• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS First in the World to Unleash Full SATA Express Performance

Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
4,784 (1.06/day)
Location
Still on the East Side
ASUS today announced that research and development work supported by Intel has led to the discovery of a BIOS structure that unleashes the true full potential of the latest SATA Express interface standard on future ASUS motherboards. Following the CES 2014 debut of the ASUS Z87-Deluxe/SATA Express concept motherboard, ASUS and Intel continued working together to ensure that users enjoy the full performance of the SATA Express interface and SATA Express components.

The joint research effort means that ASUS is the first motherboard manufacturer in the world to discover and implement a technology that is critical for SATA Express to perform at its best - the Separate Reference Clock with Independent Spread Spectrum Clocking Architecture, or SRIS for short.





In order to identify and validate this exciting and valuable breakthrough, ASUS developed Hyper Express, an exclusive 2.5-inch SATA Express external enclosure. This smart invention is a concept device that accommodates two mSATA devices and enabled ASUS engineers to measure extensively SATA Express interface design, allowing us to finely engineer new motherboard designs to unleash the new standard's full speed.

Full-speed SATA Express with SRIS in the BIOS
In order to deliver the full potential of SATA Express, the host motherboard must contain the SRIS architecture in the BIOS. It ensures that the crucial timings between the high-speed SATA Express device and the motherboard are kept precisely in tune. Users of future ASUS motherboards will enjoy sequential read/write speeds of up to 745/809 MB/s - so fast that a 10 GB full-length HD movie transfers in around 10 seconds!

SRIS ensures the best SATA Express compatibility
In addition to unleashing the full speed of SATA Express, the ASUS SRIS breakthrough provides consumers with numerous other advantages.

SATA Express-capable motherboards that lack the SRIS architecture in the BIOS could present compatibility problems. SATA Express devices might not be recognized, for example; or recognized devices might not work correctly. Even in situations where SATA Express devices are recognized and appear to function correctly, their true performance could be hindered by lack of SRIS BIOS implementation.

The discovery and development of SRIS is another world first for ASUS and cements our position as the industry's leading motherboard manufacturer. Our SATA Express solution is the only one to have undergone full SRIS testing and validation to ensure the true potential of the interface is realized - and that means that only buyers of forthcoming ASUS motherboards are assured the very best SATA Express performance.

The SRIS BIOS technology will be available worldwide in future ASUS motherboards.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,883 (0.81/day)
I would like to see some numbers from some reviewers to believe those numbers. I really hope this standard has stable drivers at the release.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.70/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
I usually evaluate every board that fits my criteria regardless of brand, but with PR like this I might just cut out Asus altogether.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.14/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name "Run of the mill" (except GPU)
Processor R9 3900X
Motherboard ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate
Cooling Cryorig (not recommended)
Memory 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14
Video Card(s) Radeon RX6900XT
Storage Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Case Define R5
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
Hmm, I thought SATA express theoretical numbers were more in the 3+ GB/s area, ~800MB/s seems a bit poor.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,239 (0.75/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Hmm, I thought SATA express theoretical numbers were more in the 3+ GB/s area, ~800MB/s seems a bit poor.

It's probably the SSD they used in testing. Will be nice to have those being the bottleneck again, instead of the interface.

Also LOL @ "discover". You "discovered" BIOS code? Really, do tell me more.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,027 (0.24/day)
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI x670e Tomahawk wifi
Cooling Artic Freezer II 360
Memory G.Skill 32gb ddr5 6000mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 7900XTX 24 GB
Storage Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
Display(s) Alienware 3420DW 120 Freesync
Case LianLi Lancool III white non-rgb
Audio Device(s) Onboard ALC
Power Supply Corsair Shift 1000W
Mouse G502 Hero
Keyboard Ducky Shine 5
Software Win 11 64bit
Benchmark Scores The second best!
I usually evaluate every board that fits my criteria regardless of brand, but with PR like this I might just cut out Asus altogether.

I have. But interested to see if it actually will work.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
124 (0.03/day)
Location
root/localhost
System Name Casual Movie Rig
Processor Intel i7-4790K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-Deluxe
Cooling NZXT Kraken X61 280mm All-In-One Water / Liquid CPU Cooling Solution
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR3 1866MHz CL9
Video Card(s) None yet
Storage SSD Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SATA-III 2.5 inch | WD VelociRaptor 1TB SATA-III 10000 RPM 64MB
Display(s) BenQ Professional Gaming XL2430T 24 inch 1ms GTG black
Case NZXT Phantom 820 Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) None
Power Supply Corsair AXi Digital AX860i
Software Windows 8.1 PRO 64bit English Retail
Can't wait for Z97-Deluxe :respect:
And I hope they will include that Sata -> Sata Express adaptor they had in the demo for Z87-Deluxe video.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,662 (0.34/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard ASUS STRIX X670E-F
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / EK Quantum CPU / Alphacool GPU / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 96GB (2 x 48 GB) G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim X 24GB
Storage WD SN850 2TB, 2 x 512GB Samsung PM981a, 4 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD for Windows Storage Spaces
Display(s) 2 x Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + HMD
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x 1 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Corsair K100
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
Hmm, I thought SATA express theoretical numbers were more in the 3+ GB/s area, ~800MB/s seems a bit poor.

SATA Express is PCI Express 2.0 x2, which means 1 GB/s theoretical maximum performance. Of course, no actual drive will ever reach 1GB/s due to overhead, so it's entirely possible that 800MB/s is close to the limit of SATA express. SATA express is not a huge improvement over SATA 3 - only 66% more bandwidth compared to the 100% more that previous SATA generations brought.

I have always been negative regarding SATA express. Native PCIe SSDs are a much better choice if you need the extra bandwidth. Sandforce's upcoming SF-3700 SSD controller is native PCIe 2.0 x4 but will also be available in SATA Express. The problem is that by using SATA express instead of a PCIe card you are cutting that drive's interface bandwidth in half from 2GB/s to 1GB/s.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.14/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name "Run of the mill" (except GPU)
Processor R9 3900X
Motherboard ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate
Cooling Cryorig (not recommended)
Memory 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14
Video Card(s) Radeon RX6900XT
Storage Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Case Define R5
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
SATA Express is PCI Express 2.0 x2, which means 1 GB/s theoretical maximum performance. It is not a huge improvement over SATA 3 - only 66% more bandwidth compared to the 100% more that previous SATA generations brought.

I have always been negative regarding SATA express. Native PCIe SSDs are a much better choice if you need the extra bandwidth. Sandforce's upcoming SF-3700 SSD controller is native PCIe 2.0 x4, so by using SATA express instead of a PCIe slot you are already cutting that drive's interface bandwidth in half.

Per some other article I read (Anandtech I think) it (S-ex) (oh, there's a nice abbreviation!) should also be cabpable of being wired as x4 and why not 3.0 as well? Which would be a lot more useful, otherwise it's very "meh" and we may as well just use the M.2 slot which at least has the benefit of deleting cables and not needed external power. Not having a power feed from the board connector is also a bit "doh!" IMO ...
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,027 (0.24/day)
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI x670e Tomahawk wifi
Cooling Artic Freezer II 360
Memory G.Skill 32gb ddr5 6000mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 7900XTX 24 GB
Storage Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
Display(s) Alienware 3420DW 120 Freesync
Case LianLi Lancool III white non-rgb
Audio Device(s) Onboard ALC
Power Supply Corsair Shift 1000W
Mouse G502 Hero
Keyboard Ducky Shine 5
Software Win 11 64bit
Benchmark Scores The second best!
Sandforce's upcoming SF-3700 SSD controller is native PCIe 2.0 x4 but will also be available in SATA Express. The problem is that by using SATA express instead of a PCIe card you are cutting that drive's interface bandwidth in half from 2GB/s to 1GB/s.

Has the controller been released yet?
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,662 (0.34/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard ASUS STRIX X670E-F
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / EK Quantum CPU / Alphacool GPU / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 96GB (2 x 48 GB) G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim X 24GB
Storage WD SN850 2TB, 2 x 512GB Samsung PM981a, 4 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD for Windows Storage Spaces
Display(s) 2 x Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + HMD
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x 1 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Corsair K100
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
Has the controller been released yet?

Not yet, but you can view the official specifications from the manufacturer:

http://www.lsi.com/downloads/Public/Flash Storage Processors/LSI-PB-SF3700-Family.pdf

It won't support PCIe 3.0 and it gets maximum bandwidth from an x4 slot, which neither SATA Express nor M.2 provide.
Per some other article I read (Anandtech I think) it (S-ex) (oh, there's a nice abbreviation!) should also be cabpable of being wired as x4 and why not 3.0 as well? Which would be a lot more useful, otherwise it's very "meh" and we may as well just use the M.2 slot which at least has the benefit of deleting cables and not needed external power. Not having a power feed from the board connector is also a bit "doh!" IMO ...

It's possible that PCIe 3.0 could be done using current cables. However, I don't see how the width could be expanded to x4 without a change of connector.

Edit: I found the Anandtech article to which you are referring. The article refers to PCIe 2.0 x2 (SATA Express) having a maximum real-world bandwidth of ~780MB/s compared to ~515MB/s for SATA 6Gb/s. The article does state that PCIe 3.0 is supported on SATA express, but considering all of these SATA express motherboards are connected via PCIe 2.0 to the southbridge, that will diminish the usefulness of SATA Express. You would have to steal lanes from graphics to use PCIe 3.0, and I'm not sure how many motherboard manufacturers will do that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,586 (0.34/day)
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Keychron Q1
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 217634.24 BogoMIPS

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,944 (2.61/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
I usually evaluate every board that fits my criteria regardless of brand, but with PR like this I might just cut out Asus altogether.

Why would this be any reason to completely disregard Asus boards?

I don't know about you, but if reviewers test it out and its as advertised in terms of speed, IMO this is a welcomed addition.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
302 (0.08/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
Processor AMD 1700X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Memory F4-3200C14D-16GFX
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 960 Pro
Display(s) PG279Q
Case HAF X
Power Supply Silencer MK III 850
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
SF-3700 SSD controller - that still "features" DuraWrite. One data type at full speed all other data at dirt slow speed. Watch for huge ATTO numbers and much much slower CDM/AS SSD and real world numbers.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
8,068 (1.40/day)
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
3 cables. I can't believe that it takes 3 cables.:shadedshu:
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,457 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Hmm, I thought SATA express theoretical numbers were more in the 3+ GB/s area, ~800MB/s seems a bit poor.
Actually max is 1600MB/s... Not sure thou.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,662 (0.34/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard ASUS STRIX X670E-F
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / EK Quantum CPU / Alphacool GPU / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 96GB (2 x 48 GB) G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim X 24GB
Storage WD SN850 2TB, 2 x 512GB Samsung PM981a, 4 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD for Windows Storage Spaces
Display(s) 2 x Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + HMD
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x 1 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Corsair K100
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
Actually max is 1600MB/s... Not sure thou.

That's if you're using PCIe 3.0. On this board (and all the other Z97 SATA express boards I've seen so far) the lanes are PCIe 2.0 through the southbridge so you only get ~800MB/s in real world environments..
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.70/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
Why would this be any reason to completely disregard Asus boards?

I don't know about you, but if reviewers test it out and its as advertised in terms of speed, IMO this is a welcomed addition.

I glaze over most PR but this particular piece just rubbed me the wrong way. It goes beyond the expected fluff into FUD which is a questionable tactic. Also, their Hyper Express device with SATA drives/controller allowed them to tune their SATA Express port for future devices with true PCIe NAND controllers?


That's if you're using PCIe 3.0. On this board (and all the other Z97 SATA express boards I've seen so far) the lanes are PCIe 2.0 through the southbridge so you only get ~800MB/s in real world environments..

Cross fingers for some X99 boards using those extra lanes for PCIe 3.0 M.4/SATA Express II. :D
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,956 (0.27/day)
Location
The Kingdom of Norway
Processor Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550I AORUS PRO AX 1.1
Cooling Noctua NB-U12A
Memory 2x 32GB Fury DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 5700 XT Red Dragon
Storage Kingston FURY Renegade 2TB PCIe 4.0
Display(s) 2x Dell U2412M
Case Phanteks P400A
Audio Device(s) Hifimediy Sabre 9018 USB DAC
Power Supply Corsair AX850 (from 2012)
Software Windows 10?
wait what? there is a typo it should be called SATAN Express!
:)
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,870 (0.32/day)
Processor RyZen R9 3950X
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB
Memory 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB)
Video Card(s) RTX 3050
Storage Samsung 2TB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Zulman MS800
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic 650W
VR HMD Oculus Rift, Oculus Quest V1, Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 11 64bit
I glaze over most PR but this particular piece just rubbed me the wrong way. It goes beyond the expected fluff into FUD which is a questionable tactic. Also, their Hyper Express device with SATA drives/controller allowed them to tune their SATA Express port for future devices with true PCIe NAND controllers?




Cross fingers for some X99 boards using those extra lanes for PCIe 3.0 M.4/SATA Express II. :D

Its probably reasonable to assume that X99 / LGA2011-3 board manufacturers will take advantage of the additional lanes the platform provides. One might even find Thunderbolt II on such X99 / LGA2011-3 boards along with some other things.

Still such motherboards won't come cheaply and may start at ~$300+ USD as an entry level and maybe even more like ~$350 or ~$400.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.70/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
It's been awhile, but I've paid those prices in the past (Athlon MP with SCSI, Xeon HT, etc).

It's not so bad if a manufacturer puts out just the right board. Like I paid $280 for my Lian-Li case, but I've used it for some five years now.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,870 (0.32/day)
Processor RyZen R9 3950X
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB
Memory 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB)
Video Card(s) RTX 3050
Storage Samsung 2TB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Zulman MS800
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic 650W
VR HMD Oculus Rift, Oculus Quest V1, Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 11 64bit
It's been awhile, but I've paid those prices in the past (Athlon MP with SCSI, Xeon HT, etc).

It's not so bad if a manufacturer puts out just the right board. Like I paid $280 for my Lian-Li case, but I've used it for some five years now.

Of that I have no doubt and nor do I have any issue paying a bit more for a board that has the feature set (and so on) that I want.

However, a lot of people will look to pay less in their build (or distribute their funds differently) and as such will historically avoid more expensive platforms like X79 / C600 / LGA2011. That history may very well be consistent with the upcoming X99 / LGA2011-3 platform. In fact, with all else being equal, X99 / LGA2011-3 may work out to be slightly more expensive due to the introduction of DDR4.

So while you and I might build X99 / LGA2011-3 platforms others will avoid it like the plague and they wont suffer performance wise in a lot of cases for doing so either (depending on their use case).
 
Top