• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Moore's Law Buckles as Intel's Tick-Tock Cycle Slows Down

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,277 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel co-founder Gordon Moore's claim that transistor counts in microprocessors can be doubled with 2 years, by means of miniaturizing silicon lithography is beginning to buckle. In its latest earnings release, CEO Brian Krzanich said that the company's recent product cycles marked a slowing down of its "tick-tock" product development from 2 years to close to 2.5 years. With the company approaching sub-10 nm scales, it's bound to stay that way.

To keep Moore's Law alive, Intel adopted a product development strategy it calls tick-tock. Think of it as a metronome that give rhythm to the company. Each "tock" marks the arrival of a new micro-architecture, and each "tick" marks its miniaturization to a smaller silicon fab process. Normally, each year is bound to see one of the two in alternation.



"Penryn" was Intel's first 45 nm chip and miniaturization of "Conroe", "Nehalem" was a newer architecture on 45 nm, "Westmere" was its miniaturization to 32 nm, "Sandy Bridge" was a newer architecture on 32 nm, "Ivy Bridge" was its miniaturization to 22 nm, "Haswell" was a new architecture on 22 nm, and "Broadwell" is its miniaturization to 14 nm. "Skylake" is a new architecture on 14 nm. It was all well and good until "Broadwell."

Intel approached "Broadwell" slower than expected, because implementing the 14 nm node took longer. Intel launched its "Haswell Refresh" silicon to hold ground over mid-2014 to mid-2015. To compensate for lost ground, the company allowed "Broadwell" to be cannibalized by an on-schedule "Skylake" launch. The two less-than-memorable Broadwell desktop chips, the i7-5775C and i5-5675C, are tough to find in the retail market.

Krzanich suggested that the company could face a similarly slow product development cycle as it approaches the limits of how small it can make its chips using existing materials. With "Skylake" out this August, it could be a while before you see its miniaturization to 10 nm, codenamed "Cannonlake." IBM has had better luck with sub-10 nm. The company recently demonstrated a 7 nm chip built with a new silicon-germanium alloy substrate. IBM recently sold the division responsible for this in-toto, to GlobalFoundries, the principal foundry partner of AMD. Krzanich concluded that Moore's Law is still "alive and safe," and that it's not the first time it faced difficulties.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
5,197 (0.76/day)
Location
Kansas City, KS
System Name Dell XPS 15 9560
Processor I7-7700HQ
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1050/1080 Ti
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal
Case Razer Core
Audio Device(s) Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650
Mouse Logitech Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G910
You know... people have been talking about this for like the last 10 years and it still hasn't actually happened.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
857 (0.19/day)
Location
Oregon
System Name Red 101
Processor 9th Gen Intel Core i9-9900k
Motherboard EVGA Z370 Classified
Cooling Custom Primochill and Heatkiller water cooling loop
Memory 16GB of Gskill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 with Heatkiller block @2114Mhz
Storage 4- Samsung Evo 250GB, 1- Pro 512GB and 1-512GB M.2
Display(s) LG 38" UW
Case In Win 101 customized a lot and painted red
Audio Device(s) Razer Kraken 7.1 Chroma
Power Supply EVGA 850w G2
Mouse Razer DeathAdderv2
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Win10Pro and games
Benchmark Scores NA
Everyone should have saw this coming.

It cant just keep getting smaller. I know a lot of people think this it is magic, well it isn't, it is engineering and they literally aren't able to engineer it smaller, right now!

I am sure competition plays some part in this, the slower they make new chips the more they make on current chips, meaning they don't have to spend as much on engineering, research&design, and new market research. the competition is themselves.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I think what goes unsaid is that cost to research smaller processes is going to start climbing exponentially--at least until an alternative is found that doesn't rely on electrons.

IBM did demonstrate a 7nm process but that's hardly anything production ready. It was only a proof of concept.
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,104 (1.66/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
3,275 (0.46/day)
Location
Sunny California
Processor Intel Core i9 13900KF
Motherboard Asus ROG Maximus Z690 Hero EVA Edition
Cooling Asus Ryujin II 360 EVA Edition
Memory 4x16GBs DDR5 6800MHz G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo Series
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 4090 AMP Extreme Airo
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 Pro OS - 4TB Nextorage G Series Games - 8TBs WD Black Storage
Display(s) LG C2 OLED 42" 4K 120Hz HDR G-Sync enabled TV
Case Asus ROG Helios EVA Edition
Audio Device(s) Denon AVR-S910W - 7.1 Klipsch Dolby ATMOS Speaker Setup - Audeze Maxwell
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 1300W
Mouse Asus ROG Keris EVA Edition - Asus ROG Scabbard II EVA Edition
Keyboard Asus ROG Strix Scope EVA Edition
VR HMD Samsung Odyssey VR
Software Windows 11 Pro 64bit
You know... people have been talking about this for like the last 10 years and it still hasn't actually happened.
What do you mean it hasn't happened? We have been on the same 28nm process node for GPUs for over two years now, and now even the mighty Intel has reached that wall; the race to manufacture profitable and reliable consumer chips at 10nm and bellow will require pushing the limits of optics and current materials, and that's a fact.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
I always laugh when anyone brings up Moore's Law. Moore's Law exists solely for/because of financial purposes (profit). It has nothing to do with actual limitations of technology. We'd be on god knows what kind of technology if money wasn't holding everything back. Why innoavte and invent new things or make things ridiculously faster if you can sell bunch of old ones at full price and bump the speed slightly every half a year instead of making giant leaps every year...

It didn't slow down because it's so hard to make good tech, it's slowed down because Intel has no interest in making things faster and cheaper with pretty much no real competition around...
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
The last I read from Intel is that they will be moving away from silicon after 10nm. Rumors have it that new materials will allow much higher clocks so there should be advances in performance even without sub-7nm node. Intel will possibly be using indium gallium arsenide.

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015...d-to-10nm-will-move-away-from-silicon-at-7nm/

The graph on the left was what I was talking about. That line could turn sharply up unless breakthroughs are made.
 
D

Deleted member 138597

Guest
Once scientists find a way to mass produce silicene or graphene, that'll be the time when going smaller would be much easier - and the limit then would be upto the size of an atom ;)
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
15,436 (2.43/day)
Location
Mid-Atlantic
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 13600KF
Motherboard AsRock B760M Steel Legend Wifi
Cooling Noctua NH-U9S
Memory 4x 16 Gb Gskill S5 DDR5 @6000
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Gaming OC 6750 XT 12GB
Storage WD_BLACK 4TB SN850x
Display(s) Gigabye M32U
Case Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 P2
Mouse MX Master 3s
Keyboard Logitech G915 Wireless Clicky
Software The Matrix
You know... people have been talking about this for like the last 10 years and it still hasn't actually happened.

Holy crap, dude. Back from the dead?
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
5,197 (0.76/day)
Location
Kansas City, KS
System Name Dell XPS 15 9560
Processor I7-7700HQ
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1050/1080 Ti
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal
Case Razer Core
Audio Device(s) Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650
Mouse Logitech Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G910
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
777 (0.18/day)
Location
Norway
System Name Games/internet/usage
Processor I7 5820k 4.2 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A2
Cooling custom water loop for cpu and gpu
Memory 16GiB Crucial Ballistix Sport 2666 MHz
Video Card(s) Radeon Rx 6800 XT
Storage Samsung XP941 500 GB + 1 TB SSD
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case Caselabs Magnum M8
Audio Device(s) Shiit Modi 2 Uber -> Matrix m-stage -> HD650
Power Supply beQuiet dark power pro 1200W
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Win 10 Pro
I always laugh when anyone brings up Moore's Law. Moore's Law exists solely for/because of financial purposes (profit). It has nothing to do with actual limitations of technology. We'd be on god knows what kind of technology if money wasn't holding everything back. Why innoavte and invent new things or make things ridiculously faster if you can sell bunch of old ones at full price and bump the speed slightly every half a year instead of making giant leaps every year...

It didn't slow down because it's so hard to make good tech, it's slowed down because Intel has no interest in making things faster and cheaper with pretty much no real competition around...

Hear hear, it helps when the full law is considerd:

The number of transistors economically viable on a chip will double every 2 years. The only reason it has been linked to node size is because that how you made transistors cheaper, Since that already is starting to fail.

Remember a more interesting graph showing the relative performance of CPUs in a comuter arcitecture class i had at university, it flattens out after Nehalem.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
18,914 (2.86/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown
VR HMD Acer Mixed Reality Headset
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
Ages ago I read an article about using synthetic diamond, dunno what happened to that.

Anyway I am expecting some sci-fi stuff the coming years.
 
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
144 (0.04/day)
Location
Finland
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard MSI B350 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4
Memory 32GB (2 x 16GB) Kingston FURY Beast, DDR4 3200MHz, CL16
Video Card(s) ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Advanced Edition
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 512 GB (M.2), Samsung 860 EVO 1 TB (SATA)
Display(s) 27" Ozone DSP27 Pro
Case Fractal Design Define S2
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR444
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12II-620 Evolution
Mouse Logitech G502 HERO SE
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Windows 10 Home x64
What do you mean it hasn't happened? We have been on the same 28nm process node for GPUs for over two years now
Actually, over 3 and a half. The 28nm Tahiti (HD 7970) launched in Dec 2011 / Jan 2012.

Intel has still been keeping Moore's Law alive, but TSMC (and everyone else) has been behind it for a long time. With Broadwell that law no longer applies to Intel either.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Cost reduction is needed to justify new technology generations

I would prefer that the progress is driven by desire for more performance and work done, instead of someone greedy and stupid trying to save money and make more profit.
Actually, over 3 and a half. The 28nm Tahiti (HD 7970) launched in Dec 2011 / Jan 2012.

Intel has still been keeping Moore's Law alive, but TSMC (and everyone else) has been behind it for a long time. With Broadwell that law no longer applies to Intel either.

Of course, that law is not a law but nonsense. :laugh:
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,104 (1.66/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.24/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Moore's Law exists solely for/because of financial purposes (profit). It has nothing to do with actual limitations of technology. We'd be on god knows what kind of technology if money wasn't holding everything back. Why innoavte and invent new things or make things ridiculously faster if you can sell bunch of old ones at full price and bump the speed slightly every half a year instead of making giant leaps every year...

^This.

There is also a difference between technology that the public knows about and uses and technology that is magnitudes better, but will never be advertised until years/decades later. It is simply drivelled out as the TPTB see fit.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
152 (0.04/day)
Location
Columbia, SC
Processor Intel 2500k OCed at 4.6ghz
Motherboard Intel Z77
Cooling Thermalright Macho Rev.A
Memory 8GB G.Skill 2133
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 Windforce 3X OCed at 1050mhz base and 1600mhz vram
Storage Mushkin Enhance 256gb SSD, Western Digital 750gb and 3TB HHDs
Display(s) Asus 24" 1080p
Case Lian-Li Mid Tower
Audio Device(s) Mobo sound
Power Supply SeaSonic 560 watt gold
Mouse Logitec 3 button laser mouse
Keyboard Das Keyboard Model S (the blank key model)
Software Windows 8.1 64 bit
There were a lot of talks about magic of graphene. And then all went silent. I wonder if that's even still on a table...

My brother is an EE in the LED department of a major multinational electronics manufacturer, and according to him, graphene, while promising, is still incredibly expensive to produce in anything other than powder, and methods for mass producing it in uniform sheets or wafers larger than a few MM is still beyond current tech. He doesn't predict there will be mass market implementation for at least another 10-15 years, and that is only if some major hurdles in production are overcome. He also said that there is a lot of internal discussion within this manufacturer, that there is about a 50% chance that graphene may never be an economically viable replacement for silicon. It has a lot of other uses (cell phone antennas have actually been one of the big areas of development) but as a replacement for the silicon substrate in processors, don't get your hopes up.
 
Last edited:

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Oh well, this slowdown had to come at some point.

I remember it being quoted as doubling every 1.5 years many moons ago, so it's been on a slowdown for a long time. In fact, I'd say we actually hit the brick wall way back in 2004 when power usage and heat became too high, so clock rates got stuck at their current frequencies of maxing out at 3.5-4GHz. Who remembers Intels initial plans to have the Pentium 4 scale to 10GHz and beyond? They came crashing down because of this issue.

Intel and others then managed to work around it by increasing core count, transistor density and more efficient architecutures, but it's obvious that this strategy can't last forever, as we eventually reach the size of atoms, so there's a minimum size for the transistors.

This limitation is a real bummer, so I hope they find another way around it soon.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,757 (0.31/day)
System Name Lailalo
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X Boosts to 4.95Ghz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (WIFI
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT 20GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro Plus 1TB, Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Power Supply XPG 1000W
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
Watch AMD releases Zen and suddenly Intel has a whole new world of performance CPUs that put the current ones to shame.

So full of BS Intel...so full of BS...
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
550 (0.13/day)
Processor Intel Core 2 QX6850
Motherboard ABIT AB9 Pro
Cooling Zalman CNPS-9900 MAX-R
Memory Patriot PDC24G6400LLK (4x 2 GB)
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 560 Ti Twin Light Turbo
Storage Not Enough!
Display(s) Samsung T240HD
Case NZXT Zero
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-Fi Elite Pro
Power Supply Thortech Thunderbolt Plus TTBPK00G 1000W
Mouse Elecom M-DUX70BK
Keyboard CM Storm Trigger (Cherry MX Brown)
Software NOT Windows 10
Watch AMD releases Zen and suddenly Intel has a whole new world of performance CPUs that put the current ones to shame.

So full of BS Intel...so full of BS...
Unlikely. Both AMD and nVidia have been stuck with 28 nm process for their products while Intel can put out stuff on 14 nm process. Zen would need to have major architectural efficiencies to compensate for that.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,379 (1.08/day)
Watch AMD releases Zen and suddenly Intel has a whole new world of performance CPUs that put the current ones to shame.

So full of BS Intel...so full of BS...

Maybe, if they would have 50 times the R&D budget, and a time machine that will take them 5 years into the future.
 
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
144 (0.04/day)
Location
Finland
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard MSI B350 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4
Memory 32GB (2 x 16GB) Kingston FURY Beast, DDR4 3200MHz, CL16
Video Card(s) ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Advanced Edition
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 512 GB (M.2), Samsung 860 EVO 1 TB (SATA)
Display(s) 27" Ozone DSP27 Pro
Case Fractal Design Define S2
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR444
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12II-620 Evolution
Mouse Logitech G502 HERO SE
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Windows 10 Home x64
Unlikely. Both AMD and nVidia have been stuck with 28 nm process for their products while Intel can put out stuff on 14 nm process. Zen would need to have major architectural efficiencies to compensate for that.
Zen will be 14nm. But yeah, it likely won't catch Skylake, and if it does, Intel won't have a new product ready for a while (they could still probably bump clocks at the expense of power consumption, like Devil's Canyon). Making new fabs and architechtures is very hard nowadays, Intel doesn't have multiple generations of CPUs ready to counter AMD's possible comeback like some seem to believe.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,926 (0.46/day)
Location
UK
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
It's still being researched as far as I know. Hopefully the obstacles will be overcome. It would be amazing to have a CPU run at 400 GHz.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/518426/how-to-save-the-troubled-graphene-transistor/

There are SiGe transistors that have done 798Ghz.

Also single conventional Si transistors can also hit really really high clocks. The problem is that in a CPU you have several billion transistors and if one of them can't do more than 4Ghz at X voltage then the whole CPU has to run at 4Ghz. If you had CPUs with really really low transistor counts you could in theory end up with chips that can run super high clocks.

IBM has CPUs that ship at 5Ghz+.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 64K
Top