• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

SSDs More Reliable than HDDs: Backblaze Study

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,274 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
In the initial days of SSDs, some 11-odd years ago, SSDs were considered unreliable. They'd randomly fail on you, causing irrecoverable data loss. Gaming desktop users usually installed an HDD to go with the SSD in their builds, so they could take regular whole-disk images of the SSD onto the HDD; Microsoft even added a disk imaging feature with Windows 7. Since then, SSDs have come a long way with reliability, are now backed with longer warranties than HDDs, and high endurance. Notebook vendors are increasingly opting for SSDs as the sole storage device in their thin-and-light products. A Backblaze study reveals an interesting finding: SSDs are 21 times more reliable than HDDs.

Backblaze is popular for conducting regular actionable studies on storage device reliability in the enterprise segment, particularly dissecting how each brand of HDD and SSD fares in terms of drive failures or average failure rates (AFR). In a study covering Q1 2021 (January 1 to March 31), Backblaze finds that the AFR of HDDs across brands, stands at 10.56%. In the same period, SSDs across brands lodged an AFR of a stunning 0.58%. In other words, roughly 1 in 10 HDDs failed, compared to roughly 1 in 200 SSDs. Things get interesting when Backblaze looks all the way back to 2013, when it started studying drive reliability.



With annualized failure rates studied between April 2013 and April 1, 2021, Backblaze finds that SSDs total 0.65% AFR, while HDDs do 6.04%. The relatively higher HDD failure rates are attributable to the fact that they have moving parts; pull more average age (before they need replacement), the fact that before they reach their manufacturer-rated endurance, SSDs are highly tolerant to electrical faults using capacitor banks, and the fact that HDD manufacturers have generally reduced the warranties on their drives after the HDD factory flooding incidents in 2012.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2020
Messages
245 (0.18/day)
Location
2nd Earth
Processor Ryzen 5700X
Motherboard Gigabyte AX-370 Gaming 5, BIOS F51h
Cooling MSI Core Frozr L
Memory 32GB 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Ti Trio
Storage Crucial MX300 525GB + Samsung 970 Evo 1TB + 3TB 7.2k + 4TB 5.4k
Display(s) LG 34UC99 3440x1440 75Hz + LG 24MP88HM
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX TG Galaxy Silver
Audio Device(s) Edifier XM6PF 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G3
Mouse Steelseries Rival 3
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Lite Stormtrooper Edition
As a media hoarder, I'm looking forward to a future time when I can get 2-4 TB SATA SSD with just slightly higher price than HDD.
Then I can replace my 3+4 TB media storage with SSD.
 
D

Deleted member 205776

Guest
What are hard drives?

 
D

Deleted member 205776

Guest
Congrats. I don't need an A3 sized printer, but I don't act surprised they exist for those that do. Servers obviously do need low-cost bulk storage, which is what Backblaze is all about.
Take a chill pill. Never meant to attack your precious HDDs. I just think that the less moving parts in my system, the better. Obviously you wouldn't buy SSDs if you're a data hoarder, at least not now.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
As a media hoarder, I'm looking forward to a future time when I can get 2-4 TB SATA SSD with just slightly higher price than HDD.
Then I can replace my 3+4 TB media storage with SSD.
Try Fleabay, used (enterprise) or even OEM drives from reputable sellers are generally cheap & super reliable.
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
18,851 (3.08/day)
Location
UK\USA
Processor AMD 3900X \ AMD 7700X
Motherboard ASRock AM4 X570 Pro 4 \ ASUS X670Xe TUF
Cooling D15
Memory Patriot 2x16GB PVS432G320C6K \ G.Skill Flare X5 F5-6000J3238F 2x16GB
Video Card(s) eVga GTX1060 SSC \ XFX RX 6950XT RX-695XATBD9
Storage Sammy 860, MX500, Sabrent Rocket 4 Sammy Evo 980 \ 1xSabrent Rocket 4+, Sammy 2x990 Pro
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ LG 43UN700
Case Fractal Design Pop Air 2x140mm fans from Torrent \ Fractal Design Torrent 2 SilverStone FHP141x2
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V677 \ Yamaha CX-830+Yamaha MX-630 Infinity RS4000\Paradigm P Studio 20, Blue Yeti
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-750 \ Corsair RM1000X Shift
Mouse Steelseries Sensei wireless \ Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ Wooting Two HE
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
What are hard drives?


Same here, Been buying them since intel released their 80GB models ( sata2 ), how ever i have had 3 to fail on me, one Corsair, OCZ and a Team Group one which were on the phison controller(2) and one on the Sandforce controller.

One of the Intel 80GB drives originally priced around $220 at the time is showing signs of quitting too. So to me they are doing a little better but nothing to get excited about.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
1,260 (0.32/day)
Location
Artem S. Tashkinov
Yeah, right, SSDs might work longer but when they die, the data usually become completely unsalvagable.

At the same time under most circumstances the data from the HDD can be recovered.

You can tell me everything about backups, you don't have to, but absolute most people never create them and sometimes they create a single backup and then give up on them. Edit: I personally know a couple of people who've been burnt by not having backups more than once.

Lastly in developing/underdeveloped countries, SSDs continue to be super-expensive, unless you're OK with 128GB or data which nowadays is just too little - smartphones often more.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
1,166 (0.20/day)
Location
Hampton Roads
Processor Xeon x5650
Motherboard SABERTOOTH X58
Cooling Fans
Memory 24 GB Kingston HyperX 1600
Video Card(s) GTX 1060 3GB
Storage small ssd
Display(s) Dell 2001F, BenQ short throw
Case Lian Li
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply X750
Software Mint 19.3, Win 10
Benchmark Scores not so fast...
Same here, Been buying them since intel released their 80GB models ( sata2 ), how ever i have had 3 to fail on me, one Corsair, OCZ and a Team Group one which were on the phison controller(2) and one on the Sandforce controller.

One of the Intel 80GB drives originally priced around $220 at the time is showing signs of quitting too. So to me they are doing a little better but nothing to get excited about.
Holy smokes, that post needs to get moved into the Nostalgic Hardware thread. Thanks for the flashback.

My latest (brand new, not used) PC purchase was a 500GB SSD. My media hoarding days are done.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
1,115 (0.84/day)
Yeah, right, SSDs might work longer but when they die, the data usually become completely insalvagable.

At the same time under most circumstances the data from the HDD can be recovered.

You can tell me everything about backups, you don't have to, but absolute most people never create them and sometimes they create a single backup and then give up on them.

Lastly in developing/underdeveloped countries, SSDs continue to be super-expensive, unless you're OK with 128GB or data which nowadays is just too little - smartphone often have more.

Never creating backups and/or not keeping it appropriately updated is a mistake you only get to make once.

Much better argument for HDDs would actually be for suitability as offline backup medium of choice, where HDDs have inherent edge due to data retention.
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
513 (0.09/day)
Location
You are here.
System Name Prometheus
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
Cooling EKWB EK-240 AIO D-RGB
Memory G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4070Ti Ventus 3X OC 12GB
Storage WD Black SN850 1TB + 1 x Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
Display(s) DELL U4320Q 4K + Wacom Cintiq Pro 16 4K
Case Jonsbo A4 ver1.1 SFF
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum SFX
Mouse Logitech Pro Wireless
Keyboard Vortex Race 3 75% MX Brown
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
What are hard drives?


They're like fidget spinners, but for data hoarders. I have 12 2TB HDDs, in order to replace them with SSDs, I'd have to pay 500% more. A whole lot more if I'd want to upgrade to 4-8TB drives. Spinning rust still has the price and density advantage. And, in order to mitigate some of the risk, I have large arrays that can still function with 2 drive failures and will automagically dip into a spare pool when a drive dies.
 
D

Deleted member 205776

Guest
They're like fidget spinners, but for data hoarders. I have 12 2TB HDDs, in order to replace them with SSDs, I'd have to pay 500% more. A whole lot more if I'd want to upgrade to 4-8TB drives. Spinning rust still has the price and density advantage. And, in order to mitigate some of the risk, I have large arrays that can still function with 2 drive failures and will automagically dip into a spare pool when a drive dies.
And read what I said above, if you're a data hoarder you evidently will not buy SSDs right now. I get that hard drives are better for exponentially more storage. But personally I don't need that much storage and prefer having noiseless and vibrationless drives in my system.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
2,592 (2.20/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
Never creating backups and/or not keeping it appropriately updated is a mistake you only get to make once.
What makes you think that?

In the initial days of SSDs, some 11-odd years ago, SSDs were considered unreliable
Unreliable? I don't remember that time, and I bought my first SSD in 2011 - a used Intel X25-M 80GB that cost me 85 EUR. We didn't quite trust MLC back then, how on earth can you put four distinct voltage levels into a single cell?
The first two or three generations of OCZ Vertex SSDs ... yes, that's another story, and "unreliable" is an understatement.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
In the initial days of SSDs, some 11-odd years ago, SSDs were considered unreliable. They'd randomly fail on you, causing irrecoverable data loss. Gaming desktop users usually installed an HDD to go with the SSD in their builds, so they could take regular whole-disk images of the SSD onto the HDD

That a bit of revisionism right there. People weren't installing HDDs alongside SSDs because SSDs would fail, they did it because SSDs were tiny. To the point reviewers had trouble installing just Windows and Crysis on a 32GB SSD.

And I believe SSDs' MTBF overtook HDDs years ago. But it's nice to have a third party confirm that. Also, keep in mind SSDs will "fail" if left unpowered for some time. Keep that in mind if you want to use a SSD in an external enclosure or something like that.

For bonus points: who remembers "parking" HDD heads prior to shutting down?
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
1,115 (0.84/day)
What makes you think that?

If you don't learn from mistake of not making backup, then losing your important data, you had it coming. It is not like we only know since yesterday it's important to manage backups...

It doesn't matter if you can then play with recovery or not, when you should've never put yourself in that situation to begin with.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
2,792 (0.99/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage Too much
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse G305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
That's really not what the charts are saying. The average HDD age listed is 4 times the average SSD age. It's apples to oranges to say x storage device is more reliable than y when y has been put through 4 times the wear. It's entirely misleading.

Mind you SSD wear is likely highly workload dependent. Read only SSD drives are likely to last a lot longer than ones being constantly written to.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2019
Messages
70 (0.04/day)
Location
France
System Name Computer
Processor Intel Core i9-9900kf
Motherboard MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling MSI MPG Coreliquid K360
Memory 32GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR4-3600 CL16-19-19-39
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX 4070 DUAL OC
Storage A Bunch of Sata SSD and some HD for storage
Display(s) Asus MG278q (main screen)
Same here, Been buying them since intel released their 80GB models ( sata2 ), how ever i have had 3 to fail on me, one Corsair, OCZ and a Team Group one which were on the phison controller(2) and one on the Sandforce controller.

One of the Intel 80GB drives originally priced around $220 at the time is showing signs of quitting too. So to me they are doing a little better but nothing to get excited about.
I think we have installed around 500-600 SSD at work, we had a single SSD failure in the last 5 years, and we are using very low priced one for working station, as the datas are on the servers anyway. In the same time we had a lot of HDD with bad sectors inducing low performances or just failing. Indeed the chance to recover the data on an HDD are higher, but the difference in reliability seems to be quite sensible from my experience.

Edit : for the record, we have around 1000 computers, so it's half HDD, half SSD in the inventory. HDD are on average older than SSD since we only buy SSD for the last 2-3years, but we still had more HDD failure in the same lifespan than SSD.
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I think we have installed around 500-600 SSD at work, we had a single SSD failure in the last 5 years, and we are using very low priced one for working station, as the datas are on the servers anyway. In the same time we had a lot of HDD with bad sectors inducing low performances or just failing. Indeed the chance to recover the data on an HDD are higher, but the difference in reliability seems to be quite sensible from my experience.

Edit : for the record, we have around 1000 computers, so it's half HDD, half SSD in the inventory. HDD are on average older than SSD since we only buy SSD for the last 2-3years, but we still had more HDD failure in the same lifespan than SSD.
Well, SSDs develop "bad sectors" just the same. But they "correct" them in the background.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
9,723 (5.12/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon-B Mk. 4
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance EXPO DDR5-6000
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7800 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2, 4 + 8 TB Seagate Barracuda 3.5"
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 single-core: 1,800, multi-core: 18,000. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 9,900.
Wait a minute... what about the column "Average age"? Does this data mean that 0.65% of SSDs failed after a year, while 6.04% of HDDs failed after 4 years of operation? That isn't really a fair comparison.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
474 (0.27/day)
System Name Fractal
Processor Intel Core i5 13600K
Motherboard Asus ProArt Z790 Creator WiFi
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 360
Memory 16GBx2 G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 DDR5 6000 CL30-40-40-96 (F5-6000J3040F16GX2-RS5K)
Video Card(s) PNY RTX A2000 6GB
Storage SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Display(s) LG 34GK950F-B (34"/IPS/1440p/21:9/144Hz/FreeSync)
Case Fractal Design R6 Gunmetal Blackout w/ USB-C
Audio Device(s) Steelseries Arctis 7 Wireless/Klipsch Pro-Media 2.1BT
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 850w 80+ Titanium
Mouse Logitech G700S
Keyboard Corsair K68
Software Windows 11 Pro
Skimmed the article and the thread. Reactions:

Duh.

Unsalvageable? When SSD's "die" from wear don't they go into a read only mode...you can get your data, you just can't write to it anymore.

And old? I think I could go out and fire up my OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD based system (that's been off for a good 2 years) and it would work fine. That machine is a solid 10 years old and was on nearly 24/7 for a good 8 years.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Skimmed the article and the thread. Reactions:

Duh.

Unsalvageable? When SSD's "die" from wear don't they go into a read only mode...you can get your data, you just can't write to it anymore.

And old? I think I could go out and fire up my OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD based system (that's been off for a good 2 years) and it would work fine. That machine is a solid 10 years old and was on nearly 24/7 for a good 8 years.
While that is technically correct, modern file systems write metadata in the background, so they will fail to work on read-only drives.
The data is probably salvageable, but salvaging it is not straightforward.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
963 (0.23/day)
System Name Poor Man's PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Motherboard MSI B650M Mortar WiFi
Cooling ID Cooling SE 206 XT
Memory 32GB GSkill Flare X5 DDR5 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 6800 XT
Storage XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB + 8 TB WD Ultrastar DC HC320
Display(s) Mi Gaming Curved 3440x1440 144Hz
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) MPow Air Wireless + Mi Soundbar
Power Supply Enermax Revolution DF 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 3
Keyboard Logitech Pro X + Kailh box heavy pale blue switch + Durock stabilizers
VR HMD Meta Quest 2
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
Somewhat mixed feelings here. I have a case where one of my computers refuses to boot up simply because it hasn't been used for a long time, months to be precise. Unique case indeed where I knew similar computer equipped with mechanical drive had no problem.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
2,592 (2.20/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
While that is technically correct, modern file systems write metadata in the background, so they will fail to work on read-only drives.
The data is probably salvageable, but salvaging it is not straightforward.
For some additional fun: you want to salvage data as Windows admin, but don't have access to some user's folder. Well, you're the admin, you can add privileges to yourself ... but no, you can't because privileges are stored as NTFS metadata on the drive, and the drive is read-only.
 
Top