• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung starts Mass Production of QLC Consumer SSDs, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB with over 520 MB/s Read/Write

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,029 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Samsung Electronics, the world leader in advanced memory technology, today announced that it has begun mass producing the industry's first 4-bit (QLC, quad-level cell) 4-terabyte (TB) SATA solid-state drive (SSD) for consumers.

Based on 1-terabit (Tb) V-NAND with outstanding performance equivalent to the company's 3-bit design, Samsung's QLC SSD is expected to bring a new level of efficiency to consumer SSDs.





"Samsung's new 4-bit SATA SSD will herald a massive move to terabyte-SSDs for consumers," said Jaesoo Han, executive vice president of memory sales & marketing at Samsung Electronics. "As we expand our lineup across consumer segments and to the enterprise, 4-bit terabyte-SSD products will rapidly spread throughout the entire market."

With its new 1Tb 4-bit V-NAND chip, Samsung will be able to efficiently produce a 128GB memory card for smartphones that will lead the charge toward higher capacities for high-performance memory storage.

Typically, as data stored within a memory cell increases from three bits to four, the chip capacity per unit area would rise and the electrical charge (used to determine information from a sensor) would decrease by as much as 50 percent, making it considerably more difficult to maintain a device's desired performance and speed.

However, Samsung's 4-bit 4TB QLC SATA SSD maintains its performance levels at the same level as a 3-bit SSD, by using a 3-bit SSD controller and TurboWrite technology, while increasing drive capacity through the use of 32 chips, all based on 64-layer fourth-generation 1Tb V-NAND.*

The 4-bit QLC SSD enables a sequential read speed of 540 MB/s and a sequential write speed of 520 MB/s, and comes with a three-year warranty.

Samsung plans to introduce several 4-bit consumer SSDs later this year with 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB capacities in the widely used 2.5-inch form factor.

Since introducing the 32-gigabyte (GB) 1-bit SSD in 2006, which ushered in the PC SSD era, to today's 4TB 4-bit SSD, Samsung continues to drive new thresholds for each multi-bit generation.

In addition, the company expects to provide M.2 NVMe SSDs for the enterprise this year and begin mass production of 4-bit fifth-generation V-NAND. This will considerably expand its SSD lineup to meet the growing demand for faster, more reliable performance across a wide span of applications, such as next generation data centers, enterprise servers, and enterprise storage.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,465 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
That's nice. But what is going to be the price/GB again?? If it's 10 cents, It would be awesome, otherwise it's just very expensive capacity....
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.93/day)
People really need to be going SSD only route. Not long ago I've seen the Sandisk Ultra 2TB for 300 bucks. While more expensive than any 2TB HDD, it has so many benefits and doesn't get outdated like graphic cards, 300 bucks seems like a great investment. I paid 800€ for 2TB 850 Pro and I still consider it as one of the best investments I've done to date. Speed, silence and capacity is just something no HDD can ever match.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,042 (0.36/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Ideal pricing would be:

1TB=100$
2TB =150$
4TB=200$
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,029 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
That's nice. But what is going to be the price/GB again?? If it's 10 cents, It would be awesome, otherwise it's just very expensive capacity....
I think 10 cents per GB isn't unrealistic with QLC, but at first they'll price it closer to today's TLC to rake in the $$
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
610 (0.25/day)
Heck yeah! Really excited about this. I definitely think $100 for 1TB (SATA) is possible when you compare what the cheapest TLC SATA SSD is right now.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,210 (3.81/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Motherboard MSI E3 KRAIT Gaming v5
Cooling Tt tower + 120mm Tt fan
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3600 C18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 Mini
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
So the only benefit of these is size?
No use to me if 512Gb is enough for my needs.
 

Jonathan Marcus

New Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
People really need to be going SSD only route. Not long ago I've seen the Sandisk Ultra 2TB for 300 bucks. While more expensive than any 2TB HDD, it has so many benefits and doesn't get outdated like graphic cards, 300 bucks seems like a great investment. I paid 800€ for 2TB 850 Pro and I still consider it as one of the best investments I've done to date. Speed, silence and capacity is just something no HDD can ever match.
You are completely right. "SSD only route".
New generation computers (both laptops and PCs) have double drive systems SSD+HDD.
People are using SSDs as operating system drives and HDDs for storage.
But according to me when you use double drive systems, nothing changes.
I have a laptop with an SSD and HDD. SSD for the operating system and HDD for the storage.
But whenever I turn on the laptop, first of all HDD starts to run! The first noise I hear is the HDD's spinning noise. And I hate! from this.
A few days ago I detached the HDD.
Now there is only SSD in the laptop and I noticed that "system is completely silent, cooler and faster". And battery lasts longer.
If you have a double drive system SSD+HDD, you will not benefit from your SSD 100%. HDD will try to start firs!
SSD only systems are unique.
A lot of people are asking for the P/E cycles?
Do not worry about the P/E cycles.
Even the QLC SSDs have enough cycles for consumers.
This process will follow to mature. And SSD drives will replace the HDD drives in the future.
Prices will fall. Capacities and speeds will increase.
Even the worst SSD is much better than the best HDD.
Please look at that.
https://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/8TB-NVMe-NF1-SSD-4_main.jpg
8TB SSD drive with (11cm x 3.05 cm) size. And app. 10 gram.
NVMe 1.3 protocol and PCIe 4.0 interface, delivering sequential read speeds of 3,100 megabytes per second (MB/s) and write speeds of 2,000MB/s.
https://news.samsung.com/global/sam...ta-centers-in-next-generation-nf1-form-factor
And now look at that.
8TB HDD drive with (26 x 10 x 15 cm) size. And 605 gram. Only 190MB read speed.
https://www.seagate.com/www-content/datasheets/pdfs/exos-5e8DS1954-2-1712US-en_US.pdf
Which of these would you prefer?
1 - 10 gram / 11cm x 3.05 cm / 3100 MB read - 2000 MB write / zero noise
2 - 605 grm / 26 x 10 x 15 cm / 190 MB read.
?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,210 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Samsung's 4-bit 4TB QLC SATA SSD maintains its performance levels at the same level as a 3-bit SSD, by using a 3-bit SSD controller and TurboWrite technology

That does not compute. How does a controller mitigate physical limitations of NAND dies?
 

silentbogo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
5,473 (1.44/day)
Location
Kyiv, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS X570-PLUS TUF Gaming
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240mm AIO
Memory 4x8GB Samsung DDR4 ECC UDIMM
Video Card(s) Inno3D RTX 3070 Ti iChill
Storage ADATA Legend 2TB + ADATA SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case ghetto CM Cosmos RC-1000
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD)
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Modecom Volcano Blade (Kailh choc LP)
VR HMD Google dreamview headset(aka fancy cardboard)
Software Windows 11, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
That's nice. But what is going to be the price/GB again?? If it's 10 cents, It would be awesome, otherwise it's just very expensive capacity....
I think it's realistic for QLC. Even 3D TLC prices are slowly crawling to sub-15c/GB... Maybe by Q2 2019?...

So the only benefit of these is size?
Size and price.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.05/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
That does not compute. How does a controller mitigate physical limitations of NAND dies?
That caught my eye as well. Pure marketing BS. "Our new 3-story 500-seat long-distance jetliner performs and handles like a fighter jet, 'cause we use the same engine tech as fighter jets do." Yeah, that's not how things work.

You are completely right. "SSD only route".
...
While you're not wrong, we have a long, long way to go to where SSDs can compete with high-capacity HDDs for high-capacity use cases. SSDs are limited in price by the cost of silicon wafers (which is increasing) and density. We've seen massive density gains in recent years with 3D NAND, but this pace won't last for long - and SSDs are still multiple times more expensive per GB than HDDs. HDDs have the intrinsic base cost of the housing, actuator and motor, which makes <~$40 HDDs infeasible, but on the other hand those costs don't really scale - you only need to add more platters or make platters denser for more capacity. Neither of these are easy, of course, but they're not that expensive.

Still, HDDs have no place in laptops (or really consumer desktops either, outside of those who have particular storage needs). Outside of my HTPC, I haven't used a PC with a HDD in it for quite a few years.

On the other hand, consumer NAS adoption pretty much needs to accelerate, given the vast amounts of data the average user produces these days. And for mass storage of cold or semi-cold data, HDDs are excellent. If we move our mass storage (and thus HDDs) into a separate device, we get to keep the best of both worlds - compactness, silence and power efficiency all the time, capacity when we need it.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
159 (0.07/day)
Location
Finland
Processor i7 4770K
Motherboard Asus Z87-Expert
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S, &case fans all controlled by Aquaero 6
Memory 2x8GB TeamGroup Xtreem LV 2133MHz
Video Card(s) Vega 64
Storage Samsung 840 Pro + 2x 5GB WD Red@RAID1
Display(s) Dell U3014
Case Lian Li PC-A71B
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR, Objective2 (2x), AKG K702&712, Beyerdynamic DT990
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 650 (+Eaton 5P 1550 as "backup power")
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech G810
Do not worry about the P/E cycles.
Even the QLC SSDs have enough cycles for consumers.
P/E cycles mean nothing if there's no proper data retention.
In likely case you don't know how Flash memory works QLC needs to distinguish 16 charge levels to avoid error/data corruption.
That's starting to be basically semi analog recording, leaving very little room for charge to degrade/leak etc.

While biggest advantage of digital is its reliability in allowing considerable signal degradation without any effect to actual data...
 

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.24/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
That caught my eye as well. Pure marketing BS. "Our new 3-story 500-seat long-distance jetliner performs and handles like a fighter jet, 'cause we use the same engine tech as fighter jets do." Yeah, that's not how things work.


While you're not wrong, we have a long, long way to go to where SSDs can compete with high-capacity HDDs for high-capacity use cases. SSDs are limited in price by the cost of silicon wafers (which is increasing) and density. We've seen massive density gains in recent years with 3D NAND, but this pace won't last for long - and SSDs are still multiple times more expensive per GB than HDDs. HDDs have the intrinsic base cost of the housing, actuator and motor, which makes <~$40 HDDs infeasible, but on the other hand those costs don't really scale - you only need to add more platters or make platters denser for more capacity. Neither of these are easy, of course, but they're not that expensive.

Still, HDDs have no place in laptops (or really consumer desktops either, outside of those who have particular storage needs). Outside of my HTPC, I haven't used a PC with a HDD in it for quite a few years.

On the other hand, consumer NAS adoption pretty much needs to accelerate, given the vast amounts of data the average user produces these days. And for mass storage of cold or semi-cold data, HDDs are excellent. If we move our mass storage (and thus HDDs) into a separate device, we get to keep the best of both worlds - compactness, silence and power efficiency all the time, capacity when we need it.

Aye. Hard drives aren't going anywhere any time soon. They provide way too much value in many different use cases.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
102 (0.03/day)
So the only benefit of these is size?
No use to me if 512Gb is enough for my needs.

I'll forward this to Samsung and tell them to halt production cause some guy on tech powerup has no use for cheaper higher storage ssd's.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,210 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
P/E cycles mean nothing if there's no proper data retention.
In likely case you don't know how Flash memory works QLC needs to distinguish 16 charge levels to avoid error/data corruption.
That's starting to be basically semi analog recording, leaving very little room for charge to degrade/leak etc.

While biggest advantage of digital is its reliability in allowing considerable signal degradation without any effect to actual data...
And if you manage to retain your data, accessing it is still slower.

Aye. Hard drives aren't going anywhere any time soon. They provide way too much value in many different use cases.
As I have always said: we've had commercial HDDs since the 80s and tape still hasn't completely disappeared. Maybe HDDs will be replaced faster, but it would be foolish to expect them to go extinct less than a decade after SSD have been with us.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,465 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Either way, the HDD are 100% doomed. It's just a matter of time regardless if it's 10, 20 or 50 years. Why do you think WD, Seagate or Hitachi are masively investing now on SSD tech even if they lost the express train already?
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,210 (3.81/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Motherboard MSI E3 KRAIT Gaming v5
Cooling Tt tower + 120mm Tt fan
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3600 C18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 Mini
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
I'll forward this to Samsung and tell them to halt production cause some guy on tech powerup has no use for cheaper higher storage ssd's.
They will realise like I do, that I am not the target market, and the sender is a moron!
Be off with you fool.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
131 (0.05/day)
Processor Haswell-E - i7-5820K @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99S
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Palit Super JetStream 980Ti
Storage SSD: 512GB [Crucial MX100] HDD: 34TB [4 x 6TB WD Blue, 2 x 5TB Seagate External]
Display(s) Acer ProDesigner BM320 4K
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
... and yours for the price of a second hand car. FO Samsung.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,133 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
If the cache is big enough, you will never feel how slow the main storage is.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,210 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
610 (0.25/day)
Anyone looking for a main performance drive is not buying QLC; it's for bulk storage on desktops and/or good enough storage for mobile devices/laptops. Seems like the haters are focusing on that. If you want performance buy Optane and Samsung's MLC Pro NVMe drives.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,210 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Anyone looking for a main performance drive is not buying QLC; it's for bulk storage on desktops and/or good enough storage for mobile devices/laptops. Seems like the haters are focusing on that. If you want performance buy Optane and Samsung's MLC Pro NVMe drives.
Not really. Bulk storage is exactly where you want data retention to not suck.
 
Top