• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

European Union Raids Intel in Search of Evidence for Anti-Trust Case

ChillyMyst

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
551 (0.09/day)
yeah, like i said, they have had to admit that imc is the way to go, after they badmouthed the idea when amd started using it.

it really should help intel get around the problems they been having like to little fsb bandwith for their high end chips due to the cores using the FSB to talk to eachother as well as the fsb moving all that other data.......really becomes like a freeway at rushhour :p
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
1,065 (0.16/day)
System Name [Primary Workstation]
Processor Intel Core i7-920 Bloomfield @ 3.8GHz/4.55GHz [24-7/Bench]
Motherboard EVGA X58 E758-A1 [Tweaked right!]
Cooling Cooler Master V8 [stock fan + two 133CFM ULTRA KAZE fans]
Memory 12GB [Kingston HyperX]
Video Card(s) constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer nVidia]
Storage constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer Hitachi/Samsung]
Display(s) Triple LCD [40 inch primary + 32 & 28 inch auxiliary displays]
Case Cooler Master Cosmos 1000 [Mesh Mod, CFM Overload]
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 + onboard Realtek ALC889A [Logitech Z-5300 Spk., Niko 650-HP 5.1 Hp., X-Bass Hp.]
Power Supply Corsair TX950W [aka Reactor]
Software This and that... [All software 100% legit and paid for, 0% pirated]
Benchmark Scores Ridiculously good scores!!!
it really should help intel get around the problems they been having like to little fsb bandwith for their high end chips due to the cores using the FSB to talk to eachother as well as the fsb moving all that other data.......really becomes like a freeway at rushhour :p

Yeah, Intel platforms are bandwith hungry, always have been more or less.
 

ChillyMyst

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
551 (0.09/day)
specly the pentium-d, that netburst core is horribly banwith hungery, only thing they where good at was encoding media :/
 

panchoman

Sold my stars!
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Messages
9,595 (1.57/day)
Processor Amd Athlon X2 4600+ Windsor(90nm) EE(65W) @2.9-3.0 @1.45
Motherboard Biostar Tforce [Nvidia] 550
Cooling Thermaltake Blue Orb-- bunch of other fans here and there....
Memory 2 gigs (2x1gb) of patriot ddr2 800 @ 4-4-4-12-2t
Video Card(s) Sapphire X1950pro Pci-E x16 @stock@stock on stock
Storage Seagate 7200.11 250gb Drive, WD raptors (30/40) in Raid 0
Display(s) ANCIENT 15" sony lcd, bought it when it was like 500 bucks
Case Apevia X-plorer blue/black
Audio Device(s) Onboard- Why get an sound card when you can hum??
Power Supply Antec NeoHe 550-manufactured by seasonic -replacement to the discontinued smart power series
Software Windows XP pro SP2 -- vista is still crap

imperialreign

New Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Messages
7,043 (1.15/day)
Location
Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
System Name УльтраФиолет
Processor Intel Kentsfield Q9650 @ 3.8GHz (4.2GHz highest achieved)
Motherboard ASUS P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi; X38 NSB, ICH9R SSB
Cooling Delta V3 block, XPSC res, 120x3 rad, ST 1/2" pump - 10 fans, SYSTRIN HDD cooler, Antec HDD cooler
Memory Dual channel 8GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 @ 1800MHz @ 7-7-7-20 1T
Video Card(s) Quadfire: (2) Sapphire HD5970
Storage (2) WD VelociRaptor 300GB SATA-300; WD 320GB SATA-300; WD 200GB UATA + WD 160GB UATA
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster T240 24" (16:10)
Case Cooler Master Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCI-E x1
Power Supply Kingwin Mach1 1200W modular
Software Windows XP Home SP3; Vista Ultimate x64 SP2
Benchmark Scores 3m06: 20270 here: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12313
The whole Pentium 4 series is a pristine prime example of why we as consumers need to see AMD stay around. They ran hot (especially the Prescotts), the architecture was stagnant, and their biggest selling points were the absolute insane clock speeds of the core itself - which Intel only accomplished by jacking the ever loving crap out of the BUS multiplier - leaving you with a fast processor per a spec sheet, but being horribly hampered down by slow BUS speeds, leaving you with sub par performance that just looked really great on paper, and that's all the customer ever saw. We didn't see anything noteworthy from Intel until AMD struck back, and Intel responded by fumbling over itself by slapping two P4 cores together, instead of actually doing real R&D work. Anyhow, even if you're not an AMD fanboi, we should offer our support in this. Even to the consumer, it appears that Intel have played an iron fist over the years, and that we're all pretty sure they've been playing with a stacked deck, which just isn't right nor is it fair.
 
Top