• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Kaby Lake Desktop Processors Specifications Detailed In Official Documents

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.34/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
News and specifications about Intel's upcoming Kaby Lake-based desktop CPUs are thin, but a recent leak has made it possible to discern at least some details, due to an Intel product change notification (PCN) document.

A PCN is a document issued by a manufacturer to inform customers about a change to a mass-produced product or its manufacturing process. In this PCN, Intel details a new factory in Vietnam which will work in order to "ensure a continuous supply of the Select Intel Xeon Processor E3-1205, Intel Core i5-7400 Processor, Intel Core i5-7400T Processor, Intel Core i5-7500 Processor, Intel Core i5-7500T Processor, Intel Core i5-7600 Processor, Intel Core i5-7600K Processor, Intel Core i5-7600T Processor, Intel Core i7-7700 Processor, Intel Core i7-7700T Processor and Intel Core i7-7700K Processor products".





According to the document, Intel is readying a first release wave of at least 11 quad-core processors. The chips keep the usual Intel nomenclature of cores and Hyper-Threading scaling from i3 (2 cores, 4 threads) through i5 (4 cores, 4 threads) and i7 (4 cores, eight threads) models. As has been the case in the past, Intel will have available high-performance K variants (i.e., with an unlocked multiplier and 95W TDP), T variants (low-power, 35 W TDP) and standard, 65 W versions of their Kaby Lake processors. THE PCN also "details" what looks like a Xeon part, E3-1205v6, though not much about it is known at this time, with the exception of its 3.0 GHz frequency.



Of these 11 processors, three will be Core i7 models, filling TDP levels of 95, 65 and 35 W (i7-7700K, with base frequency of 4.2 GHz and 95 W TDP; i7-7700, with reduced clockspeed of 3.6 GHz and 65 W TDP, and a a low-power, 2.9 GHz i7-7700T). Another seven CPUs will fit in the i5 bracket (from the top-of-the-line i5-7600K, an unlocked-multiplier CPU operating at 3.8 GHz and 95W TDP through to the lowest-performing processor, the 35 W, 2.4 GHz i5-7400T.

Architecture-wise, not much of a difference is expected between the upcoming Kaby Lake family of processors compared to their Skylake predecessors, barring some eventual refinements here and there (if you choose to count Intel's Speed Shift v2 technology here, feel free to do so). The same is true for their manufacturing process, with Intel's 14nm+ basically enabling a bump in frequencies for all Kaby Lake processors' stock clocks when compared to their Skylake predecessors ranging between a moderate 300 Mhz (i5-7600K against the i5-6600K, for instance) and a measly 100 MHz increase (i7-7700T against its 17-6700T counterpart).



It's likely that most performance improvements with Kaby Lake will stem from their increased frequency, as well as the ability to more quickly change between frequency states, but to how much of an improvement that will bring remains to be seen. It may be that the refined 14nm+ manufacturing process that Intel is leveraging here will allow for increased overclocking potential - and then again, those eventual gains may already be reflected in the base frequency bump Intel has applied to the Kaby Lake family.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
660 (0.14/day)
System Name Tiger1-Workstation
Processor Intel XEON E3-1275V2 / E3-1230V3
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 / AsRock H87 Performance
Cooling Corsair H80i Watercooling
Memory 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2400
Video Card(s) Inno3D GTX 780 Ti
Storage 2TB SSD(4X OCZ vertex 4 256GB LSI RAID0 + Crucial M550 1TB)
Display(s) 2x Dell U3011 30" IPS
Case Silverstone Raven 03
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX--> Xonar Essence One --> SPL Auditor -->Hivi X6
Power Supply Corsair AX860i Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 Enterprise
Intel may start innovating again when there is actually a competitor to innovate against.
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,945 (2.60/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
Was going to replace my shittyh clocking 4770k with a 7700k in February, but after reading that Coffee Lake could bring 6 cores to the mainstream platform I might wait out for that. After all i just got this z97 Gaming 5 board and I really like it.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,398 (0.97/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Zen Zen Zen ohmmmmm
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.86/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
I hope Zen is at least half decent, I'd love to grab a new Intel setup at a lower price.
 

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.34/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Intel may start innovating again when there is actually a competitor to innovate against.


True to that. Here's hoping Zen will be the kickstart Intel needs.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
1,064 (0.18/day)
Location
Montreal
System Name Aryzen / Sairikiki / Tesseract
Processor 5800x / i7 920@3.73 / 5800x
Motherboard Steel Legend B450M / GB EX58-UDP4 / Steel Legend B550M
Cooling Mugen 5 / Pure Rock / Glacier One 240
Memory Corsair Something 16 / Corsair Something 12 / G.Skill 32
Video Card(s) AMD 6800XT / AMD 6750XT / Sapphire 7800XT
Storage Way too many drives...
Display(s) LG 332GP850-B / Sony w800b / Sony X90J
Case EVOLV X / Carbide 540 / Carbide 280x
Audio Device(s) SB ZxR + GSP 500 / board / Denon X1700h + ELAC Uni-Fi 2 + Senn 6XX
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME GX-750 / Corsair HX750 / Seasonic Focus PX-650
Mouse G700 / none / G602
Keyboard G910
Software w11 64
Benchmark Scores I don't play benchmarks...
I hope Zen is at least half decent, I'd love to grab a new Intel setup at a lower price.

Or maybe if Zen is good you can just grab that and support the underdog.
 
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
660 (0.14/day)
System Name Tiger1-Workstation
Processor Intel XEON E3-1275V2 / E3-1230V3
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 / AsRock H87 Performance
Cooling Corsair H80i Watercooling
Memory 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2400
Video Card(s) Inno3D GTX 780 Ti
Storage 2TB SSD(4X OCZ vertex 4 256GB LSI RAID0 + Crucial M550 1TB)
Display(s) 2x Dell U3011 30" IPS
Case Silverstone Raven 03
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX--> Xonar Essence One --> SPL Auditor -->Hivi X6
Power Supply Corsair AX860i Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 Enterprise
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,385 (1.08/day)
Or maybe if Zen is good you can just grab that and support the underdog.

You're not buying a 20$ T-shirt that says "support the underdog". This might result in a decision to throw hundreds of dollars away towards a potentially inferior product.

Might as well ask "might jump under the bus for the rest of us?". May the better, more boring and obvious option win those who want it.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Nobody wants to settle for second best =)

I'm sure as shit not paying 1st place prizes. Haswell is junk. It was a waste of money even though I got 450 dollars of BS for 300 (cpu/MB combo).

Wallet is waiting for Zen and Vega to drop.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,398 (0.97/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
You're not buying a 20$ T-shirt that says "support the underdog". This might result in a decision to throw hundreds of dollars away towards a potentially inferior product.

Might as well ask "might jump under the bus for the rest of us?". May the better, more boring and obvious option win those who want it.

Potentially inferior as in 199 fps vs 210 fps or 5 seconds for something to be done instead of 4.5 seconds.
It all does not matter that much in the real world so your analogy is way off.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,323 (0.52/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
I just want to buy an A12-9800 that launched 2 months ago, without buying that pre-built HP oem box from Costco.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
63 (0.02/day)
Location
South Carolina, US
System Name Dragons Breath
Processor Intel i7-3770K OCd to 5ghz Not Delidded
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth Z77
Cooling CPU TEC Chilled Water Cooling, GPU Radiator Cooled
Memory G.Skill Trident 1600mhz 8G 2 x 4G
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 w EK Copper/Acetal Water Block
Storage Samsung 1T SSD, WD HDD 7200rpm 2T Backup
Display(s) 46" Toshiba HDTV 1080P
Case Antec 900/2 main machine, Azza 1000 cooling
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster z
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X, and 1000w Silverstone TEC Cooling
Mouse Microsoft Trackball Explorer
Keyboard Logitech Illuminated wired
Software Win7 Pro 64bit
Seeing as how my 3770K @ 5ghz is still holding it's on in the quad core field, I see no reason as yet to upgrade from it, maybe soon, hopefully?

But the performance gains need to be much further than Haswell or Skylake are for investing in an entire build just to upgrade the CPU.

Since AMD is no competition Intel is satisfied in taking these CPU tick, tock, baby steps, it would be nice to see AMD throw a wrench in Intel gears once more like happened in the past and wake them out of their complacency.

Unfortunately for us history may never repeat itself with AMD waking up Intel.

Reminiscing over the AMD FX57, FX60 days.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,467 (1.40/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
I think the Core architecture is dried out already. Time for intel to bring something new to the table.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,901 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Intel may start innovating again when there is actually a competitor to innovate against.
Ever since Sandy Bridge, the socket 115x platform has been stagnant. Granted, it have a real world IPC improvement of ~6-15%*, so for anyone owning a ~3.5 GHz quad core of Sandy Bridge or later have no reason to upgrade, as long as their current hardware is working. The only real reason to upgrade is if you need more cores, and then the E-platform is your only option.

*) Intel is claiming ~10% IPC improvement for each iteration, but that figure includes new special features such as AES acceleration, AVX, etc. which is only used in specific applications. I'm instead using "real world IPC", talking about improvements which can help all applications.

But bringing it back to your point; there have been no competition at all for five years, so hopefully Zen will help a little bit. I don't expect Zen to be better in most cases, but I do like the direction of some of the features which could make it better for superscalar workloads.

It appears to me like it will have 6 execution ports, 4 ALU + 2 FPU, and a larger L2 cache. For comparison, SB and newer have 3 execution ports capable of ALU or FPU*. I still expect Intel to have a better prefetcher, and perhaps a better memory controller or core IO. (*With 3 execution ports, SB is still capable of up to 8 floating point operations per cycle, combining add, mul, shuf)

These are assumptions, but unfortunately it seems like most workloads will not favor Zen at this point. But at least this time AMD made a good design choice, unilke Bulldozer. I would expect that Intel will make their next architecture more of a superscalar as well, since it's practically the only way to scale IPC going forward. And they really should, because adding more ALUs is really cheap, I would put 8 of them in a core to push developers to write better code. The prefetchers have so big instruction windows now that they can probably feed more execution ports.

Have you ever wondered why modern CPU performance doesn't seem to scale at all? If you remember the 80s and 90s, the CPUs back then were able to achieve impressive stuff thanks to efficient software. But throughout the 90s developers got used to "scale with MHz", assuming that the performance will continue to double every two years or so, so there were no point in spending time optimizing code. The truth is that ever since Netburst hit the clock frequency wall, all major improvements have been in the direction of superscalar processors, yet almost all software is more bloated than ever. More and more advanced prefetchers help mitigate a little bit, but they can only do so much.

Most software today (with the exception of a few optimized libraries, etc.) are written so inefficient that probably less than 5% of the clock cycles is spent doing any real work. This happens because developers design abstract data models without thinking about the hardware nor the actual problem they are going to solve, so they end up with super-bloated abstracted code. Most design patterns doesn't take into account that modern CPUs are superscalars at all. The end result is code where >80% of CPU cycles is spent on branch mispredictions and cache misses. The remainder is mostly OO overhead and similar.
 

jrau

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
First time post ...

Is it a valid assumption that Intel is "holding back" on CPU development? The general assumption is that because there isn't an alternative choice for x86 CPUs at the high performance end of the product line Intel isn't "trying".

AMD went back to the beginning with what some say is one of the best CPU designers in the business. If they get to 80% of Intel's top performance does that mean Intel really is trying hard and maybe CPUs don't get way faster each generation forever.

On a more personal level ... I work in Excel all day long. A few years ago I built a PC that was faster than my work PC. That led to a faster work PC. While the improvement was immediate and huge I have learned that if I write a better macro (VBA code) I get bigger performance gains that what a new PC delivered.

It might not be possible for Intel to deliver a CPU that can overcome poorly written code ...
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,478 (0.84/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
First time post ...

Is it a valid assumption that Intel is "holding back" on CPU development? The general assumption is that because there isn't an alternative choice for x86 CPUs at the high performance end of the product line Intel isn't "trying".

AMD went back to the beginning with what some say is one of the best CPU designers in the business. If they get to 80% of Intel's top performance does that mean Intel really is trying hard and maybe CPUs don't get way faster each generation forever.

On a more personal level ... I work in Excel all day long. A few years ago I built a PC that was faster than my work PC. That led to a faster work PC. While the improvement was immediate and huge I have learned that if I write a better macro (VBA code) I get bigger performance gains that what a new PC delivered.

It might not be possible for Intel to deliver a CPU that can overcome poorly written code ...
Far mroe likely that intel is not throwing tons of money into upping IPC anymore. the low hanging fruit was plucked years ago, and with 0 competition from AMD, intel has no reason to throw hundreds of millions into getting another 10% out of their current arch. Their efforts in low power and iGPU performance is paying off far more then any IPC gain.

The only reason intel would go back to IPC gains is if AMD delivers a chip that matches a skylake chip in IPC.
I hope Zen is at least half decent, I'd love to grab a new Intel setup at a lower price.
This mindset is what leads to intel controlling the market, because nobody buys AMD. Same issue in the GPU market. If zen is close to skylake performance, why would anybody pay intel's ludicrous prices?
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Intel may start innovating again when there is actually a competitor to innovate against.
Haha. You mean innovate in a way that you care about. Intel has done a lot in areas where gaming isn't a factor. CPUs like the Xeon D-1541 is pretty crazy considering it's an 8c/16t SoC with a 45-watt TDP. That's something I would love to have in my gateway/nas/vm host server.
 

jrau

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
Haha. You mean innovate in a way that you care about. Intel has done a lot in areas where gaming isn't a factor. CPUs like the Xeon D-1541 is pretty crazy considering it's an 8c/16t SoC with a 45-watt TDP. That's something I would love to have in my gateway/nas/vm host server.

Isn't there a lot of testing showing that a high-end CPU does not really affect gaming frame rates? So if Intel released Kaby Lake and reviews showed it was 100% faster than Skylake would it make a difference playing games?

For me the game I play most is Excel ... a 100% IPC improvement would surely improve my enjoyment!
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
857 (0.19/day)
Location
Oregon
System Name Red 101
Processor 9th Gen Intel Core i9-9900k
Motherboard EVGA Z370 Classified
Cooling Custom Primochill and Heatkiller water cooling loop
Memory 16GB of Gskill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 with Heatkiller block @2114Mhz
Storage 4- Samsung Evo 250GB, 1- Pro 512GB and 1-512GB M.2
Display(s) LG 38" UW
Case In Win 101 customized a lot and painted red
Audio Device(s) Razer Kraken 7.1 Chroma
Power Supply EVGA 850w G2
Mouse Razer DeathAdderv2
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Win10Pro and games
Benchmark Scores NA
just back here waiting tell more than 4 cores on a chip
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.86/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
This mindset is what leads to intel controlling the market, because nobody buys AMD. Same issue in the GPU market. If zen is close to skylake performance, why would anybody pay intel's ludicrous prices?

Nah, there are people here that are already sold on Zen and Vega before they have even seen a single benchmark.

I am supporting the underdog.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Isn't there a lot of testing showing that a high-end CPU does not really affect gaming frame rates? So if Intel released Kaby Lake and reviews showed it was 100% faster than Skylake would it make a difference playing games?

For me the game I play most is Excel ... a 100% IPC improvement would surely improve my enjoyment!
I'm a software engineer and when I'm given more cores, I'll do my best to take advantage of them but, that really depends on the workload. I've been working on a software integration service at work that has half-decent throughput because everything heavy is processed asynchronously and I've seen the latest version easily consume 4 full cores when running full tilt but, depending on what the bottleneck (in the software,) is, it may or may not fully utilize all the system's resources.

For me, more cores mean fewer servers to do the same task (which, on the cloud, means less money to run it,) so, I have a very different perspective on cores than most people do. I only game occasionally now to be honest. I spend more time doing professional development in my free time than I do playing games.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,323 (0.52/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Top