• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

VIA Making a Comeback to x86 CPU Market with Zhaoxin R&D Monies

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,283 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
The only other active x86 architecture licensee than AMD, VIA Technologies, is planning a comeback to the x86 processor market, bolstered by R&D investment by Shanghai Zhaoxin Semiconductor. VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout in 2018, and at least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel's "Gemini Lake" SoCs. The new VIA-Zhaoxin combine CPU family begins with the KX-5000 "Wudaoku" SoCs launched late-2017. These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset (including the southrbidge).

The KX-5000 chips feature 4 or 8 CPU cores without SMT, 2.00-2.20 GHz nominal CPU clock, 2.40 GHz boost clock, a dual-channel DDR4 IMC, a PCI-Express gen 3.0 root complex, an integrated graphics core, and platform I/O that includes SATA 6 Gbps, and USB 3.1 gen 2. This chip debuted on only one product from a major OEM, the Lenovo M6200 desktop model launched in China. 2018 could see a broader launch of VIA-Zhaoxin chips, with the KX-6000. While the older chips were built on the 28 nm process, the KX-6000 series will be built on the newer 16 nm process, feature 4 or 8 CPU cores clocked at speeds of up to 3.00 GHz, while retaining the feature-set of the KX-5000 series. These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel "Gemini Lake" SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,239 (0.75/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Considering the Chinese want to end their reliance on Western electronics, VIA pretty much has a captive -and very lucrative - market. I forsee their x86 license being revoked in the future as the USA-China trade war heats up.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,457 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
You know that for a fact that Intel was doing shit for the past 10 years when VIA is making a comeback challenging their newest low cost CPUs...
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
349 (0.09/day)
Would be nice for them to come back with some serious offers, but I guess it is pretty hard to make a high performing and low power X86 core, without having some great talent architects.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,402 (1.44/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x/5600x
Motherboard B450 AORUS M
Cooling EK AIO - 6 fan action
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) PIXIO IPS 240Hz 1080P
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
I like VIA they made nice sound cards Envy24 (drivers weren't great though).
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
Every competition is welcome. And I hope they'll also venture into high end segment so we have nice competition going on. But low and mid end is also nice. Has been a while when we had 3 or more CPU makers. I wish Cyrix was also still around... :(
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Messages
38 (0.01/day)
System Name main rig
Processor i7 8700K @4.8GHz
Motherboard GA Z370 AORUS Gaming 3
Cooling Be Quiet! Dark Rock Advanced
Memory Patriot 16GB DDR4-2800
Video Card(s) GA RTX 2070 GAMING 8G
Storage ADATA XPG GAMMIX S11 PRO 1TB M.2 + more
Case Corsair Carbide 330R
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750w
More competition means happier consumers so yeah they have my blessings.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,457 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Would be nice for them to come back with some serious offers, but I guess it is pretty hard to make a high performing and low power X86 core, without having some great talent architects.
Is OK. They don't have to re-design the wheel. Reverse engineering done under the microscope does wonders. They can adapt to both AMD/Intel's architecture and come up with something simmillar.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,762 (1.91/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
then whats the real power of it? they should point something that they are strong
performance? value? less heat? cheap? embedded? small chip or something
if not i guess they gonna have hard time to enter the market and doing battle
 

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,378 (2.37/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
Considering the Chinese want to end their reliance on Western electronics, VIA pretty much has a captive -and very lucrative - market. I forsee their x86 license being revoked in the future as the USA-China trade war heats up.

Neither country can afford a trade war. There might be some bluster from the old wigged windbag (or whoever follows him) but global economics always wins. The Chinese market (allied with Russia in their proxy way) is too big to cut off. And vice versa, China wants the US market so trade wars are likely to be token affairs where socks and lollipops get taxed.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
You know that for a fact that Intel was doing shit for the past 10 years when VIA is making a comeback challenging their newest low cost CPUs...
Right, our laptops have exactly the same battery life (and CPU power) they had 10 years ago. Damn Intel...
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
610 (0.26/day)
If anything, it's good for China to have a homegrown competent CPU maker. I know Russia has been trying the same with their Elbrus line. A lot of people are hyped about competition against AMD and Intel but I think this is a bit more of a localized benefit. I could see all their future government PCs and larger systems running something from VIA. Which is pretty neat to be able to do.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,973 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
If I read this correctly, SATA and USB 3.1 are not part of the SOC

1514906640685.jpg
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
777 (0.18/day)
Location
Norway
System Name Games/internet/usage
Processor I7 5820k 4.2 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A2
Cooling custom water loop for cpu and gpu
Memory 16GiB Crucial Ballistix Sport 2666 MHz
Video Card(s) Radeon Rx 6800 XT
Storage Samsung XP941 500 GB + 1 TB SSD
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case Caselabs Magnum M8
Audio Device(s) Shiit Modi 2 Uber -> Matrix m-stage -> HD650
Power Supply beQuiet dark power pro 1200W
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Win 10 Pro
If anything, it's good for China to have a homegrown competent CPU maker. I know Russia has been trying the same with their Elbrus line. A lot of people are hyped about competition against AMD and Intel but I think this is a bit more of a localized benefit. I could see all their future government PCs and larger systems running something from VIA. Which is pretty neat to be able to do.

Well, biggest question will be if you want CIA, FSB or their Chinese counterpart (MSS if Wikipedia is to be trusted) to spy on you, so yay, you might get a choice in the matter.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
650 (0.10/day)
Location
Madrid, Spain
System Name Sample light
Processor AMD Phenom II 965
Motherboard MSI DKA790GX
Cooling Zalman 9500LED
Memory 2x 2GB G-skill PC8500
Video Card(s) Asus built AMD/ATI HD4850
Storage 500GB Wesern Digital green
Display(s) too ashamed to tell, but its an acer
Case Lian Li V2000
Audio Device(s) Echo Audiofire 2
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Windows XP pro SP3
Heres the thing, i remember VIA being the plague when the K7 was around.

The KT133 and KT266 ram issues, the 686B southbridge with UDMA mode issues and problems when tried to transfer more then 1GB from 1 drive to another.
via chipsets gave good performance, but at the cost of stability and issue after issue, after a while everyone who could afford to would escape to the AMD 760 chipset and those who couldnt would go for the Sis 756FX and 758 chipsters,

tell you the truth, Asrock wouldnt have become famous if it wasnt for their rock solid AMD sis 746FX and 748 chipset boards which replaced the Annoying and unreliable ECS K7S5a as the backbone of every Economy Athlon and Athlon XP build.

They did own S3 and Trident at some moment so i do believe they have some GPU knowhow, and they have all of Cyrixes all patents (including the canceled jashua which if released could have gone toe to toe with the P3 and K7). but its been too much time...
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,973 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
Heres the thing, i remember VIA being the plague when the K7 was around.

The KT133 and KT266 ram issues, the 686B southbridge with UDMA mode issues and problems when tried to transfer more then 1GB from 1 drive to another.
via chipsets gave good performance, but at the cost of stability and issue after issue, after a while everyone who could afford to would escape to the AMD 760 chipset and those who couldnt would go for the Sis 756FX and 758 chipsters,

tell you the truth, Asrock wouldnt have become famous if it wasnt for their rock solid AMD sis 746FX and 748 chipset boards which replaced the Annoying and unreliable ECS K7S5a as the backbone of every Economy Athlon and Athlon XP build.

They did own S3 and Trident at some moment so i do believe they have some GPU knowhow, and they have all of Cyrixes all patents (including the canceled jashua which if released could have gone toe to toe with the P3 and K7). but its been too much time...
At the same time VIA had performance problems with their memory controllers Intel had serious problems with 820 and Rambus if I remember correctly. No one was perfect back then.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.98/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
Heres the thing, i remember VIA being the plague when the K7 was around.

The KT133 and KT266 ram issues, the 686B southbridge with UDMA mode issues and problems when tried to transfer more then 1GB from 1 drive to another.
via chipsets gave good performance, but at the cost of stability and issue after issue, after a while everyone who could afford to would escape to the AMD 760 chipset and those who couldnt would go for the Sis 756FX and 758 chipsters,

tell you the truth, Asrock wouldnt have become famous if it wasnt for their rock solid AMD sis 746FX and 748 chipset boards which replaced the Annoying and unreliable ECS K7S5a as the backbone of every Economy Athlon and Athlon XP build.

They did own S3 and Trident at some moment so i do believe they have some GPU knowhow, and they have all of Cyrixes all patents (including the canceled jashua which if released could have gone toe to toe with the P3 and K7). but its been too much time...

You forgot nForce. Athlon CPU and nForce chipset. Match made in heaven
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
25,559 (6.52/day)
I dont think they left x86 market, its just that they were making embedded systems and not too many consumer CPUs.
That's about right.
Every competition is welcome. And I hope they'll also venture into high end segment so we have nice competition going on. But low and mid end is also nice. Has been a while when we had 3 or more CPU makers. I wish Cyrix was also still around... :(
VIA = Cyrix. VIA bought the company out in 1999(?). So yeah, wish granted! Happy New Year! :rockout::toast:
You forgot nForce. Athlon CPU and nForce chipset. Match made in heaven
True, ironically. That pair gave excellent bang for buck value!
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
296 (0.07/day)
System Name Darkside
Processor R7 3700X
Motherboard Aorus Elite X570
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx l240
Memory Thermaltake Toughram DDR4 3600MHz CL18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage ADATA & WD 500GB NVME PCIe 3.0, many WD Black 1-3TB HD
Display(s) Samsung C27JG5x
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XL
Audio Device(s) iFi xDSD / micro iTube2 / micro iCAN SE
Power Supply EVGA 750W G2
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB
Benchmark Scores Not sure, don't care
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
152 (0.06/day)
System Name The cube
Processor AMD Ryzen 5700g
Motherboard Gigabyte B550M Aorus Elite
Cooling Thermalright ARO-M14
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3800mhz
Video Card(s) Powercolor Radeon RX 6900XT Red Devil
Storage Kingston 1TB NV2| 2x 1TB 2.5" Hitachi 7200rpm | 2TB 2.5" Toshiba USB 3.0
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G5 32" + LG 24MP59G 24"
Case Chieftec CI-02B-OP
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Extreme Audio PCI-E (SB1040)
Power Supply Corsair HX1200
Mouse Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Win10 x64 PRO
Benchmark Scores Mobile: Asus Strix Advantage G713QY | Ryzen 7 5900HX | 16GB Micron 3200MHz CL21 | RX 6800M 12GB |
Heres the thing, i remember VIA being the plague when the K7 was around.

The KT133 and KT266 ram issues.

There's no such thing. I collect x86 hardware since 1998, and I've never encountered or read about this supposed ram issue the KT133 and KT266 suffer from. VIA chipsets are the best thing to happen to the socket A platform since sliced bread, and they had some great chipsets for super socket 7 (AMD K6-II/K6-III) as well, with no real competition - namely the VIA MVP3 and MVP4. On socket 370 they offered AGP 4x, ATA100 and great overclocking support at a much more competitive price then intel's own chipsets, and the Apollo Pro 133 had superior AGP performance when compared to the intel 815.

This issue you speak of only affected early pentium 4 chipsets, as the P4M266/P4X266 did indeed have memory related stability issues, but only when using more then 768MB of ram, and using that much memory was very uncommon in 2001.

the 686B southbridge with UDMA mode issues and problems when tried to transfer more then 1GB from 1 drive to another.

This issue (data corruption when transferring a file larger then 1GB from one partition to another - not more then 1gb of data from one drive to another) occurs only on early motherboards equipped with the VT82C686B. It's not really the controller's fault, but in fact a PCI latency issue. This issue has plagued select VIA chipsets from 00-01 and affected not only the HDD controller built into the SB, but addon cards as well, especially PCI sound cards and Gigabit LAN cards. There are BIOS updates and software patches available to fix this problem.

via chipsets gave good performance, but at the cost of stability and issue after issue, after a while everyone who could afford to would escape to the AMD 760 chipset and those who couldnt would go for the Sis 756FX and 758 chipsters,

VIA got a bad name in the Pentium II/III era when loads of cheap no-name slot 1 motherboards flooded the US (and europe to a lesser extent), and consumers unknowingly bought their fill. The problem there is not the chipset (VIA Apollo) but the poor quality and design of these cheap boards witch would be unstable to varying degrees (from unusable to tolerable). Slot 1 VIA boards from ABIT, Soltek and Asus will give any i440 board a run for it's money, and were cheaper. Vendors like PC-Chips, Matsonic, Jetway and so on released the aforementioned cheap and unstable slot 1 boards, and are the cause of the rumor. This can be also coupled with intel's anti competitive practices, where they would give large OEM's like Asus and Abit huge discounts to postpone the release of boards running competing chipsets, and release those in limited supply.

If you have the time and hardware you can see for yourself. Just go on ebay and buy the first PC-Chips/Matsonic/Jetway slot 1 VIA board you find, and try to build a machine around it. Then do the same with a proper VIA board like the Abit VA6 or Asus P3V4, and compare performance with an Intel 440 equipped motherboard. You will be pleasantly surprised.

There were some other issues as well. The aforementioned PCI latency bug, and poor chipset support in nvidia Forceware and Detonator video card drivers. There are some Detonator versions witch will cause BSODs on via chipsets under win98, but work fine on intel chipset boards.

Throughout my IT career and years of collecting hardware, I've only come across socket A SiS chipset boards inside cheap pre-buit machines with everything on board and usually no AGP slot. Performance and stability of these systems was abysmal. SiS did make good socket A chipsets but were too late to release them, and their reputation was already soiled by the plethora of aforementioned budget machines that flooded the low-end market. VIA was already offering the excellent KT400 by the time SiS pulled their shit together and released a stable / fast FSB200/DDR400 cabable socket A chipset - and guess what - they were still used in budget rigs - even tough this time around SiS had a winning product.

Same story with Super Socket 7 - SiS was late to the party, and most machines were using the MVP3 chipset from VIA.

AMD 760 boards are a rarity in eastern europe. I've only seen one, and that is the FIC AD11 in my collection. An excellent early DDR board, but from what I remember AMD chipset motherboards were nearly double the price of their VIA counterparts, so they sold really poorly. There was no motivation to buy one either, since you could get the same level of performance / features / stability from an equivalent VIA chipset board, and use the rest of the cash for more ram or a faster video card - witch is what most people did.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,973 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
There's no such thing. I collect x86 hardware since 1998, and I've never encountered or read about this supposed ram issue the KT133 and KT266 suffer from.
They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with the A versions in both cases. SiS was beating those first versions, with chipsets like the excellent 735 in memory performance. But VIA was also a very strong brand back then, with major influence on manufacturers, making life for SiS difficult, the way Intel was doing it for AMD.

VIA had a bad name because it was underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel. I had a BX motherboard with my first Celeron CPU that I managed to burn out of stupidity(no experience with PC hardware). The replacement was a board with VIA chipset. Even with faster 133MHz SDRAM(BX could run the memory only at 100MHz) and AGP overclocking of the graphics card from 66MHz to 75MHz the VIA board was making my system slower than with the BX.
 
Top