• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TSMC Achieves Major Breakthrough in 2 nm Manufacturing Process, Risk Production in 2023

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.34/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
The Taiwan Economic Daily claims that TSMC has achieved a major internal breakthrough for the eventual rollout of 2 nm fabrication process technology. According to the publication, this breakthrough has turned TSMC even more optimistic towards a 2023 rollout of 2 nm risk production - which is all the more impressive considering reports that TSMC will be leaving the FinFet realm for a new multi-bridge channel field effect transistor (MBCFET) architecture - itself based on the Gate-All-Around (GAA) technology. This breakthrough comes one year after TSMC put together an internal team whose aim was to pave the way for 2 nm deployment.

MBCFET expands on the GAAFET architecture by taking the Nanowire field-effect transistor and expanding it so that it becomes a Nanosheet. The main idea is to make the field-effect transistor three-dimensional. This new complementary metal oxide semiconductor transistor can improve circuit control and reduce leakage current. This design philosophy is not exclusive to TSMC - Samsung has plans to deploy a variant of this design on their 3 nm process technology. And as has been the norm, further reductions in chip fabrication scale come at hefty costs - while the development cost for 5 nm has already achieved $476M in cost, Samsung reports that their 3 nm GAA technology will cost in excess of $500M - and 2 nm, naturally, will come in even costlier than that.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,285 (3.86/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Man, it must suck to work for Intel and read news like this at the moment.

Competition hotting up in the race to 2nm and 3nm whilst your 10nm process is still so broken that you can't scale it up to desktops and servers, and your PHB's put all the eggs in the 7nm basket which has already been pushed back by more time that its total development cycle was supposed to last.
 
Joined
May 2, 2016
Messages
171 (0.06/day)
Soo, what comes next? 0nm? And after that -1nm? As they continue to shrink the nodes, numbers are starting to become silly... We all know 7nm aren't really 7nm.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,285 (3.86/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Soo, what comes next? 0nm? And after that -1nm? As they continue to shrink the nodes, numbers are starting to become silly... We all know 7nm aren't really 7nm.
I guess these half-node shrinks from TSMC and Samsung are going to need to be named differently soon as gate lengths are already pretty meaningless and soon they're going to run out of integers.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
28 (0.01/day)
Soo, what comes next? 0nm? And after that -1nm? As they continue to shrink the nodes, numbers are starting to become silly... We all know 7nm aren't really 7nm.

Yea... no. What's next is picometers: 1 x 10^-12. So, 999 pm is 0.999 um, etc.

So any optical guys out there know when one would have to transition from EUV light to x-rays lithography?
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Messages
128 (0.08/day)
Well, INTEL in particular is the last "entity" (or whatever) who can complain about these naming gimmicks... Weren't they the first ones using innovative naming convention with 486DX-4, where four was indicator for CPU working 4 times faster than MB... In this concrete example, 100Mhz over 33Mhz - makes it four, right?

All similarly bad practices confuse... well, suppose everyone - something may be 2nm, but we are lead to believe that it's... 7 times better than 14nm - which I seriously doubt...
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
5,460 (1.42/day)
Location
Everywhere all the time all at once
System Name The Little One
Processor i5-11320H @4.4GHZ
Motherboard AZW SEI
Cooling Fan w/heat pipes + side & rear vents
Memory 64GB Crucial DDR4-3200 (2x 32GB)
Video Card(s) Iris XE
Storage WD Black SN850X 4TB m.2, Seagate 2TB SSD + SN850 4TB x2 in an external enclosure
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" & 2x 32"
Case Practically identical to a mac mini, just purrtier in slate blue, & with 3x usb ports on the front !
Audio Device(s) Yamaha ATS-1060 Bluetooth Soundbar & Subwoofer
Power Supply 65w brick
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shitzu turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores PDQ
Well, a few years ago, while visiting the Gaza pyramids,I picked up a few .000000001pm chips from some weird-looking, triangle shaped guys there, and they said they would be releasing them to this world ~2036, so we don't have too much longer to wait for some major advancements in speed, efficiency, and thermals, hahaha :)
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
1,260 (0.31/day)
Location
Artem S. Tashkinov
Soo, what comes next? 0nm? And after that -1nm? As they continue to shrink the nodes, numbers are starting to become silly... We all know 7nm aren't really 7nm.

These are marketing nanometers. They have meant crap for the past five years.

What they need to talk about and show us is density (millions of transistors per square millimeter), power consumption and frequency.
 

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
15,911 (4.58/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
So why are they building a 5nm factory in Arizona that won't be finished until 2024? this makes no sense to me, just build a 2nm facility.... since construction hasn't even really started yet it would be easy to do...
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
1,380 (0.29/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor Intel Xeon E5-1680v2
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling Intel AIO
Memory 8x4GB DDR3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB + 2x WD RE 4TB HDD
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi Uber/Sony CDP-XA20ES/Pioneer CT-656>Sony TA-F630ESD>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
So why are they building a 5nm factory in Arizona that won't be finished until 2024? this makes no sense to me, just build a 2nm facility.... since construction hasn't even really started yet it would be easy to do...

Not every chip requires to be built on newest and greatest node you know. For example: anything used for space programs cannot use any of these nodes due to the environment (radiation, temperatures etc.).
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,285 (3.86/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Not every chip requires to be built on newest and greatest node you know. For example: anything used for space programs cannot use any of these nodes due to the environment (radiation, temperatures etc.).
GloFo 12nm still alive and kicking on every Zen2/Zen3 Ryzen/TR/EPYC processor made today.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
298 (0.11/day)
System Name Main
Processor 8700K
Motherboard Maximus Hero X
Cooling EVGA 280 CLC w/ Noctua silent fans
Memory 2x8GB 3600/16
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080TI Hybrid
Well, INTEL in particular is the last "entity" (or whatever) who can complain about these naming gimmicks... Weren't they the first ones using innovative naming convention with 486DX-4, where four was indicator for CPU working 4 times faster than MB... In this concrete example, 100Mhz over 33Mhz - makes it four, right?

All similarly bad practices confuse... well, suppose everyone - something may be 2nm, but we are lead to believe that it's... 7 times better than 14nm - which I seriously doubt...

That's actually not a good example because I know the 486 also had a 25mhz bus option. There was even an original Pentium that ran at 50mhz (2x25).
 

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
15,911 (4.58/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
GloFo 12nm still alive and kicking on every Zen2/Zen3 Ryzen/TR/EPYC processor made today.


ya but context is important with a comment like this, which you fail to provide. lulz.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
82 (0.01/day)
Location
Cheltenham, England, UK
System Name Lenovo Legion 5
Processor AMD® Ryzen™ 7 5800H Processor 8C/16T 3.2 GHz (16M Cache, up to 4.45 GHz) @ 4605MHz (44.5x103.5MHz)
Cooling Dual Fan 3 heatpipes
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 3200MT/s CL18-19-19-43
Video Card(s) NVIDIA® GeForce™ RTX 3060 6GB GDDR6 192-bit 3840 SM TGP 140W @2167MHz max clock
Storage Crucial CT500P3PSSD8 500GB NVMe + SAMSUNG MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB NVMe
Display(s) 15.6" FHD 165Hz (1920x1080) 16:9 IPS 300nits Anti-glare
Audio Device(s) Nahimic, Logitec G332
Power Supply 300W
Keyboard Backlit
Software Windows 11 Home 64-bit
So why are they building a 5nm factory in Arizona that won't be finished until 2024? this makes no sense to me, just build a 2nm facility.... since construction hasn't even really started yet it would be easy to do...

Not every chip requires to be built on newest and greatest node you know. For example: anything used for space programs cannot use any of these nodes due to the environment (radiation, temperatures etc.).

Also it needs to go through a lot of testing and validation I guess, before they can roll it out.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
25,559 (6.48/day)
Man, it must suck to work for Intel and read news like this at the moment.

Competition hotting up in the race to 2nm and 3nm whilst your 10nm process is still so broken that you can't scale it up to desktops and servers, and your PHB's put all the eggs in the 7nm basket which has already been pushed back by more time that its total development cycle was supposed to last.
You do know there's more to the equation than just raw nanometer scaling statements, right?
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,285 (3.86/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
You do know there's more to the equation than just raw nanometer scaling statements, right?
I've already said as much in this very thread:
gate lengths are already pretty meaningless
It's just a node name and one of the reason Intel's 10nm is doing so badly is because it's trying more new/risky technologies than TSMC's 7nm and it's actually pretty close in transistor density as well.

If Intel had been less ambitious with 10nm and just worked on a simpler jump, (ie, still 10nm but not trying multiple high-risk industry-firsts like Cobalt, COAG, and 36nm pitch without EUV) they likely wouldn't be in the mess they're in right now.
 
Last edited:

tabascosauz

Moderator
Supporter
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
7,525 (2.33/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name ab┃ob
Processor 7800X3D┃5800X3D
Motherboard B650E PG-ITX┃X570 Impact
Cooling PA120+T30┃AXP120x67
Memory 64GB 6000CL30┃32GB 3600CL14
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Eagle┃RTX A2000
Storage 8TB of SSDs┃1TB SN550
Display(s) 43" QN90B / 32" M32Q / 27" S2721DGF
Case Caselabs S3┃Lazer3D HT5
Power Supply Corsair HX1000┃HDPlex
So why are they building a 5nm factory in Arizona that won't be finished until 2024? this makes no sense to me, just build a 2nm facility.... since construction hasn't even really started yet it would be easy to do...

The US fab is not for you and me. The US fab is for government and military contracts. TSMC wants to get on the Trusted Foundry list and take government business away from Globalfoundries' two fabs, with its cutting edge (in the military context) processes.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
25,559 (6.48/day)
The US fab is not for you and me. The US fab is for government and military contracts. TSMC wants to get on the Trusted Foundry list and take government business away from Globalfoundries' two fabs, with its cutting edge (in the military context) processes.
That has not, as of yet, been confirmed publicly.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,491 (0.21/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Riotoro Enigma G2 850W
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
milking the nm cow til possible this is all; when they reach the physical limit game over; in 5 years if no other solution will become viable we'll be stuck at multi chip level to compensate ....
 

tabascosauz

Moderator
Supporter
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
7,525 (2.33/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name ab┃ob
Processor 7800X3D┃5800X3D
Motherboard B650E PG-ITX┃X570 Impact
Cooling PA120+T30┃AXP120x67
Memory 64GB 6000CL30┃32GB 3600CL14
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Eagle┃RTX A2000
Storage 8TB of SSDs┃1TB SN550
Display(s) 43" QN90B / 32" M32Q / 27" S2721DGF
Case Caselabs S3┃Lazer3D HT5
Power Supply Corsair HX1000┃HDPlex
That has not, as of yet, been confirmed publicly.

I mean, true, but do we need it to be? It's not an inexpensive fab to build, but in size and supply it's nowhere near the size it would need to be at to rival or meaningfully supplement TSMC's existing "consumer-facing" fabs, and TSMC's own expected roadmaps would leave N5 in the dust in a consumer electronics context. On the other hand, even considering the increasing popularity of COTS and modern electronics in new military projects, applying the N5 process would be a big step up for military contracts, especially given the US' current objectives with respect to China. They've got a lot of work to do on the technology front, and the new US fab seems all but geared towards that.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
2,026 (1.53/day)
Location
Bulgaria
milking the nm cow til possible this is all; when they reach the physical limit game over; in 5 years if no other solution will become viable we'll be stuck at multi chip level to compensate ....
Gates lenght is XXnm far away from it's physical limits. Marketing nanometers is only how wight(fat) is transistor itself. That in not related to physical limitations of node.

credit: extremetech+wikichip
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
531 (0.11/day)
Location
Inside a mini ITX
System Name ITX Desktop
Processor Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro WiFi Z390
Cooling Arctic esports 34 duo.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC White PRO
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Intel SSD 660p
Case NZXT H200
Power Supply Corsair CX Series 750 Watt
These are marketing nanometers. They have meant crap for the past five years.

What they need to talk about and show us is density (millions of transistors per square millimeter), power consumption and frequency.

No 2nm info yet, but here are some estimates from WikiChip for TSMCs 5 and 3nm:


1605561416714.png


Density will continue to scale well and the power consumption will decrease a bit, however with Dennard scaling hitting a wall, don't expect any significant increases in clock frequencies. CPU architectures will have to go wider and deeper to increase single core performance. GPUs can have significant performance increases by having more execution units at almost the same or even lower clocks.

So any optical guys out there know when one would have to transition from EUV light to x-rays lithography?

Not an optical guy, but as a device architect, I don't think it'll happen for silicon. Multipatterning EUV is enough to hit the limitations of silicon. We'll see short channel effects making silicon unsuitable for any further scaling before the need for x-ray lithography arises. 3D stacking can extend the life of silicon for a little bit longer, before moving to alternate materials.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
158 (0.06/day)
Processor 5950X
Motherboard Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory Crucial Ballistix 3600MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080 Vision
Storage 980 Pro 500GB, 970 Evo Plus 500GB, Crucial MX500 2TB, Crucial MX500 2TB, Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34WQC
Case Cooler Master C700M
Audio Device(s) Bose
Power Supply AX850
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard MSI GK80
Software W10 Pro
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z Single-Thread: 688 Multi-Thread: 11940
That's why I order the 5950X now instead of waiting for the zen 4, so that in 6 or 7 years time I'll move to the 2nm note.
 
Top