• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel to Introduce 3D XPoint DIMM Tech to the Market on 2018

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.35/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Early on in Intel's 3D XPoint teasers and announcements, the company planned to have this memory integrated not only as a system cache solution or SSD replacement, but also as a potential substitute for DRAM memory. The objective: to revolutionize the amount of DRAM memory a given system can carry, at a much lower price per GB, with a somewhat acceptable performance penalty. Intel describes the current DRAM implementation as too small, too expensive, and too unstable (read: data loss on power loss) to continue being on top of the memory food chain. This is where the 3D Xpoint DIMM implementation can bear fruits, by offering significantly higher amounts of storage at much lower pricing, while keeping attractive bandwidth and latency performance. DRAM will still be used for system-critical operations and booting, albeit in lower capacities, and will be used side by side with these 3D XPoint DIMM slots, which will take in the bulk of the work.

This kind of usage for Intel's 3D XPoint also delivers an interesting side-effect: since this memory is persistent (which means that data isn't lost when the power is turned off,) interruption or loss of power won't erase the work in memory. At the same time, this means that this kind of DRAM-substitute memory requires some security precautions DRAM doesn't, since anyone with direct physical access to the stick could just remove one and take it with all the data inside. Even though a 2018 time to market seems a little to optimistic, considering all the changes this implementation would require from adopters, the technology is definitely promising enough to tempt users to make the jump.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
So this is like positioning the first round of xpoint as a cache for HDDs. Now we get a cache for RAM. I have to say, I'm not a big fan of adding more stuff into my case.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
536 (0.08/day)
System Name Ed-PC
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus TUF Z690 PLUS Wifi D4
Cooling Noctua NH-14S
Memory Crucial Ballistix DDR4 C16@3600 16GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia MSI 970
Storage Samsung 980, 860evo
Case Lian Li Lancool II mesh Perf
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Software Win10 Pro 64bit
No, this is not HDD cache system IMO, its more like L1, L2 etc.
So instead of trying to have 16-64gb of DDR4, you could have like 4-8gb of DDr4 and 32/64gb of X point, it might not be as fast as DRR4 but has good low latency.

My guess you need at least workstation type system, with same loads, not for mainstream so much, though that would depend on cost moving forward on DDRx vs X point.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,401 (1.44/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x/5600x
Motherboard B450 AORUS M
Cooling EK AIO - 6 fan action
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) PIXIO IPS 240Hz 1080P
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
Proprietary Intel Only tech.
 

Solaris17

Super Dainty Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
25,774 (3.79/day)
Location
Alabama
System Name Rocinante
Processor I9 14900KS
Motherboard EVGA z690 Dark KINGPIN (modded BIOS)
Cooling EK-AIO Elite 360 D-RGB
Memory 64GB Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 @6400
Video Card(s) MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090
Storage 1x 500GB 980 Pro | 1x 1TB 980 Pro | 1x 8TB Corsair MP400
Display(s) Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC
Case Lian Li o11 Evo Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Moondrop S8's on Schiit Hel 2e
Power Supply Bequiet! Power Pro 12 1500w
Mouse Lamzu Atlantis mini (White)
Keyboard Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Akko Crystal Blues
VR HMD Quest 3
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores I dont have time for that.
got it, so back to the DDR2 / DDR3 split boards (#unstable) only with proprietary Intel memory. This sounds like a winning recipe.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (0.99/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
Windmills are not going to power all of this! Hopefully the return is higher than the costs of all these trillizions and brazillions of wattage needed to feed all this tech! I forsee a cable-link to the Sun sucking in energy directly from its core...

And yet, police wants me to fit an ultra dampening exhaust to my sportsbike!

I swear I am not smoking anything, it's just.. the heat,... all this heat that's making me mad....
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
6,270 (0.95/day)
Location
New York
Processor INTEL CORE I9-9900K @ 5Ghz all core 4.7Ghz Cache @1.305 volts
Motherboard ASUS PRIME Z390-P ATX
Cooling CORSAIR HYDRO H150I PRO RGB 360MM 6x120mm fans push pull
Memory CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 3000Mhz 4x8 32gb @ 4000Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GEFORECE RTX 2080 SUPER XC HYBRID GAMING
Storage ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB 3D NAND NVMe,Intel 660p 1TB m.2 ,1TB WD Blue 3D NAND,500GB WD Blue 3D NAND,
Display(s) 50" Sharp Roku TV 8ms responce time and Philips 75Hz 328E9QJAB 32" curved
Case BLACK LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC XL FULL-TOWER GAMING CASE,
Power Supply 1600 Watt
Software Windows 10
nice tech for lab work. :toast: Imma bet ya that AMD has some counter tech too....anyone know what it is?...........................................anything that helps cut the waiting game in the lab will be utilized in the lab and that i have no doubt.
 
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,792 (0.40/day)
Location
Tre, Suomi Finland
System Name Ladpot ◦◦◦ Desktop
Processor R7 5800H ◦◦◦ i7 4770K, watercooled
Motherboard HP 88D2 ◦◦◦ Asus Z87-C2 Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Mixed gases ◦◦◦ Fuzion V1, MCW60/R2, DDC1/DDCT-01s top, PA120.3, EK200, D12SL-12, liq.metal TIM
Memory 2× 8GB DDR4-3200 ◦◦◦ 2× 8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 ◦◦◦ heaps of dead GPUs in the garage
Storage Samsung 980 PRO 2TB ◦◦◦ Samsung 840Pro 256@178GB + 4× WD Red 2TB in RAID10 + LaCie Blade Runner 4TB
Display(s) HP ZR30w 30" 2560×1600 (WQXGA) H2-IPS
Case Lian Li PC-A16B
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S / Contour RollerMouse Red+
Keyboard Logitech Elite Keyboard from 2006 / Contour Balance Keyboard / Logitech diNovo Edge
Software W11 x64 ◦◦◦ W10 x64
Benchmark Scores It does boot up? I think.
XPoint RAM?
Nice!
All things DRAM has been awfully boring for 10 years already.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
2,047 (0.39/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
Processor R9 5950x
Motherboard Asus x570 Crosshair VIII Formula
Cooling EK 360mm AIO D-RGB
Memory G.Skill Trident Z Neo 2x16gb (CL16@3800MHz)
Video Card(s) PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB NVMe | Intel 660p 2TB NVMe
Display(s) Acer Predator XB323QK 4K 144Hz
Case Corsair 5000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Objective2 Amp/DAC | GoXLR | AKG K612PRO | Beyerdynamic DT880| Rode Pod Mic
Power Supply Corsair AX 850w
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Elite V2
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum RGB "Cherry MX Brown"
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Window 11 Pro
watch Rambus sue intel :laugh:
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
856 (0.20/day)
Location
Australia
System Name ATHENA
Processor AMD 7950X
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair X670E Extreme
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S, 7 x Noctua NF-A14 industrialPPC IP67 2000RPM
Memory 2x32GB Trident Z RGB 6000Mhz CL30
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 Strix
Storage 3 x Kingston Fury 4TB, 4 x Samsung 870 QVO
Display(s) Alienware AW3821DW, Wacom Cintiq Pro 15
Case Fractal Design Torrent
Audio Device(s) Topping A90/D90 MQA, Fluid FPX7 Fader Pro, Beyerdynamic T1 G2, Beyerdynamic MMX300
Power Supply ASUS THOR 1600T
Mouse Xtrfy MZ1 - Zy' Rail, Logitech MX Vertical, Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915 TKL
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 11 + OpenSUSE MicroOS
I'm going to come out with this as a big 'maybe'.

I can't see many DB admins wanting to go backwards in their memory performance. I would much rather see this as something joined to the fabric as storage and cache rather than trying to replace DRAM.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
540 (0.13/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 5800x
Motherboard B550i Aorus Pro AX
Cooling Custom Cooling
Memory 32Gb Patriot Viper 3600 RGB
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3080 Ventus Trio OC
Storage Samsung 960 EVO
Display(s) Specterpro 34uw100
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Power Supply Cooler Master V750 Gold SFX
Mouse Glorious Model D Wireless
Keyboard Ducky One 2
VR HMD Quest 2
Software Windows 11 64bit
The objective: to revolutionize the amount of DRAM memory a given system can carry, at a much lower price per GB, with a somewhat acceptable performance penalty.

lol

This is where the 3D Xpoint DIMM implementation can bear fruits, by offering significantly higher amounts of storage at much lower pricing, while keeping attractive bandwidth and latency performance

Source: EXPreview

I guess this must some sort of an ssd on a dimm slot. Seeing the words Intel and lower pricing made me try to reread the article several times to check if my eyes were fooling me.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.27/day)
So this is like positioning the first round of xpoint as a cache for HDDs. Now we get a cache for RAM. I have to say, I'm not a big fan of adding more stuff into my case.

The opposite. Cache is always used to speed up memory access.
So if you insist to use this word, then XPoint DIMM is still a cache for HDD - just in a more obvious place (as RAM is basically the same). And of course RAM will cache the XPoint module if needed.
But the main reason they make this is simply to offer a big jump in "RAM" capacity (at a cost of some performance). RAM size is a major bottleneck in enterprise solutions today.

The whole Optane thing was designed with DIMMs in mind from the start.
The other products we've seen: M.2 caches and more traditional SSDs are most likely just side products benefiting from excellent performance of Optane (albeit it would stand out a lot more if released 2-3 years back).
Intel has a very good tech in their hands - they're using it wherever they can. :)
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
The opposite. Cache is always used to speed up memory access.
So if you insist to use this word, then XPoint DIMM is still a cache for HDD - just in a more obvious place (as RAM is basically the same). And of course RAM will cache the XPoint module if needed.
But the main reason they make this is simply to offer a big jump in "RAM" capacity (at a cost of some performance). RAM size is a major bottleneck in enterprise solutions today.

The whole Optane thing was designed with DIMMs in mind from the start.
The other products we've seen: M.2 caches and more traditional SSDs are most likely just side products benefiting from excellent performance of Optane (albeit it would stand out a lot more if released 2-3 years back).
Intel has a very good tech in their hands - they're using it wherever they can. :)
When I said "cache" I was thinking about something that goes in between, not about actual performance.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.27/day)
When I said "cache" I was thinking about something that goes in between, not about actual performance.
Same here. But then what did you mean by "cache for RAM"? Because XPoint in a DIMM is still a cache for HDD (it's between the HDD and CPU).
XPoint DIMMs are not designed to cache RAM or backup RAM or whatever. This is another type of memory. You could use just XPoint and the PC would still work (just slower).
If a PC houses both DDR and XPoint, it simply can choose how to use them based on properties. This is a move in the right direction.

Let's not forget RAM was invented as a memory for holding currently needed data. Today it has 2 functions: traditional RAM and fast access storage. DDR is not optimal for the latter.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
473 (0.17/day)
I think the goal here is to allow for affordable FSB drive caching. XPoint isn' lt volatile so you could theoretically have your entire operating system and then some (professional apps, CAD software, Photoshop, etc.) stored in ultra fast DDR4 DIMMs twice as fast as an NVMe drive, assuming XPoint drivers support such a configuration.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
That diagram is mighty interesting.

XPoint DIMM:
~6 GB/s
~250 ns latency

PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe SSD:
~3.2 GB/s
<10 ms latency

Only thing they don't answer is cost, density, and endurance.

I could see this as the go-to memory standard for RAID cards (don't need to write-back anymore because the data is safe on the card should there be an interruption). A shame is over half a year away yet.

Putting 250ns latency into perspective:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
522 (0.12/day)
Unless it replaces both the hard disk and ram then its kinda pointless in my opinion. As it is the function of ram is already somewhat of a cache between the cpu and the data, so to add yet another layer of cache is just way too many bus stops in my not very educated opinion lol
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,104 (0.33/day)
There was a time when I was completely blown away by prospects of 3DXpoint. A storage upgrade bigger than that between HDD and SSD's. I was honestly prepared to throw $500 away if it meant I could have 500GB of something 1000x faster than my current SSD-RAID setup.


But then every presentation Intel cut the expected speed in half, and now it's out - and SLOWER than a good PCIE SSD. One of the biggest tech disappointments I have ever seen.


Considering they can't even beat the fastest conventional SSD's, I don't expect the performance penalty of using it as DRAM as anything close to acceptable...
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Uh, how many SSDs can move at 3.2 GB/s? Even those I've seen that do reach high into the read speeds, write speeds are sorely lacking.

Until someone actually benchmarks these things, we won't really know. But from what Intel has said so far, it looks faster in every way than current SSD tech.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,104 (0.33/day)
Uh, how many SSDs can move at 3.2 GB/s? Even those I've seen that do reach high into the read speeds, write speeds are sorely lacking.

Until someone actually benchmarks these things, we won't really know. But from what Intel has said so far, it looks faster in every way than current SSD tech.

Uhhh here:

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod...cm_re=samsung_SSD_PCIE-_-20-147-596-_-Product


Took 5 seconds to find. This isn't 2012 anymore, these things are becoming quite common.


And btw, there shouldn't even be a competition. Intel advertised 1000x the speed. Instead it's around the same, for much more money, and much less capacity options. What a revolutionary technology.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Well yeah, reality struck Intel but don't count the chickens until the eggs hatch.

Intel could beat it's 1.47 GB/$, it's endurance, or it's latency. Considering they are talking about packaging it in DIMMs, I'd guess that the endurance is off the charts compared to SSDs.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.27/day)
Unless it replaces both the hard disk and ram then its kinda pointless in my opinion. As it is the function of ram is already somewhat of a cache between the cpu and the data, so to add yet another layer of cache is just way too many bus stops in my not very educated opinion lol
This is not a cache similar to RAM, which constantly overwrites data to hold what's needed by the CPU.
XPoint (even in DIMM) is a normal storage. It holds everything you need and is non-volatile. So by principle it can replace drives, as they wouldn't be needed at all (one DIMM could replace one M.2 - think how this revolutionizes consumer mobo designs).

However, in the enterprise solution presented by Intel (SAP HANA) it doesn't replace HDD/SSD storage, but it has 2 advantages over RAM (that is normally used by SAP):
1) it's few times more dense, with lower price per GB (cost-wise, less DIMMs also translate into less server nodes - big money here!).
2) it's persistent, so it drastically reduces the time of system setup.

Just to give you an example of setup time importance: when a DB crashes or needs a reset (maintenance etc), you have to populate RAM before it'll work again.
A typical enterprise-grade HDD can be read at around 100MB/s and at that speed a 1TB database will take >2.5h to setup.
Of course you can increase the read speed with RAID or SSDs, but the database will most likely also be way bigger than 1TB...

This is the reason why database maintenance usually means server down for hours... and a server crash during the day means a long lunch break for analysts. :D

A persistent, yet fast memory is the golden grail. I don't know whether XPoint is the technology that will dominate in coming years, but it's almost obvious that the basic idea is what we've been waiting for.

But then every presentation Intel cut the expected speed in half, and now it's out - and SLOWER than a good PCIE SSD. One of the biggest tech disappointments I have ever seen.
Considering they can't even beat the fastest conventional SSD's, I don't expect the performance penalty of using it as DRAM as anything close to acceptable...

You're looking at the wrong figures. Here are latency and 4K random (including preconditioning), respectively:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-optane-3d-xpoint-p4800x,review-33867-4.html
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-optane-3d-xpoint-p4800x,review-33867-5.html
XPoint is years ahead of SSD development curve.
NAND will never even get close to these results, so the simple fact is: other SSD companies still have to develop/launch their future SSD tech. Intel and Micron already have it.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Same here. But then what did you mean by "cache for RAM"? Because XPoint in a DIMM is still a cache for HDD (it's between the HDD and CPU).
XPoint DIMMs are not designed to cache RAM or backup RAM or whatever. This is another type of memory. You could use just XPoint and the PC would still work (just slower).
If a PC houses both DDR and XPoint, it simply can choose how to use them based on properties. This is a move in the right direction.

Let's not forget RAM was invented as a memory for holding currently needed data. Today it has 2 functions: traditional RAM and fast access storage. DDR is not optimal for the latter.

Something that does not replace RAM, but instead inserts itself between RAM and SSD/HDD.
The way I see it, in this form it's more geared towards alleviating RAM usage, hence my designation as "cache for RAM". I suppose you can look at it the other way and say it's a cache for permanent storage, too, and you wouldn't be wrong. But it's still one more component and as always when adding complexity, there's always something to be lost.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
RAM is cache but it's greatest weakness is its volatility. XPoint's greatest strength is that it is non-volatile. XPoint is ideal for a write cache on storage solutions. If there's a loss of power or catastrophic failure, the data that was meant to be written by a RAID would not be lost so the write can still successfully complete when the issue is resolved.

I can't see it being used as an intermediary between RAM and long-term storage because, unless the price per GB is far less than RAM, RAM is the better option because the performance is more important than non-volatility. That said, if you can get 1 TB of XPoint for the price of 128 GB DDR4, suddenly XPoint looks really attractive.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
RAM is cache but it's greatest weakness is its volatility. XPoint's greatest strength is that it is non-volatile. XPoint is ideal for a write cache on storage solutions. If there's a loss of power or catastrophic failure, the data that was meant to be written by a RAID would not be lost so the write can still successfully complete when the issue is resolved.

I can't see it being used as an intermediary between RAM and long-term storage because, unless the price per GB is far less than RAM, RAM is the better option because the performance is more important than non-volatility. That said, if you can get 1 TB of XPoint for the price of 128 GB DDR4, suddenly XPoint looks really attractive.
Yeah, well, the the nice part of the story and I agree with it. Cost effective or not, that's how Intel will market it.

But as I said, I'm worried about other things. It's one more component added to the system and it adds complexity. Will it eat PCIe lanes? Will it need a modification of the current RAM channels? Cause it will definitely need additional sockets. As Intel has already stated, it will need Opal encryption, otherwise someone could lift your XPoint stick and read all sorts of things from it. Is Opal encryption viable in conjunction with RAM (i.e. it doesn't completely kill an already underwhelming performance)?

I'm not against XPoint, I'm willing to forgive things in a first iteration. But at the same time I can't not notice the first iteration is a far cry from what was initially promised. Thus I'll take any further marketing slides with a pinch of salt and tend to look at things not said a little more.
 
Top