- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 20,906 (5.97/day)
- Location
- The Washing Machine
Processor | i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V |
---|---|
Motherboard | AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370 |
Cooling | beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3 |
Memory | 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16 |
Video Card(s) | ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming |
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD |
Display(s) | Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440) |
Case | Fractal Design Define R5 |
Audio Device(s) | Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova G2 750W |
Mouse | XTRFY M42 |
Keyboard | Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II |
Software | W10 x64 |
An i7 with a 1070 makes perfect sense. The Z170 chipset will probably not see a more powerful CPU than the 6700K. And while an i5 might be more than adequate now, I'm inclined to believe it won't keep up with an i7 in 2-3 years time. But I don't plan on upgrading the MoBo and CPU that soon. You suggest buying a 1080 instead of a 1070. 25% more fps for 62% more €... I'd rather spend the 300€ I'll save towards the next GPU upgrade which I plan on upgrading in 2-3 years time - something that won't require the purchase of a new MoBo unlike the CPU upgrade at that time would. True nowadays. Let's talk in 3 years again, shall we?
We've seen this sentiment in the past ten (!) + years and I've probably been reading it as long as I've been building systems. And to this day, it has been proven untrue. People are still gaming very much close to 95-100% efficiency on an i7 920, or a Sandy Bridge CPU. The i7 Skylake today offers at best 2-4% perf gain on the top end cards compared to a four year old i7.
So... only reason I would pick i7 for gaming rigs is non-overclockable and with higher clocks out of the box. Not for the HT. Either way it is not a cost-effective CPU for gaming and it never really will be, at best in a very select handful of titles that are not console ports but heavily PC optimized and hard to run... and I honestly can't think of any game title that applies to that today.