• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Alleged Prices of TSMC Silicon Wafers Appear

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,225 (0.91/day)
TSMC, one of the biggest silicon manufacturers in the world, usually doesn't disclose company pricing of the silicon it manufactures and only shares that with its customers. It appears that RetiredEngineer (@chiakokhua on Twitter) got a hold of the pricing of TSMCs wafers on every manufacturing node starting from 90 nm down to 5 nm. That includes a wide portfolio of 65, 40, 28, 20, 16/12, 10, and 7 nm nodes as well. The table shown below includes information dating to April 2020, so it is possible that some things are now different and they surely are. There are a few quite interesting notes from the image, namely the price increase as the node shrinks.

From 90 nm to 20 nm, the price of the wafer didn't increase as much, however, starting from 16/12 nm node(s), TSMC has seen costs per wafer, and other costs increase exponentially. For example, just compare the 10 nm wafer price of $5992 with the price of a 5 nm wafer which costs an amazing $16988. This is more than a 180% price increase in just three years, however, the cost per transistor is down as you get around 229% higher density in that period, making TSMC actually in line with Moore's Law. That is comparing Transistor density (MTr / mm²) of 52.51 million transistors for the 10 nm node and 173 million transistors per mm² of the 5 nm node .


View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2019
Messages
166 (0.09/day)
System Name My PC
Processor AMD 2700 x @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming
Cooling Zalman CNPS20X
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 570 PULSE
Storage Adata Ultimate SU800
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A
Audio Device(s) Logitech G51
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX, 80+ Gold, 550W
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121
As far as i understand it correctly, the chart contain prices in 2020, it probably is that prices of older nodes were higher when they were the latest and now in 2020 are discounted.

Certainly being on advanced node is costly. The 16/12 seems a sweet spot and probably is the reason why Nvidia used it through 2019 and half of 2020 and the 7NM being double the price why they went for 8nm Samsung.

Also means that Big Navi can not be a cheap card in order to obtain at least decent margins unless AMD, becoming a major customer, can negotiate healthy discounts.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Messages
35 (0.02/day)
So some prices per chip for 5nm, 0.1 defects/cm^2, $17000 per wafer - A14 is probably between 81 and 100mm^2:

81mm^2: 668 fully working chips out of 724, $25.45 each
100mm^2: 526 / 581, $32.32 each

Zen 4 is likely to be on 5nm - assuming that it retains an 8C CCD, but with 64MB L3 and larger CPU cores, it will be close to that 81mm^2 mark. With 32MB still it could be closer to 64mm^2, 866 dies / 922 @ $19.60 each (but wafer price will have dropped by 2022)
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
3,065 (1.13/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator Mk-II
Processor i7 13700KF
Motherboard MSI Z790 Carbon
Cooling ID-Cooling SE-226-XT + Phanteks T30
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5 7200Cas34
Video Card(s) Asus RTX4090 TUF
Storage Kingston KC3000 2TB NVME
Display(s) LG OLED CX48"
Case Corsair 5000D Air
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software win11
As far as i understand it correctly, the chart contain prices in 2020, it probably is that prices of older nodes were higher when they were the latest and now in 2020 are discounted.

Certainly being on advanced node is costly. The 16/12 seems a sweet spot and probably is the reason why Nvidia used it through 2019 and half of 2020 and the 7NM being double the price why they went for 8nm Samsung.

Also means that Big Navi can not be a cheap card in order to obtain at least decent margins unless AMD, becoming a major customer, can negotiate healthy discounts.

Yup that make producing Big Navi chip at 500mm2 7nm at 80% yield rate cost just as much as 750mm2 12nm chip at 50% yield rate.
AMD just doesn't have any margin to compete with RTX 3070/3080 at this point, they may just release a limited quantity of Big Navi just to stay relevant.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
165 (0.04/day)
to be fair, he said that he didn't find these just lying about somewhere. he calculated those values from his own knowledge and experience.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Messages
142 (0.05/day)
System Name Avell old monster - Workstation T1 - HTPC
Processor i7-3630QM\i7-5960x\Ryzen 3 2200G
Cooling Stock.
Memory 2x4Gb @ 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) HD 7970M \ EVGA GTX 980\ Vega 8
Storage SSD Sandisk Ultra li - 480 GB + 1 TB 5400 RPM WD - 960gb SDD + 2TB HDD
Yup that make producing Big Navi chip at 500mm2 7nm at 80% yield rate cost just as much as 750mm2 12nm chip at 50% yield rate.
AMD just doesn't have any margin to compete with RTX 3070/3080 at this point, they may just release a limited quantity of Big Navi just to stay relevant.

You say this using the 2018 price... and comparing it to 12nm (which is not even 12nm FFN) not samsung 8nm and ampere. Plus, AMD should certainly have access to better prices/wafer than that.
1600359812929.png

The Xbox GPU with 56CU is less than 180mm² and the Navi with 80CU is 500mm² ? How ? Where did you get those numbers? I hope you haven't just doubled the size of the Navi10 (250mm² x 2)...
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
3,065 (1.13/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator Mk-II
Processor i7 13700KF
Motherboard MSI Z790 Carbon
Cooling ID-Cooling SE-226-XT + Phanteks T30
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5 7200Cas34
Video Card(s) Asus RTX4090 TUF
Storage Kingston KC3000 2TB NVME
Display(s) LG OLED CX48"
Case Corsair 5000D Air
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software win11
You say this using the 2018 price... and comparing it to 12nm (which is not even 12nm FFN) not samsung 8nm and ampere. Plus, AMD should certainly have access to better prices/wafer than that.
View attachment 168990
The Xbox GPU with 56CU is less than 180mm² and the Navi with 80CU is 500mm² ? How ? Where did you get those numbers? I hope you haven't just doubled the size of the Navi10 (250mm² x 2)...

so 7nm wafer get cheaper but 16/12nm wafer don't ? what kinda logic is that LOL, and I was comparing Navi to Turing. Samsung 8N is probably even cheaper per wafer seeing Ampere prices.
And no AMD is only a minor customer of TSMC, they dont get any special treatment regarding wafer prices, biggest customer is Apple.
80CU plus 512bit bus mem controller and specialized RT cores, kinda hard to imagine Big Navi is much smaller than 500mm2, unless they don't want to compete with 3070 at all.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.49/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
You say this using the 2018 price... and comparing it to 12nm (which is not even 12nm FFN) not samsung 8nm and ampere. Plus, AMD should certainly have access to better prices/wafer than that.

The Xbox GPU with 56CU is less than 180mm² and the Navi with 80CU is 500mm² ? How ? Where did you get those numbers? I hope you haven't just doubled the size of the Navi10 (250mm² x 2)...
Never mind the trolling...
The information that is missing from the article is what is the size of the wafers, TSMC typically has 150mm, 200mm, and 300mm ones.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,197 (0.74/day)
Yup that make producing Big Navi chip at 500mm2 7nm at 80% yield rate cost just as much as 750mm2 12nm chip at 50% yield rate.
AMD just doesn't have any margin to compete with RTX 3070/3080 at this point, they may just release a limited quantity of Big Navi just to stay relevant.
Even if what you allude to is correct and accurate Big Navi chip hasn't even launched yet kind of premature to draw that conclusion. What you say could hold true or might not. I think from a rational standpoint I'd expect a bit more from Nvidia in terms of performance upside than AMD because they are transitioning to a smaller node that said big gains can still be achieved without that otherwise Nvidia wouldn't be where it is on the node's it's at nor would Intel be able to squeeze as much performance out of 14nm as it continues to milk further. There are area's where AMD could make huge gains to it's GPU design's, but it's a matter of what they've chosen to do based on the budget they've allocated to it. I'll be fine with AMD not even exceeding a RTX3070's' performance if the price is aggressive and the power requirements are compelling and if you combine that with good CF support and scaling that really changes the dynamics of the situation in a significant manner. AMD doesn't have to create a huge monolithic chip to beat Nvidia they could just as easily create a well priced and efficient scalable chip that runs circles around it.

It's impossible to tell at this point in time. Now seems like as compelling a time as any to make a strong push at advancing CF and mGPU setups between PCIe 4.0 having excess bandwidth to readily and easily devout to it and with variable rate shading plus HBCC along with infinity fabric provides ample amounts of leeway to work around and address some of those mGPU micro stutter problems. It could a case in the future that with mGPU you just tweak a few variable rate shader settings and you can smooth out mGPU micro stutter in major ways. Either way this is a compelling generation of GPU upgrades between things like RTRT and variable rate shading and other things. I really hope AMD has a ace up it's sleeve and makes some big advancements in area's hopefully they've improved compression a lot Nvidia's made a lot more inroads in that area in recent years. The more competitive it is between both companies the better it is for consumers. I'm just hoping they have a unexpected surprise thrown in someplace.
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,618 (0.29/day)
nothing is alleged, why is tpu so bad at titles!

the image says CALCULATED, the source says RIGOROUS ESTIMATES (further saying based on a report that was shown to him)
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
3,521 (0.56/day)
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
Processor Ryzen 5700x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aero G R1.1 BiosF5g
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14 w/ NF-A15 HS-PWM Fan 1500rpm
Memory Micron DDR4-3200 2x32GB D.S. D.R. (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Video Card(s) AMD RX 6800 - Asus Tuf
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB & 2TB & 4TB Corsair LPX
Display(s) LG 27UL550-W (27" 4k)
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 (no window)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220-VB
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex V Gold Pro 850W ATX Ver2.52
Mouse Mionix Naos Pro
Keyboard Corsair Strafe with browns
Software W10 22H2 Pro x64
Toss a coin to your foundry...............a friend of humanity...................
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
690 (0.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Eula
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix XT
Memory Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC
Storage Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB and Toshiba N300 NAS 10TB HDD
Display(s) 2X LG 27UL600 27in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP
Case Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W
Mouse SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex 5
Software MS Windows 11 Pro
Note why NVIDIA's PC gaming Ampere SKUs are fabricated at Samsung's 8nm.
 
Top