Thinker_145
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2008
- Messages
- 29 (0.00/day)
Processor | Intel E6750 at 2.66Ghz |
---|---|
Motherboard | Intel DG33FB |
Memory | 4x1GB Kingston DDR2 667Mhz |
Video Card(s) | XFX 8800 GTS 640MB XXX Edition@600Mhz\1500Mhz\1900Mhz |
Storage | Seagate 250GB 7200RPM |
Display(s) | 17" Viewsonic Ultrabrite CRT Monitor Professional Edition |
Case | ATX Doom Case |
Audio Device(s) | BOSE Circumaural Headphone,Logitech X-530 5.1 speakers and realtek HD audio |
Power Supply | Corsair VX450 Watt |
You can look at benchmarks running GPU's at stock speeds all you want but what really matters is how they perform when overcloked.
Some cards are intentionally underclocked to show better numbers in benchmarks for a more expensive product.Some cards are clocked a little higher at stock to show better numbers in benchmarks than your rivals card.
This site gave both the GTS and GT a beefy overclock and the results show that both cards are identical with no winner.One wins some and loses some.The other wins some and loses some.Both cards are equal in terms of performance.And the overclock given to both cards is certainly fair as to their OC capability.
Now unless someone else can prove otherwise it just seems to me that the whole world of PC hardware is just wrong about this issue.
http://xtreview.com/review219.htm
Some cards are intentionally underclocked to show better numbers in benchmarks for a more expensive product.Some cards are clocked a little higher at stock to show better numbers in benchmarks than your rivals card.
This site gave both the GTS and GT a beefy overclock and the results show that both cards are identical with no winner.One wins some and loses some.The other wins some and loses some.Both cards are equal in terms of performance.And the overclock given to both cards is certainly fair as to their OC capability.
Now unless someone else can prove otherwise it just seems to me that the whole world of PC hardware is just wrong about this issue.
http://xtreview.com/review219.htm