Search results

Yes, but how... - anyone?

OT: There's so many opinions about benchmarking, if not Geekbench, which benchmark do You consider more/most relevant?

Isn't that what's so usual, people (myself included) carry with us plenty of old and irrelevant information/data, mainly because it's almost impossible to keep being updated with it all?

For my Asrock X570 it says "Update AMD AGESA Combo-AM4 V2 1.0.0.2" (note: V2), but what about AGESA 1.0.0.6, what's the difference? Edit: Found this https://www.planet3dnow.de/cms/56750-agesa-combo-am4v2pi-1-0-0-2-und-combo-am4-1-0-0-6-schliessen-sicherheitsluecke-bei-amd-apus/, seems that...

We've found that the best security protection against vulnerabilities, that is to avoid intel - for now. Ok, they struggle - at least they say they do - to secure their new models, but leaving older models completely without mitigations! Quite often is a new UEFI/BIOS needed, but motherboard...

Not out of the Blue, out of the Red (team;)

The war is on!

Well that explains the smile, keep smiling Lisa

Possibly a used up and drained resource that Amd can do better without

I have problems with the thought that Amd would be involved in a scam business, I think it sounds quite interesting.

Doctors advice: buy it and keep quite about it;)

Ha-ha, hi-hi, Der8auer did that ("the CPU remained attached to the cooler, which resulted in some bent pins (screams in horror)"), then l'm in good company. Yes I remember that feeling..., and I also learned the lesson - twist before lift it.

Let's hope that the product Amd is releasing as replacement will have s SAFE setting. That is, if the SSD fails, the HDD will still have the data secured for access. Meaning, it will be used as a stand alone HDD.

And hopfully the last ... 14nm;) I'm just curios whether they can maintain that "Single-Core Turbo boost reaching 5.3 GHz" in 10 - 7 - 5nm or not?

What do we (You) know about SD Express?

You are SO clever, according your own judgement.

Have they (Amd) laughed - joker?

But how can it be downloaded, latest still 441.87? Found it:)

Still no Thunderbolt:( It's real shame, Amd is loosing customers to Intel due to this!

Same with 441.87, no control panel! Last is 441.12 that works with cp. I'm installing with just the HDMI-option checked. Could it be that Nvidia is angry that they don't receive the telemetry info???

Oh yes, they (Nvidia) really fear Amd - as also Intel does!!!

May I ask, have You yourself tested all models from XFX since the model You mention? We have used R7-360 & R9-380 plus RX-480 & Vega64, and has not experienced any other problems than those that comes with the model in general. So far I've been lucky;)

Question: "2.7 slots, but who's counting but we?" My response: I am, would never consider buying a card wider than 2S (≥41mm).

But to what use, as the Ryzen 3000 cpu's response to oc is so limited?

Could next generation be the "Death Lake"