• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Scientists find a way to see and manipulate 'quantum motion'

CAPSLOCKSTUCK

Spaced Out Lunar Tick
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
8,578 (2.10/day)
Location
llaregguB...WALES
System Name Party On
Processor Xeon w 3520
Motherboard DFI Lanparty
Cooling Big tower thing
Memory 6 gb Ballistix Tracer
Video Card(s) HD 7970
Case a plank of wood
Audio Device(s) seperate amp and 6 big speakers
Power Supply Corsair
Mouse cheap
Keyboard under going restoration
Ripples in the fabric of space-time could reveal how the universe was created nearly 14 billion years ago.

But finding these ripples, known as 'gravitational waves', has so far proved elusive.

Now, US scientists claim they have found a way to improve the detectors used to spot the gravitational waves of the Big Bang.



Researchers at Caltech claim they have found a way to observe, and control, something known as 'quantum motion' in a relatively large object.

If you forget to wind up a grandfather, you will eventually find the swinging pendulum come to rest. But this is only valid at the level of classical physics – or the laws and principles that appear to explain the physics of relatively large objects at human scale.

At the level of quantum mechanics, the rules that govern the behaviour of matter and light at the atomic scale, nothing can quite be completely at rest.

'In the past couple of years, my group and a couple of other groups around the world have learned how to cool the motion of a small micrometre-scale object to produce this state at the bottom, or the quantum ground state,' says Keith Schwab, a Caltech professor of applied physics.

'But we know that even at the quantum ground state, at zero-temperature, very small amplitude fluctuations—or noise—remain.'

Quantum motion, or noise, is theoretically an intrinsic part of the motion of all objects, and can throw off sensitive detectors used to measure gravitation waves.
Schwab and his colleagues designed a device that would allow them to see this noise and then manipulate it.
The micrometre-scale device is made up of a flexible aluminium plate that sits atop a silicon surface.
The plate is coupled to a superconducting electrical circuit, which vibrates at a rate of 3.5 million times per second.

According to the laws of classical mechanics, the vibrating structures eventually will come to a complete rest if cooled to the ground state. But that is not what Schwab and his colleagues saw when they actually cooled the spring to the ground state in their experiments.
Instead, the residual energy-quantum noise - remained.

'This energy is part of the quantum description of nature - you just can't get it out,' says Schwab.

'We all know quantum mechanics explains precisely why electrons behave weirdly.

'Here, we're applying quantum physics to something that is relatively big, a device that you can see under an optical microscope, and we're seeing the quantum effects in a trillion atoms instead of just one.'

The researchers then developed a technique to manipulate the inherent quantum noise and found that it is possible to reduce it periodically.

'There are two main variables that describe the noise or movement,' Schwab explains.'We showed that we can actually make the fluctuations of one of the variables smaller—at the expense of making the quantum fluctuations of the other variable larger.

'That is what's called a quantum squeezed state; we squeezed the noise down in one place, but because of the squeezing, the noise has to squirt out in other places.

'But as long as those more noisy places aren't where you're obtaining a measurement, it doesn't matter.'


The ability to control quantum noise could one day be used to improve the precision of very sensitive measurements, such as those obtained by LIGO, the Laser Interferometry Gravitational-wave Observatory. This is being used by a Caltech-and-MIT-led project searching to search for signs of gravitational waves, ripples in the fabric of space-time.

'We've been thinking a lot about using these methods to detect gravitational waves from pulsars—incredibly dense stars that are the mass of our sun compressed into a 10 km radius and spin at 10 to 100 times a second,' Schwab says.

'In the 1970s, Kip Thorne and others wrote papers saying that these pulsars should be emitting gravity waves that are nearly perfectly periodic,' Schwab says. 'So we're thinking hard about how to use these techniques on a gram-scale object to reduce quantum noise in detectors, thus increasing the sensitivity to pick up on those gravity waves.'

In order to do that, the current device would have to be scaled up.

'Our work aims to detect quantum mechanics at bigger and bigger scales, and one day, our hope is that this will eventually start touching on something as big as gravitational waves,' he says.

These results were published in an article titled, 'Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator' in the journal Science.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.12/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
Classical physics there is proof of, quantum physics just a theory...
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.63/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
According to the laws of classical mechanics, the vibrating structures eventually will come to a complete rest if cooled to the ground state. But that is not what Schwab and his colleagues saw when they actually cooled the spring to the ground state in their experiments.
Instead, the residual energy-quantum noise - remained.
That's quite the stretch. There was a similar paper not long ago about gravitational waves and it didn't survive peer review.

I think the idea that 0K doesn't stop quantum activity is sound but their experiment doesn't sound like proof of it.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
7,023 (1.41/day)
Source for the opening post

Classical physics there is proof of, quantum physics just a theory...
Quantum physics proved right. Here or here and without quantum physics there wouldn't be LEDs, lasers and computer chips. Sure, there are many other things that weren't proved but it doesn't mean it's impossible. Science will allow that sooner or later.
 
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
473 (0.07/day)
Location
ireland, galway
Processor q6600 G0 @ 2.8Ghz
Motherboard ex38 DS4
Cooling air
Memory 4 *1gig tracer ballistic
Video Card(s) sapphire dual bios 6950
Storage ssd- sandisk 120gb, sata- 2 500gb samsung in raid 1 & 1 samsung 400gb
Display(s) LG w2452tx
Case nzxt
Audio Device(s) na
Power Supply hiper 730
Mouse g9
Keyboard bt microsoft arch
Software win7
Classical physics there is proof of, quantum physics just a theory...


it has been proved correct on every single experiment, probably the most successful theories of modern man and the foundations of modern electronics work on it...
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
235 (0.07/day)
Location
Sol system, ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
System Name The Yellow Box
Processor AMD K5 100
Motherboard Intel 5DVX0130
Cooling A snazzy stock cooler
Memory 64MB EDO SIMM
Video Card(s) ATI Mach 64 4MB + Creative Voodoo 8MB
Storage IBM 1.6GB IDE + IBM 3.2GB IDE
Display(s) 15" AOC CRT (Terrible, terrible POS)
Case Cheapo Yellow Box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster
Power Supply No name 200W
Mouse Microsoft IntelliMouse
Keyboard Cherry G80
Software Windows 98Se
universe was created nearly 14 billion years ago.

Again this BS.

It wasn't created 14 billion years ago, that is just our observational limitation. We can only see the universe 14 billion year from our point of view. The problem is we don’t really know where that point is located, nor how far it really goes.
No different than if you were standing somewhere in the desert, without a map, and saw a mountain range. Then proclaimed you are the centre of the world and the range is how far it goes since you can’t see past it.

It’s stupid really.

But then again:
"Humans do not realize they are only the third most intelligent and are among the most ignorant and technologically backward people in the universe."
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.63/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
That's the article's author's words, not CAPSLOCKSTUCK.

"Created" is a bad word too; more accurately said: the "big bang" occurred 13.8 billion years ago.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
353 (0.09/day)
Processor Core i5-3350P @3.5GHz
Motherboard MSI Z77MA-G45 (uATX)
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) |Ξ \/ G /\ GeForce GTX 670 FTW+ 4GB w/Backplate, Part Number: 04G-P4-3673-KR, ASIC 68.5%
Storage some cheap seagates and one wd green
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case some cheap old eurocase, black, with integrated cheap lit lcd for basic monitoring
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Enermax Triathlor 550W ETA550AWT bronze, non-modular, airflow audible over 300W power draw
Mouse PMSG1G
Keyboard oldschool membrane Keytronic 104 Key PS/2 (big enter, right part of right shift broken into "\" key)
Again this BS.

It wasn't created 14 billion years ago, that is just our observational limitation. We can only see the universe 14 billion year from our point of view. The problem is we don’t really know where that point is located, nor how far it really goes.
No different than if you were standing somewhere in the desert, without a map, and saw a mountain range. Then proclaimed you are the centre of the world and the range is how far it goes since you can’t see past it.

It’s stupid really.

But then again:
"Humans do not realize they are only the third most intelligent and are among the most ignorant and technologically backward people in the universe."
my thinking is that universe never began end will never end. but maybe we can set a date for some specific conditions that enabled the big bang. for all we know we might be part of a monstrous oscilator that bounces outward and inward periodically for eternity.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
179 (0.03/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4,8 GHz
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Alpenfön Brocken 2
Memory 32 GB G.Skill DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU II R290
Storage 1 TB HD + 180 GB SSD + 500 GB SSD
Display(s) Philips BDM4065 39,95" Ultra-HD
Case Antec P280
Audio Device(s) Onboard HD sound on 5.1 system
Power Supply Silverstone SST-ST85F-GS Strider Gold Series - 850 Watt
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Since we don't "know" much at all, all we can say is: the part of our universe we can see is at least around 14 billion years old. One step further and speculation begins. We don't know how big, how old, if our part is "normal" or "exotic" in a larger finite/infinite universe/multiverse/whatever...

What I do know though is that it's early in the morning and I need my coffee.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,424 (0.41/day)
System Name octo1
Processor dual Xeon 2687W ES
Motherboard Supermicro
Cooling dual Noctua NH-D14
Memory generic ECC reg
Video Card(s) 2 HD7950
Storage generic
Case Rosewill Thor
Quantum physics and General Relativity are basically at odds with one another. For GR, space has to continuous and relatively rigid - otherwise we would have already detected gravity waves and we haven't. QM assumes that space, like everything else, is quantized or iow, discontinuous. One of them has to be wrong. And there have been experiments that seem to support the idea that photons of different energies propagate through space at different speeds - a no-no for GR. The same applies to different speeds for neutrinos and photons but these seem to move at different speeds as well.

Decisive help could now be at hand.IceCubeis a neutrino detector buried in a cubic kilometre of Antarctic icethat came fully on stream in 2011. In April 2012, it found two neutrinos that set scientific tongues wagging. Called in a fit of scientific whimsy Bert and Ernie, after two characters from the TV showSesame Street, they were far more energetic than those generated by the sun. For that reason alone,Dan Hooperof Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, thinks it's likely that they come from a gamma-ray burst. "There aren't that many things that can make that amount of energy in a single particle. GRBs top the list," he says. Just recently, IceCube announced the discovery of a further 26 neutrinos whose energies possibly betrayed an extragalactic source.

Amelino-Camelia thinks he has found three more in earlier IceCube data – ones that perfectly fit the idea of quantum space-time effects taking place. They all arrived from the general direction of three independently verified GRBs – but, if they are indeed associated with the bursts, got to Earth thousands of seconds earlier than the gamma rays.

Neutrinos are expected to escape from a collapsing star sooner than the light of a GRB because they don't interact, whereas the visible blast has to fight its way through the collapsing gas before speeding through space. But even taking this into account, Amelino-Camelia maintains that the huge size of the gap between the neutrinos and gamma-ray light is consistent with the different effects of a space-time interaction on them.

http://www.newscientist.com/article...gnals-defy-einstein.html?full=true&print=true
 
Top