3Dmark Time Spy - Post your scores!

[EarthDog]

This is gonna get interesting when all these zen cpus come online.

it won't change things too much.. cores matter here, but only a couple hundred points.

(Going from 4c8t to 8c16t...even less so from 6c12t to 8c16t)

 

[thesmokingman]

it won't change things too much.. cores matter here, but only a couple hundred points.

(Going from 4c8t to 8c16t...even less so from 6c12t to 8c16t)

This is the multicore hero bench. If you want to be on the HoF, you need moar cores.

 

[EarthDog]

Just tested it to confirm. I lost about 500 points (7000 to 6500) going from a 6950x @ 4.2 GHz to a 7700K at 5Ghz with the same clocks on the GPU. Mind you, thats a 10c/20t CPU down to a 4c/8t CPU. If someone jumps up from a comparable 8t CPU (4790K/6700K) to the 16t Ryzen around 4.3Ghz.. I would imagine around a couple (2)hundred points.

 

[thesmokingman]

Just tested it to confirm. I lost about 500 points (7000 to 6500) going from a 6950x @ 4.2 GHz to a 7700K at 5Ghz with the same clocks on the GPU. Mind you, thats a 10c/20t CPU down to a 4c/8t CPU. If someone jumps up from a comparable 8t CPU (4790K/6700K) to the 16t Ryzen around 4.3Ghz.. I would imagine around a couple (2)hundred points.

I would guess that a lot of ppl who don't or wont buy a $1.6K cpu, could make waves with a 1700 or similar on the cpu side of the bench. Futuremark really emphasizes cores when they are weighting the physics scores especially in firestrike. There's no way in hell for a 4c/8t part to can hit or even dream of 24K physics, even though the physics score has no real bearing on gpu score. Know what I mean? In some ways at least to me, they have some agreement to blow up physics numbers if core # <=8 then multiply factor 10, or some shiznits like that.

For ex. there's no way my 4.8ghz skylake will beat these 8c/16t or higher rigs even though my setup is faster! Put aside that this timespy is more cpu centric. If we move to the traditional firestrike, it starts to get even more hilarious.

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/1011822/spy/961871/spy/470208

 

[EarthDog]

It means more in FS, true...this is TS though. You are preaching to the chior...but it's only a few hundred points here from 8t 5ghz to 20t 4.2ghz.

 

[thesmokingman]

It means more in FS, true...this is TS though. You are preaching to the chior...but it's only a few hundred points here from 8t 5ghz to 20t 4.2ghz.

No the physics score difference in TS is more like 4-5k, which when combined gives a 800pt difference in Total Score in the example I linked above. You're missing the point. To get that 800pt difference back, you'd need to bridge that 4k-5k cpu score, which you'll never be able to do with a 4c part. You make the few hundred points sound like its nothing lol.

 

[EarthDog]

I get it... totally. But what can you do? At least it's more affordable to have more cores.

But who's running anything at stock cpu (your link)? The less cores the higher it clocks, the closer you are (but likely never catching - a point never in question) to catching it. As I said, a realistic scenario, a 5 ghz 7700k and a 6950x at 4.2 yielded 500 points difference overall. Again, not something you will make up, but... it's only going to be a couple hundred points when you are talking the jump from 8t to 16t assuming similar overclocks on the intel 8t (close to or 5ghz which should cover 4790K-7800k), and the Ryzen in the low 4s where it seems to top out on ambient.

Time will tell either way!

 

[gint87]

View attachment 84526 Might be adding another 1080 soon.View attachment 84526

 

[EarthDog]

Updated anyone that was close to the formatting. If you were not updated, please refer to the first post for the screenshot and formatting requirements.

It really is not hard to copy and paste people... how can so many bork this so often?

 

[R00kie]

7894 - gdallsk / 5820K@4.5 GHz / GTX1080 FE @ 2088 - 1375

 

[The Pack]

11853-The Pack / i7 6850K@4,4GHz / 2x Asus Strix GTX 1070 O8G @ 2126/2200

The validation is failed, because i`ve got the new beta driver 378.77. He works fine, better than the whql before

 

[pyon]

Score: 16976/ 7700K 5.3GHz / Titan X(pascal) X2 2.11GHz

 

[thesmokingman]

It means more in FS, true...this is TS though. You are preaching to the chior...but it's only a few hundred points here from 8t 5ghz to 20t 4.2ghz.

This is what I'm talking about.

https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...erclocking-results.231161/page-5#post-3611804

 

[EarthDog]

Yep.. knew where you were going with it.

Again though, this is TS, not FS. Percent wise it's going to be less than FS. It will still be helpful for these benchmarks, without a doubt, just perhaps not as much as i feel you are thinking here.




Will update the thread soon...

 

[gint87]

I'll try to use correct formatting this time. Just got my second GTX 1080.

12343 - gint87 / i7 7700k 4.9GHz / GTX 1080 Founders Edition SLI @ 2012MHz / Memory 32Gb Corasair Vengeance LED 3200 MHz

 

[EarthDog]

Updated...

 

[pyon]

Score: 14010/ 7700K @5.43GHz Cache @5.23GHz Memory @4.15GHz / GTX-1080 X2 @2.25GHz

 

[MrGenius]

Just when I'd lost all hope of ever breaking 3000...the newest Radeon Beta drivers came through for me! In a BIG way too! Chalk me up for another 106 points!!!

3072 - MrGenius / i5-3570K @ 4.8GHz / MSI R9 280X Gaming 3GB @ 1229MHz / 1850MHz

I guess that answers the question of whether async compute has finally been fixed for GCN 1.0 with the 17.2.1 and later drivers. It's OBVIOUSLY working MUCH better now!!!

 

[untrugby]

Just got my Ryzen and 1080ti in here is my score with the ryzen at 3.9 and the 1080ti at stock. Will have to mess around with the OC on it later

9215 - UNTRugby / Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.9Ghz / GTX 1080ti @ 1602 mhz

 

[EarthDog]

Nice runs! Will update tonight!

 

[R00kie]

Got a second 1080

5820K@4.5GHz - GTX 1080 1962/1375 MHz

 

[The Pack]

Got a second 1080

5820K@4.5GHz - GTX 1080 1962/1375 MHz

Good Job, but look @ my 2 GTX 1070

 

[R00kie]

Good Job, but look @ my 2 GTX 1070

You've got more PCI-E lanes than I do, plus you've pushed your cards way more than I did. But still, a difference is still a difference.

 

[The Pack]

12015 - The Pack/ i7 6850K @ 4.4GHz 2x Asus Strix GTX 1070 @ 2126MHz / 9800MHz first card (Samsung RAM) + 8750 second card (Micron RAM)

 

[The Pack]

You've got more PCI-E lanes than I do, plus you've pushed your cards way more than I did. But still, a difference is still a difference.

Yes of course, but i paid only 1000 Dollars for 2 cards...