• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Does a SSD give gaming performance (fps) boost over HDD?

Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
831 (0.30/day)
System Name Gaming Desktop
Processor i7 6700k
Motherboard asus rog alpha
Cooling H110i
Memory Corsair Dominator 16gb DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Storage EVO 840 500gb, EVO 850 500gb, Perc 710 Raid WD RED 4tbx4
Case Corsair 500r
Power Supply Antec 850
Mouse Logitec G502
Keyboard a cheap dell
the heaven benchmark makes sense to me since it counts min and average fps. and the scene shifts are counted towards fps.

I've moved my steam games back and forth between 512gb evo 850 and my raid 5 (4x4tb wd reds) and other than load time there is no perceivable difference in gaming.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,325 (1.50/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 16GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Hmm honestly I have never seen FPS increase when using SSD drive. I got a SSD into my PS3 and haven't noticed any fps boost. Although its a console so I'm stuck at 30 anyway but the load time is way faster.
With that texture streaming. I noticed that GTAV eats a bit of vram and I can't go with all the opts set to full since of my GTCX 780 ti 3gb limitation. crossing that margin of vram game goes nuts and textures are not there sometimes. Wonder if I could go with that texture stream feature and play with all the opts full and still see smooth and all texture in place while playing? Not sure if GTAV has that option in the game.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
1,025 (0.37/day)
Location
Croatistan
System Name 1.21 gigawatts!
Processor Intel Core i7 6700K
Motherboard MSI Z170A Krait Gaming 3X
Cooling Be Quiet! Shadow Rock Slim with Arctic MX-4
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 MHz
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 1080 Game Rock
Storage Mushkin Triactor 240GB + Toshiba X300 4TB + Team L3 EVO 480GB
Display(s) Philips 237E7QDSB/00 23" FHD AH-IPS
Case Aerocool Aero-1000 white + 4 Arctic F12 PWM Rev.2 fans
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio Boost 3 with Nahimic Audio Enhancer
Power Supply FSP Hydro G 650W
Mouse Cougar 700M eSports white
Keyboard E-Blue Cobra II
Software Windows 8.1 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15: 948 (stock) / 1044 (4,7 GHz) FarCry 5 1080p Ultra: min 100, avg 116, max 133 FPS
The only thing I noticed is reduced loading time in games. However, the differences (game loading times) between common 2.5" SSD and fast 3.5" HDD like Toshiba X300 are not so big.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
3,842 (0.61/day)
Location
Maryland
System Name HAL
Processor Core i9 13900k @5.8-6.1
Motherboard Z790 Arous master
Cooling EKWB Quantum Velocity V2 & (2) 360 Corsair XR7 Rads push/pull
Memory 2x 32GB (64GB) Gskill trident 6000 CL30 @28 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 Gigagbyte gaming OC @ +200/1300
Storage (M2's) 2x Samsung 980 pro 2TB, 1xWD Black 2TB, 1x SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Display(s) 65" LG OLED 120HZ
Case Lian Li dyanmic Evo11 with distro plate
Power Supply Thermaltake 1350
Software Microsoft Windows 11 x64
Load times are improved, not much if any fps gains though. Still it's a big difference, even in the general performance of the pc.. I highly recommend them.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.70/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
Perhaps we should split off NVMe SSDs into their own camp as the protocol is a good deal more efficient. Now, gains on the desktop are generally not going to amount to much but perhaps we could see something in tailored tests such as the games with streaming textures mentioned earlier.
 

Gettoxp

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
I have resently upgraded from 5600rmp hdd to an ssd and with the hdd I tested 3d mark time spy and got around 20-30 fps with my ssd I get 53-78 fps I must say that the hdd was about to die and was a really slow model from 2002. The physx score is still the same about 12 fps but loading time reduced from half n hour to a couple of seconds. Firestrike had a minimum fps of 18 but that increased as well to 48 fps the average fps here is the same loading time again is much faster. I think that the upgrade to an ssd will only increase fps if textures on the storage must be read or written. Then read and write speeds of the disk will benefit the fps in games.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
278 (0.06/day)
System Name MSI GT72S 6QE
Processor Core i7 6820HK
Motherboard Intel Sunrise Point CM236
Cooling 2 fans
Memory 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-RAM (2133 MHz)
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M - 8192 MB
Storage 1 ssd 3 hard drives
Display(s) 17.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, Full HD
Case ??!!!
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC899
Power Supply most beautiful brick you have ever seen
SSD only good for loading time on game,else is 0

Not really. On my laptop I had stuttering in cs go before I installed it to the ssd. So while it might not increase frame rate it does in my experience make for smoother gameplay in some titles.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.02/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT

Gettoxp

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
In my case it's definitely the read and write speed between texture transfer on the disk. Te minimum fps will go up because of the required time to read and write the textures on the disk. This will mean less stutter.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
12,280 (2.36/day)
Location
Oregon
System Name Juliette // HTPC
Processor Intel i7 9700K // AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Motherboard ASUS Prime Z390X-A // ASRock B550 ITX-AC
Cooling Noctua NH-U12 Black // Stock
Memory Corsair DDR4 3600 32gb //G.SKILL Trident Z Royal Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 3600
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX4070 OC// GTX 1650
Storage Samsung 970 EVO NVMe 1Tb, Intel 665p Series M.2 2280 1TB // Samsung 1Tb SSD
Display(s) ASUS VP348QGL 34" Quad HD 3440 x 1440 // 55" LG 4K SK8000 Series
Case Seasonic SYNCRO Q7// Silverstone Granada GD05
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 // HDMI to Samsung HW-R650 sound bar
Power Supply Seasonic SYNCRO 750 W // CORSAIR Vengeance 650M
Mouse Cooler Master MM710 53G
Keyboard Logitech 920-009300 G512 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro // Windows 10 Pro
It could also be paging textures if you're low on ram. SSD would be way faster
 

Punx223

Not so new member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
83 (0.04/day)
Location
somewhere around -195C
System Name Whatever im running atm
Processor Ryzen 9 5950X, i9 10900K, i9 10980XE, i9 12900K
Motherboard X570 Godlike, Maximus XII Extreme, Maximus XIII Extreme, Rampage VI APEX , Z690-TBD
Cooling Custom Liquid cooling
Memory too much
Video Card(s) RTX 3090, TITAN RTX, TITAN V, TITAN Xp, 2080 Ti, 5700XT, Radeon VII
Storage 1.5TB 905P AIC, 1.2TB 750 AIC, 2TB Sabrent Rocket M.2, 2TB 970 PRO, 1TB 960 PRO
Display(s) Main: ASUS XG438Q, Asus PG27UQ, Ancillary array: Acer EB321HQU
Case Lian Li PC011D XL, be quiet! Silent Base 802, Dimastech Easy XL, Praxis Wetbench, Streacom BC1
Audio Device(s) Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless, some PC speakers, onboard codec, (For now)
Power Supply be quiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500W, Corsair AX1600i, Enermax Platimax 1050W, ASUS THOR 1200W
Mouse Logi G502, Logi G903
Keyboard Das Prime 13
VR HMD Vive Pro
Software Indeed
Benchmark Scores Lots of them: https://hwbot.org/user/punx223/
Has anyone taken a look at this masterpiece? how is it going form a regular TITAN Xp to a TITAN Xp CE (Star wars card) you get massive performance gains?

the standard TITAN Xp and CE version are same memory/speed/GPU and Clock speed.... I must assume at this point that numbers are being made up or something is seriously wrong with Anthony's test bench.

https://www.tweaktown.com/articles/8511/final-fantasy-xv-windows-edition-benchmarks-far/index3.html

This is on top of the fact that he has made public posts bashing PUBG as not able to get playable framerates even on low graphics on his test system and a TTIAN Xp which I personally run and run fin at high settings... dont get me wrong, The game is horribly optimized but not that horrible... I feel like he's too caught up on writing as many click baity articles that the attention to detail is gone...

This is purely my opinion.
 
Top