• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Editorial x86 Lacks Innovation, Arm is Catching up. Enough to Replace the Giant?

Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,890 (0.81/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
The x86 architecture is massive, having more than a thousand instructions, some of which are very complex. This approach is called Complex Instruction Set Computing (CISC). Internally, these instructions are split into micro-ops, which further complicates processor design.
Actually, you got it all wrong.
Back in the 80s there were two main arguments in the CISC vs. RISC discussions;
- A smaller instruction set allows higher flexibility in implementation
- Having to support legacy instructions in hardware
Moving to using micro-operations solved both of these, and therefore eliminating the only real advantages of RISC over CISC. In all x86 CPUs since the early 90s, the CPU front-end decodes the x86 ISA into the microarchitecture's specific ISA, which gives the designer full control over which instructions are prioritized in the hardware implementation, and which can be "simulated" using a combination of other instructions. This way the instructions can be optimized for however many execution units and various resources are present in the CPU, and the whole pipeline doesn't need to support every legacy feature. Every modern x86 microarchtecture is sort of a hybrid of CISC and RISC, with RISC-like micro-operations. Even current ARM microarchitectures have gotten some CISC-like features including some SIMD and loads of ASIC features, but still differs from modern "CISC" designs by using a load-store architectures (like FordGT90Concept mentioned), which means that ARM will always require more instructions to do the same work.

x86 is still advancing, and if anything x86 is more held back by software than ARM is respectively. Very little software is compiled to use any ISA features beyond AMD64/SSE2, even as recently as Sunny Cove Intel added an instruction to speed up memory copying. AVX-512 is also shaping up to become very flexible compared to previous iterations, hopefully AMD will support it soon. Further down the line, Intel is researching into "threadlets", which have to potential for massive performance gains, but yet again are more in the "CISC" direction than "RISC".

Low hanging fruit and a clean slate. That is why ARM is so promising.
While ARM have changed a lot over the years, it dates back to ~1985, so I wouldn't call it quite a "clean slate".
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,475 (1.33/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
ARM's promise is in lack of features and solutions that high-performance architectures have implemented over last few decades. ARM has been focused on low power and simply never needed anything of the sort. Today it is relatively easy for ARM to come within striking distance of other architectures.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,892 (2.56/day)
Location
Ex-usa
Here is the history of Intel's progress with x86:

4-core Core i7 2600K 3.4 - 3.8 GHz (Sandy Bridge)
4-core Core i7 3770K 3.5 - 3.9 GHz (Ivy Bridge) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 4770K 3.5 - 3.9 GHz (Haswell) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 5775C 3.3 - 3.7 GHz (Broadwell) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 6700K 4.0 - 4.2 GHz (Skylake) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 7700K 4.2 - 4.5 GHz (Kaby Lake) + small IPC improvement

6-core Core i7 8700K 3.7 - 4.7 GHz (Coffee Lake) + small IPC improvement
8-core Core i9 9900K 3.6 - 5.0 GHz (Coffee Lake)

10-core Core i9 10900K 3.7 - 5.3 GHz (Comet Lake)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,781 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
Here is the history of Intel's progress with x86:

Before AMD's Ryzen

4-core Core i7 2600K 3.4 - 3.8 GHz (Sandy Bridge)
4-core Core i7 3770K 3.5 - 3.9 GHz (Ivy Bridge) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 4770K 3.5 - 3.9 GHz (Haswell) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 5775C 3.3 - 3.7 GHz (Broadwell) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 6700K 4.0 - 4.2 GHz (Skylake) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 7700K 4.2 - 4.5 GHz (Kaby Lake) + small IPC improvement

After AMD's Ryzen in 2017

6-core Core i7 8700K 3.7 - 4.7 GHz (Coffee Lake) + small IPC improvement
8-core Core i9 9900K 3.6 - 5.0 GHz (Coffee Lake)

10-core Core i9 10900K 3.7 - 5.3 GHz (Comet Lake)

Before AMD Ryzen
- My birth. 1986.

After AMD Ryzen
- My daughter's birth, 2018.

Thanks, AMD

:confused::kookoo::roll::lovetpu:
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,892 (2.56/day)
Location
Ex-usa
Thanks, AMD

I will edit my comment because you wrongly emphasize and focus on AMD when you didn't read the post actually.

10-core Comet Lake is basically Sandy Bridge with 2.5 times the cores, 1.4 times the IPC, some added complex instructions, and a mild frequency bump.
All in 9 years.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,781 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
I will edit my comment because you wrongly emphasize and focus on AMD when you didn't read the post actually.

10-core Comet Lake is basically Sandy Bridge with 2.5 times the cores, 1.4 times the IPC, some added complex instructions, and a mild frequency bump.
All in 9 years.

Well yay, you want a cookie now? Does Intel need a cookie? x86?

Your point still eludes me. Is this somehow a good thing? Maybe you oughta look at core counts in, say, PowerPC over the years. The one you heralded with Cell... when was that, an 8 core in... 2005? And let's not begin about ARM... they had 64 core monstrosities years back.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,892 (2.56/day)
Location
Ex-usa
Well yay, you want a cookie now? Does Intel need a cookie? x86?

Your point still eludes me. Is this somehow a good thing? Maybe you oughta look at core counts in, say, PowerPC over the years. The one you heralded with Cell... when was that, an 8 core in... 2005?

The headline of the article is x86 Lacks Innovation and you are arguing that x86 is a second coming of Jesus Christ.
x86 is something not optimal for us and we must move on to something better, otherwise more crisises will come.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,781 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
The headline of the article is x86 Lacks Innovation and you are arguing that x86 is a second coming of Jesus Christ.
x86 is something not optimal for us and we must move on to something better, otherwise more crisises will come.

x86 is pretty optimal for me. It provides me with a job. An income. It allows me to play state of the art games and use top of the line hardware, that runs on one of the best OS'es in the world, supported by the most diverse and largest community on the planet.

ARM? Pretty lacking in that respect. It will need quite a few years to get there.

This goes back to my first comment in this topic, really. Its not ONLY about performance, its first and foremost about software. And software is the great equalizer here, too. Do you really think software will adjust to the limitations of ARM? Of course not. This brings up a dilemma: do we change ARM to make it usable with new demands in software? Or do we change the software to 'fit in' with ARM's limitations?

And just like that.... you've created another x86.
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
For this in the know, Andrew Tanenbaum explained over 2 decades ago why x86 has become an inefficient hybrid in his Structured Computer Organization book.
Obviously, since then x86 was able to push boundaries with Core and Zen. But it also lost big time when trying to fit into the mobile space. The best solution is an ever shifting target, but x86's age is undeniably showing. It does not mean it's a bad architecture or anything (nothing that serves the public well for almost half a century ever is).
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,475 (1.33/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
For this in the know, Andrew Tanenbaum explained over 2 decades ago why x86 has become an inefficient hybrid in his Structured Computer Organization book.
5.8.1 The Problem with the Pentium 4?
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
690 (0.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Eula
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix XT
Memory Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC
Storage Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB and Toshiba N300 NAS 10TB HDD
Display(s) 2X LG 27UL600 27in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W
Mouse SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 5
Software MS Windows 11 Pro
Modern X86 CPUs has RISC cores.

Both the Athlon and the P6 run the CISC x86 ISA in what amounts to hardware emulation, but they translate the x86 instructions into smaller, RISC-like operations that fed into a fully post-RISC core. Their cores have a number of RISC features (LOAD/STORE memory access, pipelined execution, reduced instructions, expanded register count via register renaming), to which are added all of the post-RISC features we've discussed. The Athlon muddies the waters even further in that it uses both direct execution and a microcode engine for instruction decoding. A crucial difference between the Athlon (and P6) and the G4 is that, as already noted, the Athlon must translate x86 instructions into smaller RISC ops
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
Intel wants to grow and the lucrative mobile, IoT and networking markets are the most obvious directions.
Except mobile, IoT & networking, a lot of it, aren't really that lucrative. And the only ones who've consistently made a profit in the mobile sector are integrated players like Apple, Samsung & recently Huawei (for a lot of other reasons as well) so basically not Intel & they'll never be a force in this sector ever again.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
690 (0.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Eula
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix XT
Memory Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC
Storage Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB and Toshiba N300 NAS 10TB HDD
Display(s) 2X LG 27UL600 27in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W
Mouse SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 5
Software MS Windows 11 Pro
You had to explain about IBM's PowerPC and the Sony's PlayStation 3 Cell.

Cell is a 2005-2006 technology and yet its raw performance is around Intel's current processors.
That's not true.

PS3 vs PS4.jpg


FP compare.jpg



AMD GCN's has full support for IEEE-754-2008 similar SSE. AMD APU beats IBM CELL!

AMD GCN IEEE-754-2008 full support.jpg


There's a reason why Sony has abandoned CELL!

AMD's PS5 APU (CPU has 896 GFLOPS full IEEE-754 support, GpGPU has 10.28 TFLOPS compute full IEEE-754-2008 support and 11 ~TFLOPS equivalent RT cores) will murder CELL.

Larger monster is XSX's APU (CPU has 972 GFLOPS full IEEE-754 support, GpGPU has 12.147 TFLOPS compute full IEEE-754-2008 support and 13 ~TFLOPS equivalent RT cores)

XSX's APU supports 97.176 TOPS (trillion operations per second) for machine learning AI.

Fusion beats CELL
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
5.8.1 The Problem with the Pentium 4?
I obviously don't remember the exact chapter, but the gist of it was x86 is stuck between being a CISC architecture while trying to emulate a RISC one. His opinion was the hardware dedicated to this was unsustainable in the long term.

Edit: You made me look: in my 4th edition that's "5.8.1 The Problem with the Pentium II" ;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
690 (0.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Eula
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix XT
Memory Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC
Storage Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB and Toshiba N300 NAS 10TB HDD
Display(s) 2X LG 27UL600 27in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W
Mouse SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 5
Software MS Windows 11 Pro
I obviously don't remember the exact chapter, but the gist of it was x86 is stuck between being a CISC architecture while trying to emulate a RISC one. His opinion was the hardware dedicated to this was unsustainable in the long term.
There are many false prophets against the X86.

AMD has K12 which is an ARMv8-A (AArch64) clone CPU.

AMD K12 R&D leverages much of the work done on x86.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.27/day)
Except mobile, IoT & networking, a lot of it, aren't really that lucrative. And the only ones who've consistently made a profit in the mobile sector are integrated players like Apple, Samsung & recently Huawei (for a lot of other reasons as well) so basically not Intel & they'll never be a force in this sector ever again.
Again: you're talking about consumer products. Intel is into enterprise/industry solutions. Look up their Edge and 5G dedication.

Moreover, even if not as profitable as CPUs, it's still more profitable and closer to Intel's comfort zone than, let's say, producing games or selling insurance.
Intel is expected to grow. That's it. They're trying new things.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
690 (0.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Eula
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix XT
Memory Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC
Storage Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB and Toshiba N300 NAS 10TB HDD
Display(s) 2X LG 27UL600 27in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W
Mouse SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 5
Software MS Windows 11 Pro
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
There are many false prophets against the X86.

AMD has K12 which is an ARMv8-A (AArch64) clone CPU.

AMD K12 R&D leverages much of the work done on x86.
I don't think anyone is against x86. But when you're doing CPU design, you'd better get your bearings straight, that's all.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
690 (0.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Eula
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix XT
Memory Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC
Storage Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB and Toshiba N300 NAS 10TB HDD
Display(s) 2X LG 27UL600 27in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W
Mouse SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 5
Software MS Windows 11 Pro
Here is the history of Intel's progress with x86:

4-core Core i7 2600K 3.4 - 3.8 GHz (Sandy Bridge)
4-core Core i7 3770K 3.5 - 3.9 GHz (Ivy Bridge) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 4770K 3.5 - 3.9 GHz (Haswell) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 5775C 3.3 - 3.7 GHz (Broadwell) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 6700K 4.0 - 4.2 GHz (Skylake) + small IPC improvement
4-core Core i7 7700K 4.2 - 4.5 GHz (Kaby Lake) + small IPC improvement

6-core Core i7 8700K 3.7 - 4.7 GHz (Coffee Lake) + small IPC improvement
8-core Core i9 9900K 3.6 - 5.0 GHz (Coffee Lake)

10-core Core i9 10900K 3.7 - 5.3 GHz (Comet Lake)
Note that "X86-64" instruction set holder is AMD not Intel LOL.

Intel is the cloner for AMD's X86-64 CPUs.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
Again: you're talking about consumer products. Intel is into enterprise/industry solutions. Look up their Edge and 5G dedication.
When you're talking mobile ~ Intel is dead there, worse than a dodo be it consumer or enterprise sector!

IoT ~ evolving space & a security nightmare, remind us what's their achievement there?

Also for networking how about not patching routers(?) with massive security holes :rolleyes:

Networking ~ that's the only space where there are competitive & in some ways leading, part because Broadcom & QC are both high end & command price premiums!
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2018
Messages
116 (0.05/day)
Again: you're talking about consumer products. Intel is into enterprise/industry solutions. Look up their Edge and 5G dedication.

Moreover, even if not as profitable as CPUs, it's still more profitable and closer to Intel's comfort zone than, let's say, producing games or selling insurance.
Intel is expected to grow. That's it. They're trying new things.

Intel is so strong that it sold its baseband solution to Apple.

For IoT, car and other appliance solutions, a quad-core generic ARM cores will do.
1. If you go x86, you will risk to have only 2 suppliers (Intel / AMD) while when you go ARM, you can just license and create your own solution.
2. x86 has neither performance nor power efficiency benefits over ARM in this segment.

There are many examples that Intel does not want to go "low-end":
1. Optane over NAND flash (sold to Micron)
2. x86 tablet solutions (ARM is dominant)
3. Rambus over DDR-RAM
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,890 (0.81/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
There are many false prophets against the X86.
Yeah, people have been predicting the end of x86 since the early 80s.
It's even mentioned in movies; RISC architecture is gonna change everything :cool:
But on a serious note, nothing is going to challenge x86 performance wise in the near future, and when something eventually does, it will not be ARM, it will be something more SIMD oriented, or a brand new concept none of us can concieve yet.

AMD has K12 which is an ARMv8-A (AArch64) clone CPU.

AMD K12 R&D leverages much of the work done on x86.
Most have forgotten that K12 was supposed to be the next big archtecture after Bulldozer, Zen was intended as a stop-gap, but since then K12 has "disappeared" and AMD plans to keep iterating Zen for many years to come. If K12 is not completely abandoned, it probably exists as a low-priority research project. Back in those days AMD had big plans to abandon x86, even with their failed "project skybridge" to have platforms supporting both x86 and ARM.
 
Top