• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Acer Considering non-Atom Options for Upcoming Nettops

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,487 (9.18/day)
Likes
17,517
Location
Hyderabad, India
#1
The Intel Atom processor saw the company create a new niche, that of netbooks (sub-notebooks) and nettops. It has become the de-facto choice of OEM builders who are themselves teething in this new market. Intel Atom finds direct competition in VIA Nano, which offers the same x86 embedded options, at nearly the same thermal footprints, although AMD has some catching up to do in this segment.

Industry observer, DigiTimes, notes that Acer could be eying non-Atom options for its upcoming nettop SKUs. These products could feature VIA Nano, or AMD Athlon low-power processors. The company is basing it on the issue, that it plans to sell around 12~13 million nettop units, and given the situation, sourcing all the processors from Intel doesn't seem feasible. The silicon giant is already dealing with massive back-orders, backlog and stock shortages for the amount of demand the Atom has created. Acer also has three OEM sources in mind to make the nettop: Quanta Computer, Wistron and Micro-Star International (MSI). The company is expected to reach a decision in December.

Source: DigiTimes
 
Last edited:

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,203 (9.52/day)
Likes
13,691
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + Corsair Void RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#3
rofl, 12 nettops.

Good thing they're not going ATOM, cause they're slow as shit... you know its a problem when you're out-performed by Via.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,809 (2.57/day)
Likes
529
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Boddha Getta Boddha Getta Bah!
Processor AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.382
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory 2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 6870 980/1100
Storage WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Display(s) Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case NZXT White Switch 810
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 5.1
Power Supply NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Profession 64 Bit
#4
I wouldnt say they are slow as shit. That one Acer Onebook I checked out at Walmart was pretty zippy.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
1,777 (0.50/day)
Likes
163
Location
South Australia
System Name QUACK
Processor Intel i7 2600K (3.4 GHz, 8 threads)
Motherboard Asus P67P8-V3
Cooling Xigmatek Balder 120mm (4x120,1x140mm case)
Memory Patriot 2 Viper Sector 5, 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 4GB
Storage 1x Samsung EVO 850 (500GB) SSD, 1x Fujitsu 256GB SSD
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp U2311h 23" (so sexy)
Case CoolerMaster Gladiator RC-600
Audio Device(s) Onboard 5.1
Power Supply Antec 850w with yellow racing stripes
Software Windows 7 HP 64 bit
#5
Atoms are a nice concept, but as Intel's roadmap shows no improvement until Q3 2009 for the mobile chipset+CPU offering, I would not like to see netbooks stick with Atom CPUs: the chipset is awful and has a higher TDP than the CPU itself!
A Via Nano has a much cooler chipset, runs faster, and (IIRC) can play Crysis when paired with an 8600 GT.
A dual core AMD offering would be nice as well, as Hyperthreading just doesn't cut it.
Its good to see Asus branching out though, hopefully we'll see cheaper Asus EEEs or Acer Aspires soon as well.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
7,404 (1.72/day)
Likes
663
#6
nah, the 945gse has a TDP of 6w, and that is including a IGP. (atom @ 4w)...total is around 11~12ish

VIA Nano alone at 1.8ghz has a TDP of 25w. The CN896 chipset TDP is (what I can find) 4w.

I know there is cut down Nano @ 1ghz that has a TDP of 5w.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
292 (0.07/day)
Likes
51
Location
TX
Processor Intel Core i7 2600K @ 5GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling NZXT Kraken X60 CPU
Memory 16gb (4x4) G.SKILL Ripjaws X DDR3 2133
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX 970 FTW
Storage 1x Samsung 850 Pro 512gb, 1x Crucial M500 480gb, 2x 1TB WD Raptor RAID 0
Display(s) 1x LG 34UM95 21:9 (3440x1440) twin Dell E1709W (900x1440) portrait wings
Case Corsair Carbide 540
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Professional
Power Supply Corsair AX750
Software Windows 7 Home 64-bit
#7
the mobile 945GSE has a TDP of 6w, and then the ICH7 SB has a TDP of 3.3w, and then the atom 230 (1.6ghz single core) on top of that is another 4w. The Atom 330 (1.6ghz dual core) is 8w. So total platform is 13.3w-17.3w.

The Via Nano varies by model (as does atom), topping out at a 2ghz/25w TDP. This model may not make it into any mobile products and instead could be the "nettop" processor. The 1.8ghz L2100 Nano has a ~20w TDP. There is also a 1.6ghz model with a 17w TDP. The ultra low voltage versions (U series) are what you would likely see against the Atom processors, and start with the U2300 at 1ghz, with a 5w TDP. The ULV nanos top out with the U2400 described as "1.3ghz+" (rumored to be 1.5-1.6) with a 8w TDP. Early samples of the nano platforms were using the CN896+VT8251, but you may see the VX800 used instead as its a simple chip solution with a 5w TDP and superior feature set. The VX800 was designed for the Nano processors, while the CN896 was an evolution for the C7. Both are compatible with one another, but its likely you'll see the VX800 as its already appearing on C7 platforms. So you could have a U2300 paired with the VX800 single chip solution, and have a 10w platform.

Using the VX800 would give the Nano an edge as it would offer superior features to 945GSE (GBE, HD audio, media decoding), native LVDS, as well as better graphics performance...but lets face it GMA950 is about as slow as it gets these days

Nano is going to be a good step up from C7 in performance and I cant wait to get my hands on one. But it will be higher power consumption than Atom...but thats a given as Intel sacrificed performance and simplified its architecture to gain that low power envelope, and then they turned to their latest 45nm manufacturing technology. VIA on the other hand is only now making the transition to 65nm, C7s were built in IBMs 90nm SOI technology, but Nano is a super scalar design, using out of order issue/execution, and besides that it is pin compatible with C7, so really just about any existing C7 platform could be upgraded with a drop in Nano, giving them faster turn around to get their nettops and netbooks to market.

Performance wise though, I think AMD would still come out on top with their embedded Athlon and Athlon X2 models (8-35w TDP) paired with the 780E chipset. 780E + SB750 would offer by far, the best feature sets as well as the HD 3200 IGP would actually be up to the task of gaming! The Raon Digital Everun Note is a great example of what the AMD alternative can look like. Thought that is not using the latest embedded AMD processors and is paired with the 690E, but it is a 7" laptop that is portable (thicker than Atom based units) and offers great performance.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,203 (9.52/day)
Likes
13,691
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + Corsair Void RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#8
I have no links, but if you compare the performance, the Via chip is way out on top. 10W or 20W, in the end its a minimal difference to a user - the via being 720P media playback capable compared to the atom not being capable, thats a *big* difference.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
517 (0.11/day)
Likes
51
Location
Germany,Hannover
Processor Intel® Core™ i5-3570K
Motherboard Z77 Extreme4
Cooling Scythe Ninja 3 Rev. B
Memory Patriot DIMM 8 GB DDR3-1866 Kit (PV38G186C9KRD, Viper 3 Venom Red)
Video Card(s) Palit 650GTX 1GB DDR5
Storage 1TB SATA 600 Hitachi HDS721010DLE630
Display(s) 23" LCD TN-Film from Asus with Tilt/Pivot
Case Zaria A20 !!!THANK YOU TECHPOWERUP.COM!!!
Audio Device(s) onboard Sound
Power Supply BeQuiet 720W, cable management..
Software Windows 7 Pro x64
#9
atom is slow like my p3 500Mhz, the nettops are snappy because of their "special" win xp or light linux
don't buy them for "some" office task's as productivity will be bad :roll:
 

Bytor

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
1,051 (0.27/day)
Likes
105
System Name "The Dark Spider"
Processor AMD Phenom 9850 @ 3.0
Motherboard Asus M3A79-T
Cooling Water: CPU and GPU's, 2 pumps, 2 BIX Rads, D-Tek Fuzion v1, 2 Swiftech MCW60
Memory 4 gigs Crucial Balistix Tracers (1066 @ 1256)
Video Card(s) Sapphire 4870x2
Storage WD SATA 640 Gig HDD
Display(s) Acer 24" beast...
Case Modded Rocketfish
Audio Device(s) Onboard (only use head phones)
Power Supply 700 watt
Software a bunch
Benchmark Scores 3D Mark 06: 9859 on 2-X1950 pro's Xfire 3D Mark 06: 12794 on 1-3870 3D Mark 06: 16484 Xfire
#10
A little off your topic...

I have been looking at a Netbook to replace my old/heavy Sony Vaio laptop. Can they run a lot if not all the apps a normal laptop can?

Mainly would use it for internet and GPS while traveling (via MS streets and trips)

Thanks
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
7,404 (1.72/day)
Likes
663
#11
A little off your topic...

I have been looking at a Netbook to replace my old/heavy Sony Vaio laptop. Can they run a lot if not all the apps a normal laptop can?

Mainly would use it for internet and GPS while traveling (via MS streets and trips)

Thanks
what is your budget?