hercules71185
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2007
- Messages
- 83 (0.01/day)
System Name | Thor |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i5 2500k @ 4.8 |
Motherboard | asrock z77 extreme 3 z77 |
Cooling | corsair h60 |
Memory | Kingston hyperx 8gb ddr3 |
Video Card(s) | Nvidia gtx 680 |
Storage | (2) 1 TB. WD caviar black in raid 0. 2TB caviar green for storage |
Display(s) | 65 inch 3d smart samsung tv. :) |
Case | thermaltake Nvidia element V |
Audio Device(s) | onboard THX 7.1 |
Power Supply | 700 watt toughpower thermaltake |
Software | everything |
Benchmark Scores | 13,000 3dmark05 108,000 aquamark3 haven't did many since I upgraded these were with my 8600gt :) |
I just bought one online 5 mins ago and waiting for it to come in.
I game a little. I'm guessing my 8600gt won't push my games at 1680 x 1050 tho.
My question is, what is my best bet running my games at lower settings and the native resolution or how bad is it to just use 1440 x 900. I had a monitor before and played games like battlefield 2142 at that and noticed no difference it looked great. But, now I see the word native. Does this mean that my monitor will look like it came from a cows anus at other resolutions like everyone claims or will it be alright
I game a little. I'm guessing my 8600gt won't push my games at 1680 x 1050 tho.
My question is, what is my best bet running my games at lower settings and the native resolution or how bad is it to just use 1440 x 900. I had a monitor before and played games like battlefield 2142 at that and noticed no difference it looked great. But, now I see the word native. Does this mean that my monitor will look like it came from a cows anus at other resolutions like everyone claims or will it be alright