• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Black Ops III: 12 GB RAM and GTX 980 Ti Not Enough

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Windows has a lot to do with that, I have 8 GB of RAM and when I am using only 3 GB or 4 GB I keep seeing hard faults which is kind of weird since there is so much RAM available this should not be happening .

Maybe Windows is also guilty for this, a while back I was getting "Close programs to prevent information loss" constantly after leaving Firefox or some other program open for a few hours. I was getting this on Windows 8.1 but it never happened to me on Windows 7, well expect when I formated external USB drive and explorer started eating all the memory because of the memory leak (Thank you Microsucks for not fixing that, idiots).
A hard fault is any time the "page file" is accessed. So you can be idling and Windows will decide to take stuff out of memory to make more room. You can disabled the page file and still get hard faults, the difference is that the hard faults aren't accessing a real drive but, rather essentially a ram disk instead of a real disk.

You don't need to fill system memory in Windows for it to start hard faulting, it just does it a lot more often when you start running out of space. Another reason why I run without a page file.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
75 (0.02/day)
Processor Intel i7 6700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X-Gaming 7
Cooling Nocuta nh-d14
Memory Patriot 16GB
Video Card(s) Gibabyte GeForce GTX 1080Ti
Storage (system) Corsair 120GB Force GT, (games) 500GB 840, (data) Seagate 1TB Barracuda + WD 1TB Black
Display(s) AOC AG271QG
Case NZXT Phantom
Power Supply Corsair ax1200i
Mouse g502
Keyboard G710+
Software Win10
Huh?

On side note, anyone fancy a BF4 Conquest game? I just put this new 60Hz server up on PC:

-=THE EAGLES=- 60Hz |No Limits|Conquest 24/7|4FUN|Free 4 All

Anyone from EU (and surrounding areas) are very welcome to join!

cheers lads! :)
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,457 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
It's awesome! Let's have some uncompressed textures, put them inside the game and be done with it. No wonder the game is more than 50GB....
Ridiculous!!
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,520 (0.73/day)
Location
Perth AU
Processor Intel Core i9 10980XE @ 4.7Ghz 1.2v
Motherboard ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
Cooling EK-Velocity D-RGB, EK-CoolStream PE 360, XSPC TX240 Ultrathin, EK X-RES 140 Revo D5 RGB PWM
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB F4-3000C14D 64GB
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 OC WC
Storage M.2 990 Pro 1TB / 10TB WD RED Helium / 3x 860 2TB Evos
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G7 28"
Case Corsair Obsidian 500D SE Modded
Power Supply Cooler Master V Series 1300W
Software Windows 11
Must be the shitty old engine code there still using they should of just paid unreal %5 and used unreal.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
2,178 (0.54/day)
Location
Deez Nutz, bozo!
System Name Rainbow Puke Machine :D
Processor Intel Core i5-11400 (MCE enabled, PL removed)
Motherboard ASUS STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI mATX
Cooling Corsair H60i RGB PRO XT AIO + HD120 RGB (x3) + SP120 RGB PRO (x3) + Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 2 x 8GB 3200MHz DDR4 C16
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 Twin Fan 6GB GDDR6 (Stock)
Storage Corsair MP600 PRO 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen4 x4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29WK600-W Ultrawide 1080p IPS Monitor (primary display)
Case Corsair iCUE 220T RGB Airflow (White) w/Lighting Node CORE + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (x4).
Audio Device(s) ASUS ROG Supreme FX S1220A w/ Savitech SV3H712 AMP + Sonic Studio 3 suite
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB FPS Gaming (White)
Keyboard Corsair K60 PRO RGB Mechanical w/ Cherry VIOLA Switches
VR HMD Pico 4 128GB AIO VR Headset* (* = in consideration of getting one)
Software Windows 10 Professional x64 (Update 22H2)
@Xzibit will do on my main rig (Rig 1) & also to see if there's any impact on Rig 2. Will run without those anti-aliasing methods to gauge performance impact.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,304 (0.52/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Latest game stresses latest hardware on top-shelf "ultra" benchmark settings. News at 11.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
941 (0.21/day)
Location
South-Africa
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)
Cooling Corsair iCUE H115i Elite Capellix 280mm
Memory 32GB G.Skill DDR4 3600Mhz CL18
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 3070 Ti TUF Gaming OC Edition
Storage Sabrent Rocket 1TB M.2
Display(s) Dell S3220DGF
Case Corsair iCUE 4000X
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D2X
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Platinum
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 - Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K70 MK.2 Low-Profile Rapidfire
Software Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (64-bit)
Well, we better see some killer number crunching graphics cards from nVidia or AMD. It would seem most of the latest game titles are very demanding. I am sure Fallout 4 and Deus-Ex: Mankind Divided will be so too.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,147 (0.78/day)
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s) Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s) onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard same
VR HMD nah
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
You couldn't be more wrong with that statement, Ultra doesn't necessarily means having x8 of MSAA, which is what taxes the most the performance of a game when you setup the "Ultra" preset of a game. I'm pretty sure the sample quality isn't part of a developer goal when targeting the final visual results in a video game, anything above x2 MSAA, heck even above any post-processing Anti Aliasing technique is pretty much a complement for more sharpness in the image.
MSAA didn't exist in 2005. It has nothing to do with an Ultra preset.

Ultra = the most hardware taxing visual display a game can muster, optimization be damned. And a 1000$ machine shouldn't be able to handle it, at least not based on the precedents set by games like doom 3, quake 4, crysis, heavily modded skyrim. etc. You want eye candy? It's going to cost you.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
That's a load of bollocks @yogurt_21 and you know it.

Firstly, MSAA did exist long before 2005. I didn't bother to do that much extensive search, but GeForce 3 back in 2001 had MSAA support. Not to mention the fact that "anti-aliasing" has been used even long before that. I know my GeForce 2MX and GeForce 2 Pro had anti-aliasing which I extensively used even back then. Probably year 2000 or so.

Secondly, providing superior visual fidelity by not using ANY optimizations is just stupendous wasting of resources if you can barely tell the difference in the end or even worse, if you can't tell the difference at all! That's why Far Cry used poly-bumpmapping which gives player the illussion you're using 3 million polygons on a model, but in reality, you're only using 3000. Sure some took it a bit too far which resulted in square-ish heads in stills, but frankly, in-game, you've rarely noticed it even on such far end extremes.

And this isn't the only optimization. Megatextures, texture streaming, LOD, tessellation etc, all this stuff means you can spend resources on things that matter and cleverly obscure those that are less important. It's why we can have wast worlds because engine is cleverly balancing graphic card capabilities for things that matter and things that don't. If you spend all resources on a character you can't even admire properly, you've just wasted resources that could be spent on 500 trees in the distance. Sure there are people who say faking something is not the same, but when faked effect is nearly impossible to be distinguished from the reference one, does it even matter at that point?

Besides, Ultra setting often doesn't mean you're disabling optimizations, it just means you're pushing the settings to start tessellating items sooner and using distance LOD later. Which is logically more demanding...
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
203 (0.06/day)
And why are you comparing these two, exactly?
The game may be ridiculously unoptimized, doesn't mean it has 2007 graphics.
you are right, ut3 actually looks better than bloopers3, all those mushy textures, yuck, i shouldnt have compared it to a 07 game, next time i might do comparison between blondes&blacks3 and ut2003

Sounds to me like an Nvidia based game.....
oh its based alright, higher ram usage than a kite
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,147 (0.78/day)
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s) Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s) onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard same
VR HMD nah
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
That's a load of bollocks @yogurt_21 and you know it.

Firstly, MSAA did exist long before 2005. I didn't bother to do that much extensive search, but GeForce 3 back in 2001 had MSAA support. Not to mention the fact that "anti-aliasing" has been used even long before that. I know my GeForce 2MX and GeForce 2 Pro had anti-aliasing which I extensively used even back then. Probably year 2000 or so.

Secondly, providing superior visual fidelity by not using ANY optimizations is just stupendous wasting of resources if you can barely tell the difference in the end or even worse, if you can't tell the difference at all! That's why Far Cry used poly-bumpmapping which gives player the illussion you're using 3 million polygons on a model, but in reality, you're only using 3000. Sure some took it a bit too far which resulted in square-ish heads in stills, but frankly, in-game, you've rarely noticed it even on such far end extremes.

And this isn't the only optimization. Megatextures, texture streaming, LOD, tessellation etc, all this stuff means you can spend resources on things that matter and cleverly obscure those that are less important. It's why we can have wast worlds because engine is cleverly balancing graphic card capabilities for things that matter and things that don't. If you spend all resources on a character you can't even admire properly, you've just wasted resources that could be spent on 500 trees in the distance. Sure there are people who say faking something is not the same, but when faked effect is nearly impossible to be distinguished from the reference one, does it even matter at that point?

Besides, Ultra setting often doesn't mean you're disabling optimizations, it just means you're pushing the settings to start tessellating items sooner and using distance LOD later. Which is logically more demanding...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/anti-aliasing-nvidia-geforce-amd-radeon,2868.html

Quincunx Anti-Aliasing is not MSAA

its a precursor or rather something NV tried to do to make better aa performance when the hardware couldn't handle it. I do see MSAA as a part of the Open GL 1.5 standard from late 2003 though as well as DirectX 9.0c from August 2004. So you are correct it was around in 2005, but SSAA (games settings just had it as AA) was still the standard then. Either way the ultra setting wasn't just about aa, draw distance/FOV, shadows, hdr, water effects, other animations like arrow trails, bullet effects, and etc.

So thanks for zeroing in on some random points in my post. The point was that Ultra was not as he described locked in with an 8x MSAA boost.

secondly who says it has to look the same? you? are you ranting against yourself? As described above Ultra typically adds a ton of different effects to a game, many of which are quite noticeable. Though ideally the game will still look and play fine with them off for the majority of people.

Some people are just fine adding an area rug and calling it a day. Some people pay millions to interior decorators to make their homes look like a palace or the set of their fav sci-fi show.

Ultra mode is for the latter group.

The rest will do fine on Medium or High or better yet their own custom preset of the effects they care about and none that they don't.

But chewing up 12GB of ram isn't a feat these days and as good as a single 980 ti is, you can still go better (sli, tri-sli, sli titan-z's)
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
But chewing up 12GB of ram isn't a feat these days and as good as a single 980 ti is, you can still go better (sli, tri-sli, sli titan-z's)
Absolutely but, it seems that it is also hungry enough for VRAM where the 4GB versus 6/8GB argument starts becoming more of a thing.
Once we installed 16 GB RAM in the system, the game ran buttery-smooth with our GTX 980 Ti.
So tell me, how does the 390 and 390X behave with it? This article seems to be 100% "omg, nvidia cards can barely run it," which means nothing if not pitted up against the competition. :confused:
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
748 (0.19/day)
Location
Oceania
Blame MS not the developers. Any rig with a 4GB GPU will need 16GB running a DX11 title..... it's the way WDDM works...(or doesn't work lol)

Drivers map system memory into GPU address space, but in W7/8.1 it's a bit broken, as there's no Dynamic Resources or reclaim support
This means the maximum available is mapped to the GPU...usually equvilant to the VRAM on your card.


It was supposed to be fixed in 8.1 but MS postponed it till W10..... no biggie, as Wiz said witth 16GB it's all good... :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.89/day)
Comparison

Beta




Final



 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
Perhaps it's just an oversight/bug and they probably didn't think about 12GB systems and manualy treat as as 16GB ones? As I wrote earlier, the rest is good, any AAA game should use as much resources as it can, it's actually a good thing to fill up the system and the video memory as much as possible.
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
1,301 (0.27/day)
Location
[Formerly] Khartoum, Sudan.
System Name 192.168.1.1~192.168.1.100
Processor AMD Ryzen5 5600G.
Motherboard Gigabyte B550m DS3H.
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth.
Memory 16GB Crucial DDR4.
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1080 OC (Underclocked, underpowered).
Storage Samsung 980 NVME 500GB && Assortment of SSDs.
Display(s) LG 24MK430 primary && Samsung S24D590 secondary
Case Corsair Graphite 780T.
Audio Device(s) On-Board.
Power Supply SeaSonic CORE GM-650.
Mouse Coolermaster MM530.
Keyboard Kingston HyperX Alloy FPS.
VR HMD A pair of OP spectacles.
Software Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
Benchmark Scores Me no know English. What bench mean? Bench like one sit on?
any AAA game should use as much resources as it can, it's actually a good thing to fill up the system and the video memory as much as possible.

Any game should use as much resources as it needs.
Scaling in resource requirements should be downwards to work on less powered machines (by reducing render elements/quality, etc). Scaling upwards should always be capped by what the game can offer. Go higher and it's a case of poor optimization.

Drivers map system memory into GPU address space, but in W7/8.1 it's a bit broken, as there's no Dynamic Resources or reclaim.
This basically means the maximum available is mapped into the GPU adress space...usually equvilant to the VRAM on your card.

I thought this was fixed with Windows 7 (and d3d10/11)
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
748 (0.19/day)
Location
Oceania
Any game should use as much resources as it needs.
Scaling in resource requirements should be downwards to work on less powered machines (by reducing render elements/quality, etc). Scaling upwards should always be capped by what the game can offer. Go higher and it's a case of poor optimization.



I thought this was fixed with Windows 7 (and d3d10/11)
They're talking about DWM and 0 copy between RAM and VRAM. I'm referring to unified addressing where RAM is mapped into GPU space......

but it's not fixed, and never will be in W7... kernel issue..



Here's some info on DX if you want to read ....

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn899121(v=vs.85).aspx
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Location
Memphis TN
System Name Tupac
Processor I7 950 3.7ghz OC
Motherboard Sabertooth x58
Cooling Astek Liquid Cooling Custom Cyberpower
Memory 24g Triple Channel 1800MHz (6x4 i think)
Video Card(s) Geforce GTX 470 SLIx2
Storage 1gb Regular, 120gb Samsung Pro 950
Display(s) 24 Inch
Case Coolermaster HAF-X
Audio Device(s) Internal
Power Supply Coolermaster 1000w 80 Plus Gold Certified
Mouse Regular Wheel with back button mouse
Keyboard Sidewinder 4,6 or 8 (newest) cant remember
Software Anything
Benchmark Scores Been a long time
Crysis came out in 2007 and it was unique in many ways. It's 2015, BLOPS3 is not breaking any grounds, aside from sales.

I do think it looks cool however I also liked it when it was Call of Duty 2 dunno why:p
I thought I read it stutters on the GTX 980ti but that disappears with the Titan X?

Oh I missed that bottom comment about 16gb of ram and the GTX 980ti working fine... Ok so we now have 6 Cards that can run it efficiently on Ultra.


Eh yea, I actually like the Black Ops/WaW games just for the zombies personally as the multiplayer got to boring and pretty easy if you know the right ways to play it (Meaning right guns, positions, etc).
I di too but... Wish
Let's hope Bethesda's Fallout 4 does better

Hope so just pre-ordered :p
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,104 (1.66/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
I do think it looks cool however I also liked it when it was Call of Duty 2 dunno why:p

Probably because COD 2 was better. COD 1, 2 and MW1 were the most fun to me but I haven't given up on the series. I'm way behind though. I've still got half of Black Ops 1 to finish and then on to MW3 later on. I'm in no hurry. Newer COD games aren't a priority for me. I still like to go back and play 1, 2 and 4 every couple of years.

And welcome to TPU fellow Tennesean. :toast:
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
Any game should use as much resources as it needs.
Scaling in resource requirements should be downwards to work on less powered machines (by reducing render elements/quality, etc). Scaling upwards should always be capped by what the game can offer. Go higher and it's a case of poor optimization.
Absolutely not. Windows should cache as much as it could and the game engine should also cache/prefetch/prebake/etc as much as it could on any given system. Loading up stuff from storage vs having it in RAM or VRAM is an easy choice.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
748 (0.19/day)
Location
Oceania
Absolutely not. Windows should cache as much as it could and the game engine should also cache/prefetch/prebake/etc as much as it could on any given system. Loading up stuff from storage vs having it in RAM or VRAM is an easy choice.
Yep for sure.....:)




Execption being Superfetch imo. :p Never did like it lol
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
1,301 (0.27/day)
Location
[Formerly] Khartoum, Sudan.
System Name 192.168.1.1~192.168.1.100
Processor AMD Ryzen5 5600G.
Motherboard Gigabyte B550m DS3H.
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth.
Memory 16GB Crucial DDR4.
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1080 OC (Underclocked, underpowered).
Storage Samsung 980 NVME 500GB && Assortment of SSDs.
Display(s) LG 24MK430 primary && Samsung S24D590 secondary
Case Corsair Graphite 780T.
Audio Device(s) On-Board.
Power Supply SeaSonic CORE GM-650.
Mouse Coolermaster MM530.
Keyboard Kingston HyperX Alloy FPS.
VR HMD A pair of OP spectacles.
Software Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
Benchmark Scores Me no know English. What bench mean? Bench like one sit on?
Absolutely not. Windows should cache as much as it could and the game engine should also cache/prefetch/prebake/etc as much as it could on any given system. Loading up stuff from storage vs having it in RAM or VRAM is an easy choice.

IIRC Windows' been doing similar stuff since XP and Vista (Prefetcher and Superfetch, respectively), and I can't count the times I had to disable the latter because it was screwing up the system.

You are right. Running a game from ram is better, but that still wouldn't justify caching data for segments that won't be needed for minutes/hours to come, or ones that aren't needed any more. What matters is what's being displayed now and what will be in the very near future (for the game), in other words: what the game "needs". Then it's simply a matter of balancing when to cache newer data and when to scrub older ones.



I'll take your word for now. My experience with programming hasn't reached d3d yet >_>
 

Am*

Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
316 (0.07/day)
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz (stock voltage)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz
Storage 6TB of Samsung SSDs + 12TB of HDDs
Display(s) LG C1 48 + LG 38UC99 + Samsung S34E790C + BenQ XL2420T + PHILIPS 231C5TJKFU
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Z SE + Z906 5.1 speakers/DT 990 PRO
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX 650W 80+ Platinum
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CHERRY MX-Board 1.0 Backlit Silent Red Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro (RIP) + Winbloat 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
And this is exactly why I bought a Titan X over the 980 Ti...so I won't be forced to wait for months of patches etc before they fixed memory leaks in case I wanted to play one of these crappy ports (not that I do - COD is the last game I'd consider buying)...
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,909 (2.43/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Phantom
Processor Core i7-8700k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F Black CPU cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2080 Ti Xc
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 4TB WD Black; 1x400GB VelRptr; 1x 4TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
I have to laugh...several people have talked of patches to fix the amount of RAM used....why do you assume there will be patches for that? Why do you assume Activision thinks it is a bug? You use up that much system RAM with a game because it was DESIGNED that way.
 

Am*

Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
316 (0.07/day)
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz (stock voltage)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz
Storage 6TB of Samsung SSDs + 12TB of HDDs
Display(s) LG C1 48 + LG 38UC99 + Samsung S34E790C + BenQ XL2420T + PHILIPS 231C5TJKFU
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Z SE + Z906 5.1 speakers/DT 990 PRO
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX 650W 80+ Platinum
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CHERRY MX-Board 1.0 Backlit Silent Red Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro (RIP) + Winbloat 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
I have to laugh...several people have talked of patches to fix the amount of RAM used....why do you assume there will be patches for that? Why do you assume Activision thinks it is a bug? You use up that much system RAM with a game because it was DESIGNED that way.

1. Because the game looks like crap...
2. Because Batman AK used over 7GB at launch, now uses around 5.5GB max. GTA V online also had memory leak issues, which have been fixed since.
 
Top