• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

4 core/8 thread CPU's better overclocking potential than CPU's with > 4c/8t?

Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
1,755 (1.25/day)
My SB-E 3820 only seemed to beat out my 5820k in overclocking ability, but in general do 4c/8t CPU's have significantly higher overclocking margins than CPU's having more cores?
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
41,653 (6.59/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
My SB-E 3820 only seemed to beat out my 5820k in overclocking ability, but in general do 4c/8t CPU's have significantly higher overclocking margins than CPU's having more cores?
No.

8350 at 5.0 on air which is a 125W part beating out the 220W parts requiring water lol.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,771 (0.95/day)
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name ---
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s) 3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
forget 4c/8t, 4c/4t is even better :p


Cheap $15 CPU on a $10 Mobo :nutkick:
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2022
Messages
355 (0.42/day)
System Name EA-ZEN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with -50mW UV
Motherboard Asus X570
Cooling Big Air
Memory 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 2080 Ti Strix highly OC’ed
Storage 1 TB NVME, 500 GB SSD etc
Display(s) 2x 27”, main: curved 144Hz SVA with BLS and HDR
Case Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Z906 5.1 and Audeze Headphones, Shure SM7B mic
Power Supply Enough
Mouse Old but gold
Keyboard Mechanical Cherry Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores A lot
My SB-E 3820 only seemed to beat out my 5820k in overclocking ability, but in general do 4c/8t CPU's have significantly higher overclocking margins than CPU's having more cores?
A bit higher yes. Less cores means, less cores have to achieve the higher clock, means the probability for the overclocks success is higher. Extreme overclockers usually disable cores to achieve higher clocks, same reason.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,457 (0.35/day)
Location
Australia
No.

8350 at 5.0 on air which is a 125W part beating out the 220W parts requiring water lol.
Huh? @ 5.0Ghz it would be drinking more than 125w, I know, have the same chip & board as yourself unless you are EXTREMELY lucky in the silicon lottery.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
1,755 (1.25/day)
A bit higher yes. Less cores means, less cores have to achieve the higher clock, means the probability for the overclocks success is higher. Extreme overclockers usually disable cores to achieve higher clocks, same reason.
Do you disable cores in the BIOS? I've heard of peeps disabling hyperthreading but I didn't know you could also disable cores.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
41,653 (6.59/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Huh? @ 5.0Ghz it would be drinking more than 125w, I know, have the same chip & board as yourself unless you are EXTREMELY lucky in the silicon lottery.
I just bought them at microcenter back in 2014, you should see my air cooler (Ashura) it never froze in Ryzen Blender either.

Yes I know but to have a 125W chip do it on Air only is a feat in itself.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2022
Messages
355 (0.42/day)
System Name EA-ZEN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with -50mW UV
Motherboard Asus X570
Cooling Big Air
Memory 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 2080 Ti Strix highly OC’ed
Storage 1 TB NVME, 500 GB SSD etc
Display(s) 2x 27”, main: curved 144Hz SVA with BLS and HDR
Case Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Z906 5.1 and Audeze Headphones, Shure SM7B mic
Power Supply Enough
Mouse Old but gold
Keyboard Mechanical Cherry Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores A lot
Do you disable cores in the BIOS? I've heard of peeps disabling hyperthreading but I didn't know you could also disable cores.
Yea, both helps.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,457 (0.35/day)
Location
Australia
Gaming on my 11th gen i7, I disable HT - it's useless with the current state of game engines. I've gamed with it enabled but did not see an increase in fps.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
41,653 (6.59/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Gaming on my 11th gen i7, I disable HT - it's useless with the current state of game engines. I've gamed with it enabled but did not see an increase in fps.
It was proven in a couple of vids, virtual cores are for work, not gaming lol
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,457 (0.35/day)
Location
Australia
It was proven in a couple of vids, virtual cores are for work, not gaming lol
Depends on the game engine. There are games out there that use more than 8 threads but they do not interest me.
Besides, without HT, can get higher core clocks/ringbus with less heat.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
1,755 (1.25/day)
Even if games can't make use of hyperthreading the OS should be able to and if the OS is running more efficiently because of it wouldn't it be best to leave hyperthreading enabled?
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
2,244 (1.04/day)
Location
south wales uk
System Name 1.FortySe7en VR rig 2. intel teliscope rig 3.MSI GP72MVR Leopard Pro .E-52699, Xeon play thing
Processor 1.3900x @stock 2. i7 7700k @5. 3. i7 7700hq
Motherboard 1.aorus x570 ultra 2. z270 Maximus IX Hero,4 MR9A PRO ATX X99
Cooling 1.Hard tube loop, cpu and gpu 2. Hard loop cpu and gpu 4 360 AIO
Memory 1.Gskill neo @3600 32gb 2.hyperxfury 32gb @3000 3. 16gb hyperx @2400 4 64GB 2133 in quad channel
Video Card(s) 1.GIGABYTE RTX 3080 WaterForce WB 2. Aorus RTX2080 3. 1060 3gb. 4 Arc 770LE 16 gb
Storage 1 M.2 500gb , 2 3tb HDs 2. 256gb ssd, 3tbHD 3. 256 m.2. 1tb ssd 4. 2gb ssd
Display(s) 1.LG 50" UHD , 2 MSI Optix MAG342C UWHD. 3.17" 120 hz display 4. Acer Preditor 144hz 32inch.z
Case 1. Thermaltake P5 2. Thermaltake P3 4. some cheapo case that should not be named.
Audio Device(s) 1 Onboard 2 Onboard 3 Onboard 4. onboard.
Power Supply 1.seasonic gx 850w 2. seasonic gx 750w. 4 RM850w
Mouse 1 ROG Gladius 2 Corsair m65 pro
Keyboard 1. ROG Strix Flare 2. Corsair F75 RBG 3. steelseries RBG
VR HMD rift and rift S and Quest 2.
Software 1. win11 pro 2. win11 pro 3, win11 home 4 win11 pro
Benchmark Scores 1.7821 cb20 ,cb15 3442 1c 204 cpu-z 1c 539 12c 8847 2. 1106 cb 3.cb 970
yes, most 7700ks will go to 5ghz 0r 5.2 ghz on water without too much fuss.
 

Outback Bronze

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
2,007 (0.42/day)
Location
Walkabout Creek
System Name Raptor Baked
Processor 14900k w.c.
Motherboard Z790 Hero
Cooling w.c.
Memory 32GB Hynix
Video Card(s) Zotac 4080 w.c.
Storage 2TB Kingston kc3k
Display(s) Gigabyte 34" Curved
Case Corsair 460X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PCIe5 850w
Mouse Asus
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Cool n Quiet.
Gaming on my 11th gen i7, I disable HT - it's useless with the current state of game engines. I've gamed with it enabled but did not see an increase in fps.

Yep I game on me 8 P-cores only. Plenty fast enough with the speedy Golden Cove cores. Can OC higher also with less heat and power.

If I need to thread something ill just turn them on.
 
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
1,978 (1.57/day)
Location
Lithuania
System Name Shizuka
Processor Intel Core i5 10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M Aorus Pro
Cooling Scythe Choten
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill Aegis 2666 MHz
Video Card(s) PowerColor Red Dragon V2 RX 580 8GB ~100 watts in Wattman
Storage 512GB WD Blue + 256GB WD Green + 4TH Toshiba X300
Display(s) BenQ BL2420PT
Case Cooler Master Silencio S400
Audio Device(s) Topping D10 + AIWA NSX-V70
Power Supply Chieftec A90 550W (GDP-550C)
Mouse Steel Series Rival 100
Keyboard Hama SL 570
Software Windows 10 Enterprise
Is that on LN2 or some fancy cooling solution?
I bet it's just some basic 92mm or 120mm tower. Those chips are notoriously easy to clock high. It's not Intel or Ryzen crap that burns everything at 5GHz.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
1,755 (1.25/day)
It seems like among the latest Intel Alderlake CPU's the ones with the highest max turbo frequency aren't the 4-core or even 6-core models but the 16 core models? For example, the 10-core i5-12600K, which has a max turbo frequency of 4.9 Ghz. while the 4-core i5 and i3 models on have a max turbo frequency of 4.7Ghz. The i9 Alderlakes (at least the 16-core model) have a max turbo frequency of 5.5 Ghz and the i7 Alderlakes 5.10 Ghz. I would've figured the exact opposite? Or maybe max turbo frequency has nothing to do with the overclocking margins of a given CPU?
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,585 (2.71/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Besides, without HT, can get higher core clocks/ringbus with less heat.

You should have bought the 8-core i7 9700K ;)
(no hyperthreading)
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
785 (0.45/day)
It seems like among the latest Intel Alderlake CPU's the ones with the highest max turbo frequency aren't the 4-core or even 6-core models but the 16 core models? For example, the 10-core i5-12600K, which has a max turbo frequency of 4.9 Ghz. while the 4-core i5 and i3 models on have a max turbo frequency of 4.7Ghz. The i9 Alderlakes (at least the 16-core model) have a max turbo frequency of 5.5 Ghz and the i7 Alderlakes 5.10 Ghz. I would've figured the exact opposite? Or maybe max turbo frequency has nothing to do with the overclocking margins of a given CPU?

It's almost like, Intel want you to buy the higher end chips because their margins are much better?

Who'd have thunk it ?

My guess is that those lower end chips can be OC way above frequency of more expensive parts ? Tell me I'm wrong?

Then again, I'm rocking an 8 year old 4790k @ 4.6 in one rig with a 6800xt, 4k, suits my needs fine.

Any unlocked newer 4c 8t chip should be even better I'd think.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
1,755 (1.25/day)
@mb194dc
So Intel cherry picks out the best performers for their high core parts and the worst parts have cores disabled and are pawned off as I3's and I5's?
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.23/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Not usually but the odd line and chip do buck that trend.
Golden samples are sprinkled everywhere after all.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
1,755 (1.25/day)
You should have bought the 8-core i7 9700K ;)
(no hyperthreading)
I returned an 8700k for a 9700k and after looking at the article cited here it looks like I made a mistake because on average the 8700k is slightly faster than the 9700k in most gaming scenarios.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,457 (0.35/day)
Location
Australia
It's almost like, Intel want you to buy the higher end chips because their margins are much better?

Who'd have thunk it ?

My guess is that those lower end chips can be OC way above frequency of more expensive parts ? Tell me I'm wrong?

Then again, I'm rocking an 8 year old 4790k @ 4.6 in one rig with a 6800xt, 4k, suits my needs fine.

Any unlocked newer 4c 8t chip should be even better I'd think.
The higher end chips have better IMCs for overclocking memory. At least with current & past generation. This of course appeals to enthusiasts.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2022
Messages
355 (0.42/day)
System Name EA-ZEN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with -50mW UV
Motherboard Asus X570
Cooling Big Air
Memory 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 2080 Ti Strix highly OC’ed
Storage 1 TB NVME, 500 GB SSD etc
Display(s) 2x 27”, main: curved 144Hz SVA with BLS and HDR
Case Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Z906 5.1 and Audeze Headphones, Shure SM7B mic
Power Supply Enough
Mouse Old but gold
Keyboard Mechanical Cherry Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores A lot
It was proven in a couple of vids, virtual cores are for work, not gaming lol
Not if the CPU only has 2-4 cores, then SMT is a must have.
I returned an 8700k for a 9700k and after looking at the article cited here it looks like I made a mistake because on average the 8700k is slightly faster than the 9700k in most gaming scenarios.
They are more or less even, SMT is like a 20% performance uplift, 2 extra cores, very comparable, but I would prefer the 9900K over both. You did a sidegrade there
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
785 (0.45/day)
@mb194dc
So Intel cherry picks out the best performers for their high core parts and the worst parts have cores disabled and are pawned off as I3's and I5's?

They deliberately don't have the stock boost on cheaper chips higher than the parts with more cores, which are much more expensive. When technically, they'll be able to clock higher...

You'll find you can overclock chips with fewer cores to higher frequencies than the high end parts. Which is why Intel don't offer unlocked multiplier on 4c 8t... now

12300f has been pushed using bclk to massive frequencies, oh for a 12300k...
 
Top