• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel's Foveros-based, Hybrid x86 CPUs Mean the Company Needed to Sprinkle some ARM

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.34/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Intel at its architecture day revealed one of the more exquisite in-house designs for the company in recent years: a hybrid x86 chip that seems to imbibe from ARM's own big.Little design mantra. The new Hybrid x86 CPU that was announced takes this design choice in pairing a single, high-performance Sunny Cove core with four smaller Atom cores. This chip is built using Intel's Foveros manufacturing technology, which means a 22FFL IO chip serves as an active interposer, connected via TSVs to a 10nm die that contains both types of cores. The tiny chips measures just 12 x 12 x 1 mm (144 mm²), and looks to reduce footprint even further by including a POP (package on package) memory design.

The new Intel design is aimed at low-power environments, with the chip having been designed to work on a 2 mW standby power ratio, with less than a 7 W of power - for a big.Little five-core design and a 64 EU design with Gen11 graphics core. Intel's Jim Keller said that the company is testing the intricacies and advantages of this design internally, so more products based on this manufacturing and packaging mantra could pop up sometime in the future.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,238 (0.75/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Seems like Intel (or maybe all the new blood there) finally realised/accepted that there's no way they're going to get Atom up to decent performance levels nor Core down to decent power ones before ARM sews up the mobile market for good, so they've gone with a compromise. "Perfect is the enemy of good enough" and maybe, hopefully, Fovoros will finally be the Intel mobile attempt that's good enough to actually succeed.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
307 (0.07/day)
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard Asrock X470 Master sli/ac
Cooling Raijintek Themis Evo
Memory Team Dark Pro 3200 cl14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Gold Plus 850W
Seems like Intel (or maybe all the new blood there) finally realised/accepted that there's no way they're going to get Atom up to decent performance levels nor Core down to decent power ones before ARM sews up the mobile market for good, so they've gone with a compromise. "Perfect is the enemy of good enough" and maybe, hopefully, Fovoros will finally be the Intel mobile attempt that's good enough to actually succeed.
Don't Core M have low power usage and decent performance at 2c/4t, in fact better performance overall than 4c/4t Atoms? Only problem is Intel's arbitrary pricing prevents wide adoption.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
5,458 (1.42/day)
Location
Everywhere all the time all at once
System Name The Little One
Processor i5-11320H @4.4GHZ
Motherboard AZW SEI
Cooling Fan w/heat pipes + side & rear vents
Memory 64GB Crucial DDR4-3200 (2x 32GB)
Video Card(s) Iris XE
Storage WD Black SN850X 4TB m.2, Seagate 2TB SSD + SN850 4TB x2 in an external enclosure
Display(s) 2x Samsung 43" & 2x 32"
Case Practically identical to a mac mini, just purrtier in slate blue, & with 3x usb ports on the front !
Audio Device(s) Yamaha ATS-1060 Bluetooth Soundbar & Subwoofer
Power Supply 65w brick
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2
Keyboard Logitech G613 mechanical wireless
Software Windows 10 pro 64 bit, with all the unnecessary background shitzu turned OFF !
Benchmark Scores PDQ
big, little, ARM, pOp.....whateva yada yada yada...

when they are moar cheaper, faster & more efficient than Qualcomm's & Sammy's chips, please call me :D
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,743 (1.68/day)
Well it's possible that Foveros was made for Fuchsia - the alleged successor to Chrome OS & Android - the one OS to rule them all.
Seems like Intel (or maybe all the new blood there) finally realised/accepted that there's no way they're going to get Atom up to decent performance levels nor Core down to decent power ones before ARM sews up the mobile market for good, so they've gone with a compromise. "Perfect is the enemy of good enough" and maybe, hopefully, Fovoros will finally be the Intel mobile attempt that's good enough to actually succeed.
No core M throttles like hell for smartphone level TDP, the cores are simply too big & power hungry
Don't Core M have low power usage and decent performance at 2c/4t, in fact better performance overall than 4c/4t Atoms? Only problem is Intel's arbitrary pricing prevents wide adoption.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
545 (0.18/day)
Location
Here
System Name Skypas
Processor Intel Core i7-6700
Motherboard Asus H170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X Turbo
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 6GB
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) LG 22EA63V
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2 w/ Deepcool XFan 120
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 Pro (to be replaced by 2025)
A single big core is kinda weird, but my guess is it's gonna show up in new MacBook lineup so optimization won't be a problem
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,902 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
Seems like Intel (or maybe all the new blood there) finally realised/accepted that there's no way they're going to get Atom up to decent performance levels nor Core down to decent power ones before ARM sews up the mobile market for good, so they've gone with a compromise. "Perfect is the enemy of good enough" and maybe, hopefully, Fovoros will finally be the Intel mobile attempt that's good enough to actually succeed.

Doubtful. The reason ARM works so well is because the barrier of entry is so low. With these complicated chips, Intel is once again putting a rather complex architecture out there to battle very cheap ones.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,475 (0.84/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
Well it's possible that Foveros was made for Fuchsia - the alleged successor to Chrome OS & Android - the one OS to rule them all.
No core M throttles like hell for smartphone level TDP, the cores are simply too big & power hungry
Devil's advocate, core M also dramatically outperformed ARM chips of the time. The two simply were not comparable. And given how abysmally slow windows on ARM executes x86 code, in real life applications the core M is still likely faster then most ARM chips today.
 
Top