• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Announces the Entry-level GeForce GT 720

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,895 (7.38/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
NVIDIA announced its entry-level graphics card for this generation, the GeForce GT 720. Based on the 28 nm GK208 silicon, the chip features 192 CUDA cores, and a 64-bit wide DDR3 memory interface, holding 1 GB of memory. It features core clock speeds of 797 MHz, and memory clock speeds of 1600 MHz DDR. Most cards based on this chip are expected to be single-slot, half-height, and passively cooled. NVIDIA is capturing the sub-$50 market with this chip.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
so newer stuff from nvidia now is entry level
 
At last, real, actual, new chips for the low end, not just rebadged GT 2xx's!
Nevermind, GK208 is used in the 640 chips...
 
Last edited:
It is still GK, GK208 was released long ago for notebook use now they made a desktop card out of it.
 
Nvidia needs to sell all the crap they can because they are in a bind going forward as we shall publicly see soon.
 
How does this compare to the integrated GPU on AMD/Intel's processors?
 
At Nvidia's product page it also mentions the option for GDDR5. And what is also supported and their is a little irony in that, is Adaptive VSync.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-720/specifications

How does this compare to the integrated GPU on AMD/Intel's processors?

With DDR3 RAM it only has 14.4MB/sec bandwidth, the same that GT210 DDR3, or GT620 have. In other words it's slow. Really slow, because it doesn't have the bandwidth necessary to run anything. Compared to iGPUs? Probably slower than an iGPU on a quad core AMD, or compared to Iris Pro. But that's just a guess. With 64bit data bus and DDR3 it's useless even with 19200 CUDA cores, not 192. Now that I mention it, it could be a good cheap option for CUDA or PhysX.
 
Back
Top