• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

How would you rather game?

How would you rather game?


  • Total voters
    73

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Since not many can play 4K at 144Hz yet, since the monitors cost about 3 grand and the graphics cards for that resolution and framerate aren't quite available yet, how would you prefer to game when it comes to spatial resolution v temporal resolution? Vote in the poll!
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
6,176 (1.13/day)
Location
Midlands,UK
System Name Ultraman
Processor Intel core i9 13900HK
Motherboard Alienware/Dell inverted motherboard
Cooling Alienware/Dell cooling solution + IETS GT500 cooling pad
Memory Alienware/Dell 32GB 6000mhz DDR5
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX4080 12GB
Storage 1TB Dell supplied NVME + Samsung Evo 1TB NVME
Display(s) AOC Gaming CU34G3S/BK
Case Alienware X16
Audio Device(s) onboard/Speakers: Logitech G560
Power Supply Alienware/Dell battery + 330W charger
Mouse Microsoft Pro Intellimouse - White
Keyboard Ducky One2 SF White MX cherry Red
Software Windows 11
Ideal situation for me is 60+ fps in either 1080 or now 1440p, Ive just bought myself my first ever 1440p 144hz monitor so I'm bit excited to try that out.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Please vote kurosagi01!
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,533 (0.37/day)
System Name Obsolete / Waiting for Zen 5 or Arrow Lake
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz @ 1.35v / No AVX Offset
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 280 Hz + 77" QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX / Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Other; 1440p @ 165 Hz Gsync. Perfect balance for me. 1080p is too low, 2160p is too high. My OC'ed 1080 Ti is pretty crap in 2160p... in demanding games on high settings that is.

I think I will stay at 1440p if the upcoming Mini LED backlight gaming panels will have this option. Maybe even with 240 Hz. Or just keep my current monitor.
 
Last edited:

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,909 (2.43/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Phantom
Processor Core i7-8700k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F Black CPU cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2080 Ti Xc
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 4TB WD Black; 1x400GB VelRptr; 1x 4TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
2560x1440 constant 60fps. For me. 60fps is actually very good and acceptable. I want the top-end visuals.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,244 (1.36/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Ryzen 5800x
Motherboard Gigabyte x570 Gaming X
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 4x8GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 6800 XT (reference)
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 2TB
Display(s) Samsung CFG70, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
4k @ 60fps

(since I'm doing a lot on a TV). But that is but a dream.

edit: I should say that I'm getting close, since I have one of the newer Samsungs with Freesync. So I can get by with 50fps games. While some lighter games easily do 60fps without help (Ori, Cuphead). Surpringly, Forza 7 and DOOM are solid 60 fps, but that's a rarity.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
3,148 (0.47/day)
Location
Canada
System Name PCGR
Processor 12400f
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX B660-I
Cooling Stock Intel Cooler
Memory 2x16GB DDR5 5600 Corsair
Video Card(s) Dell RTX 3080
Storage 1x 512GB Mmoment PCIe 3 NVME 1x 2TB Corsair S70
Display(s) LG 32" 1440p
Case Phanteks Evolve itx
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply 750W Cooler Master sfx
Software Windows 11
1080p is fine for me. If the game dips to 40fps it doesn't bother me. It only becomes noticeable for me at around 30 fps. I like max details but If I have to lower some details because of performance, I go at AA first, and the type used. Then I go after some other questionable functions.

With my system I shouldn't have a problem, but you would be surprised. Killing Floor 2 with max details drives my system down in some areas to 37fps if the battle is too heated.

Doesn't make my game unplayable. But does ruin some of the experience.

Would like to play on my 4k tv, even if at 1080p res. So i can sit back in my underwear and enjoy the big screen.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
This is a very good poll qbit.
I'd take 1080p 144 fps over 4k 60 anyday, though it's not my preferred #1 choice. I value high framerate more than level of detail but I just hate aliasing, I like smooth edges and sharp image. That's why my primary gaming display is 24" 1440p at 165hz. If I had to choose between high framerate at 1080p and better sharpness at 4K, I'd chooose smoother framerate without a dobut.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
I agree with rtwjunkie though,if I didn't want 144 fps and I was okay with 60, I'd much rather turn on all eyecandy at 1440p (e.g. PCSS/HTFS) than run without them at 4K.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
I see a few of your are picking 2560p at 165Hz. I guess that would have made for a good third option. Didn't think about it. :ohwell:

I can edit the poll to add it, but I think it would remove all your votes if I did so.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
813 (0.20/day)
System Name White Shark
Processor 5600x
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua U12A Chromax
Memory Crucial Ballistix 16GB (8GBx2) CL16 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 3080 12gb Asus TUF OC
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB OS / 860 EVO 500 GB /860 EVO 1TB/ Seagate 1TB
Display(s) LG 34GP83A-B 3440x1440p 144hz nano-ips ultrawide
Case Phanteks P500A (White/Black)
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless
Power Supply Seasonic 850FX focus gold 80plus
Mouse HyperX Pulsefire Haste
Keyboard HyperX Alloy Origins Core - Tenkeyless
Software W10
I only have vsync off in Overwatch and Battlefield, everything else 1440p 60hz vsync on. Due to gpus prices not many people can afford a 1440p monitor along with a strong gpu that can push 100fps at that resolution even 60fps stable. Hope that next gpus gen makes this posible turning 1440p 60hz the standard res for most gamers. So for me 1440p 60hz cuz i cant reach 144 or 100 fps in most games for now. But i would love to be able to play at 144hz all the time.
So 2560x1440p 144hz is my desire
2560x1440p 60hz is what i can achieve and no complains looks amazing
 
Last edited:

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
@Tatty_One I see you've taken the Old Skool option! :p
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
My ideal monitor would be 2560x1600 (8:5), 144 Hz, DisplayHDR 600, FreeSync 2 and enough GPU grunt to maintain it.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,533 (0.37/day)
System Name Obsolete / Waiting for Zen 5 or Arrow Lake
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz @ 1.35v / No AVX Offset
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 280 Hz + 77" QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX / Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
My ideal monitor would be 2560x1600 (8:5), 144 Hz, DisplayHDR 600, FreeSync 2 and enough GPU grunt to maintain it.

Why HDR 600 when 1000 exist? HDR 400 and 600 is pretty crap compared to my OLED HDR. I have not seen 1000 on a PC monitor yet. Hopefully it's way better.

Might as well add mini LED backlight. For "perfect", micro LED instead.

Not sure I'd want anything else than 16:9 after trying out Ultrawide for a few weeks. Too bad support in games. Most of my games were played with black bars or streched.. Most games are made and optimized for 16:9.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
2,873 (0.85/day)
System Name The beast and the little runt.
Processor Ryzen 5 5600X - Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING - ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero X570
Cooling Noctua NH-L9x65 SE-AM4a - NH-D15 chromax.black with IPPC Industrial 3000 RPM 120/140 MM fans.
Memory G.SKILL TRIDENT Z ROYAL GOLD/SILVER 32 GB (2 x 16 GB and 4 x 8 GB) 3600 MHz CL14-15-15-35 1.45 volts
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE RTX 4060 OC LOW PROFILE - GIGABYTE RTX 4090 GAMING OC
Storage Samsung 980 PRO 1 TB + 2 TB - Samsung 870 EVO 4 TB - 2 x WD RED PRO 16 GB + WD ULTRASTAR 22 TB
Display(s) Asus 27" TUF VG27AQL1A and a Dell 24" for dual setup
Case Phanteks Enthoo 719/LUXE 2 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Onboard on both boards
Power Supply Phanteks Revolt X 1200W
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed Wireless Gaming Mouse
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spectrum
Software WINDOWS 10 PRO 64 BITS on both systems
Benchmark Scores Se more about my 2 in 1 system here: kortlink.dk/2ca4x
60 fps+ in 4k and i am happy.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Why HDR 600 when 1000 exist?
Because 1000 nit is intended for being in direct sunlight, which I am not. They are blindingly bright in a dimly lit room, which I am.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,533 (0.37/day)
System Name Obsolete / Waiting for Zen 5 or Arrow Lake
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz @ 1.35v / No AVX Offset
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 280 Hz + 77" QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX / Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Because 1000 nit is intended for being in direct sunlight, which I am not. They are blindingly bright in a dimly lit room, which I am.

Well LCD needs this kind of brightness boost to be able to deliver decent HDR, even in a dim room. Should have FALD backlight anyway. This is why mini LED backlight is going to be interresting. Edge lit LCD sucks for HDR. Most "HDR" PC monitors are a complete joke tho.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
303 (0.12/day)
Location
SoCal
System Name unnamed currently :*(
Processor Intel Core i7-5960x
Motherboard ASUS ROG RAMPAGE V EDITION 10
Cooling EKWB/Bitspower CPU, motherboard & GPU WB
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 4x4gb ddr4 2666
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 Ti FE 11GB
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 1 TB M.2 SSD & WD Black 5TB HDD
Display(s) Asus SwiftROG PG278Q & Asus PB277Q
Case Corsair 900D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair Axi1200
Mouse Steel Series Sensei RAW
Keyboard Corsair K70
Benchmark Scores 4.8 ghz @ 1.37 - 5930k - old cpu 4.6 GHZ @ 1.3 - 5960X - current cpu
Been gaming 1440p@144hz for almost 3 years. Love it. Can’t go back to 1080. Since 4K is so expensive I’ll stay on this res until 2020 and then upgrade
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Well LCD needs this kind of brightness boost to be able to deliver decent HDR, even in a dim room. Should have FALD backlight anyway. This is why mini LED backlight is going to be interresting. Edge lit LCD sucks for HDR. Most "HDR" PC monitors are a complete joke tho.
HDR is about contrast more than brightness and DisplayHDR 600 requires 3000:1 ratio which is three times better than typical displays.

Here's an example of a 1500 nit presentation/advertising display and it also has a contrast ratio of 3000:1 (via local dimming):
http://www.dynascanusa.com/product/55-1500-nit-high-brightness-lcd-with-super-narrow-bezel-ds55lx3/
The brighter the illumination, the more difficult it is to prevent bleeding.

DisplayHDR 1000 is intended for living rooms or situations where you're sitting many feet away.
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,533 (0.37/day)
System Name Obsolete / Waiting for Zen 5 or Arrow Lake
Processor i9-9900K @ 5.2 GHz @ 1.35v / No AVX Offset
Motherboard AsRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 4000/CL15
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 280 Hz + 77" QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence STX / Upgraded Op-Amps
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
HDR is about contrast more than brightness and DisplayHDR 600 requires 3000:1 ratio which is three times better than typical displays.

Here's an example of a 1500 nit presentation/advertising display and it also has a contrast ratio of 3000:1 (via local dimming):
http://www.dynascanusa.com/product/55-1500-nit-high-brightness-lcd-with-super-narrow-bezel-ds55lx3/
The brighter the illumination, the more difficult it is to prevent bleeding.

DisplayHDR 1000 is intended for living rooms or situations where you're sitting many feet away.

DisplayHDR is a measurement for PC monitors from what I know. All DisplayHDR certified screens are PC monitors, zero TV's on the list. With TV's, you simply look for Ultra HD Premium to ensure a good HDR experience and requirement is 1000 peak-nits and 0.05 nits black level, which is on par with DisplayHDR 1000 for LCD panels.

So why should DisplayHDR 1000 be intended for a living room TV? TV's already have a standard.

You're talking about your "dream specs". Pretty strange to settle with crappy HDR then. DisplayHDR 1000 + FALD / Mini LED backlight and you will get a much better HDR experience than DisplayHDR 600. 400 is basicly useless HDR. There's tons of fake HDR TV's and PC monitors. Some even use 8 bit panels, no FRC.

My dream monitor would not use LCD. It would use Micro LED. Backlight is crap. Self emitting pixels is the future.
Even the best LCD TV's with FALD is not even close to the HDR quality that OLED is capable of.

Nothing below DisplayHDR 1000 or Ultra HD Premium would be able to deliver a good HDR experience. LCD tech that is. If you go HDR, get proper HDR.
Proper HDR makes a huge difference. Crappy HDR does not. When some people say that HDR is not impressive, you just know that they have not seen proper HDR. Either because they were using a "fake HDR" monitor or TV... or simply failed to set the software up correctly.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
2,960 (0.90/day)
Location
Long Island
1440p w/ AU Optronics 165 Hz IPS Screen, when > 75 fps, G-Sync OFF / ULMB ON. Would not consider any monitor w/o ULMB.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
911 (0.43/day)
Location
Al Balqa', Jordan
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (Covered with Cooler Master MasterGel Pro)
Motherboard ASRock B450 Steel Legend, BIOS Version: 8.01 [Beta]
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML120L V2 RGB, 5x Galax Vortex Wind-02 (3xFront Intake, 2x Top exhaust)
Memory Kingston FURY Beast RGB 3600 MT/s 32 GB (8 GB x4), (KF436C17BBA/8)
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Dual OC
Storage Kingston NV2 1 TB
Display(s) MSI PRO M251 (HDMI), Running @104 Hz
Case Cooler Master MasterBox MB520
Audio Device(s) HP H360G USB
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE 550 80+ White
Mouse HP G200 Black
Keyboard Redragon MITRA K551-1 RGB
Software Windows 11 Home
So someone voted for 30 FPS !! , I know it's very playable , but you will not feel the pleasure of the gaming.:(
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
1440p@75/100/120Hz. I vary the refresh rate depending on what game I'm playing and what I can run smoothly without dropping frames. Though I actually can't tell the difference between 75Hz and 120Hz, so I tend to just leave it at that...
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
DisplayHDR is a measurement for PC monitors from what I know.
VESA creates standards for everything display. VGA is VESA, DVI is VESA (which HDMI Forum piggy backed on for HDMI), DisplayPort is VESA, the mounts for panels is VESA, sRGB was designed by VESA, etc.

All DisplayHDR certified screens are PC monitors, zero TV's on the list.
The standard is still new. DisplayHDR TVs will be coming. There's only maybe a dozen DisplayHDR monitors and most of those were FreeSync 2 compliant (which exceeds DisplayHDR 400 so certification was a breeze). Very few "HDR" TVs on the market today can pass DisplayHDR testing.

With TV's, you simply look for Ultra HD Premium to ensure a good HDR experience and requirement is 1000 peak-nits and 0.05 nits black level, which is on par with DisplayHDR 1000 for LCD panels.
UHD Premium, where this topic is concerned, is basically HDR10+ which is a video encoding and signaling standard for 10-bit color data with lighting information. It isn't a test/standard for ensuring panels faithfully display what they receive. DisplayHDR is. Example, this UHD premium TV does not qualify for DisplayHDR 1000 because it's maximum luminosity is only 900 cd/m2. Depending on how well it can control lighting across the breadth of the panel, it may not qualify for DisplayHDR 600 or even DisplayHDR 400. It can display HDR10+ encoded video though (big whoop-dee-doo).

You're talking about your "dream specs". Pretty strange to settle with crappy HDR then.
I said "ideal" not "dream." The monitor I want doesn't even exist thanks to the rarity of FreeSync 2 certified monitors (because fast response time, broad frequency response, and infinite dynamic contrast ratio) and 8:5 resolution ratio (because freakin' Hollywood killed it by throwing 16:9 at everyone).
 
Last edited:
Top