• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD's Ryzen 7 1700X Glorious Benchmarks Leak; IHS, Pin Layout Photographed

Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.24/day)
I disagree to a point. Most games now are built with a focus on 4 cores as a minimum and scaling up to 6 cores. So far any more than that has yielded little to no return in most AAA titles; however this also has slowly been changing and will continue to do so with a lot of titles like Ashes of the Signularity and City Skylines pushing for as many threads as you will give them.

Setting that aside, that we can't expect AMD to jump from as far behind as they were to first place in one revision. They seemed to have achieved their 40% IPC target and that put them right around the 4770K and 6900K in single threaded performance. That is damn impressive. I am sure they have Ryzen+ design already in the works for further refinement. Is it the best for gaming? No. Well what if we consider that price thou!

And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,648 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
Cinebench numbers are great. Especially if MT test is at 3.5GHz getting equal to 6900K for a third of its price and lower power consumption on a less optimised procedure! Epic product from AMD and now it's clear why they turned the Zen name to Ryzen... ;)
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.13/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.
Where is AMD's IPC slower than intels on any of the supposed leaked benchmarks? your talking shit and making it up as you go along by my reckoning.... you do realise of all the leaked benchmarks, the Ryzen chips have been run at stock/boost clocks which are a good 400-500mhz slower than intels
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.24/day)
You should read everything on the source link. Maybe you could avoid being silly.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
738 (0.11/day)
Location
Austin, TX
System Name WAZAAM!
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X370 Pro Gaming
Cooling Kraken x62
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB SC
Storage Micron 9200 Max
Display(s) Samsung 49" 5120x1440 120hz
Case Corsair 600D
Audio Device(s) Onboard - Bose Companion 2 Speakers
Power Supply CORSAIR Professional Series HX850
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
I get 3347 in Cinebench on my work system. (2133 mem). That 1500 looks pretty good.

upload_2017-2-21_16-46-58.png
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
738 (0.11/day)
Location
Austin, TX
System Name WAZAAM!
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X370 Pro Gaming
Cooling Kraken x62
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB SC
Storage Micron 9200 Max
Display(s) Samsung 49" 5120x1440 120hz
Case Corsair 600D
Audio Device(s) Onboard - Bose Companion 2 Speakers
Power Supply CORSAIR Professional Series HX850
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
IPC is the most important thing in games

Not really. You want IPC * Clock for single threads. If AMD's turbo/XFR works better than Intel's version then the single threaded performance can be better.

So it's very much a 'wait and see'.
 

psycore

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Nope, Multi thread is what you need actually from now on, witcher 3 gta v watch dogs 2 etc, and let's say older games that interesting me to, needs better single thread performance ok look if you have time many videos in you tube comparison between
5960x vs 6700k.the 6700k has far better single thread performance isn't? in all games i was checked there is absolutely no one game older or new between those cpus 6700k and 5960x and say that the one performs better than the other,not only that and if you carefully look the benchmarks you'll see that the 5960x has better minimum frames and that is the most important in pc gaming.Anyway if you think that the new cpus like R7 1700x will have the same performance like i7 4770k or 4790k then you are completely wrong.In games like gta v witcher 3 watch dogs 2 battlefield1 the R7 1700X will be far far ahead.But let's wait and see real time results.Don't worry these new chips will be great for everything.4 cores will be useless from now on,very soon
 

psycore

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.
 

psycore

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Wrong with R7 you will have the same performance in gaming plus far better performance in other works' Let's wait some real time benchmarks in gaming
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
158 (0.06/day)
Processor 5950X
Motherboard Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory Crucial Ballistix 3600MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080 Vision
Storage 980 Pro 500GB, 970 Evo Plus 500GB, Crucial MX500 2TB, Crucial MX500 2TB, Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34WQC
Case Cooler Master C700M
Audio Device(s) Bose
Power Supply AX850
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard MSI GK80
Software W10 Pro
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z Single-Thread: 688 Multi-Thread: 11940
When I read the review of the RX480, and it said: Power consumption was 40w for Blue Ray playback, I stopped reading...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.13/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
Lot of new members talking shit and coming across as butthurt on ALL Ryzen threads, think they anticipate the onslaught that's coming, happy days :D
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,304 (0.52/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
When I read the review of the RX480, and it said: Power consumption was 40w for Blue Ray playback, I stopped reading...

wccftech posters have arrived!
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,601 (0.79/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
809 (0.13/day)
Location
Tampa FL
Processor AMD Ryzen 3800x
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X-570-Plus (WiFi)
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H110i
Memory 32 GB Corsair Dominator RGB DDR4 3200 Mhz @3600
Video Card(s) Asus AREZ RX Vega 64 Strix OC 8GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1 TB
Display(s) Asus PB258Q 25" 2560x1440
Case Cooler Master Master Case 5 Pro
Power Supply Corsair RMx 1000
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
There's something I'd like to point out.

Everyone is so intent on comparing these results with Intel CPUs and saying "still not enough IPC"

But has anyone really compared just how much of an improvement the 1700X is over the previous generation FX CPUs

I own an FX-8320 that scores 88 and 564 for single and multi-thread with the cpu locked @3.5 Ghz compared to the 1700X's 154 and 1537 at the same 3.5 Ghz.

That's a 75% and 172.5% improvement over the Vishera (Piledriver) at the same clock speeds.

Even when compared to my overclocked results @4.7 Ghz of 112 and 701 it still is 37.5% and 119.25% faster than an 8320 with a 34% faster clock.

To me that's impressive, especially if the Ryzen X series overclock nearly as well as the FX's do.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
64 (0.02/day)
Location
Omaha
System Name Betty
Processor i7-5930K @ 4.5ghz
Motherboard ASUS X99 PRO. USB 3.1
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX AIO
Memory 16GB Corsair LPX 2666MHZ DDR4
Video Card(s) Zotac AMPED EXTREME GTX 980TI X2
Storage Intel 250GB SSD/KINGSTON 500GB SSD
Case Corsair 760T
Power Supply Corsair HX1200i
Software Windows 10
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
576 (0.10/day)
System Name Epsilon
Processor A12-9800E 35watts
Motherboard MSI Grenade AM4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB DDR4 2400 Kingston Hyper X
Video Card(s) Radeon R7 (IGP / APU)
Storage Samsung Spinpoint F1
Display(s) AOC 29" Ultra wide
Case Generic
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 380w
Software Windows 10
I own an FX-8320 that scores 88 and 564 for single and multi-thread with the cpu locked @3.5 Ghz compared to the 1700X's 154 and 1537 at the same 3.5 Ghz.

That's a 75% and 172.5% improvement over the Vishera (Piledriver) at the same clock speeds.

Nah, when a CPU design was sooo bad, it's easy to vastly improve it.

I also own an FX 8320 and its far from being the disaster everyone think it is.
The problem with the FX line is that is old, and there was no new architecture from AMD in the high end until now.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.89/day)
And then I can just put an i7 7700k at 4,8ghz, wich is easy on those chips, and I have 4 cores + 4 logical ones, more than enough for any game for 144hz, while AMD will be slower on games that use only 2 to 4 threads because of lower IPC.

IPC is the most important thing in games, just because Battlefield 1 and GTA V or some really bad Watch Dogs Ubicrap port use threads, doesn´t mean every game do it. Most of them don´t use a lot of threads but they are IPC hungry. That´s why each 200mhz overclock on your chip gives huge increase on FPS.

Close enough tho for AMD, gaming wise. And a win win on multi thread operations (editing/creating/enterprise/professional). As I´m a gamer I will stick to Intel.

You still be paying 40% more (rumor price) for a 10% IPC difference (ES test) at most
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.24/day)
Nope, Multi thread is what you need actually from now on, witcher 3 gta v watch dogs 2 etc, and let's say older games that interesting me to, needs better single thread performance ok look if you have time many videos in you tube comparison between
5960x vs 6700k.the 6700k has far better single thread performance isn't? in all games i was checked there is absolutely no one game older or new between those cpus 6700k and 5960x and say that the one performs better than the other,not only that and if you carefully look the benchmarks you'll see that the 5960x has better minimum frames and that is the most important in pc gaming.Anyway if you think that the new cpus like R7 1700x will have the same performance like i7 4770k or 4790k then you are completely wrong.In games like gta v witcher 3 watch dogs 2 battlefield1 the R7 1700X will be far far ahead.But let's wait and see real time results.Don't worry these new chips will be great for everything.4 cores will be useless from now on,very soon

I´m sorry but all I see in benchmarks is 7700k stinking on any Intel 6-core, like it stinks on Ryzen (if these benchmarks are true).

Don´t forget also the massive Ram speeds you can get with kabylake wich give huge performance boost. Curious to see if AMD can reach 4000mhz on the ram and 4,8ghz on the cpu clock that easy...
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,680 (4.29/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard Asrock X399M
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill 3600
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller
Keyboard Keychron K8
Software W10P
Now I'm starting to get excited these are the actual benchmarks I was wanting to see. Here is to hoping it is true and amd pulled something good out.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
I´m sorry but all I see in benchmarks is 7700k stinking on any Intel 6-core, like it stinks on Ryzen (if these benchmarks are true).

Don´t forget also the massive Ram speeds you can get with kabylake wich give huge performance boost. Curious to see if AMD can reach 4000mhz on the ram and 4,8ghz on the cpu clock that easy...
Oh shut it, you sound like a used car salesman.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
3,505 (0.64/day)
I think I will be looking at server part instead. I've been thinking of going dual CPU setup for a while now. Hopefully, AMD gets server parts affordable.
 
Top