• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Put Through AoTS, About 16% Faster Than GTX 1060

Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,750 (1.67/day)
I sense an issue.
We're discussing the main example of this happening. Intel didn't buy AMD because of anti-monopoly regulations (unless you have a better explanation).
But you say that it couldn't have been the reason, because these regulations don't work on Intel.
With this kind of logic we'll never get to anything constructive.
:)

Anti-monopoly regulations don't mean you can't be a monopolist. Their only role is to protect competition, but competition must exist in the first place.
If you're an only supplier of some product (because no one else knows how to do it or isn't interested) you are a monopolist, but anti-monopoly laws don't apply.

In fact legal system is what actually makes monopolies possible through copyright, patents and concessions. ;-)

So now you're literally accusing Intel and Nvidia of being better at doing business than AMD. Is this really what you intend?
It's like if you accused a runner for winning unfairly
, because he trained harder or has better body proportions. Because in your perfect world all runners should have identical bodies and train exactly the same.

Both Intel and AMD can do top-notch CPUs. But Intel is better at selling them. And selling is the core ability in any business.
I'm not sure what issue you're talking about.

I never said buying AMD, more like burying them.

No I said Intel got away with anti monopolistic, unfair trade practices in the past - same can be said of MS & they were even more blatant, arguably Google as well.

There is no law preventing natural monopolies that develop over time in more mature markets, or market segments. Let alone many places around the world that don't have (m)any anti monopoly laws in the first place.

Right, like I said. Competition or consumers?

Read again what I wrote, Intel certainly & possibly Nvidia(?) got away with much worse in the past - what makes you think the US DoJ or EU will step in if Intel/Nvidia lower their prices to such an extent that AMD becomes irrelevant? No, I thought so!

Let's not go there, I know AMD have their share of a chequered past but is it something you wanna be defending, even if it is Intel or Nvidia?

Right & let's not forget the power of $ that got them in that place, aside from lots of superior products (last decade) & shady deals.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.70/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Yeah, the latest API has been around how long now?
Long enough... but not a ton of games have it yet either. It also brings more of the cpu into things. ;)

I think Nvidia need to release a few more in between cards because I'm not sure they have enough...

What a way to confuse the consumer....
Are you serious?

If 5 cards are too much, AMD/Intel CPU selection must make you want to explode. Lololol!
 

Keullo-e

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
11,030 (2.66/day)
Location
Finland
System Name 4K-gaming
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X up to 5.05GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte B550M Aorus Elite
Cooling Custom loop (CPU+GPU, 240 & 120 rads)
Memory 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury @ DDR4-3466
Video Card(s) PowerColor RX 6700 XT Fighter OC/UV
Storage ~4TB SSD + 6TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 27" 4K120 IPS + Lenovo 32" 4K60 IPS
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow White
Audio Device(s) Asus TUF H3 Wireless
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores It runs Crysis remastered at 4K
How much did 1060 cost at launch? $299 for FE and $249 for custom cards If I remember correctly and after 2 years GTX1060 costs $210.
I will say It once more that It's unreasonable to expect a card 16% faster(It should be more) than 1060 to be priced under $200 while the slower older card(GTX1060) costs $210.

If they want this card to have at least the same performance/price ratio as 2060, then the price needs to be $279 but considering no RT I think It will be $249, but we will see.
Looks like the cheapest GTX 1060s here in Finland are 220 euros for 3GB, and 259 euros for 6GB. Feels ridiculous that 1060 is about 2½yrs old, and they're still going for about their MSRP.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,225 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
That I can understand but I thought the new line was RTX 20xx rather than 1160?? Unless it's a completely cut down version of of the 2060 for example that's going to be half the price or something, I'm not sure I understand the reason for the card?

AMD cards are a bit like it I agree, but they aren't going forward leaps and bounds in performance. It just seems like a bit of a waste to release it from my little brain that was all... :)
The new line is RTX 20xx. But since the 2060 can barely push DXR, it's clear any lesser card in that lineup won't be up to the task. If you can't use that hardware, you get rid of it and, if you don't want to be slapped with frivolous lawsuits, you do your best to make the differentiation as clear as possible. In this case, you create a numbering scheme different from 20xx.
Still pretty messy, I agree, but so is the whole movement to push RTRT into the mainstream a little too soon.
 
Last edited:

phill

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
15,973 (3.40/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill - There are others!! Just no room to put! :D
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Motherboard Asus Zenith 2 Extreme Alpha
Cooling Lots!! Dual GTX 560 rads with D5 pumps for each rad. One rad for each component
Memory Viper Steel 4 x 16GB DDR4 3600MHz not sure on the timings... Probably still at 2667!! :(
Video Card(s) Asus Strix 3090 with front and rear active full cover water blocks
Storage I'm bound to forget something here - 250GB OS, 2 x 1TB NVME, 2 x 1TB SSD, 4TB SSD, 2 x 8TB HD etc...
Display(s) 3 x Dell 27" S2721DGFA @ 7680 x 1440P @ 144Hz or 165Hz - working on it!!
Case The big Thermaltake that looks like a Case Mods
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 1600W T2
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Razer something or other....
VR HMD No headset yet
Software Windows 11 OS... Not a fan!!
Benchmark Scores I've actually never benched it!! Too busy with WCG and FAH and not gaming! :( :( Not OC'd it!! :(
The new line is RTX 20xx. But since the 2060 can barely push DXR, it's clear any lesser card in that lineup won't be up to the task. If you can't use that hardware, you get rid of it and, if you don't want to be slapped with frivolous lawsuits, you do your best to make the differentiation as clear as possible. In this case, you create a numbering scheme different from 20xx.
Still pretty messy, I agree, but so is the whole movement to push RTRT into the mainstream a little too soon.

Ah that's ok then that someone agrees even with my crappy style of english lol :)
Surprised then they didn't just release GTX cards in stead of RTX below 2070... So GTX 2060 then RTX 2070... Might have been a little better but I understand at least were your going :)
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
162 (0.03/day)
You do realize this has happened plenty times by this point right ? The 1060 wont remain forever in production.

The 2070 was sold at a lower price than the 1080ti but had comparable performance , how was that possible accordion to your logic ?
If Nvidia wants to sell all of their inventory of GTX1060 then they can't price It higher than It's successor unless they sell all stock before this new card is released.
2070 doesn't have comparable performance to 1080ti. It has weaker performance so It is price is also lower.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
162 (0.03/day)
Looks like the cheapest GTX 1060s here in Finland are 220 euros for 3GB, and 259 euros for 6GB. Feels ridiculous that 1060 is about 2½yrs old, and they're still going for about their MSRP.
If I am correct then MSRP doesn't include VAT, that's why It looks like It costs the same. AMD in this performance range has much better value(more Vram, same performance for less money).
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,225 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Ah that's ok then that someone agrees even with my crappy style of english lol :)
Surprised then they didn't just release GTX cards in stead of RTX below 2070... So GTX 2060 then RTX 2070... Might have been a little better but I understand at least were your going :)
Neah, simply changing RTX to GTX wouldn't have been enough. People are that dumb.
 

Keullo-e

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
11,030 (2.66/day)
Location
Finland
System Name 4K-gaming
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X up to 5.05GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte B550M Aorus Elite
Cooling Custom loop (CPU+GPU, 240 & 120 rads)
Memory 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury @ DDR4-3466
Video Card(s) PowerColor RX 6700 XT Fighter OC/UV
Storage ~4TB SSD + 6TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 27" 4K120 IPS + Lenovo 32" 4K60 IPS
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow White
Audio Device(s) Asus TUF H3 Wireless
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores It runs Crysis remastered at 4K
If I am correct then MSRP doesn't include VAT, that's why It looks like It costs the same. AMD in this performance range has much better value(more Vram, same performance for less money).
Yeah our MSRPs includes VAT always.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
342 (0.17/day)
Location
Hungary
Processor i5-9600K
Motherboard ASUS Prime Z390-A
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition PWM
Memory G.Skill DDR4 RipjawsV 3200MHz 16GB kit
Video Card(s) Asus RTX2060 ROG STRIX GAMING
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G7 27"
Case Cooler Master MasterCase H500
Power Supply SUPER FLOWER Leadex Gold 650W
Mouse BenQ Zowie FK1+-B
Keyboard Cherry KC 1000
Software Win 10
If I am correct then MSRP doesn't include VAT, that's why It looks like It costs the same. AMD in this performance range has much better value(more Vram, same performance for less money).

more RAM that it can't utilize, worse power draw, worse thermals, worse compatibility, worse stability. Sure, AMD is naturally the better choice
 

phill

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
15,973 (3.40/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill - There are others!! Just no room to put! :D
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Motherboard Asus Zenith 2 Extreme Alpha
Cooling Lots!! Dual GTX 560 rads with D5 pumps for each rad. One rad for each component
Memory Viper Steel 4 x 16GB DDR4 3600MHz not sure on the timings... Probably still at 2667!! :(
Video Card(s) Asus Strix 3090 with front and rear active full cover water blocks
Storage I'm bound to forget something here - 250GB OS, 2 x 1TB NVME, 2 x 1TB SSD, 4TB SSD, 2 x 8TB HD etc...
Display(s) 3 x Dell 27" S2721DGFA @ 7680 x 1440P @ 144Hz or 165Hz - working on it!!
Case The big Thermaltake that looks like a Case Mods
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 1600W T2
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Razer something or other....
VR HMD No headset yet
Software Windows 11 OS... Not a fan!!
Benchmark Scores I've actually never benched it!! Too busy with WCG and FAH and not gaming! :( :( Not OC'd it!! :(
Neah, simply changing RTX to GTX wouldn't have been enough. People are that dumb.

I like to have a bit more hope but maybe that's miss placed :laugh:

Always remember this, higher numbers is better.... :) :laugh:
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
284 (0.11/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
Existence of this GTX 1060 replacement is actually needed, especially for laptop makers.
Nvidia needs something to compete with RX 590, imagine the day all the 1060s are out of stock, then what does nvidia have in the mainstream market? Nothing other than GTX 1050Ti replacement which obviously isn't going to be strong enough.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,652 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
This GPU is made just to win over RX590 priced a bit higher. Simple as that.
 
D

Deleted member 158293

Guest
Nvidia will price it at whatever it wants, and people will just buy it, not complicated. As long add their marketing and branding help up, no need for them to be competitive at any level.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
162 (0.03/day)
more RAM that it can't utilize, worse power draw, worse thermals, worse compatibility, worse stability. Sure, AMD is naturally the better choice
1. no, having more Vram is never a disadvantage
2. yes, the power draw is very high
3. yes, temperature and fan noise is worse
4. worse compatibility? What do you mean?
5. worse stability? What do you mean?

For the price of 1050Ti 4GB you can buy a ~45% faster RX570 8GB with 3 games included.
I think RX570 is a much better choice than 1050Ti.
RX580 vs GTX1060 It is more or less a tie in my opinion.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
545 (0.18/day)
Location
Here
System Name Skypas
Processor Intel Core i7-6700
Motherboard Asus H170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X Turbo
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 6GB
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) LG 22EA63V
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2 w/ Deepcool XFan 120
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 Pro (to be replaced by 2025)
GTX 1660 Ti, let me guess it's gonna be priced at $280 and the GTX 1660 at $240 with performance equal to GTX 1060
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,225 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Nvidia will price it at whatever it wants, and people will just buy it, not complicated. As long add their marketing and branding help up, no need for them to be competitive at any level.
Yeah, that's the problem with Nvidia, they're not competitive. :kookoo:
 

Keullo-e

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
11,030 (2.66/day)
Location
Finland
System Name 4K-gaming
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X up to 5.05GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte B550M Aorus Elite
Cooling Custom loop (CPU+GPU, 240 & 120 rads)
Memory 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury @ DDR4-3466
Video Card(s) PowerColor RX 6700 XT Fighter OC/UV
Storage ~4TB SSD + 6TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 27" 4K120 IPS + Lenovo 32" 4K60 IPS
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow White
Audio Device(s) Asus TUF H3 Wireless
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores It runs Crysis remastered at 4K
1. no, having more Vram is never a disadvantage
2. yes, the power draw is very high
3. yes, temperature and fan noise is worse
4. worse compatibility? What do you mean?
5. worse stability? What do you mean?

For the price of 1050Ti 4GB you can buy a ~45% faster RX570 8GB with 3 games included.
I think RX570 is a much better choice than 1050Ti.
RX580 vs GTX1060 It is more or less a tie in my opinion.
And you can sell those games and then you can say that the card was cheap as bread.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,932 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
A few weeks ago nobody believed a word of this rumor. lol.

It has its consequences though, and those aren't very good for the RTX proposition in a broad sense. This will stall adoption at least to some degree and it will make devs scratch their head when they decide to implement RTRT or not.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.70/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Why? In my head, it's a better decision to do this than to strap RT/TC to a card which literally doesnt have enough horsepower to run it and jack the price up.

RT capabilities will come down in price as time goes on. Remember these are almost 4 months old, not 4 years. :)
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,225 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
A few weeks ago nobody believed a word of this rumor. lol.

It has its consequences though, and those aren't very good for the RTX proposition in a broad sense. This will stall adoption at least to some degree and it will make devs scratch their head when they decide to implement RTRT or not.
Developers seem to have a problem moving to DX12 in general (BFV with DX12, an API designed to offer more fine grained control, eats more VRAM than with DX11!), I don't think the mid range of this generation will have an impact on them deciding to do the legwork or not. Nvidia's partner programs will have a much bigger impact on that.

Why? In my head, it's a better decision to do this than to strap RT/TC to a card which literally doesnt have enough horsepower to run it and jack the price up.

RT capabilities will come down in price as time goes on. Remember these are almost 4 months old, not 4 years. :)
I'm pretty sure he's thinking installed base.
In my mind, this generation only serves as proving ground, so devs can see what's possible, with the installed base to come with future iterations (again, 7nm can't come soon enough).
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,902 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Why do people fall for these kinds of "leaks" every time?
As I've pointed out many times before, unreleased products don't show up with a product name, they just display the device ID. The actual product name don't show up until the product release drivers. So whenever we see "leaks" like this, we know they are fake.

We went through this for months ahead of Turing, with loads of fake news from Videocardz and Wccftech about "1180" and "1180 Ti". But as always, we forgive and forget.
This time they've even managed to create a mock-up image of "RTX 1660 Ti". They don't even try to make it convincing…

Is this really called 1660Ti instead of 1160Ti?
It doesn't make any sense with the 16-series cards…
I wouldn't trust anything sources like Wccftech, Videocards, etc. "leaks" without any real sources. All the information about "1660" so far has been fake.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2018
Messages
127 (0.06/day)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB -> 1536 CU + 1770 MHz/6000 MHz -> 5.44 TFLOPs = $279
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB -> 1280 CU + 1785 MHz/4000 MHz -> 4.57 TFLOPs = $250

If true, NVidia just pooped on us again. Waiting +2 years for 15-20 % performance increase? Shame, shame, shame on you NGreedia!
 
Top