- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 20,787 (3.41/day)
System Name | Pioneer |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R9 7950X |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans... |
Memory | 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310 |
Storage | 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs |
Display(s) | 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display |
Case | Thermaltake Core X31 |
Audio Device(s) | TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED |
Power Supply | FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W |
Mouse | Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless |
Keyboard | WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps |
Software | Gentoo Linux x64 |
I agree completely - and at at least 40°C, if not 50°C too.
But that said, it is very rare for the load of any computer to sit at 100% (or any value) for extended periods of time in "real-world" scenarios. Benchmark and stress test programs do, and perhaps some folding type programs, but even while gaming, the load is always varying.
And yes, a primary goal of the hardware industry is greater efficiency and they are making great strides at that. Let the tree huggers rejoice!
The move is towards SSDs which are more efficient than HDs. DDR4 is more efficient than DDR3. CPUs are more efficient too. Not too sure about graphics cards, however - simply because they tend to be so much more powerful these days. Pound for pound, they may be more efficient. But a 1000lb efficient gorilla still eats more bananas than a 500lb inefficient gorilla.
Fermi still holds some world class power consumption records. It's generally been dropping in tdp since.
Radeon HD29XX was pretty bad too.
Last edited: