Search results

i was just wondering on the technical side, that this could imply that RDMA2 does worse energyefficiency for mining compared to RDNA1. What does (GPU) mining traditionally use: memory bandwidth: in other words saying the turbo-hyper-infinity-cache thing could perform worse in combination with...

and then the world wonders why VR isn't being adopted in mass .... the choice of closing down a market will: -limits your gaming options (like HBO & sorts) -allow anybody that pays blackmarket value for your profile info to crosslink your PC info to IP address to FB profile to linkedin profile...

ancient old question: what are we gonna do with the containers of old junk that no gamer is gonna buy as soon as we release RDNA2? throw this useless piece of silicon at the cryptoworld. but serious: does RDNA2 loose the fight against RDNA1 on this specific function? interesting...

big navi (navi 21) will have likely 384 bit mem, 24GB, 80 compute units, ~3080 perf? this is most likely "middle navi" (navi 22) 256 bits mem, 16GB, ~64 compute units -> ~3070 perf?

100TB -> 40k dollar 1 TB -> 0.1k dollar hmm, i like the busynessmodel ....

"VMWare considers AMD broke its licensing model " nothing in the original VMware statement mentions this, seems to me like an invented quote from oc3d and blindly copy'pasted.

I would say the same if AMD showed some nice figures. NOTHING absolutely nothing should be taken as fact from any company promoting their own products (directly or indirectly through bought companies). Bring in the independent reviewers and independent benchmarks. b.t.w. adored was right on a...

intel's own benchmarks with their "real world" angle covered by adoredTv adoredTv Nothing, absolutely NOTHING should be taken for any form of seriousness coming from intel and their bought over benchmarks XPRT suites, and their idiot real-world idiocrazy (movie pun intended) Bring in...

point being that in the past you did get performance increase _and_ the power draw reduction. and now similar performance/dollar on 1080p , worse performance/doller 4k (up to -50% is totally beyond me), just better powerdraw/dollar. so worse performance @ 4k is just uber meeeeh, 1080p so...

"..obsoleting AMD's Radeon RX 580/590 offerings.." uh wait what? @ 4k gaming the 1650 super duper aint so super, and on 1080p gaming they are not too far off each other, and i can buy them both for same price. so how obsoletering is this? did i miss something? confused btw am i the only one...

nvm him, he focusses on better coolers ... i've seen a lot of benchmarks and the 1660 is a damn good card. but currently the 56 is roughly same priced in the shops, so then you should consider it as an alternative. or wait a few weeks for the price to settle down currently: if you want low...

except for price... i think u can buy a threadripper 16/32 for almost the same price, that is bonkers

wow what a review, so much data to digest, lovely! it really puts everything into perspective

Some crappy chinese usb devices can actually disconnect when fluorescent lightbulbs are firing up, this firing up causes EM waves that interfere on USB communication (in combination with bad grounds). Try it for once to flip the light switch and try and see any correlation with your phenomenon.

i crack up , when i see a project name for graphics that has "sound" in it. doomed from the start

results are normalized to the crucial mx300 2tb and normalized to take the drive capacity into account

so that is then the thing. in the review it is explicitly mentioned capacity was excluded. by that you mean you didn't exclude looking at capacity, but you included it the formulas normalization with capacity too okay, end of confusion but you might consider rephrasing that one :p

The chart you gave is a % number normalized(relative to) the crucial mx300. You saying there is no formula, is just obviously inaccurate. 'an actual real application' is an unquantified unit leaving me unable to verify, or form an opinion on. That's why I ask questions, right, to understand what...

I thought I asked a question, so I ask again what formula are you using to get to reallife benchmarks? seems tilted

please take a look at the graph of performance / $ i think you misrepresent the samsung 950 pro 256GB @ 19% (or any pci-e 4x m.2 ssd) the performance is 2+ GB/s (4x over the MX300) and cheaper ($300?), so it should be more like 400%+, so all the pci-e 4x modules should be at the top...

post sources with proof, then compare the numbers of your sources to the amount of drugs / wars funded by fiat currencies. and then come to a conclusion. you might find the answer enlightening. since crypto's have maybe 1% of the worlds finance, even _IF_ 100% of crypto's would be in illegal...

Love that they are pumping out beta's. that's good. features still buggy. but seems they have full attention , if there are 3 releases in 1 month. going to test now!

if you are making % references, you should also mention what you are comparing it to. 15% doesn't tell me anything neither does 33%. e.g. compared to amd thoroughbred? 7700k? or 7700k clock for clock? or 7700k performance per dollar? 7700k performance per watt? and if you really want kudo's...

so question: there is mentining of a 1950X @ 5.4 GHz , how much power does this one consume ? and then compensate for the 16 amd cores vs 18 intel cores. are they close together WattWize or in a completely different ballpark? so Pryzen_hypothetical=18/16*Pryzen@5.4 * (5.5/5.4) vs Pintel@5.5=840W

dont forget to enable HBCC with minimum amount of RAM. it will boost MHashes, you should be able to get to 75 MHash with 2 vega cards