Search results

so they sacrificed multi core performance for a single core lead. nothing really new here..

GPU power is greatly reduced, from 12 TFLOPS to 4 TFLOPS (One X is 6 TFLOPS). they said series S is for those who doesnt have 4K TV but want to have full experience on next gen games

same mechanism with different enclosure, meh.. i dont want to spent another $20

<$50, its still illegal but i dont want to talk about that..

for someone who complaining, $49 is even cheaper than the cheapest android smartphone on the market. this pc is for someone who just a want *pc* for browsing and playing some standard hi-def media without even breaking a sweat when you start looking at your wallet.. lets see.. : $200 24" 720p...

i know, but its useless if you can order ones from ebay for $400 - $420 exc. shipping..

$620?? yikes! :eek:

meh... no matter how they explain it, it's pretty easy to read their minds. if they develop the new engine, the game will runs laggy on current consoles. later, decrease on the experience of gameplay will generate less interest on the market that in the end it hurt the game sales.. i'm pretty...

COD is a game for kids, these kids dont care about technical like graphic, story, or anything like we do ; that's the main reason why COD never evolved into some kind technological advancements since 5 years ago and still throws the same game every years because they thought those kids are still...

when you think intel as the giant-leading company on cpu market, take a small gain or "a few million dollars" from them can be still considered as a good improvement..

well, a few millions of dollar is still a shit ton of money.. :rolleyes:

you cant barking on someone to do something that their still incapable to achieve it. patience is a lesson, you name it..

it's still one year away from being released, we just know a glimpse not a major part of story. and there's still many thing that's need to be developed further. and yet only one person in this thread that still support the game? i knew EA is a s*cker, but give crytek another chance. i've...

ahh.., so it's like AMD bought nearly an entire for what TSMC had selled on their store, and nvidia only get a tip of it. maybe in the future whoever got the contract faster and had succesfully made sure that their chip yields is on good amount have the bigger chance to avoid shortage like what...

and now there's no reason anymore to bashing both side.. :)

what i mean was why msi release the card of the series that are likely to be discontinued? as soon as they fix the problem with availability of kepler and then release the rest line-up for geforce 6 series. geforce 5 series will become less appealing for nvidia to keep it alive, starting with...

when nvidia stop production for 580 and 590.. you're not likely to see it soon if nvidia still struggle to find another fab to fix Kepler's low yields..

well, AMD didn't have any big problem with TSMC. it's kepler low yields that made 680 scarce..

with no clear future about GTX680 availability on the market, and these huge price cuts on 79xx and 78xx whoever got the crown for the fastest is not important anymore..

"include free ramen noodle with a sprinkle of gold"

or angry birds and call of (old engine) duty..

i bet AMD can cut it out to even more cheaper if nv release the rest of the line up with an adequate stock to answer the consumers demand..

that's why i said what AMD did is all about marketing, i'm sure it's no problem for AMD to cut 7970 price to $400 and recalculate the price for the rest of lineup if in the next few months GTX680 supplies would return normal or even the release of the next line up. but now, they just wait and...

the only problem that nvidia has right now is the stockpile, so from the marketing point of view what AMD do right now for not cutting the price 7970 is a right decision.. 28nm wafers availability for Nvidia is on scarce, it means they cant meet the numbers of availability that consumers...

april mop?