Intel Launches 10nm "Tiger Lake" Desktop Processors

[TheinsanegamerN]

Update the news, it was an error on the website.

Source?

Intel still lists this:

Intel® Core™ i7-11700 Processor (16M Cache, up to 4.90 GHz) Product Specifications

Intel® Core™ i7-11700 Processor (16M Cache, up to 4.90 GHz) quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more.

ark.intel.com

desktop LGA1200.

 

[Lew Zealand]

That's Rocket Lake, not Tiger Lake. Too many damn "11th gen" CPUs.

 

[theGryphon]

ARK website clearly states socket FCBGA1787

This.
What's all the fuss? ffs read.

 

[AusWolf]

It looks like an embedded / OEM CPU to me.

 

[JAB Creations]

"Intel Launches 10nm "Tiger Lake" Desktop Processors"
"Intel is likely preparing to launch ..."

 

[Why_Me]

View attachment 202044

It looks like an embedded / OEM CPU to me.

This ^^

 

[watzupken]

If this ends up on desktop, I really don't know what in the blazers is Intel doing. They are confusing their customers big time with Rocket Lake, Alder Lake and Tiger Lake all expected to happen this year. They seem to be pulling everything out of their sleeve to fend off AMD and ARM's relentless chipping of their market share across all segments.

View attachment 202044

It looks like an embedded / OEM CPU to me.

It makes sense to be an OEM only option because of the FBGA socket. With the existing 1200, it is not likely to be a plug and play solution. And it makes no sense for Intel to come up with an interim socket just for this when Alder Lake is expect to be released later this year with LGA 1700. I suspect this may end up with those NUC type of system, or even some AIO PC.

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

well damn, this nixes the 10mm intel jokes.

 

[xtreemchaos]

Oh no not again !. intels like a cat in a dustbin running round and no where to go.

 

[NuCore]

Desktop cpu.

Intel® Core™ i7-11700B Processor (24M Cache, up to 4.80 GHz) Product Specifications

Intel® Core™ i7-11700B Processor (24M Cache, up to 4.80 GHz) quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more.

ark.intel.com

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...900kb-processor-24m-cache-up-to-4-90-ghz.html

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...1500b-processor-12m-cache-up-to-4-60-ghz.html

Product Specifications

quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more.

ark.intel.com

You are a desktop processor yourself: D Look at the official site ark.intel.com These are mobile processors! You do not have verified information? Do not comment! i7-11700 (desktop) and i7-11700B (mobile) are two completely different processors!

 

[AusWolf]

Intel® Core™ i9-11900KB Processor (24M Cache, up to 4.90 GHz) Ordering and Compliance Information | Intel

Intel® Core™ i9-11900KB Processor (24M Cache, up to 4.90 GHz) - Ordering and trade compliance information inclusive of change notifications, material declarations, ordering codes and trade compliance information.

www.intel.com

"Tray Processor Intel ships these processors to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), and the OEMs typically pre-install the processor. Intel refers to these processors as tray or OEM processors. Intel doesn't provide direct warranty support. Contact your OEM or reseller for warranty support." - Directly copied from intel.com. There doesn't seem to be a BOX option, like there is with non-B (Rocket Lake LGA) SKUs.

 

[bonehead123]

Soooooooooooo...... big bleu finally made it to 10nm, 'bout friggin time

But the REAL question is: how many "++++" variants with incremental 20/50/100mhz speed bumps will this set of chips see over the next 5-8 years... 4, 6, 23 hehehehe ?????

 

[GerKNG]

Soooooooooooo...... big bleu finally made it to 10nm, 'bout friggin time

But the REAL question is: how many "++++" variants with incremental 20/50/100mhz speed bumps will this set of chips see over the next 5-8 years... 4, 6, 23 hehehehe ?????

Intels "10nm" has already a ~30% higher density than TSMCs latest 7nm node.

 

[efikkan]

Soooooooooooo...... big bleu finally made it to 10nm, 'bout friggin time

You mean, on the desktop, right? 10nm laptop chips have been produced for a while. At this point Intel is running more 10nm wafers than AMD is running at "7nm".

BTW, "Big Blue" is IBM, not Intel.

But the REAL question is: how many "++++" variants with incremental 20/50/100mhz speed bumps will this set of chips see over the next 5-8 years... 4, 6, 23 hehehehe ?????

If you paid a little attention, you would know that the pluses denotes node iterations, not chip iterations.

 

[Anymal]

I guess 11900KGB would be Ryzen killer.

 

[lexluthermiester]

Intels "10nm" has already a ~30% higher density than TSMCs latest 7nm node.

This. The "nm" naming scheme has been both accurate and misleading at the same time since 22nm. There are a number of ways to make that measurement and each has it's pro's and con's.

Look at it this way. When TSMC says 7nm, they are talking about the smallest individual functional feature of the total transistor. IBM's recent 2nm announcement is very likely the measurement of the smallest physical feature. Interestingly enough, Global Foundries and Intel both measure the size of the total functional transistor part. TSMC's 7nm process produces a transistor that is actually larger than Intels 14nm, but because of formulation and how the power delivery works, it is competitive. Samsung's 8nm is the same situation, but the characteristics are different.

The point here is that the "nm" scale is only part of the equation and because everyone uses different stardards of measurement, the "nm" statement needs to be taken with a BIG grain of salt.

Focus on the actual performance of the IC product in question instead of judging it superior or inferior based on it's "nm" scale.

 

[bonehead123]

You mean, on the desktop, right? 10nm laptop chips have been produced for a while. At this point Intel is running more 10nm wafers than AMD is running at "7nm".

BTW, "Big Blue" is IBM, not Intel.


If you paid a little attention, you would know that the pluses denotes node iterations, not chip iterations.

1. Yes I meant on the desktop, which is my primary area of interest when it comes to computing, not lappys

2. Let me rephrase then: Team Bleu.... which is what some folks here call them, as opposed to "Team Red" denoting AMD...

3. Yes I know about nodes & such, I was merely raggin on Intel for stretching their 14nm chips for so long so many times it was just getting silly

 

[Why_Me]

You are a desktop processor yourself: D Look at the official site ark.intel.com These are mobile processors! You do not have verified information? Do not comment! i7-11700 (desktop) and i7-11700B (mobile) are two completely different processors!

I linked the desktop cpu's. These new 10nm come in both desktop and mobile.

 

[AusWolf]

3. Yes I know about nodes & such, I was merely raggin on Intel for stretching their 14nm chips for so long so many times it was just getting silly

7 nm, 10 nm, 14 nm, 3587348956245294376 nm... who cares if it works?

This. The "nm" has been both accurate and misleading at the same time since 22nm. There an a number of ways to make that measurement and each has it's pro's and con's.

Look at it this way. When TSMC says 7nm, they are talking about the smallest individual functional feature of the total transistor. IBM's recent 2nm announcement is very likely the measurement of the smallest physical feature. Interestingly enough, Global Foundries and Intel both measure the size of the total functional transistor part. TSMC's 7nm process produces a transistor that is actually larger than Intels 14nm, but because of formulation and how the power delivery works, it is competitive. Samsung's 8nm is the same situation, but the characteristics are different.

The point here is that the "nm" scale is only part of the equation and because everyone uses different stardards of measurement, the "nm" statement needs to be taken with a BIG grain of salt.

Focus on the actual performance of the IC product in question instead of judging it superior or inferior based on it's "nm" scale.

This. The end user should not give any attention to nanometers and production nodes nowadays, imo. There's just too much variation among processes and measurements.

Edit: Not to mention the increased heat density of smaller nodes, which makes them worse in some regards.

 

[GerKNG]

Not to mention the increased heat density of smaller nodes, which makes them worse in some regards.

5800X *cough*

 

[lexluthermiester]

5800X *cough*

5950X *cough*

 

[mechtech]

So this is actually 10nm and not 14nm+++++????

Edit
Tiger Lake" 8-core/16-thread silicon, which packs 8 "Willow Cove" CPU cores, and "Tabby Lake" L3 Cache and "Spruce Grove" iGPU

That sounds much better

 

[AusWolf]

5950X *cough*

Anything more powerful than a 3300X. *cough*

 

[Ravenas]

Maybe they will release a 11900kb which performs better than the 10900k. Crazy they released the 11900k at 5950x prices. Basically a slap in the face to consumers.

 

[GerKNG]

Maybe they will release a 11900kb which performs better than the 10900k. Crazy they released the 11900k at 5950x prices. Basically a slap in the face to consumers.

please show me a 5950x for 580€ i'd buy one instantly.