• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

New AMD Listings in Korean RRA Certification Point to Impending Graphics Cards Release - Big Navi?

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.35/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
The Korean RRA has listed AMD graphics cards for certification this month which may well point towards an actual announcement coming from AMD during the next month. The company has already confirmed they will be discussing RDNA2 graphics cards come their next Financial Analyst Day, set for March 5th. The new entries, D32310 and D30201, have been listed on February 03 and February 19, respectively. This is relevant for a March announcement - even if just a paper one - of the new RDNA2 GPUs because historically, it seems that AMD has registered impending releases with the Korean RRA roughly one month prior to actual product releases.

As you can see in the listing, AMD registered two graphics cards in June 2019 (D16302 and D18206 - and one month later, in July, the company released Navi-based RX 5700 XT and RX 5700. AMD also registered the RX 5600 XT model number, D32501, on December 3, 2019 with a release one month later on January 21, 2020. AMD similarly registered model number D18902 on November 27, 2019 - and AMD released the 5500 XT on December 12, less than a month later. There seems to be a pattern here. if you're wondering why the model number for these new February registrations is lower than that of the RX 5600 XT (D32501 against the newer, yet lower D32310 and D30201), it could have something to do with the fact that AMD decided to carve out the RX 5600 XT SKU later than they knew they'd be releasing Big Navi - as an attempt to curtail NVIDIA in the GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1660 Super battlefield.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
221 (0.12/day)
System Name Violet
Processor AMD Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard ASRock x570 Phantom Gaming X
Cooling Be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory G.Skill Flare x 32GB 3400Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI 6900XT Gaming X Trio
Storage Western Digital WD Black SN750 1TB
Display(s) 3440x1440
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH Performance
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse EVGA X15
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 64bit
Can’t wait for big Navi. :)
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
That new arctus workstation card maybe.
Or a lower tier wx gpu.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
64 (0.04/day)
Even if this is Big Navi, Nvidia is obviously ready to launch their next-gen architecture on 7nm as well and I'm sorry AMD fans, but there's no way AMD is going to catch up yet. Big Navi might beat Big Turing, but Turing is on 12FF and is 18 months old now. When Nvidia releases Ampere (or whatever codename they give their next-gen consumer GPU architecture) they will finally take advantage of the 7nm node as well, eliminating this advantage for AMD.

It's going to be another case of "too little, too late" for AMD, I'm afraid.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,863 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Nvidia is obviously ready to launch their next-gen architecture on 7nm as well

Since it's obvious, you wouldn't mind telling us what is the overwhelming evidence that supports this would you ?
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
221 (0.12/day)
System Name Violet
Processor AMD Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard ASRock x570 Phantom Gaming X
Cooling Be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory G.Skill Flare x 32GB 3400Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI 6900XT Gaming X Trio
Storage Western Digital WD Black SN750 1TB
Display(s) 3440x1440
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH Performance
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse EVGA X15
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 64bit
Die size of the 2080TI is a gigantic 754 mm2, such a size at 7nm the costs will be gigantic high towards € 2000+ or so.
Nvidia will not sell that, not even to the biggest Nvidia fans.
So the die-size has to go down considerably and with it the performance. The architecture is the same as Turing. I think it will mainly consume less power and the performance for the 3080TI * will be around 15/20% higher than the 2080TI because architecture tweaks.

5700XT on 7nm has a die-size 251 mm2.
Radeon VII 331 mm2.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Since it's obvious, you wouldn't mind telling us what is the overwhelming evidence that supports this would you ?

His feelings of inadequacy if AMD does well. It's a sickness among Huang boys
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,669 (0.43/day)
Since it's obvious, you wouldn't mind telling us what is the overwhelming evidence that supports this would you ?
Umm Nvidias own promise of new products (not directly confirming Ampere of course) for GTC in March ( i still believe they will launch GA100 first) plus historical evidence of spring/summer releases and one and a half years have passed since turing launch.
Die size of the 2080TI is a gigantic 754 mm2, such a size at 7nm the costs will be gigantic high towards € 2000+ or so.
Nvidia will not sell that, not even to the biggest Nvidia fans.
So the die-size has to go down considerably and with it the performance. The architecture is the same as Turing. I think it will mainly consume less power and the performance for the 3080TI * will be around 15/20% higher than the 2080TI because architecture tweaks.

5700XT on 7nm has a die-size 251 mm2.
Radeon VII 331 mm2.
In order to gain speed Nvidia does not have to make any tweaks other than the 7nm node. That's the scary part. They can shrink down TU102 to 300-400mm² and still be faster than AMD just with a process shrink. Besides 7nm has high yields and is very mature now. Just what Nvidia wants for big dies.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
64 (0.04/day)
Since it's obvious, you wouldn't mind telling us what is the overwhelming evidence that supports this would you ?

Sure.
Fact: Nvidia is beating AMD's fastest chips (on 7nm) with 18 month old, 12nm chips right now.
Fact: The move to 7nm will allow for large improvements to both density and thermals. Think 50%+ faster than Tu102 for the Ampere equivalent.

So if AMD is just catching Tu102 after all this time, what makes you think such a product will be remotely competitive with Am102? That's illogical.

Die size of the 2080TI is a gigantic 754 mm2, such a size at 7nm the costs will be gigantic high towards € 2000+ or so.
Nvidia will not sell that, not even to the biggest Nvidia fans.
So the die-size has to go down considerably and with it the performance. The architecture is the same as Turing. I think it will mainly consume less power and the performance for the 3080TI * will be around 15/20% higher than the 2080TI because architecture tweaks.

5700XT on 7nm has a die-size 251 mm2.
Radeon VII 331 mm2.

What makes you think Nvidia will need to design a 751 mm^2 chip on 7nm to compete with Big Navi? Such a chip would have something like 4x the compute power of Tu102. Completely unnecessary, and unprecedented.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
575 (0.24/day)
There's an epidemic Navi driver issue right now that won't make anyone but the most hardcore of fanboys interested in AMD graphics.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
64 (0.04/day)
His feelings of inadequacy if AMD does well. It's a sickness among Huang boys

Whatever helps you sleep better at night. I'm too old for fanboyism. I buy the best products for my workloads. AMD hasn't offered anything worth my attention in the GPU market since Hawaii. I'm sorry that offends you, perhaps if you weren't so caught up in cheerleading you might not have such an irrational, emotional response to someone offering their opinion about objective matters of engineering.
 
Low quality post by TheGuruStud
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Whatever helps you sleep better at night. I'm too old for fanboyism. I buy the best products for my workloads. AMD hasn't offered anything worth my attention in the GPU market since Hawaii. I'm sorry that offends you, perhaps if you weren't so caught up in cheerleading you might not have such an irrational, emotional response to someone offering their opinion about objective matters of engineering.

Objective? It's going to cost a lot more to produce a faster 3000 series. Doubling down on ReTardX is going to cost space. Nvidia doesn't sacrifice margins. They're either going to be very expensive or the typical generational speed increase. And there's still no evidence of a release date anytime soon unless you count end of year. Nvidia can announce all they want. I know someone else that does that, too.

And apparently they don't even have TSMC fully on board.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,863 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Sure.
Fact: Nvidia is beating AMD's fastest chips (on 7nm) with 18 month old, 12nm chips right now.
Fact: The move to 7nm will allow for large improvements to both density and thermals. Think 50%+ faster than Tu102 for the Ampere equivalent.

Uhm, what's all this supposed to be ? I was expecting some inside information on how Nvidia is supposedly ready to launch anything on 7nm, instead I got some meaningless boilerplate and wishful thinking. I don't know what I was expecting.

"Fact": Nvidia is beating AMD's smallest 7nm chips with colossal 12nm chips.
"Fact" : 7nm doesn't bring any improvement to thermals, it's actually going to get worse as is the case with every node shrink which makes the thermal density increase, so I think you meant power.

Just some details.

Such a chip would have something like 4x the compute power of Tu102. Completely unnecessary, and unprecedented.

Not only that your "4x" figure is impossible based on current technology projections it's also impossible based on physical limitations. 7nm is 60% denser, so a 7nm Turing based chip of the same size would have roughly 1.6x times the compute power, to get to your mythical "4x" number the SMs would need to become a mindbogglingly 2.5x times faster. What's really unprecedented is your extremely poor estimation and it might just be the most ridiculous thing I read on this forum as of late. Talk about matters of objective engineering ...

I must say that at least you tried.

That's the scary part. They can shrink down TU102 to 300-400mm²

What's scary is that your math is just as bad as above. No, they can't do that, TU102 on 7nm would be about 470mm^2 anything below that is mathematically and physically not possible. 470 mm^2 is still relatively big, comparable to the Pascal predecessor, GP102. And this 60% denser business is the most optimistic figure by the way.

and still be faster than AMD just with a process shrink

And they'd still use chips that are bigger and a lot more costly. This stuff ain't magic, you make a bigger chip on the same node and it's likely going to be faster. Whoop de doo !
 
Last edited:

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
18,853 (3.08/day)
Location
UK\USA
Processor AMD 3900X \ AMD 7700X
Motherboard ASRock AM4 X570 Pro 4 \ ASUS X670Xe TUF
Cooling D15
Memory Patriot 2x16GB PVS432G320C6K \ G.Skill Flare X5 F5-6000J3238F 2x16GB
Video Card(s) eVga GTX1060 SSC \ XFX RX 6950XT RX-695XATBD9
Storage Sammy 860, MX500, Sabrent Rocket 4 Sammy Evo 980 \ 1xSabrent Rocket 4+, Sammy 2x990 Pro
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ LG 43UN700
Case Fractal Design Pop Air 2x140mm fans from Torrent \ Fractal Design Torrent 2 SilverStone FHP141x2
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V677 \ Yamaha CX-830+Yamaha MX-630 Infinity RS4000\Paradigm P Studio 20, Blue Yeti
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-750 \ Corsair RM1000X Shift
Mouse Steelseries Sensei wireless \ Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ Wooting Two HE
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
Even if this is Big Navi, Nvidia is obviously ready to launch their next-gen architecture on 7nm as well and I'm sorry AMD fans, but there's no way AMD is going to catch up yet. Big Navi might beat Big Turing, but Turing is on 12FF and is 18 months old now. When Nvidia releases Ampere (or whatever codename they give their next-gen consumer GPU architecture) they will finally take advantage of the 7nm node as well, eliminating this advantage for AMD.

It's going to be another case of "too little, too late" for AMD, I'm afraid.

And still way over priced.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
1,825 (0.33/day)
Location
Slovenia
System Name Multiple - Win7, Win10, Kubuntu
Processor Intel Core i7 3820 OC@ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory Corsair Vengeance 32GB 1333MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire ATI Radeon RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung SSD: 970 EVO 1TB, 2x870 EVO 250GB,860 Evo 250GB,850 Evo 250GB, WD 4x1TB, 2x2TB, 4x4TB
Display(s) Asus PB328Q 32' 1440p@75hz
Case Cooler Master CM Storm Trooper
Power Supply Corsair HX750, HX550, Galaxy 520W
Mouse Multiple, Razer Mamba Elite, Logitech M500
Keyboard Multiple - Lenovo, HP, Dell, Logitech
I llike that they keep the ATI name throughout :D
I knows names and labels don't mean much in all seriousness, but I still like the feeling :p
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
64 (0.04/day)
Uhm, what's all this supposed to be ? I was expecting some inside information on how Nvidia is supposedly ready to launch anything on 7nm, instead I got some meaningless boilerplate and wishful thinking. I don't know what I was expecting.

"Fact": Nvidia is beating AMD's smallest 7nm chips with colossal 12nm chips.
"Fact" : 7nm doesn't bring any improvement to thermals, it's actually going to get worse as is the case with every node shrink which makes the thermal density increase, so I think you meant power.

Just some details.



Not only that your "4x" figure is impossible based on current technology projections it's also impossible based on physical limitations. 7nm is 60% denser, so a 7nm Turing based chip of the same size would have roughly 1.6x times the compute power, to get to your mythical "4x" number the SMs would need to become a mindbogglingly 2.5x times faster. What's really unprecedented is your extremely poor estimation and it might just be the most ridiculous thing I read on this forum as of late. Talk about matters of objective engineering ...

I must say that at least you tried.



What's scary is that your math is just as bad as above. No, they can't do that, TU102 on 7nm would be about 470mm^2 anything below that is mathematically and physically not possible. 470 mm^2 is still relatively big, comparable to the Pascal predecessor, GP102. And this 60% denser business is the most optimistic figure by the way.



And they'd still use chips that are bigger and a lot more costly. This stuff ain't magic, you make a bigger chip on the same node and it's likely going to be faster. Whoop de doo !

TSMC 12FF process node transistor density: 33.8 MTr/mm^2
TSMC 7nm+ EUV process node transistor density: 115.8 MTr/mn^2


If you want to quibble over a few % off 4x scaling have at it, but I’m not interested.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
1,637 (0.64/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
Even if Nvidia has new cards waiting in response, it still means better cards for less money. A 5600 or 5700 would be more than enough for me, but at this point I’m waiting it out to see the next exchange. I sure hope nvidia brings new cards, and does it soon.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
528 (0.12/day)
Die size of the 2080TI is a gigantic 754 mm2, such a size at 7nm the costs will be gigantic high towards € 2000+ or so.
Nvidia will not sell that, not even to the biggest Nvidia fans.
So the die-size has to go down considerably and with it the performance. The architecture is the same as Turing. I think it will mainly consume less power and the performance for the 3080TI * will be around 15/20% higher than the 2080TI because architecture tweaks.

5700XT on 7nm has a die-size 251 mm2.
Radeon VII 331 mm2.

nvidia can cut CUDA core count by half and retain 90% to 95% performance. and they can do it without any IPC increase to the architecture. they have done it in the past. i see many people expect nvidia will be in trouble on 7nm because even with die shrink "turing" will still going to be very big. but most often people did not count what other improvement nvidia can do to turing even without changing the architecture too much

His feelings of inadequacy if AMD does well. It's a sickness among Huang boys
the same sickness AMD boy had if they see progress on nvidia.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.61/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Bring em on.

It's better that they moved than stay on another GCN Revision, GCN has ran its course

nvidia can cut CUDA core count by half and retain 90% to 95% performance. and they can do it without any IPC increase to the architecture. they have done it in the past. i see many people expect nvidia will be in trouble on 7nm because even with die shrink "turing" will still going to be very big. but most often people did not count what other improvement nvidia can do to turing even without changing the architecture too much


the same sickness AMD boy had if they see progress on nvidia.

Wheres your system specs?

Even if this is Big Navi, Nvidia is obviously ready to launch their next-gen architecture on 7nm as well and I'm sorry AMD fans, but there's no way AMD is going to catch up yet. Big Navi might beat Big Turing, but Turing is on 12FF and is 18 months old now. When Nvidia releases Ampere (or whatever codename they give their next-gen consumer GPU architecture) they will finally take advantage of the 7nm node as well, eliminating this advantage for AMD.

It's going to be another case of "too little, too late" for AMD, I'm afraid.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,669 (0.43/day)
"Fact": Nvidia is beating AMD's smallest 7nm chips with colossal 12nm chips.
And yet still has better performance per watt despite having chips twice the size running on an older process. Not bad.
"Fact" : 7nm doesn't bring any improvement to thermals, it's actually going to get worse as is the case with every node shrink which makes the thermal density increase, so I think you meant power.
That's for CPU's. GPU's are much larger and thus thermal density is much less of an issue. No to mention that unlike CPU's they are direct die cooled instead of including an IHS layer that further complicates heat transfer. We are not talking about packing tens of billions of transistiors on 75mm² chiplet here. And on the lower end cards that do use smaller dies it's also not a problem due to their much smaller power consuption.
What's scary is that your math is just as bad as above. No, they can't do that, TU102 on 7nm would be about 470mm^2 anything below that is mathematically and physically not possible. 470 mm^2 is still relatively big, comparable to the Pascal predecessor, GP102. And this 60% denser business is the most optimistic figure by the way.
That's for the highest end chip. RTX 2080 is 545mm². Even if we assume a conservative 40% area reduction from moving to 7nm that would produce a ~390mm² card. And thus far AMD can't even beat 2080. Sure they will with big navi but remember that that card wiill likely also be ~500mm² at 7nm. Essentially two times 5700 size.

So in essence AMD will beat a 545mm² current card or 390mm² die shirked card with their 500mm² card. But gets beaten by next gen Ampere within months most likely.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
that "smallest" chip in action

 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,323 (1.51/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 16GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
I hope this is the "Big Navi" I been looking to see what it can do. Just got some eagerness to maybe purchase something new :)
 

silentbogo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
5,470 (1.45/day)
Location
Kyiv, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS X570-PLUS TUF Gaming
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240mm AIO
Memory 4x8GB Samsung DDR4 ECC UDIMM
Video Card(s) Inno3D RTX 3070 Ti iChill
Storage ADATA Legend 2TB + ADATA SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case ghetto CM Cosmos RC-1000
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD)
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Modecom Volcano Blade (Kailh choc LP)
VR HMD Google dreamview headset(aka fancy cardboard)
Software Windows 11, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Do you, guys, realize that you are arguing over a non-existent product?
Rumors of "Big Navi" have been debunked some time ago, and "Arcturus" is a made-up name that someone came up with almost 2 years ago and everyone still uses it (even though it's not a thing).
Having a 225W RX5700XT is already a good-enough sign that consumer cards are near the upper TDP cap, so the most we could actually hope for is a 48CU Navi card, maybe on 7nm+ process.
Also, the majority of consumer GPU market segments are covered already, and as with Polaris, there's no need to rush for that 0.01% that'll give up their 2080Ti in favor of marginally faster AMD flagship.
 
Top