- Joined
- Oct 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,361 (0.48/day)
- Location
- Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name | Chachamaru-IV | Retro Battlestation |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | Intel Pentium II 450MHz |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG STRIX X570-F Gaming | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset) |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4 |
Memory | 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000 (16-20-20-38) | 512MB PC133 SDRAM |
Video Card(s) | nVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 FE | 3dfx Voodoo3 3000 |
Storage | 1TB WD_Black SN850 NVME SSD (OS), Toshiba 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam) |
Display(s) | Samsung Odyssey G5 27" @ 1440p144 & Dell P2312H @ 1080p60 |
Case | SilverStone Seta A1 | Beige box |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Sound Blaster AE-7 (Speakers), Creative Zen Hybrid headset | Sound Blaster AWE64 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC |
Mouse | Roccat Kone Air| Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A |
Keyboard | Vortex Race3 | Dell AT102W |
Software | Microsoft Windows 11 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE |
I'm looking at getting a laptop that shipped with a Core Duo CPU, but it capable of taking a Merom core Core2 CPU. Both CPUs have the same core clock speed and FSB speed, however the Core2 is obviously 64-bit and also has double the L2 cache and SSSE3. I've looked at comparisons for both CPUs, and it really seems like there's barely anything between them performance-wise. Even in benchmarks, the Core2 is barely ahead of the Yonah, and Geekbench even rates the Yonah as faster. So I'm honestly kinda confused as to what I should buy. I suppose that given the difference in performance is so small, I should go for the Yonah to ensure maximum compatibility and to avoid any voltage issues. What do you guys think?
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/84...et_M)_vs_Intel_Core_Duo_T2700_(Socket_M).html
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core2-Duo-T7600-vs-Intel-Core-Duo-T2700
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/84...et_M)_vs_Intel_Core_Duo_T2700_(Socket_M).html
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core2-Duo-T7600-vs-Intel-Core-Duo-T2700