- Joined
- Oct 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,361 (0.48/day)
- Location
- Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name | Chachamaru-IV | Retro Battlestation |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | Intel Pentium II 450MHz |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG STRIX X570-F Gaming | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset) |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4 |
Memory | 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000 (16-20-20-38) | 512MB PC133 SDRAM |
Video Card(s) | nVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 FE | 3dfx Voodoo3 3000 |
Storage | 1TB WD_Black SN850 NVME SSD (OS), Toshiba 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam) |
Display(s) | Samsung Odyssey G5 27" @ 1440p144 & Dell P2312H @ 1080p60 |
Case | SilverStone Seta A1 | Beige box |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Sound Blaster AE-7 (Speakers), Creative Zen Hybrid headset | Sound Blaster AWE64 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC |
Mouse | Roccat Kone Air| Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A |
Keyboard | Vortex Race3 | Dell AT102W |
Software | Microsoft Windows 11 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE |
I've not seen much discussion of these, and everyone I know who has an SSD uses a 2.5" form-factor. Basically, what I want to know is what's the difference?
This is the one I'm considering:
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/90gb...o-275mb-s-write-50k-iops-sandforce-controller
2.5" drives of a similar price have lower capacities and/or slower read/write times it seems, even with SATA III.
This is the one I'm considering:
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/90gb...o-275mb-s-write-50k-iops-sandforce-controller
2.5" drives of a similar price have lower capacities and/or slower read/write times it seems, even with SATA III.