• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Bulldozer Shines in 3D Gaming and Rendering: AMD

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,274 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Close to two weeks ago, reports surfaced about AMD claiming that its upcoming "Zambezi" 8-core desktop processor based on the company's new Bulldozer architecture is expected to perform 50% faster than Intel's Core i7 and its own Phenom II X6 processors. The slide forming the basis for the older report surfaced, and it's a little more than a cumulative performance estimate.

Slide #14 from AMD's Desktop Client Solutions presentation to its industry partners reveals that the company went ahead and provided a breakdown on which kinds of applications exactly does its new 8-core chip perform better compared to present-generation processors. The breakdown provides an interesting insight on the architecture itself. To begin with, AMD's 8-core Bulldozer "Zambezi" processor is 1.5X (50%) faster overall compared to Intel Core i7 "Bloomfield" 950, and AMD Phenom II X6 1100T. Breaking down that graph, the processor performs similar to the other chips in media applications, but features huge gains in gaming and 3D rendering, which is where most of its gains are coming from.



To put this into perspective, games and 3D graphics applications, which still favour processors with higher clock speeds with lesser number of cores/threads to processors with lesser clock speeds and higher number of cores/threads, performing well on Bulldozer indicates that AMD is concentrating on higher performance per core, in other words, higher instructions per clock (IPC). The modular design of Bulldozer, perhaps, is contributing to high inter-core bandwidth, which helps 3D games that can do with lesser number of cores.

AMD described the Zambezi-powered "Scorpius" enthusiast desktop platform to have "the best graphics features and performance". A comparative table also reminds us that apart from the radical design, Bulldozer might benefit from a vastly upgraded SIMD instruction set compared to the previous generation. Bulldozer packs SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, and AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions). With socket AM3+ motherboards already seeing the light of the day in pre-release photo shoots, AMD's new processor doesn't seem too far.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.16/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Except that that graph also shows the Phenom x6 to be better in games than the i7 950.

So presumably AMD is looking at games optimised for 6+ cores here.

The one area in which AMD admit that the i7 950 is faster than the Phenom x6 is "media", so presumably that's the single threaded task, as I don't think anybody would claim that a Phenom is faster than an i7 in single threaded tasks at similar clock speeds.

Therefore, contrary to the above article, Bulldozer will be a slight improvement in per core performance and a massive improvement in parallel performance.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2010
Messages
231 (0.05/day)
System Name Vika
Processor Intel Core i3 2100
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V Gen 3
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws X 8GB DDR3
Video Card(s) HIS IceQ X Radeon HD 7970 @ 1100/1550
Storage Crucial M4 SSD 64GB, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2453MH-LED 23.6in LED
Case Fractal Design Arc Midi
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG
Power Supply Antec HCG 620W
Software Windows 7 Premium 64bit
So is that 3d with or without glasses? :rolleyes::p
Anyway its nice to know to these chips can excel at gaming.. especially in the future
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
206 (0.04/day)
Location
Serbia
System Name Zverkica/HP Omen
Processor Ryzen 5, 1600/ i7-9750h
Motherboard Gigabyte AB-350-Gaming 3
Cooling Noctua NH-L12S
Memory 16GB Kingston Hyper X Predator 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) Asus RX 580/ GTX 1660ti
Storage SSD KIngston UV400, 480GB, WD 1002FAEX and some other Samsung drives
Display(s) Samsung U28H750 UHD Quantum Dot
Case Cooler Master Q500L
Audio Device(s) GENIUS SW-2.1 1800: GENIUS SW-2.1 1250
Power Supply Thermaltake Paris 650 Watt - 80 Plus Gold PSU
Mouse Razer Death Adder Elite
Keyboard ReDragon K577 RGB mechanical keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
Can't wait to see some benchmarks... Great thing for me is that I don't have to bye a new processor right away. First I bye a AM3+ mob and put my current AM3 processor on it, and latter, when I had money to spare, get some nice Bulldozer...
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,361 (0.48/day)
Location
Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name Chachamaru-IV | Retro Battlestation
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | Intel Pentium II 450MHz
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX X570-F Gaming | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset)
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000 (16-20-20-38) | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
Video Card(s) nVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 FE | 3dfx Voodoo3 3000
Storage 1TB WD_Black SN850 NVME SSD (OS), Toshiba 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam)
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G5 27" @ 1440p144 & Dell P2312H @ 1080p60
Case SilverStone Seta A1 | Beige box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster AE-7 (Speakers), Creative Zen Hybrid headset | Sound Blaster AWE64
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC
Mouse Roccat Kone Air| Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A
Keyboard Vortex Race3 | Dell AT102W
Software Microsoft Windows 11 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE
The title said "3D gaming" and I was expecting it to be referring to the intergrated GPU!
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
207 (0.04/day)
Location
Houston,TX
System Name About_To_Be_Replaced
Processor AMD Deneb 955 OC to 3.82GHz
Motherboard ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory CORSAIR XMS3 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Vapor-X Radeon HD 5770 (Juniper XT) 1GB
Storage Crucial RealSSD C300 64GB SATA III (SSD)
Display(s) Samsung 2770HD
Case COOLER MASTER HAF 912 Mid Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply CORSAIR Enthusiast Series CMPSU-650TX 650W
Software Win 7 64 Bit Home Edition SP1
Benchmark Scores Build 1: Listed Specs Build 2: Waiting for SteamRoller
Can't seem to wait for this baby - I hope it hold true to the hype. Take this CPU and add dual 6990 cards and you have a nice machine that should do well for at least 3 years. But may need a 850 or higher power supply to keep that setup going. Maybe the AMD guy can give us a better estimate on release of this - I'm hoping by April-June timeframe (or sooner)!

AMD :rockout:
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
387 (0.07/day)
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S + NF-A12x25 PWM + 4xNF-A14 PWM
Memory 16 GB Adata XPG Dazzle DDR4 3000 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 Ti Gaming 8G
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus, Samsung 850 Evo
Display(s) Samsung C24FG73 144Hz 1080p
Case Fractal Design Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Steelseries Arctis 3
Power Supply Superflower Leadex II Gold 650W
Mouse Steelseries Rival 600
Keyboard Steelseries Apex 7
Software Windows 11 Pro
They compared their future octo core with last year quad core from Intel and they're proud of winning?
AMD, wake the hell up, guys!!!
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
331 (0.06/day)
Location
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I totally like the sound of this. Waiting to upgrade my desktop as soon as Windows 8 is released, possibly next year, and this is the CPU it'll carry.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.16/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Take this CPU and add dual 6990 cards and you have a nice machine that should do well for at least 3 years.

This setup and dual 6990s would last a lot longer than 3 years. My Pentium dual core has lated 3 years and it's probably be fine for at least a couple more, lol. A high end system like that should last for 5-8 years imo, unless you really NEED cutting edge performance.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
I want to see two things....

1. Benches.
2. Price.

Except that that graph also shows the Phenom x6 to be better in games than the i7 950.

So presumably AMD is looking at games optimised for 6+ cores here.

The one area in which AMD admit that the i7 950 is faster than the Phenom x6 is "media", so presumably that's the single threaded task, as I don't think anybody would claim that a Phenom is faster than an i7 in single threaded tasks at similar clock speeds.

Therefore, contrary to the above article, Bulldozer will be a slight improvement in per core performance and a massive improvement in parallel performance.

This is about gaming and media crunching which the 1090T is very much on par with the i7 950. Nevermind the 1100T.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,828 (0.36/day)
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor Ryzen 1500X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X370-F Gaming
Cooling Stock
Memory 16Gb Corsair 3000mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTS 450
Storage Crucial M500
Display(s) Philips 1080 24'
Case NZXT
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Enermax 425W
Software Windows 10 Pro
An 8 core cpu is 50% faster than a 4 core cpu :twitch:
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,828 (0.36/day)
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor Ryzen 1500X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X370-F Gaming
Cooling Stock
Memory 16Gb Corsair 3000mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTS 450
Storage Crucial M500
Display(s) Philips 1080 24'
Case NZXT
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Enermax 425W
Software Windows 10 Pro
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
1,583 (0.22/day)
Location
Poland,Slask
System Name HAL
Processor Core i5 2500K
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Pro Rev3.1
Cooling stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600Mhz Blu
Video Card(s) Asus 560Ti DirectCuII TOP
Storage Kingston 120 3K SSD,WD Black WD1502FAEX
Display(s) LG 1440x900
Case Chieftec Mesh Midi
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750V2
Software w8
He means that adding a core(thead) doesn't mean you get +100% of performance.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
483 (0.10/day)
Location
baghdad/iraq
Processor intel i5 2500k,atom280@1930mhz
Motherboard msi h61
Cooling i have cooler master V8 but now im on stock :P
Memory team group elite 2x2 1600 @1333 7 7 7 20
Video Card(s) sapphere 5850 toxic@900/1250
Storage WD 1TB green 5400 32mb ,WD 250gb 7200/8mb
Display(s) HP 22" 1680x1050 hdmi
Case asus vento
Audio Device(s) creative XFi fatality+creative gigaworksG500 5.1
Power Supply cooler master gx 750
Software win7,64bit
do i see bottle neck here>>>> dual channel
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.16/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Except that that graph also shows the Phenom x6 to be better in games than the i7 950.

So presumably AMD is looking at games optimised for 6+ cores here.

The one area in which AMD admit that the i7 950 is faster than the Phenom x6 is "media", so presumably that's the single threaded task, as I don't think anybody would claim that a Phenom is faster than an i7 in single threaded tasks at similar clock speeds.

Therefore, contrary to the above article, Bulldozer will be a slight improvement in per core performance and a massive improvement in parallel performance.

This is about gaming and media crunching which the 1090T is very much on par with the i7 950. Nevermind the 1100T.

Like I said, nobody would claim that the Phenom is faster per clock in tasks using between 1 and 4 threads (right?). So yes, the 1090t is very much on par with the 950, and even better, in games that use more than 4 logical cores well (the only one I can think of right now is 3d mark, which isn't really a game. I'm probably forgetting something though). As I also explained above, this would appear to be what AMD is suggesting, too.

do i see bottle neck here>>>> dual channel

I think that the superiority of the 1155 CPUs over the old 1366 CPUs has shown that memory bandwith isn't as important as it's sometimes made out to be, even on high end platforms.
 

Over_Lord

News Editor
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
764 (0.16/day)
Location
Hyderabad
System Name BAH! - - tHE ECo FReAK
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 1.15V
Motherboard ASUS 785G EVO
Cooling Stock
Memory Corsair Titanium 4GB DDR3 1600MHz C9
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD5850 @ 1.049v
Storage Seagate 7200.12 500GB
Display(s) BenQ G2220HD
Case Cooler Master Elite 334
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VX550W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
An 8 core cpu is 50% faster than a 4 core cpu :twitch:
That's what I was going to point out. All these Bulldozer charts AMD is releasing are misleading because they are comparing a two year old SMT enabled architecture quad-core to a new architecture octo-core. The performance gap between them should be at least 2, not 1.5. From that information, I can almost guarentee you that existing Gulftown coares are about equal to octo-core Bulldozer in performance and an octo-core Sandy Bridge will bitch slap an octo-core Bulldozer.

All the signs AMD is sending don't look very positive to me. Yes, it has higher IPC than Phenom II but it still behind Intel. :(
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
220 (0.04/day)
if thats what 8 cores do than quad core will not be much better than a phenom
the only thing amd has to give is low price and high overclocking else it will
be a flop ,intel sandy bridge isn't much better also, compare i5 760 to i5 2300
and you get only 20% .both amd and intel are feeding us bread crumbs.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
164 (0.03/day)
System Name lumi
Processor Intel Core i5-3570
Motherboard MSI Z68A-G43 (B3)
Cooling Stock :O
Memory 16GB DDR3-12800 1600Mhz (4*4GB)
Video Card(s) nVidia 750 Ti
Storage 256GB SP900 (Linux)/Samsung 850 EVO (Win10) - 4x4TB Storage
Display(s) dual 24" Samsungs (1080)
Case Fractal Design Core 3000
Audio Device(s) Onboard :/
Power Supply 850 watt pretty green thing
Mouse Naga Trinity
Keyboard CM Quikfire TK (Red)
Software Ubuntu 18.04/Win10
People sometimes forget something when it comes to custom machine building.

I mean, for gaming people focus too much on the cpu and very little on the gpu( the major decider on graphics capabilities.)

Proving the cpu is powerful enough to feed the gpu being used, gaming benchmarks seem somewhat unimportant. If it were me, despite using my machine as more of a workstation, i'd focus more on multi-tasking performance, i mean the chances are you're going to spend more time with multiple applications open over long periods of time( atypical enthusiast machine).

So really, on a forum like techpowerup, wouldn't the major desire for all enthusiasts be multi-tasking performance?

maybe it's just me, but i figure most people here will use photoshop at some point, or run some distributed computing client in the background, or something similar.

</rant>

Seems like AMD's bulldozer has promise, with some (even if its just a bit) of evidence to say it's gonna tank in multi-tasking :) if these are priced right it would be desired by people looking for home office workstations (freelancers and the such).
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
451 (0.07/day)
Location
NJ
System Name Gaming Rig
Processor AMD Ryzen 5900x
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H110i Icue Push/Pull
Memory G Skill TridentZ F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 64GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX 3090 FE
Storage 1TB ADATA XPG SX8200 M.2 PCIe NVME
Display(s) AOC CU34G2X 34" Curved UltraWide QHD 3440x1440, VA Panel, 1ms 144MHz
Case Corsair Graphite Series 600T Mesh
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 220-G3-1000-X1
Software Windows 11 Pro
They compared their future octo core with last year quad core from Intel and they're proud of winning?
AMD, wake the hell up, guys!!!

ditto!!!!
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
10,020 (1.91/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
*puts on stupid thinking cap*
Lets say AMD ranks bulldozer according to the Phenom II. We all know that the Phenom II is maybe 80%(?) the strength of a i7 9xx processor (sans the 6 core monsters), and if they claim that bulldozer is 1.5x the power of Phenom II, then it should be 120% compared to the i7 9xx, and since that the new i2xxx are 10-20%(?) better than the old 9xx, so we have Bulldozer = Sandy Bridge.

All the numbers are obviously not accurate, they are off by at least 10%, but I think its quite a good estimate of the strength of Bulldozer after you strip all the number inflation by AMD to their own bosses.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
164 (0.03/day)
System Name lumi
Processor Intel Core i5-3570
Motherboard MSI Z68A-G43 (B3)
Cooling Stock :O
Memory 16GB DDR3-12800 1600Mhz (4*4GB)
Video Card(s) nVidia 750 Ti
Storage 256GB SP900 (Linux)/Samsung 850 EVO (Win10) - 4x4TB Storage
Display(s) dual 24" Samsungs (1080)
Case Fractal Design Core 3000
Audio Device(s) Onboard :/
Power Supply 850 watt pretty green thing
Mouse Naga Trinity
Keyboard CM Quikfire TK (Red)
Software Ubuntu 18.04/Win10
The title said "3D gaming" and I was expecting it to be referring to the intergrated GPU!

What integrated gpu... i was under the impression only AMD's apu's had cpu/gpu capabilities.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
164 (0.03/day)
System Name lumi
Processor Intel Core i5-3570
Motherboard MSI Z68A-G43 (B3)
Cooling Stock :O
Memory 16GB DDR3-12800 1600Mhz (4*4GB)
Video Card(s) nVidia 750 Ti
Storage 256GB SP900 (Linux)/Samsung 850 EVO (Win10) - 4x4TB Storage
Display(s) dual 24" Samsungs (1080)
Case Fractal Design Core 3000
Audio Device(s) Onboard :/
Power Supply 850 watt pretty green thing
Mouse Naga Trinity
Keyboard CM Quikfire TK (Red)
Software Ubuntu 18.04/Win10
*puts on stupid thinking cap*
Lets say AMD ranks bulldozer according to the Phenom II. We all know that the Phenom II is maybe 80%(?) the strength of a i7 9xx processor (sans the 6 core monsters), and if they claim that bulldozer is 1.5x the power of Phenom II, then it should be 120% compared to the i7 9xx, and since that the new i2xxx are 10-20%(?) better than the old 9xx, so we have Bulldozer = Sandy Bridge.

All the numbers are obviously not accurate, they are off by at least 10%, but I think its quite a good estimate of the strength of Bulldozer after you strip all the number inflation by AMD to their own bosses.

If what you say is true, wouldn't that mean they're equal in a large number of tasks, except multi-tasking performance where AMD's octo-core will shine?
 

ROad86

New Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
21 (0.00/day)
Processor AMD Phenom II x4 B55
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790XT-UD4P
Cooling SilverStone Nitrogon NT06 Evolution+Noiseblocker BlackSilentPro
Memory Corsair XMS3 4GB
Video Card(s) Saphire Radeon 4870
Storage WD 640 Black + WD 500 Blue
Case Antec P193
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-650TX
Software Win 7 Professional 64bit
That's what I was going to point out. All these Bulldozer charts AMD is releasing are misleading because they are comparing a two year old SMT enabled architecture quad-core to a new architecture octo-core. The performance gap between them should be at least 2, not 1.5. From that information, I can almost guarentee you that existing Gulftown coares are about equal to octo-core Bulldozer in performance and an octo-core Sandy Bridge will bitch slap an octo-core Bulldozer.

All the signs AMD is sending don't look very positive to me. Yes, it has higher IPC than Phenom II but it still behind Intel.


We have all seen reviews about Sandybridge. How much faster is the new cpu's? Because your are all talking like the 950 is something very slow. 950 is faster than i5 2500k in most tasks and lacks only from i7 2600K.
And something else everyone are comparing 4 cores(intel) vs 6/8 cores(amd). What matter's is the price. If a processor with 4 cores cost more than one with 6 or 8 why I should buy the 4 core? So the important thing is the price of the cpu's.
 
Top