• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Offers Enthusiasts More Choice Than Ever Before with New Ryzen 3000XT Processors

Joined
Apr 30, 2020
Messages
848 (0.59/day)
System Name S.L.I + RTX research rig
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X 3D.
Motherboard MSI MEG ACE X570
Cooling Corsair H150i Cappellx
Memory Corsair Vengeance pro RGB 3200mhz 16Gbs
Video Card(s) 2x Dell RTX 2080 Ti in S.L.I
Storage Western digital Sata 6.0 SDD 500gb + fanxiang S660 4TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
Display(s) HP X24i
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Power Supply EVGA G+1600watts
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Cosair K55 Pro RGB
The chips in ashes of singularity show average of 8% improvement over x versions. It is most likely a better optimized ECD, PPT, TDC. Something that is internally wired and set most likly.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,892 (2.56/day)
Location
Ex-usa
The chips in ashes of singularity show average of 8% improvement over x versions. It is most likely a better optimized ECD, PPT, TDC. Something that is internally wired and set most likly.


Which means a simple firmware or BIOS update should bring just the same improvements to the X chips, too.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
77 (0.05/day)
'new' proseesors?

si they news cpus,loosk just oc'd version,thats it,with new name.

inside not happend nothing...


is it nice to review/test old ryzens VS XT version...

hmm
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2020
Messages
848 (0.59/day)
System Name S.L.I + RTX research rig
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X 3D.
Motherboard MSI MEG ACE X570
Cooling Corsair H150i Cappellx
Memory Corsair Vengeance pro RGB 3200mhz 16Gbs
Video Card(s) 2x Dell RTX 2080 Ti in S.L.I
Storage Western digital Sata 6.0 SDD 500gb + fanxiang S660 4TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
Display(s) HP X24i
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Power Supply EVGA G+1600watts
Mouse Corsair Scimitar
Keyboard Cosair K55 Pro RGB
Which means a simple firmware or BIOS update should bring just the same improvements to the X chips, too.

no it most likely won't, because it's probably a new Silicon FIT that can not be done via a bios change, or it's just better quality Silicon FIT. As I said the gains we've seen is only in one game AoS show more than what bios change is valuable of.

I just wonder in that infinity fabric of 2000 MHz is stock, or if it's the ma, overclock. Stock would be better if left some overhead for over clock.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
474 (0.27/day)
System Name Fractal
Processor Intel Core i5 13600K
Motherboard Asus ProArt Z790 Creator WiFi
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 360
Memory 16GBx2 G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 DDR5 6000 CL30-40-40-96 (F5-6000J3040F16GX2-RS5K)
Video Card(s) PNY RTX A2000 6GB
Storage SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Display(s) LG 34GK950F-B (34"/IPS/1440p/21:9/144Hz/FreeSync)
Case Fractal Design R6 Gunmetal Blackout w/ USB-C
Audio Device(s) Steelseries Arctis 7 Wireless/Klipsch Pro-Media 2.1BT
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 850w 80+ Titanium
Mouse Logitech G700S
Keyboard Corsair K68
Software Windows 11 Pro
The real news here is StoreMi is back? Already?

I thought they dumped it and were going to start over from scratch with a new "product".
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
I honestly see zero reason to be upset or complain. These XT versions ARE NOT replacing the non-Xt versions, AMD is just giving more options and a slight performance boost while leaving the MSRP exactly the SAME. Seriously, what is there to complain about? I also heard that AMD is going to discount the Non-XT versions further as well, so at least to me this seems good all around...or am I missing something here?
Try telling that to the people that bashed intel for "refreshing" SKUs from the angry AMD hate train when intel also made process improvements from 14nm to 14nm+ to 14nm++ with higher drive current and less leakage and yet AMD puts out this XT series with "more mhz" when the main bottleneck of Zen2 is the infinity fabric clockspeed and yet it's perfectly excusable to charge this much apparently according to the cult of AMD fanboys. Not to even mention the 3900X is dirt cheap these days for example.......
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,892 (2.56/day)
Location
Ex-usa
Try telling that to the people that bashed intel for "refreshing" SKUs from the angry AMD hate train when intel also made process improvements from 14nm to 14nm+ to 14nm++ with higher drive current and less leakage and yet AMD puts out this XT series with "more mhz" when the main bottleneck of Zen2 is the infinity fabric clockspeed and yet it's perfectly excusable to charge this much apparently according to the cult of AMD fanboys. Not to even mention the 3900X is dirt cheap these days for example.......


It's not 2015. It's 2020 and twelve cores must cost $200-$250. Not double of that.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,648 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
I wonder why some Intel fans here declare a 4% increase in ST performance small whereas Intel's leadership in gaming performance in 1440P is 5% and they still hold the flag of gaming leadership very proudly? And I don't critisize the non-Intel fans for saying the same for the small XT's increase in clocks but I will wait for a full review because some binning would help with better IF-memory performance and higher all-core boost clocks that could reach Intel's gaming perfomance enough to call it a real draw (1-2%) and not an almost draw.

If I had any Ryzen 3000 CPU for now I wouldn't bother upgrading at all. Zen3 will make a much bigger difference me thinks.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
It's not 2015. It's 2020 and twelve cores must cost $200-$250. Not double of that.
;) and they sure are making a good job of doing that - sales are having the 3900X around the $415 mark rather regularly now but no, gotta put out a product that's basically the same CPU with 100mhz more for ONLY $84 for 4% performance gains! Utterly fantastic, or as the AMDs say "price2performance", honestly they were better off just cutting pricing of Zen2 on the higher end and calling it a day.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
;) and they sure are making a good job of doing that - sales are having the 3900X around the $415 mark rather regularly now but no, gotta put out a product that's basically the same CPU with 100mhz more for ONLY $84 for 4% performance gains! Utterly fantastic, or as the AMDs say "price2performance", honestly they were better off just cutting pricing of Zen2 on the higher end and calling it a day.
Why not ask your savior Intel to do that?
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
Why not ask your savior Intel to do that?
Yes, let's scapegoat to blame intel when we ignore the fact people mocked the 7XXX/8XXX/9XXX series for being "refreshes" despite the fact they had process improvements - particularly 7XXX that pushed overclocking headroom substantially and didn't charge $84 for a mere 4% ST gain in a synthetic benchmark which also ignores the fact the Zen2 arch is still severely IF bottlenecked and a 10600K or similar can quite easily outperform the 3900X in gaming.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
409 (0.14/day)
System Name Baxter
Processor Intel i7-5775C @ 4.2 GHz 1.35 V
Motherboard ASRock Z97-E ITX/AC
Cooling Scythe Big Shuriken 3 with Noctua NF-A12 fan
Memory 16 GB 2400 MHz CL11 HyperX Savage DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2070 Super Black @ 1950 MHz
Storage 1 TB Sabrent Rocket 2242 NVMe SSD (boot), 500 GB Samsung 850 EVO, and 4TB Toshiba X300 7200 RPM HDD
Display(s) Vizio P65-F1 4KTV (4k60 with HDR or 1080p120)
Case Raijintek Ophion
Audio Device(s) HDMI PCM 5.1, Vizio 5.1 surround sound
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Platinum 600 W SFX PSU
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G613 and Microsoft Media Keyboard
I don't see any difference from these XT versions compared to the 9900KS or 8086K. It seems like they're just small bumps as the binning has allowed. It is a bit odd to release new chips right before Zen 3, but it makes some sense as Intel has release their 10 series and AMD doesn't want to be uncompetitive for even a couple months. I do hope this doesn't push Zen 3 further down the line. There are plenty of people that will be buying a computer or computer parts now even though they should wait for Ampere, Big Navi, Rocket Lake-S, and Zen 3. And these will likely be the fastest processors for people with X370 or B350 motherboards, and maybe some X470 or B450 boards that miss the update to enable Zen 3. So even if it doesn't make sense for everyone, these could be the last and best processors for that group.

Before the community browbeat AMD to support X470 and B450 with the Zen 3 chips, these chips likely made a lot of sense to upgrade to for those who didn't want to buy a whole new motherboard.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
Yes, let's scapegoat to blame intel when we ignore the fact people mocked the 7XXX/8XXX/9XXX series for being "refreshes" despite the fact they had process improvements - particularly 7XXX that pushed overclocking headroom substantially and didn't charge $84 for a mere 4% ST gain in a synthetic benchmark which also ignores the fact the Zen2 arch is still severely IF bottlenecked and a 10600K or similar can quite easily outperform the 3900X in gaming.
Are you telling that those are not resfresh?? 10600K may have more performence in gaming, but what is the performence in multitasking?? And people only palys games and dont do anything on their computer??
Does Intel fans have nothing but games to play on their computers??
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,159 (0.28/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
Try telling that to the people that bashed intel for "refreshing" SKUs from the angry AMD hate train when intel also made process improvements from 14nm to 14nm+ to 14nm++ with higher drive current and less leakage and yet AMD puts out this XT series with "more mhz" when the main bottleneck of Zen2 is the infinity fabric clockspeed and yet it's perfectly excusable to charge this much apparently according to the cult of AMD fanboys. Not to even mention the 3900X is dirt cheap these days for example.......
What AMD is doing now seems closer to Intel's devil canyon than the 6700k becoming a 7700k. The 10 nm and the cove arch delay was (is) just frustating for some people. Iirc, devil canyon reception was mostly good. Benchmarks will tell the whole story, but those appears to just be filler for the people who where mad about that 5% lower fps in games with vanilla zen2.
If you have a zen 2 cpu, right now, or don't care about those fps, you have zero incentive to get those xt zen2, and can just wait for zen 3. The 7700k was the new gen, those xt are not.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
Are you telling that those are not resfresh?? 10600K may have more performence in gaming, but what is the performence in multitasking?? And people only palys games and dont do anything on their computer??
You do realize the arch is being refreshed but the node it's on isn't a refresh? 14nm - 14nm+ alone was a 12% increase in drive current on the node alone whilst running 52% less power. The 10600K is still a better buy than a 3900X for pure gaming given the fact it can overclock without the issues of degrading (and actually gain performance from doing so)
Here's a nice video on that:
And in some cases, it can outperform a 3950X - whilst costing a ton of money less (yes even the cooler and board that people seem to scapegoat to when in desperation searching for something to point their finger at).
In addition to this, only the 3900X ever makes sense for productivity @ $415 as it offers reasonable pricing on the AMD side, whilst the 10900K costs quite an amount more, for gaming though they're just not competitive due to their higher latency design and the infinity fabric and more communication steps making them less competitive in that aspect
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Messages
943 (0.47/day)
They need to milk it fast. History has shown us 2 years they have advantage next 20 years they are well down to competitor. So they need to milk you consumers asap.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
They need to milk it fast. History has shown us 2 years they have advantage next 20 years they are well down to competitor. So they need to milk you consumers asap.
Pretty much this, one day people will realize a business is only there to make money and it's down to the consumer to vote with their wallet rather than making poor purchase decisions (like this lineup here given pricing is appalling for what you're getting against last gen) not to even mention Zen3 is due soon.........
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
You do realize the arch is being refreshed but the node it's on isn't a refresh? 14nm - 14nm+ alone was a 12% increase in drive current on the node alone whilst running 52% less power. The 10600K is still a better buy than a 3900X for pure gaming given the fact it can overclock without the issues of degrading (and actually gain performance from doing so)
Here's a nice video on that:
If those 14nm is so new why it consuming so much power??
What is the storage performence of those processor?? Windows Defender performence??
My system becomes unsable if I ran Windos defender on my C drive. And my ssd is older sata with less I/O, not newer PCI-e NVME with higher I/O.
Do you Intel fans have nothing but games to play on your computer??
And in some cases, it can outperform a 3950X - whilst costing a ton of money less (yes even the cooler and board that people seem to scapegoat to when in desperation searching for something to point their finger at).
A page from Nvidia's fanboy argument : Intel processor may cheaper than a 3950X, but 10600K will be more expensive on long run with those excesive heat and electric bill.

Pretty much this, one day people will realize a business is only there to make money and it's down to the consumer to vote with their wallet rather than making poor purchase decisions (like this lineup here given pricing is appalling for what you're getting against last gen) not to even mention Zen3 is due soon.........
Sadly Intel fanboy forget that everytime.
 

Nkd

Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
364 (0.06/day)
I am waiting for the reviews. I wouldn’t be surprised if these chips actually hold higher sustained base clock on auto like compared to the old models did. I am sure they have made some improvements with process to benefit these a little.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
If those 14nm is so new why it consuming so much power??
It's consuming less than a 3950X whilst outperforming it in games, is that not enough for you? Not to mention it's only $280 against $750.
1592330454256.png

10600K pulls less than a 3900X stock to stock and outperforms it significantly and you mention "power"?
What is the storage performence of those processor?? Windows Defender performence??
My system becomes unsable if I ran Windos defender on my C drive. And my ssd is older sata with less I/O, not newer PCI-e NVME with higher I/O.
Do you Intel fans have nothing but games to play on your computer??
PCIe 4.0 controllers are useless given Q1T1 performance is appalling, latency isn't great for the drive either and it's just nothing but "MOAR SEQUENTIAL" which can be achieved for similar pricing using raid. So what "I/O"? :roll:
Future proof memers are a joke, take the 3770K for example for being "PCIe 3", why aren't you using that after all it's an excellent platform to pair a 2080ti with!!!!! :roll: can literally guarantee people would've upgraded off that platform by the time it's actually relevant or used to its complete potential, and it ends up being useless by the time it's utilised......
A page from Nvidia's fanboy argument : Intel processor may cheaper than a 3950X, but 10600K will be more expensive on long run with those excesive heat and electric bill.
Really? The 3950X pulls more power if anything... whilst providing less gaming performance.
Sadly Intel fanboy forget that everytime.
Quite ironic, isn't it?
 

Attachments

  • 1592330405782.png
    1592330405782.png
    121.5 KB · Views: 81
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
It's consuming less than a 3950X whilst outperforming it in games, is that not enough for you? Not to mention it's only $280 against $750.
View attachment 159245
10600K pulls less than a 3900X stock to stock and outperforms it significantly and you mention "power"?
You only saw the gaming performence, but what about other performence? And security holes?? Performence degradation due to security patch??
Looks like you intel fanboys have nothing but games to talk about.

PCIe 4.0 controllers are useless given Q1T1 performance is appalling, latency isn't great for the drive either and it's just nothing but "MOAR SEQUENTIAL" which can be achieved for similar pricing using raid. So what "I/O"? :roll:
Future proof memers are a joke, take the 3770K for example for being "PCIe 3", why aren't you using that after all it's an excellent platform to pair a 2080ti with!!!!! :roll: can literally guarantee people would've upgraded off that platform by the time it's actually relevant or used to its complete potential, and it ends up being useless by the time it's utilised......
3770K supports PCI-e 4.0?? Didn't knew that. o_O
And if 3700K dont bottleneck 2080Ti then why buy 10600K, when board for that cpu is cheaper.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
You only saw the gaming performence, but what about other performence?
This CPU is designed for gaming and light threaded workloads, not really blender and multitasking, so buy AMD instead there.
And security holes?? Performence degradation due to security patch??
This is why something called hardware-level mitigations exist.
They minimize the impact of patching said vulnerabilities.
3770K supports PCI-e 4.0?? Didn't knew that. o_O
No, but it clearly supports PCI-e 3.0, and how many people have kept their 3770K platform today? Same applies to PCI-e 4.0 ; )
Looks like you intel fanboys have nothing but games to talk about.
Looks like fanboys like you do enjoy avoiding answering my main points, what happened to "muh intel pulls more power in games" and somehow racks up $470 in power to reach the cost of a 3950X and exceed that... whilst pulling 30W or so less? Or are you nothing but a low quality troll?
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
963 (0.23/day)
System Name Poor Man's PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Motherboard MSI B650M Mortar WiFi
Cooling ID Cooling SE 206 XT
Memory 32GB GSkill Flare X5 DDR5 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 6800 XT
Storage XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB + 8 TB WD Ultrastar DC HC320
Display(s) Mi Gaming Curved 3440x1440 144Hz
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) MPow Air Wireless + Mi Soundbar
Power Supply Enermax Revolution DF 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 3
Keyboard Logitech Pro X + Kailh box heavy pale blue switch + Durock stabilizers
VR HMD Meta Quest 2
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
Performance are expected, but I'm quite surprise with the price. In the end I'll pick regular 3600 :D
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
This CPU is designed for gaming and light threaded workloads, not really blender and multitasking, so buy AMD instead there.
Blender/Adobe is a benchmark, but games not. :confused:

This is why something called hardware-level mitigations exist.
They minimize the impact of patching said vulnerabilities.

[/QUOTE]
Minimal empact. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=RdRand-3-Percent
No, but it clearly supports PCI-e 3.0, and how many people have kept their 3770K platform today? Same applies to PCI-e 4.0 ; )

Looks like fanboys like you do enjoy avoiding answering my main points, what happened to "muh intel pulls more power in games" and somehow racks up $470 in power to reach the cost of a 3950X and exceed that... whilst pulling 30W or so less? Or are you nothing but a low quality troll?
[/QUOTE]
o_O.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
Do you even read? Or do we need to send you a video on how to do so?
Hardware mitigation minimize the impact of discovered patches - can't patch something that was only discovered recently after the processor was made unless you make newer steppings...........
Is this all you have to say? So clearly we've been reading power consumption wrong, less power apparently means a higher power bill then. :roll: Clearly logical, just like your points.
In case you need the definitions of "minimize" and "mitigations", here you go! Free of charge:
1592333565634.png


1592333495040.png

Examples of mitigation here:
1592333507822.png

If any of these words are too big for you to understand, please do ask for further assistance I can google for you if you'd like, since you're seemingly incapable of doing so yourself.
 
Top