• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Graphics card Image Quality review

Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,683 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Year's ago Image Quality was a part of every graphics test done, I know that advanced AF and AA has made image quality very close, but with the new HDR and other standards in place I would like to see Image Quality tests performed on a few of the newer graphics cards at different settings and resolutions in a few games.

Does anyone else have interest in this, or is it possible to have done?

Games like GTA5, Battlefield 1, FO4, and perhaps a couple older titles and a couple new ones.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
3,505 (0.64/day)
For most, as long as their fps counter is high, they are happy. I know some won't even play any games without fps counter on. Makes me wonder whether they are playing a game or watching fps counter.

For me, I don't care because I cannot tell the difference in image quality unless I put different results right next to each other. Even if brand A has better image quality than B, what's the point if I cannot tell?
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,929 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
I still see some of these done. Thing is I remember a Crysis 3 article a while ago testing different AA options , and I could hardly tell the difference between any of them. I still have the same reaction watching most of DF's compassion videos. So I guess my point is image quality comparisons just don't really tell much in today's titles , where you have tons of layers of post process effects.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,683 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
For most, as long as their fps counter is high, they are happy. I know some won't even play any games without fps counter on. Makes me wonder whether they are playing a game or watching fps counter.

For me, I don't care because I cannot tell the difference in image quality unless I put different results right next to each other. Even if brand A has better image quality than B, what's the point if I cannot tell?
Immersive world. Year's ago it was very apparent in some places.

I want to know what if any difference exists and also what performance penalty exists for differing effects.

I agree about the FPS counter, and sure they are all measured at X setting, but some games have HDR render capability and things like DSR can make a difference too.
 

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,451 (2.38/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
How would a review quantify IQ? I do recall in the early Fermi days seeing ATI being more recognised as IQ superior. But i do wonder how can you make something that some might feel is subjective, empiric?
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.50/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
I'd be interested to see this aspect tested again, curious if nVidia has worked some sorcery again to increase performance like they did in the old days.

How would a review quantify IQ? I do recall in the early Fermi days seeing ATI being more recognised as IQ superior. But i do wonder how can you make something that some might feel is subjective, empiric?

That doesn't work here, we aren't talking audio.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
568 (0.21/day)
System Name ACME Singularity Unit
Processor Coal-dual 9000
Motherboard Oak Plank
Cooling 4 Snow Yetis huffing and puffing in parallel
Memory Hasty Indian (I/O: 3 smoke signals per minute)
Video Card(s) Bob Ross AI module
Storage Stone Tablet 2.0
Display(s) Where are my glasses?
Case Hand sewn bull hide
Audio Device(s) On demand tribe singing
Power Supply Spin-o-Wheel-matic
Mouse Hamster original
Keyboard Chisel 1.9a (upgraded for Stone Tablet 2.0 compatibility)
Software It's all hard down here
I cannot tell the difference in image quality

Sadly this.. used to be the difference was glaring, nowadays, it's just the FPS and whether you can run 'x' title or not. Not my field, may well be wrong, but excluding gimmicks (read: hairworks for example) i am honestly doubting any proper improvement has been made since like decades ago. Just.. more, or bigger. Not better :)

And if anyone has a GPU that proves me wrong, seriously name it. No joke. I'll get me one :)
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
3,505 (0.64/day)
How would a review quantify IQ? I do recall in the early Fermi days seeing ATI being more recognised as IQ superior. But i do wonder how can you make something that some might feel is subjective, empiric?

If I recall correctly, the test was done to favor AMD over Nvidia. And I do recall AMD"s image quality being better although marginally.

The keyword here is "marginally". Unless you magnify two results and spend real effort in differentiation, you can't tell.

Which goes right back to the staring point: What's the point?
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,683 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
How would a review quantify IQ? I do recall in the early Fermi days seeing ATI being more recognised as IQ superior. But i do wonder how can you make something that some might feel is subjective, empiric?


Side by side so to speak images from the same spot, if there are details obscured by some filters, or missing shadows, wrong colors, differences in textures etc..

Not subjective, differences between.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.59/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
I turn off fps counters because they sometimes are the culprit of lag/glitchiness
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
9,781 (2.33/day)
Location
Massachusetts
System Name Americas cure is the death of Social Justice & Political Correctness
Processor i7-11700K
Motherboard Asrock Z590 Extreme wifi 6E
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB Corsair RGB fancy boi 5000
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 Reference
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 1Tb + Samsung 970 Evo 500Gb
Display(s) Dell - 27" LED QHD G-SYNC x2
Case Fractal Design Meshify-C
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 1000 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502 spectrum
Keyboard AZIO MGK-1 RGB (Kaith Blue)
Software Win 10 Professional 64 bit
Benchmark Scores the MLGeesiest
How do you go about quantifying image quality though? It seems like such a relative and flexible term it would kind of be like quantifying a "nice" day

I did read your reply to someone asking this after I posted it, but it still seems like a really tough nail to hammer down

So I'm guessing from reading your post that what you suggest is two separate machines running two separate instances of the same software all identical just to quantify quality of the image? Seems very very labor-intensive for such a small result If it could be called that

I'm certainly not knocking your question but with all due respect it seems a bit silly in regards to the testing portion. Not that I have a better idea but I think there's a reason it's not done anymore.let's keep in mind as well this would ultimately be something to be determined by the end user,because who's to say the person doing the image quality test is able to notice the difference. No I think there's just too many if's for this to be a viable practice
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,683 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
A simple side by side comparison is all we need. It used to be part of standard benchmarks.

So are we saying that performance is all that matters..... so we should all buy consoles cause they all perform the same and image quality be damned?
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
3,505 (0.64/day)
The difference is there but it is negligible.

Additionally, there are other variables that affect image quality: cables and monitor.

In the end, doesn't matter.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
17,794 (2.66/day)
System Name AlderLake / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MHz CL36 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2 / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 11 / Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Well back in the GTA San Andreas days I preferred AMD image quality over Nvidia, with an AMD card it looked just a bit better in my opinion.
Nowadays image quality looks good on both camps. I'm using Nvidia graphics now because they had the best to offer last year when I built a new desktop.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,683 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
The difference is there but it is negligible.

Additionally, there are other variables that affect image quality: cables and monitor.

In the end, doesn't matter.

Cables don't. Monitors, yeah, but not on what is rendered out of the card, which is what's captured in a screenshot.
 
Top