek "400A" / Phanteks “Enthoo Pro series”
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC4080 / Azalia Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair RM Series RM750 / Corsair CXM CX600M
Mouse Glorious Gaming Model D Wireless / Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard Glorious GMMK with box-white switches / Keychron K6 pro with blue swithes
VR HMD Quest 3 (128gb) + Rift S + HTC Vive + DK1
Software Windows 11 Pro x64 / Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Yes
I'll take a 16 core desktop! :toast: These should make great crunchers/folders.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,427 (0.68/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 8 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Crucial MX100 SATA 2.5 SSD
Display(s) Lenovo ThinkVision 27" (LEN P27h-10)
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
I own an 8350, I can 'opinion away' all I like. I was an amd fan through and through, then they messed up and completely disappointed me and everyone else.

I'm happy with my 2009 Athlon II X4. Still waiting for games to take advantage of it. Can't say I'm disappointed with AMD. Actually I'm happy that I didn't have to change boards and I was able to drop in this fantastic piece of circuitry and its lasted 4 years and going strong.

No need to feel disappointed for me. You can have your disappointment back. Here.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,586 (0.34/day)
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Keychron Q1
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 217634.24 BogoMIPS
AMD single thread is good enough? Yea really? How many games at this point in time for example uses more then 4 threads? Heck even a lot of programs don't really use much more then 2. Less you get in to encoding graphic design kinda stuff that really helps a ton in.

Okay, most games use 4 threads or even less. But that doesn't mean other cores are useless. I can play games with at worst case negligible (due to no turbo) and at best case no performance loss while recording gameplay at 1920x1080@40 (or more) with superb quality straight into h264 with enough compression to keep the filesize relatively tiny (using ffmpeg+libx264). Meanwhile, a friend with a 4-core Intel said it becomes a bit lacking, reducing performance and making him record at slightly lower video framerates for it to keep up. Video transcoding speed is also very good, as long as using sane software. As @Mindweaver already mentioned, for crunching/folding – more cores, the better. Very important for me – compiling. Compiling benefits greatly from increased core count and pretty much scales linearly. [Re]Compiling larger projects can take very long on just a few cores. As a software engineer / programmer, I often need to recompile large projects several times a day. Especially when doing regression tests, where it can easily need a over dozen recompiles. Thus, when I moved from my dual-core to a octa-core, there was much rejoicing due to reducing compile time of a certain project I work on from ~ one hour to less than five minutes. Also, it is disappointing that in the Windows world a lot of software is still poorly threaded. While on Linux (the OS I use 99% of the time), things tend to be more threaded.

Sure, I can get the same or even better MT performance with a 6-core HT'ed Intel. But for what? 2x the price or even more? Thanks, but no thanks.

P.S. +1 to what newtekie1 said

on top of that they use 50% more power then the competitors cpu. Yea AMD cpu looks good cause initial cheaper cost but over year or 2 that cost even's out when it add's up in an eletric bill. AMD needs to get i would say either same performance with lower wattage or same wattage with say around 30% boost in single thread work loads. But that game seems to change quick when the 6/8core haswells come out in next 6ish months.
Okay, I kept deciding on not pointing this out, but I will. Since people tend to needlessly bash AMD for inefficient design when it comes to power consumption.
Example, sorted from most to least watts allocated to a single core:
Code:
i7-3820  – 4 cores, 130W TDP; 130 / 4 =   32.5W per core
FX-4350  – 4 cores, 125W TDP; 125 / 4 =  31.25W per core
FX-9590  – 8 cores, 220W TDP; 220 / 8 =   27.5W per core
i7-3970X – 6 cores, 150W TDP; 150 / 6 =     25W per core
i7-2600K – 4 cores,  95W TDP;  95 / 4 =  23.75W per core
FX-4320  – 4 cores,  95W TDP;  95 / 4 =  23.75W per core
i5-2450P – 4 cores,  95W TDP;  95 / 4 =  23.75W per core
i7-4770K – 4 cores,  84W TDP;  84 / 4 =     21W per core
FX-6350  – 6 cores, 125W TDP; 125 / 6 =  20.83W per core
i5-3550  – 4 cores,  77W TDP;  77 / 4 =  19.25W per core
i3-2330M – 2 cores,  35W TDP;  35 / 2 =   17.5W per core
FX-6300  – 6 cores.  95W TDP;  95 / 6 =  15.83W per core
FX-8350  – 8 cores, 125W TDP; 125 / 8 = 15.625W per core

OH SNAP it appears that if we consider how much TDP is allocated to a single core, it doesn't look like AMD CPUs are inefficient – the power per core is quite low, relatively. Which is only possible if the cores are efficient enough.

I own an 8350, I can 'opinion away' all I like. I was an amd fan through and through, then they messed up and completely disappointed me and everyone else.
>completely disappointed me and everyone else
>implying
>implying


You are implying too much, sir.
P.S. I totally love it.

Are you telling me that I am completely disappointed with my 8350? Ha ha ha. Please stop trying to speak for people on this thread.

Yeah, what He said. When You, @RCoon, say "and everyone else", You take on quite a bit of responsibility, Ya know...
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.77/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
Seems like there's a lot of people kidding themselves in this forum. Waste of my time.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,355 (0.94/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name Dell-y Driver
Processor Core i5-10400
Motherboard Asrock H410M-HVS
Cooling Intel 95w stock cooler
Memory 2x8 A-DATA 2999Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) UHD 630
Storage 1TB WD Green M.2 - 4TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Asus PA248 1920x1200 IPS
Case Dell Vostro 270S case
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Dell 220w
Software Windows 10 64bit
I own an 8350, I can 'opinion away' all I like. I was an amd fan through and through, then they messed up and completely disappointed me and everyone else.

I'm so disappointed that I went and bought only 4 of them.




OH SNAP it appears that if we consider how much TDP is allocated to a single core, it doesn't look like AMD CPUs are inefficient – the power per core is quite low, relatively. Which is only possible if the cores are efficient enough.

Intel's TDP isn't calculated in the same way as AMD's TDP. Intel's TDP is rated higher than the actual value because it's a worst case scenario. AMD's TDP is the average power draw during a set of test workloads.


Let's not kid ourselves. Intel CPUs are more energy efficient than AMD CPUs, that's a given, but AMD CPUs aren't terribly inefficient considering their core count.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,586 (0.34/day)
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Keychron Q1
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 217634.24 BogoMIPS
Intel's TDP isn't calculated in the same way as AMD's TDP. Intel's TDP is rated higher than the actual value because it's a worst case scenario. AMD's TDP is the average power draw during a set of test workloads.
LOL. I thought it was the other way round.
And my FX-8320 only goes close to TDP when overclocked, where it hovers around 120-123 W on full load, as reported by internal sensors or whatever sh*t.
And when I overclock More Than I Should™, it appears to drop my voltage on load to zealously keep the power consumption below 124.75W no matter what. Unless I disable lotsa stuff and turn on several overrides (can't find a better word) that my previous mobo didn't even have. (So my previous mobo was zealously keeping the power draw like this all the time)
So, from what I saw with my own eyes, saying that AMD's TDP is "average power draw" must be very much false.

Seems like there's a lot of people kidding themselves in this forum. Waste of my time.
Real smooth. That just shows You are out of arguments and don't have anything genuinely useful to say. Aww well...
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,355 (0.94/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name Dell-y Driver
Processor Core i5-10400
Motherboard Asrock H410M-HVS
Cooling Intel 95w stock cooler
Memory 2x8 A-DATA 2999Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) UHD 630
Storage 1TB WD Green M.2 - 4TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Asus PA248 1920x1200 IPS
Case Dell Vostro 270S case
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Dell 220w
Software Windows 10 64bit
AMD themselves say that it's an average:

TEST CONDITIONS
Given the goal of representing typical power usage in real world conditions, environmental test conditions were chosen to reflect that aspect (room temp of 70°F, server’s fan heat sink used, closed case, etc.) The power for the cores, memory controller, and HyperTransport™ links was logged multiple times per second throughout the entire duration of the workload tested, and the time- averaged power consumption for that workload was calculated. The results across the suite of workloads are used to derive the ACP number. The ACP value for each processor power band is representative of the geometric mean for the entire suite of benchmark applications plus a margin based on AMD historical manufacturing experience.

http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/43761D-ACP_PowerConsumption.pdf

EDIT: That being said, AMD tests with lower binned parts so you could say that it's TDP is an average of the lowest binned CPUs.



It could be that your motherboard is undervolting your CPU, my GA-880GM-USB3 undervolts my 8350 to 1.28v when I set voltage on AUTO.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,586 (0.34/day)
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Keychron Q1
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 217634.24 BogoMIPS
isn't that just for Opterons?
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,762 (1.91/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
I sincerely doubt this will ever come to any other market besides Opteron. If it does, enjoy the 50000W TDP.

yeah, one major problem ofAMD is power consumption
come on AMD
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,427 (0.68/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 8 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Crucial MX100 SATA 2.5 SSD
Display(s) Lenovo ThinkVision 27" (LEN P27h-10)
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
Seems like there's a lot of people kidding themselves in this forum. Waste of my time.

So your saying this forum only makes good use of your time when we share your views and agree with you?
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.31/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
I feckin love the power consumption card, really funny.
On Tpu most ardent members in actuality smash efficiency to the kerb in favour of Ghz or even Mhz gains , this is not Eco power up that's elsewhere and to the likes of me a few watts means nothing get over it.
Sdp is coming to Amd parts soon enough mark my words as intels subterfuge seams to have blinded their fans.
Far to busy kidding myself to rise to Rcoons Bs.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.15/day)
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
As much as I'd like to see a (very plausible) 6M/12T/12 core Steamroller w/ L3 and PCI-Express 3.0 (that admitedly, currently would be platform-less)... I'm still rooting for APUs, now more than ever. Software developers and open sources projects need to get their shit together and cook us some HSA magic tho. So far we've only got 2-3 actual previews and a handful of promises from developers X and Y.

IMHO, HSA needs to be pushed from the ARM front too if it wants get full-scale traction.
 
Top