• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Acer Predator XB271HU bmiprz 144-165 Hz

Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,316 (0.31/day)
Processor i7-13700k
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming z790-plus
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 RGB
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5 7000mhz
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Geforce RTX 4070 Super ( 2800mhz @ 1.0volt, ~60mhz overlock -.1volts. 180-190watt draw)
Storage 1x Samsung 980 Pro PCIe4 NVme, 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate
Display(s) Acer Predator XB273u 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz
Power Supply Corsair RMx Series RM850x (OCZ Z series PSU retired after 13 years of service)
Mouse Logitech G502 hero
Keyboard Logitech G710+
I have owned my Acer xb271 for little over a year now, the bleeding issue is very minor least from what i seen. Only time really noticed it is pretty much a black screen in a very dark room. Have light in the room even with a dark scene its pretty much not noticeable at all. I have done some calibration on it using settings reported on sites which you can google to find.

So on the bleeding and uniformity , does the Asus comparable 27" ISP Gsync ( ROG Swift PG279Q) is the same or is it better as they both use same panels?
Also, seems market is dead on ISP 1440 high refresh monitors, there all pushing 4k but I find it hard to believe users will buy these as graphic card needs to be top end ones or even SLI if you want like 120 fps.

I have a gtx1080 and find new games can only 60-100fps that is with some settings turned down. Takes a lot of power to drive 1440p as it is.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
412 (0.09/day)
Processor Intel i7 10700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Pro AX
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200MHZ (2X16GB)
Video Card(s) Palit GTX1080ti Super JetStream 11GB
Storage Trandscend 370s 256GB / WD Caviar Black 2+1TB
Display(s) Acer XB270HU 144hz Gsync
Case Phanteks Eclipse P600S White
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZXR
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X 1000W 80 Plus Gold
Acer probably has the poorest quality panel among all gaming brands. My XB270HU (the predecessor to this one) also has horrible bleeding and 4 dead pixels that show up after 1 year of use (which means it's non-returnable now).
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,239 (0.75/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
For anyone wondering, "BMIPRZ" is the model - the "B" signifies an IPS panel, while the "AMIPRZ" model uses a TN panel.
 

Inle

Staff member
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
319 (0.13/day)
System Name Efrafa
Processor Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4,3 GHz
Motherboard Asus X99 STRIX Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X52
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 32 GB
Video Card(s) Asus ROG STRIX GeForce GTX 1080 OC Edition
Storage ADATA SX8000 NVMe 512 GB + 5x Kingston HyperX Savage 512 GB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU
Case Corsair Crystal 460X
Audio Device(s) Audiolab M-DAC
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0
Software Battlefield 1

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.24/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Thank you for reviewing this. I've been watching this monitor for 6 months. Now that I know Vega's performance, I'll be skipping AMD this cycle for an 1080ti and be picking this monitor up.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
can I ask ? What's the point of 144hz monitor on games ?
I use a single Strix 1080ti +7700k and I can't get over 70 fps on modern games at max settings and 3k-4k resolutions ?
So to go over 144fps and also have minimum 144fps resolution must be low settings must be low resolution so why are these called gaming if you play games at these settings ?
I was thinking that maybe 2x1080ti can go at 150-180 fps for those monitors and max settings and good resolution but does all SLI works great for all modern games ?
I really want to know the point of these monitors that I don't get ... are these monitors for older games ?
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,669 (0.43/day)
can I ask ? What's the point of 144hz monitor on games ?
I use a single Strix 1080ti +7700k and I can't get over 70 fps on modern games at max settings and 3k-4k resolutions ?
So to go over 144fps and also have minimum 144fps resolution must be low settings must be low resolution so why are these called gaming if you play games at these settings ?
I was thinking that maybe 2x1080ti can go at 150-180 fps for those monitors and max settings and good resolution but does all SLI works great for all modern games ?
I really want to know the point of these monitors that I don't get ... are these monitors for older games ?
Not nesseceraly. It is game specific. Some games achieve 144fps on max or close to max settings. Others require turning down settings. Thankfully i know of no games that you have to play at low settings at 1440p to get 60fps+
And high refreshrate and high resolution help outside the games too. You can't game 24/7. It's inevitable that you do other stuff too and that suits monitors like this also very well - being IPS and large screen.

Forget 4K gaming. That wont be viable for several generations yet unless you significantly turn down settings. And you won't buy 1080Ti and a 4K screen to play with medium settings. 1440p is a good compromise between age old 1080p and unattainable 4K.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
8,253 (1.24/day)
System Name money pit..
Processor Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s) Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s) 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s) onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..
can I ask ? What's the point of 144hz monitor on games ?
I use a single Strix 1080ti +7700k and I can't get over 70 fps on modern games at max settings and 3k-4k resolutions ?
So to go over 144fps and also have minimum 144fps resolution must be low settings must be low resolution so why are these called gaming if you play games at these settings ?
I was thinking that maybe 2x1080ti can go at 150-180 fps for those monitors and max settings and good resolution but does all SLI works great for all modern games ?
I really want to know the point of these monitors that I don't get ... are these monitors for older games ?

i have the asus version of the reviewed monitor.. i have mine set at 120 hrz and run a frame rate cap set at 75.. as i have often said i personally cant tell the difference between 75 fps and 140.. and yep my hardware is capable of quite high frames rates with some games..

even with a pair of 1080 TI cards i would probably cap at 100 fps.. mostly people just lust after what they cant have.. and people buy high numbers..

trog

i bought my asus monitor for its good viewing angles and better colour than my previous TN gaming panel.. i certainly dont need or use its possible 165 hrz refresh rate..
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
407 (0.14/day)
Location
UK
System Name it needs a name?
Processor Xeon E3-1241 v3 @3.5GHz- standard clock
Motherboard Asus Z97A 3.1
Cooling Bequiet! Dark Rock 3 CPU cooler, 2 x 140mm intake and 1 x 120mm exhaust PWM fans in the case
Memory 16 GB Crucial DDR3 1600MHz CL9 Ballistix Sport 2 x 8 GB
Video Card(s) Palit 980ti Super Jetscream
Storage Sandisk X110 256GB SSD, Sandisk Ultra II 960GB SSD, 640GB WD Blue, 12TB Ultrastar
Display(s) Acer XB270HU
Case Lian Li PC 7H
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 USB interface
Power Supply Seasonic P660
Mouse cheapo logitech wireless
Keyboard some keyboard from the 90's
Software Win10pro 64bit
can I ask ? What's the point of 144hz monitor on games ?
I use a single Strix 1080ti +7700k and I can't get over 70 fps on modern games at max settings and 3k-4k resolutions ?
So to go over 144fps and also have minimum 144fps resolution must be low settings must be low resolution so why are these called gaming if you play games at these settings ?
I was thinking that maybe 2x1080ti can go at 150-180 fps for those monitors and max settings and good resolution but does all SLI works great for all modern games ?
I really want to know the point of these monitors that I don't get ... are these monitors for older games ?
Higher fps makes games easier. Depends on the game of course.

Also higher fps make games look smoother.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.89/day)
Higher fps makes games easier. Depends on the game of course.

Also higher fps make games look smoother.

Consistent FPS make games smooth.

At a higher hz the inconsistencies (variations) are less noticeable.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
407 (0.14/day)
Location
UK
System Name it needs a name?
Processor Xeon E3-1241 v3 @3.5GHz- standard clock
Motherboard Asus Z97A 3.1
Cooling Bequiet! Dark Rock 3 CPU cooler, 2 x 140mm intake and 1 x 120mm exhaust PWM fans in the case
Memory 16 GB Crucial DDR3 1600MHz CL9 Ballistix Sport 2 x 8 GB
Video Card(s) Palit 980ti Super Jetscream
Storage Sandisk X110 256GB SSD, Sandisk Ultra II 960GB SSD, 640GB WD Blue, 12TB Ultrastar
Display(s) Acer XB270HU
Case Lian Li PC 7H
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 USB interface
Power Supply Seasonic P660
Mouse cheapo logitech wireless
Keyboard some keyboard from the 90's
Software Win10pro 64bit

deu

Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
493 (0.17/day)
System Name Bo-minator (my name is bo)
Processor AMD 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory G-SkiLL 2x8GB RAM 3600Mhz (CL16-16-16-16-36)
Video Card(s) ASUS STRIX 1080Ti OC
Storage Samsung EVO 850 1TB
Display(s) ACER XB271HU + DELL 2717D
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply Antec HCP 1000W
Mouse G403
Keyboard CM STORM Quick Fire Rapid
Software Windows 10 64-bit Pro
Benchmark Scores XX
So on the bleeding and uniformity , does the Asus comparable 27" ISP Gsync ( ROG Swift PG279Q) is the same or is it better as they both use same panels?

Also, seems market is dead on ISP 1440 high refresh monitors, there all pushing 4k but I find it hard to believe users will buy these as graphic card needs to be top end ones or even SLI if you want like 120 fps.

Yes: ASUS uses the same panel. Some people say that Acer actually bins the panels better. (whether or not it is true i dont know) I own the Acer monitor, and trust me it is gorgeous!) Worth every penny!)
 

deu

Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
493 (0.17/day)
System Name Bo-minator (my name is bo)
Processor AMD 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory G-SkiLL 2x8GB RAM 3600Mhz (CL16-16-16-16-36)
Video Card(s) ASUS STRIX 1080Ti OC
Storage Samsung EVO 850 1TB
Display(s) ACER XB271HU + DELL 2717D
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply Antec HCP 1000W
Mouse G403
Keyboard CM STORM Quick Fire Rapid
Software Windows 10 64-bit Pro
Benchmark Scores XX
Bleeding like a hemophiliac on this one.

SOME of the panels have the bleeding some dont :) Mine have a LITTLE in the bottom right but its not something i notice in any situation besides pitchblack-only. But if you get one with too much its a return :)
 

deu

Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
493 (0.17/day)
System Name Bo-minator (my name is bo)
Processor AMD 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory G-SkiLL 2x8GB RAM 3600Mhz (CL16-16-16-16-36)
Video Card(s) ASUS STRIX 1080Ti OC
Storage Samsung EVO 850 1TB
Display(s) ACER XB271HU + DELL 2717D
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply Antec HCP 1000W
Mouse G403
Keyboard CM STORM Quick Fire Rapid
Software Windows 10 64-bit Pro
Benchmark Scores XX
I have the screen and the bleed is almost non existent. The thing is that SOME of the panels produced have some bad bleeding but alot dont. So its down to panel lottery.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
8,253 (1.24/day)
System Name money pit..
Processor Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s) Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s) 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s) onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..
I agree with both your points.

We need to define smooth with respect to fps!

how about a rock solid g-synced 78 fps (as shown by fraps) no ups no downs.. would that be considered smooth.. at 1440 that is what i see in every game i play.. currently its battlefield 1..

and dare i ask the question.. where does 4 K fit in here with this "smoothness" stuff.. being as most folks will be struggling to get 60 fps..

trog
 

Inle

Staff member
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
319 (0.13/day)
System Name Efrafa
Processor Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4,3 GHz
Motherboard Asus X99 STRIX Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X52
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 32 GB
Video Card(s) Asus ROG STRIX GeForce GTX 1080 OC Edition
Storage ADATA SX8000 NVMe 512 GB + 5x Kingston HyperX Savage 512 GB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU
Case Corsair Crystal 460X
Audio Device(s) Audiolab M-DAC
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0
Software Battlefield 1
Thank you for reviewing this. I've been watching this monitor for 6 months. Now that I know Vega's performance, I'll be skipping AMD this cycle for an 1080ti and be picking this monitor up.

I have to admit I did the same. Tested it, reviewed it and decided to buy it :) That rarely happens but I simply couldn't part ways with it. The gaming experience is staggering.

To reply to a couple of other comments. You don't need to hit 144 or more fps to fully utilize everything this monitor has to offer. You want to stay within the G-Sync range, which goes up to 165 Hz/FPS. However, you'll also get the full G-Sync experience with a lower framerate, as the G-Sync range starts from 35 Hz/FPS. The G-Sync eliminates stutter and screen tearing. But it's the high refresh rate, combined with a high framerate, that give you that insane aim accuracy and perfect feeling of smoothness. The more FPS you get, the higher refresh rate you'll get as well, since the G-Sync module basically makes sure that the refresh rate and the framerate are in sync. For me, the difference between 70 and 90 FPS/Hz is massive. And the overall smoothness and accuracy keep improving as FPS rises. I can still feel improvements between ie. 100 and 120 FPS. But after 120 FPS/Hz, it becomes increasingly hard for me to notice a big difference. Some eSports pros claim they still feel the difference up and over 200 Hz/FPS. Even though I did do a bit of competitive gaming, I guess I never reached that level :)

Of course, when you're not gaming, your framerate/refresh rate will be whatever you set it to in the Nvidia Control Panel, so 144 or 165 Hz. Thanks to that, you won't believe how accurately and smoothly your cursor moves across the screen. Extremely useful for more demanding Photoshop work, CAD/CAM apps and such.

And another thing worth noting - 1440p contains waaaaay less pixels than 4K (try multiplying the numbers). My GTX 1080 runs Battlefield 1 on High at around 100-120 FPS. On 4K, I'd probably get half that. That's one of the reasons I love 1440p for gaming - the picture is sharp, but you don't have to go SLI or Titan to get 100+ FPS at high settings in AAA games.
 
Last edited:

Danny_HR

New Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Thanks for this review. Very thorough and on point.
I was looking at this monitor for a while now, and this might really push me over the edge.

If I do indeed get it, that profile will most definitely be of use, so thanks again. :)
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
8,253 (1.24/day)
System Name money pit..
Processor Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s) Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s) 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s) onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..
i would think a big question remains unanswered for a lot of folks.. very relatively and subjectively speaking which is best for gaming.. high refresh rates and high frame rates at 1440 or low refresh rates and low frame rates at 4 K.. ?

the other thing that i would really love to know.. i cant tell the difference between lets say a g-synced 75 fps and 120 fps it all seems equally smooth to me.. i do admit to probably being a fair bit older than the reviewer and none of my bits work quite as well as they used to do and my kill rate in BF1 aint that clever.. he he

trog
 

Inle

Staff member
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
319 (0.13/day)
System Name Efrafa
Processor Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4,3 GHz
Motherboard Asus X99 STRIX Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X52
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 32 GB
Video Card(s) Asus ROG STRIX GeForce GTX 1080 OC Edition
Storage ADATA SX8000 NVMe 512 GB + 5x Kingston HyperX Savage 512 GB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU
Case Corsair Crystal 460X
Audio Device(s) Audiolab M-DAC
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0
Software Battlefield 1
i would think a big question remains unanswered for a lot of folks.. very relatively and subjectively speaking which is best for gaming.. high refresh rates and high frame rates at 1440 or low refresh rates and low frame rates at 4 K.. ?
trog

That's easy: high framerate + high refresh rate @ 1440p is better, hands down, no question about it :)
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,669 (0.43/day)
Indeed. Most won't even notice 4K but i bet they will notice the performance drop it causes. While everyone notices smoother mouse movement on high refreshrate.
 

Wayoutwilly

New Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
i would think a big question remains unanswered for a lot of folks.. very relatively and subjectively speaking which is best for gaming.. high refresh rates and high frame rates at 1440 or low refresh rates and low frame rates at 4 K.. ?

the other thing that i would really love to know.. i cant tell the difference between lets say a g-synced 75 fps and 120 fps it all seems equally smooth to me.. i do admit to probably being a fair bit older than the reviewer and none of my bits work quite as well as they used to do and my kill rate in BF1 aint that clever.. he he

trog

I also have to admit to not being young anymore, but I always feel lower and smooth vs high and jerky - if we remove a low FOV as the worst offender when it comes to motion sicknes in games (first person games mostly), smooth 30 FPS is better, for me, than jerky 60 FPS. Microstutters are not only driving me crazy but sooner or later I get sick. So, as a gentleman of certain age ;), I would always go 1440p with smooth frame rate over 4K with jerky one (I game on 1440p with GeForce 970 and still is quite OK - GeForce 1070 would be better but that ship had sailed).
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
407 (0.14/day)
Location
UK
System Name it needs a name?
Processor Xeon E3-1241 v3 @3.5GHz- standard clock
Motherboard Asus Z97A 3.1
Cooling Bequiet! Dark Rock 3 CPU cooler, 2 x 140mm intake and 1 x 120mm exhaust PWM fans in the case
Memory 16 GB Crucial DDR3 1600MHz CL9 Ballistix Sport 2 x 8 GB
Video Card(s) Palit 980ti Super Jetscream
Storage Sandisk X110 256GB SSD, Sandisk Ultra II 960GB SSD, 640GB WD Blue, 12TB Ultrastar
Display(s) Acer XB270HU
Case Lian Li PC 7H
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 USB interface
Power Supply Seasonic P660
Mouse cheapo logitech wireless
Keyboard some keyboard from the 90's
Software Win10pro 64bit
how about a rock solid g-synced 78 fps (as shown by fraps) no ups no downs.. would that be considered smooth.. at 1440 that is what i see in every game i play.. currently its battlefield 1..

and dare i ask the question.. where does 4 K fit in here with this "smoothness" stuff.. being as most folks will be struggling to get 60 fps..

trog
What looks best is subjective, for me 78fps is good but I can see a definite improvement between 78 and 120.

Also I find that if the card is maxed out with gsync on, the minor constant variation in fps doesn't affect the percieved smoothness, not unless there is a glitch and the game slows right down.

So I tend to just let eveything go flat out. Heck, my GPU is running pretty much factory settings and never overheats, why not?

I don't run maximum AA in every game, for example I'd rather have the fps in project cars, it's worth about 2 sec a lap on the Nurburgring to turn the AA down with my GPU :D.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
8,253 (1.24/day)
System Name money pit..
Processor Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s) Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s) 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s) onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..
What looks best is subjective, for me 78fps is good but I can see a definite improvement between 78 and 120.

Also I find that if the card is maxed out with gsync on, the minor constant variation in fps doesn't affect the percieved smoothness, not unless there is a glitch and the game slows right down.

So I tend to just let eveything go flat out. Heck, my GPU is running pretty much factory settings and never overheats, why not?

I don't run maximum AA in every game, for example I'd rather have the fps in project cars, it's worth about 2 sec a lap on the Nurburgring to turn the AA down with my GPU :D.

flat out my pair 980 TI cards are a pair of room heaters.. i knew they would be when i bought them..

i cap at 75 fps which for reasons unknown to me shows 78 fps in fraps.. i have no reasons (for me at least) to run higher.. if i only had one card i wouldnt bother there would be no heat problem.. i also dont bother running things like AA maxed out..

i do have heat and noise problems with the two cards running flat out.. 78 fps seem perfectly smooth to me.. i dont get stutters or any of the other problems i so often read about.. currently my 7700K at 4.8 ghz hits 90 C when playing battlefield 1 for any length of time.. at 5 ghz it would hit 100 C..

my systems only real problem is it generates too much heat.. its down to one simple thing.. a pair of room heater graphics cards in SLI.. hence my frame rate cap.. i dont work them any harder than i have to.. :)

so far i have not found a game that at 1440 i cant maintain the constant 78 fps.. one day i might.. he he

trog

ps.. i do honestly think (twitch pro gamers apart) that the benefits from super high refresh rates are being exaggerated but then again i think the benefits from 4 K are being exaggerated.. but reviews do tend to do this for higher end gear..
 
Last edited:
Top